BPV_EUPP European Union Public Policy

Ekonomicko-správní fakulta
podzim 2010
Rozsah
2/2. 6 kr. Ukončení: zk.
Vyučující
doc. Ing. David Špaček, Ph.D. (přednášející)
John Frederick Wilton, B.A. (Hons), M. Soc Sc, Ph.D. (přednášející)
Garance
doc. JUDr. Ivan Malý, CSc.
Katedra veřejné ekonomie – Ekonomicko-správní fakulta
Kontaktní osoba: Mgr. Kateřina Kociánová
Rozvrh
St 11:05–14:30 S308
Předpoklady
! PVEUPP European Union Public Policy
Omezení zápisu do předmětu
Předmět je nabízen i studentům mimo mateřské obory.
Předmět si smí zapsat nejvýše 18 stud.
Momentální stav registrace a zápisu: zapsáno: 0/18, pouze zareg.: 0/18, pouze zareg. s předností (mateřské obory): 0/18
Mateřské obory/plány
Cíle předmětu
Despite definitive debates about whether the European Union (EU) can be compared with the characteristics of a fully-fledged state, it is certainly beyond the dispute that the EU has acquired for itself at least the policy-making attributes of a modern state across an increasingly wide range of policy sectors. As a result, it has also gained a considerable degree of power in order to set policy agendas, and formulate, implement and enforce policy decisions.

The course has the following main objectives:
- to understand and characterize the EU institutions and the EU public policy process;
- to be able to conceptualise the EU public policy process into four sections (agenda setting, policy formulation, policy decision-making and policy implementation) and to employ different models of analysis at different levels within the EU and at different stages of the policy process;
- to understand and specify selected EU public policy areas.
Osnova
  • The course will be taught through a series of 13 weeks of lectures, seminars and workshops.
  • LECTURE PROGRAMME:
  • 1. The development of the European Union and the development of E.U. public policy;
  • 2. The basis of, and principles underpinning, E.U. public policy: harmonisation, mutual recognition and convergence?;
  • 3. Agenda-setting 1: role and purpose, E.U. political process, and the nature of agendas;
  • 4. Agenda-setting 2: fragmentation and the absence of effective policy co-ordination;
  • 5. Policy formulation 1: the policy communities and policy networks model;
  • 6. Policy formulation 2: policy-making uncertainty, expertise and epistemic communities, multiple policy-making ‘venues’;
  • READING AND SEMINAR PREPARATION WEEK;
  • 7. Policy decision-making 1: institutional analysis;
  • 8. Policy decision-making 2: decision-making in the European Parliament;
  • 9. Policy implementation: implementation as a complex and multifaceted process, inter-organisational behaviour and implementation analysis, characterising implementation in the E.U.;
  • 10. A case study of the E.U. policy process: Education policy ;
  • 11. Two further case studies of the E.U. policy process: Welfare policy and Environmental policy;
  • 12. The E.U. policy process: ‘Holidays in Euroland’ (BBC video);
  • 13. Regions and the E.U. public policy process;
  • 14. The ‘Europeanisation’ of public policy;
  • WORKSHOP AND SEMINAR PROGRAMME:
  • PLEASE NOTE: 75% attendance at workshop and seminars (i.e. at least 5) is a requirement to pass this course
  • Students will be expected to have read assigned texts for each workshop and seminar, and participate in discussions. Indicative readings are given below for each seminar and workshop.
  • WORKSHOP:
  • This will consist of students' participation and discussion groups.
  • QUESTION: Is harmonisation, mutual recognition or convergence the best principle upon which European Public Policy should be based? Provide reasons and evidence for your preference.
  • READINGS: Threlfall, M. (2003) ‘European social integration: harmonization, convergence and the single social area’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13, pp.121-140.
  • Borros, S. and Greve, B. (2004) The Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union, special issue of Journal of European Public Policy, 11:2 (various articles of interest)
  • Sinn, H-W and Ochel, W (2003) ‘Social Union, convergence and migration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, pp.869-96.
  • Roberts, I. and Springer, B. Social Policy in the European Union: Between Harmonisation and National Autonomy, Boulder, Lynne Reiner, 2001.
  • SEMINARS:
  • If they wish, students can elaborate a formal oral seminar presentation in English on one of the seminar questions listed below in the Seminar programme. Presentations can be made individually or as part of a group. Students will be encouraged to do so as these presentations can be on topics in the Seminar programme related to their essay question choice, and discussion and feedback in the seminar and in later consultations with the tutor (should these be requested) will greatly assist in the production of the assessment essay. Assignment of seminar presentation topics, on a voluntary basis, will commence from week 2 of the course, and seminars and presentations will commence from week 7, following the lecture. For seminar topics where no student paper presentation is made, there will be a general group discussion
  • SEMINAR QUESTIONS:
  • 1. Has the development of European Union public policy assisted E.U. integration and added to E.U. integration theory?
