Použitá literatura

  1. Fact SheetMEDLINE® Journal Selection [Internet]. NIH: U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/lstrc/jsel.html

  2. Akshantala Education and Charitable Trust. IBI Factor [Internet]. InfoBase Index. c2013 [cited 2020 Feb 6]. Available from: http://www.infobaseindex.com/ibifactor.php

  3. Andrew C, Traynor V, Iverson D. An integrative review: understanding driving retirement decisions for individuals living with a dementia. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2015 Dec [cited 2019 Nov 17];71(12):2728–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12727

  4. Beall J. List of Publishers [Internet]. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. 2012 [cited 2017 January 31]. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20160524111242/https://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/

  5. Beall J. Hijacked Journals [Internet]. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. 2014 [cited 2017 January 31]. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20160604161447/https://scholarlyoa.com/other-pages/hijacked-journals/

  6. Beall J. Cardiology Journal’s Decline is Heartbreaking [Internet]. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. 2014 [cited 2017 January 31]. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20160608065500/https://scholarlyoa.com/2014/07/08/cardiology-journals-decline-is-heartbreaking/

  7. Beall J. Criteria for Determining Predatory Open-Access Publishers [Internet]. 3rd ed. [Denver]; 2015. 6 p. [cited 2016 May 1]. Available from: http://www.ufv.ca/media/assets/research/workshops/Criteria-for-Determining-Predatory-Publishers.pdf

  8. Beall J. More Duplication of Journal Titles and Conference Names by Predatory Publishers [Internet]. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. 2015 [cited 2017 January 31]. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20161224064542/https://scholarlyoa.com/2015/10/06/more-duplication-of-journal-titles-and-conference-names-by-predatory-publishers/

  9. Beall J. Another Article about Plagiarism — That Contains Plagiarism [Internet]. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. 2016 [cited 2017 January 31]. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20160503043821/https://scholarlyoa.com/2016/02/16/another-article-about-plagiarism-that-contains-plagiarism/

  10. Beall J. List of Standalone Journals [Internet]. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. 2016 [cited 2017 January 31]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20170111172309/https://scholarlyoa.com/individual-journals/

  11. Beall J. Misleading Metrics [Internet]. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. 2016 [cited 2017 January 31]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20170111172311/https://scholarlyoa.com/other-pages/misleading-metrics/

  12. Beall J. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. 2016 [cited 2017 January 31]. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20170103170903/https://scholarlyoa.com/

  13. Beall J. Predatory Publisher Organizes Conference Using Same Name as Legitimate Conference | Scholarly Open Access [Internet]. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. [cited 2017 January 31]. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20160503043451/https://scholarlyoa.com/2014/08/28/predatory-publisher-organizes-conference-using-same-name-as-legitimate-conference/

  14. Beall J. Proposed Criteria for Identifying Predatory Conferences [Internet]. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. 2016 [cited 2017 January 31]. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20160624083058/https://scholarlyoa.com/2016/06/23/proposed-criteria-for-identifying-predatory-conferences/

  15. Beall J. Don’t Use PubMed as a Journal Whitelist [Internet]. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. 2016 [cited 2017 February 3] Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20170114052258/https://scholarlyoa.com/2016/10/20/dont-use-pubmed-as-a-journal-whitelist/

  16. Bloudoff-Indelicato M. Backlash after Frontiers journals added to list of questionable publishers. Nature [Internet]. 2015 jen [cited 2016 May 1];526(7575):613–613. Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/526613f

  17. Butler D. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature News [Internet]. 2013 Mar 28 [cited 2016 May 5];495(7442):433. Available from: http://www.nature.com/news/investigating-journals-the-dark-side-of-publishing-1.12666

  18. Carafoli E. Scientific misconduct: the dark side of sicence. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 August 8];26(3):369-382. Available from: http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12210-015-0415-4.pdf doi: 10.1007/s12210-015-0415-4

  19. CASP. Critical appraisal skills programme checklist [Internet]. Oxford: Critical Appraisal Skills Programme; 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 28]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018.pdf

  20. Clarivate Analytics. Title suppressions [Internet]. InCites Journal Citation Reports Help. 2018 [cited 2019 Nov 4]. Available from: http://help.incites.clarivate.com/incitesLiveJCR/JCRGroup/titleSuppressions.html

  21. Coughlan M, Cronin P, Ryan F. Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research. Br J Nurs [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2019 Nov 17];16(11):658–63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.11.23681

  22. Edie AH, Conklin JL. Avoiding predatory journals: Quick peer review processes too good to be true. Nurs Forum. 2019;54(3):336–9.

