Treaty | Signed | Ratified* | Protocols | Reservations | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
African Charter (1981) | – | – | – | – | – |
Am. Declaration (1948) | – | – | – | – | – |
Am. Convention (1969) | – | – | – | – | – |
Arab Charter (2004) | – | – | – | – | – |
ECHR (1950) | 26-Nov-1991 | 19-Jan-1993 | 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 13; 14 | – | – |
EU Charter [2000 (2009)] | 13-Dec-2007 | 9-Apr-2008 | 30 | The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union interpreted by the European Court of Justice is to apply fully to the EU institutions and to the field of EU law, which must be consistent with its provisions. A protocols clarifies that this does not extend the scope of courts to strike down domestic legislation in the United Kingdom, Poland, and the Czech Republic although it would still bind the EU institutions and apply to the field of EU law: Article 1 The Charter does not extend the ability of the Court of Justice of the European Union, or any court or tribunal of Poland or of the United Kingdom, to find that the laws, regulations or administrative provisions, practices or action of Poland or of the United Kingdom are inconsistent with the fundamental rights, freedoms and principles that it reaffirms. In particular, and for the avoidance of doubt, nothing in Title IV of the Charter creates justiciable rights applicable to Poland or the United Kingdom except in so far as Poland or the United Kingdom has provided for such rights in its national law. Article 2 To the extent that a provision of the Charter refers to national laws and practices, it shall only apply to Poland or the United Kingdom to the extent that the rights or principles that it contains are recognised in the law or practices of Poland or of the United Kingdom. —Reform Treaty - Protocol (No 7) |
– |
Treaty | Signed | Ratified* | Protocols | Reservations | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICERD (1966) | 7-Mar-1966 | 5-Dec-1968 | – | – | – |
ICESCR (1966) | 2-Mar-1967 | 18-Mar-1977 | – | – | – |
ICCPR (1966) | 2-Mar-1967 | 18-Mar-1977 | 1; 2 | Reservation to the 1th Optional protocol: Poland accedes to the Protocol while making a reservation that would exclude the procedure set out in article 5 (2) (a), in cases where the matter has already been examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement. |
– |
CEDAW (1979) | 29-May-1980 | 30-Jul-1980 | 1 | – | – |
CAT (1984) | 13-Jan-1986 | 26-Jul-1989 | 1 | Upon signature: Under article 28, the Polish People's Republic does not consider itself bound by article 20 of the Convention. Furthermore, the Polish People's Republic does not consider itself bound by article 30, paragraph 1, of the Convention. |
– |
CRC (1989) | 26-Jan-1990 | 7-Jun-1991 | 1; 2 | – | – |
CPRMW (1990) | – | – | – | – | – |
CRPD (2006) | 30-Mar-2007 | 25-Sep-2012 | – | Reservations made upon ratification: “The Republic of Poland understands that Article 23.1 (b) and Article 25 (a) shall not be interpreted in a way conferring an individual right to abortion or mandating state party to provide access thereto, unless that right is guaranteed by the national law.” “Article 23.1(a) of the Convention refers to the recognition of the right of all persons with disabilities who are of marriageable age to marry and to found a family on the basis of free and full consent of the intending spouses. By virtue of Article 46 of the Convention the Republic of Poland reserves the right not to apply Article 23.1(a) of the Convention until relevant domestic legislation is amended. Until the withdrawal of the reservation a disabled person whose disability results from a mental illness or mental disability and who is of marriageable age, can not get married without the court's approval based on the statement that the health or mental condition of that person does not jeopardize the marriage, nor the health of prospective children and on condition that such a person has not been fully incapacitated. These conditions result from Article 12 § 1 of the Polish Code on Family and Guardianship (Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland of 1964, No. 9, item 59, with subsequent amendments).” Interpretative Declaration made upon ratification: “The Republic of Poland declares that it will interpret Article 12 of the Convention in a way allowing the application of the incapacitation, in the circumstances and in the manner set forth in the domestic law, as a measure indicated in Article 12.4, when a person suffering from a mental illness, mental disability or other mental disorder is unable to control his or her conduct.” Reservation made upon signature: The Republic of Poland understands that Articles 23.1 (b) and 25 (a) shall not be interpreted in a way conferring an individual right to abortion or mandating state party to provide access thereto. |
– |
ICCPED (2006) | 25-Jun-2013 | – | – | – | – |
* or accession/succession
Centrum interaktivních a multimediálních studijních opor pro inovaci výuky a efektivní učení | CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0041