  • READINGS: Rosamond, B. Theories Of European Integration, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2000.
  • Hix, S. The Political System of the European Union, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2005.
  • 2. (a) If fragmentation of the institutions of the E.U. is good for a rich diversity of ideas and proposals in agenda-setting, what does it mean for effective public policy co-ordination and implementation?
  • 2. (b) How useful is the policy community and policy networks model in analysing public policy formulation in the European Union?
  • READINGS (for 2 (a) and (b)):
  • Richardson, J. European Union. Power and policy-making (Third edition), Oxford, Routledge, 2006. (alternatively, Second edition, 2001).
  • Hix, S. The Political System of the European Union, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2005.
  • McCormick, J. Understanding the European Union (Third edition), Basingstoke, Palgrave , 2005
  • Nugent, N. The Government and Politics of the European Union, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
  • 3. What factors undermine most the negotiating position of the E.U. parliament in the public policy decision-making process?
  • READINGS: Richardson, J. European Union. Power and policy-making (Third edition), Oxford, Routledge, 2006. (alternatively, Second edition, 2001).
  • Hix, S. The Political System of the European Union, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2005.
  • McCormick, J. Understanding the European Union (Third edition), Basingstoke, Palgrave , 2005
  • Nugent, N. The Government and Politics of the European Union, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
  • 4. Select an E.U. Public Policy area and, providing evidence, assess whether the best principle for that policy to be based upon would be harmonisation, mutual recognition or convergence.
  • READINGS: Hantrais, L. Social Policy in the EU, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2000 (second edition) or 2007 (third edition).
  • Borros, S. and Greve, B. (2004) The Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union, special issue of Journal of European Public Policy, 11:2 (various articles of interest)
  • Threlfall, M. (2003) ‘European social integration: harmonization, convergence and the single social area’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13, pp.121-140.
  • Jordan, A. and Liefferink, D. (eds.) Environmental Policy in Europe: The Europeanization of National Environmental Policy, London, Routledge, 2004.
  • Kleinman, M. A European Welfare State: European Union Social Policy in context, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2002.
  • Mosher, J. and Trubek, D. (2003) ‘Alternative approaches to governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 4:1, pp.63-88.
  • Guillen, A. and Palier, B. (2004) ‘Does Europe matter? Accession to EU and social policy developments in recent and new member states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 14:3, pp.203-209, and other articles in this special issue on EU Enlargement, Europeanisation and Social Policy.
  • Jepsen, M. and Pascual, A.S. (2005) ‘The European Social Model: an exercise in deconstruction’, Journal of European Social Policy, 15(3), pp.231-245.
  • Neilson, J. (1998) ‘Equal opportunities for women in the European Union: success or failure?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 8, pp.64-79.
  • Sinn, H-W and Ochel, W (2003) ‘Social Union, convergence and migration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, pp.869-96.
  • Vobruba, G. (2003) ‘The enlargement crisis of the European Union: limits of the dialectics of integration and expansion’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13 (1), pp.35-48, and responses by M. Bach and M. Rhodes.
  • Roberts, I. and Springer, B. Social Policy in the European Union: Between Harmonisation and National Autonomy, Boulder, Lynne Reiner, 2001.
  • 5. Select an E.U. Public Policy area and, providing evidence, assess whether the best principle for that policy to be based upon would be harmonisation, mutual recognition or convergence. Readings:
  • 6. What are the links between regions and the E.U. in the public policy making process, and what influence do regions have in that process?
  • READINGS: Richardson, J. European Union. Power and policy-making (Third edition), Oxford, Routledge, 2006, Ch.13. (alternatively, Second edition, 2001, Ch.12).
  • Farrell, H. and Heritier, A. (2005) ‘A Rationalist-Institutionalist Explanation of Endogenous Regional Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12/2: pp.273-90.
Literatura
  • Featherstone, K. and Radaelli, C. (eds.) The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003. (especially the Introduction and the chapter by D. Wincott).
  • Gallie, D. (ed.) Resisting marginalisation: Unemployment experience and social policy in the EU, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • Geyer, R. Exploring European Social Policy, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2000
  • Hantrais, L. Social Policy in the EU, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2000 (second edition) or 2007 (third edition).
  • Hix, S. The Political System of the European Union, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2005.
  • Jordan, A. and Liefferink, D. (eds.) Environmental Policy in Europe: The Europeanization of National Environmental Policy, London, Routledge, 2004.
