FF:AEM_01b Seminar in Methods II - Course Information
AEM_01b Seminar in Archeological Methods II
Faculty of ArtsSpring 2021
- Extent and Intensity
- 0/2/0. 5 credit(s). Type of Completion: z (credit).
- Teacher(s)
- prof. Mgr. Jiří Macháček, Ph.D. (seminar tutor)
Mgr. Petra Goláňová, Ph.D. (lecturer)
Mgr. Věra Klontza, Ph.D. (lecturer) - Guaranteed by
- prof. Mgr. Jiří Macháček, Ph.D.
Department of Archaeology and Museology – Faculty of Arts
Contact Person: Jitka Šibíčková
Supplier department: Department of Archaeology and Museology – Faculty of Arts - Timetable
- Mon 10:00–11:40 M12
- Prerequisites (in Czech)
- Předpokladem pro úspěšné absolvování předmětu je dobrá znalost angličtiny a jednoho dalšího cizího jazyka. Některé hodiny mohou probíhat v angličtině.
- Course Enrolment Limitations
- The course is only offered to the students of the study fields the course is directly associated with.
The capacity limit for the course is 25 student(s).
Current registration and enrolment status: enrolled: 1/25, only registered: 0/25 - fields of study / plans the course is directly associated with
- Archaeology (programme FF, N-AE) (2)
- Archaeology (programme FF, N-AE_) (3)
- Archaeology (programme FF, N-GE)
- Archaeology (programme FF, N-HS)
- Classical Archaeology (programme FF, N-AE) (2)
- Classical archeology (programme FF, N-AE_)
- Classical Archaeology (programme FF, N-HS)
- Course objectives
- Among the fundamental goals of the seminar we count the enhancement of the students’ knowledge of protohistory and classic archaeology. After successful completion of the course, students will be able to set their own research into the interdisciplinary and international context. Students will also improve their discussion and argumentation skills, in both spoken and written form. Emphasis will be put on the presentation of their own ideas and understanding of written text.
- Learning outcomes
- After completion of the course, student will be able to:
- identify current topics of prehistoric and early historical research;
- formulate opinions on selected issues based on studied literature and set the results of this study into a broader context;
- compare scientific opinions on selected issues and justify their methodological bases;
- hold a well-founded discussion about a special topic;
- write a professional argumentative essay including the bibliographic references. - Syllabus
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Archaeological culture
- 3. Analogies in archaeology
- 4. Social theory and methods of study of prehistoric society
- 5. Warfare
- 6. Gender and identity in archaeology
- 7. Arrival of Indo-Europeans
- 8. Ethnicity
- 9. Chronology
- 10. Economic changes in the Neolithic and Eneolithic
- 11. Economy in the Bronze Age and the Hallstatt Period
- 12. Long-distance contacts
- 13. Social interactions and methods of their study
- Literature
- required literature
- Fahlander, F., 2004. Archaeology and Anthropology - Brothers in Arms? On Analogies in 21st-century Archaeology, in: Fahlander, F., Oestigaard, T. (Eds.), Material Culture and Other Things. Post-Disciplinary Studies in the 21st Century
- Wobst, M.H., 1978. The Archaeo-Ethnology of Hunter-Gatherers or the Tyranny of the Ethnographic Record in Archaeology. American Antiquity 43, 303–309.
- Sosna, Daniel, Sládek, V., Galeta, P., 2010. Investigating mortuary sites: The search for synergy. Anthropologie XLVIII, 33–40.
- Chapman, R., 2013. Death, burial, and social representation, in: Tarlow, S., Nilsson Stutz, L. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 47–57.
- SØRENSEN, Marie Louise Stig. Gender archaeology. 1st pub. Cambridge: Polity, 2000, xi, 236. ISBN 0745620140. info
- recommended literature
- Gosden, C., 1999. Anthropology and archaeology: a changing relationship. Routledge, London; New York.
- Bickle, P., Whittle, A. (Eds.), 2013. The first farmers of central Europe: diversity in LBK lifeways. Oxbow Books, Oxford and Oakville.
- Gilchrist, R., 1999. Gender and archaeology: contesting the past. Routledge, London ; New York.
- Květina, P., Hrnčíř, V., 2013. Between archaeology and anthropology: imagining Neolithic settlements. Anthropologie 51, 323–347.
- Gramsch, A. (Ed.), 2000. Vergleichen als archäologische Methode: Analogien in den Archäologien: mit Beiträgen einer Tagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Theorie (T-AG) und einer kommentierten Bibliographie, BAR international series 825.
- DOLEŽALOVÁ, Kateřina. První ženy moravské archeologie (First woman of Moravian archaeology). Studia archaeologica Brunensia. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2013, roč. 18, č. 2, p. 63-78. ISSN 1805-918X. Digitální knihovna FF MU info
- not specified
- HARDING, A. F. Warriors and weapons in Bronze age Europe. Budapest: Archaeolingua Alapítvány, 2007, 228 s. ISBN 9789638046864. info
- MALLORY, J. P. and Douglas Q. ADAMS. The Oxford introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European world. First published. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, xxiv, 731. ISBN 9780199287918. info
- EARLE, Timothy K. Bronze Age economics : the beginnings of political economies. Boulder: Westview Press, 2002, xi, 452. ISBN 0813338778. info
- Teaching methods
- on-line výuka, homework with compulsory literature, discussions, essay
- Assessment methods
- Requirements for the course-unit credit: homework, an adequately active participation in the seminars (3 absences tolerated); essay of sufficient quality
- Language of instruction
- Czech
- Further comments (probably available only in Czech)
- Study Materials
Information on completion of the course: K získání zápočtu je třeba dostatečná a aktivní účast a splnění zadaných úkolů.
The course is taught annually.
- Enrolment Statistics (Spring 2021, recent)
- Permalink: https://is.muni.cz/course/phil/spring2021/AEM_01b