  • Kleinman, M. A European Welfare State: European Union Social Policy in context, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2002.
  • McCormick, J. Understanding the European Union (Third edition), Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2005.
  • Nugent, N. The Government and Politics of the European Union, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
  • Richardson, J. European Union. Power and policy-making (Third edition), Oxford, Routledge, 2006. (alternatively, Second edition, 2001).
  • Roberts, I. and Springer, B. Social Policy in the European Union: Between Harmonisation and National Autonomy, Boulder, Lynne Reiner, 2001.
  • Rosamond, B. Theories Of European Integration, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2000.
  • Salais, R. and Villeneuve, R. (eds.) Europe and the politics of capabilities, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2004 Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U.. (eds.) The Europeanisation of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca NY, Cornell University Press,
  • Borros, S. and Greve, B. (2004) The Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union, special issue of Journal of European Public Policy, 11:2 (various articles of interest)
  • Farrell, H. and Heritier, A. (2005) ‘A Rationalist-Institutionalist Explanation of Endogenous Regional Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12/2: pp.273-90.
  • Jepsen, M. and Pascual, A.S. (2005) ‘The European Social Model: an exercise in deconstruction’, Journal of European Social Policy, 15(3), pp.231-245.
  • Mosher, J. and Trubek, D. (2003) ‘Alternative approaches to governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 4:1, pp.63-88.
  • Neilson, J. (1998) ‘Equal opportunities for women in the European Union: success or failure?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 8, pp.64-79.
  • Sinn, H-W and Ochel, W (2003) ‘Social Union, convergence and migration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, pp.869-96.
  • Threlfall, M. (2003) ‘European social integration: harmonization, convergence and the single social area’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13, pp.121-140.
  • Van der Mei (2003) ‘Freedom of movement for the unemployed and co-ordination of unemployment benefit schemes’, European Journal of Social Security, 5:3, pp.214-229.
  • Vobruba, G. (2003) ‘The enlargement crisis of the European Union: limits of the dialectics of integration and expansion’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13 (1), pp.35-48, and responses by M. Bach and M. Rhodes.
  • Relevant webpages and other literature as specified in the syllabus.
Výukové metody
The course takes the form of both lectures and seminars. Lectures explain basic topics. During the seminars the basic topics are discussed. They are also elaborated by students in their essays. Student develop knowledges through homeworks and its public presentation as well as active participation during seminars.
Metody hodnocení
COURSE ASSESSMENT.
a) ATTENDANCE: 75% attendance at lectures (at least 11) and at the seminars/workshop (at least 5) is a requirement to pass this course.
b) ESSAY (maximum 2000 words/6 sides of an A4 sheet)
DEADLINE: To be submitted by email or through the Masaryk University Information System within the prescribed deadline. Students will be required to submit an essay answering one of the questions shown below. The essay must be of a maximum of 2,000 words/6 sides of an A4 sheet, be typed, fully properly referenced, and include full bibliography. (i) Are the processes of agenda setting and policy implementation at the two ends of the European Union public policy cycle compatible? (ii) Is European Union public policy making being ‘Europeanised’ or ‘regionalised’? (iii) How does the role of the E.U. Parliament differ from that of parliaments in E.U. Member States in respect of public policy formulation and decision-making? (iv) Choose an E.U. Public Policy area and identify positive and negative issues associated with that policy area within the E.U. policy process. Providing evidence, evaluate whether harmonization, mutual recognition or convergence is the best principle upon which the E.U. should base its policy in your chosen area.
Vyučovací jazyk
Angličtina
Informace učitele
JOURNALS (These Journals, and the articles within them above, are also held in the FSS library)
1) Environmental Politics
2) European Union Politics
3) European Political Science
4) Journal of Common Market Studies
5) Journal of European Social Policy (the ‘European Briefing’ section of this journal is very useful for up-to-date EU developments)
6) Journal of European Public Policy
INTERNET
1) http://www.cec.org.uk
2) http://www.ecsa.org
3) http://europa.eu.int
4) http://ibeurope.eu.int
5) http://www.ieep.org.uk
6) http://www.policylibrary.com
Další komentáře
Studijní materiály
Předmět je dovoleno ukončit i mimo zkouškové období.
Předmět je vyučován jednorázově.
Nezapisují si studenti, kteří absolvovali předmět PVEUPP.
Nachází se v prerekvizitách jiných předmětů
Předmět je zařazen také v obdobích podzim 2009, podzim 2011, podzim 2012, podzim 2013, podzim 2014, podzim 2015, podzim 2016, podzim 2017, podzim 2018, podzim 2019, podzim 2020, podzim 2021, podzim 2022, podzim 2023, podzim 2024.