  23. Elsevier. Scopus: Content coverage guide [Internet]. [Amsterdam]: Elsevier; 2017 [cited 2019 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/0597-Scopus-Content-Coverage-Guide-US-LETTER-v4-HI-singles-no-ticks.pdf

  24. Fórum Věda žije! Akademicky antipredátor [Internet]. Akademický antipredátor. 2016 [cited 2016 May 1]. Available from: http://antipredator.vedazije.cz/

  25. Frandsen TF. Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature: Why authors publish in questionable journals. Learned Publishing [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 3];32(1):57–62. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/leap.1214

  26. Harzing A-W, Adler NJ. Disseminating knowledge: From potential to reality—New Open-Access journals collide with convention. AMLE [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Apr 5];15(1):140–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0373

  27. Huisman J, Smits J. Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective. Scientometrics [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Apr 4];113(1):633–50. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5

  28. International DOI Foundation. The DOI System: ISO 26324 [Internet]. doi. 2016 [cited 2016 May 5]. Available from: http://www.doi.org/index.html

  29. Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical appraisal tools [Internet]. Joanna Briggs Institute. [c2019] [cited 2019 Nov 12]. Available from: https://joannabriggs.org/critical_appraisal_tools

  30. John Wiley & Sons. World Psychiatry: Editorial Board [Internet]. Wiley Online Library. 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 20]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/20515545/homepage/editorialboard.html

  31. John Wiley & Sons. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians: Editorial board [Internet]. Wiley Online Library. c2019 [cited 2019 Oct 22]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/15424863/homepage/editorialboard.html

  32. Komise pro hodnocení výsledků výzkumných organizací a ukončených programů. Zápis z 84. jednání KHV. Výzkum a vývoj v ČR. 2016 [Internet]; 2016 [cited 2016 May 11]. Available from: http://www.vyzkum.cz/FrontClanek.aspx?idsekce=772589

  33. Komm M. Predátoři a upíři aneb horor vědeckých publikací. Deník Referendum [Internet]. 2015 Dec 8 [cited 2016 May 1]; Available from: http://denikreferendum.cz/clanek/21850-predatori-a-upiri-aneb-horor-vedeckych-publikaci

  34. McGlinchey N. When should reviewers receive reminders? [Internet]. Wiley. 2017 [cited 2019 Apr 4]. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/network/researchers/being-a-peer-reviewer/when-should-reviewers-receive-reminders

  35. McKenna M. Students Block UP Rector’s Office And Get Arrested [Internet]. Kosovo 2.0. 2014 [cited 2016 May 5]. Available from: http://www.kosovotwopointzero.com/en/article/983/students-block-up-rectors-office-and-get-arrested

  36. Nadelson S, Nadelson LS. Evidence-Based Practice Article Reviews Using CASP Tools: A Method for Teaching EBP. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2019 Nov 17];11(5):344–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12059

  37. Poynder R. The Open Access Interviews: Dove Medical Press [Internet]. Open and Shut? 2008 [cited 2016 May 5]. Available from: http://poynder.blogspot.com/2008/11/open-access-interviews-dove-medical.html

  38. Ryan F, Coughlan M, Cronin P. Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research. Br J Nurs [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2019 Nov 17];16(12):738–44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.12.23726

  39. Schmidt B, Ross-Hellauer T, van Edig X, Moylan EC. Ten considerations for open peer review. F1000Res [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 11];7:969. Available from: https://f1000research.com/articles/7-969/v1

  40. Stoye E. Predatory publisher OMICS fined $50 million by US court for defrauding scientists [Internet]. Chemistry World. 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 29]. Available from: https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/predatory-publisher-omics-fined-50-million-by-us-court-for-defrauding-scientists/3010348.article

  41. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Fact Sheet: MEDLINE® Journal Selection [Internet]. U.S. National Library of Medicine 2016 [cited 2017 February 3]. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/jsel.html

  42. Ústřední knihovna Vysoké školy báňské - Technické univerzity Ostrava. Co je to otevřený přístup k výsledkům vědeckého výzkumu [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 May 1]. Available from: http://knihovna.vsb.cz/open-access/ open-access.htm

  43. Vláda ČR. Metodika hodnocení výsledků výzkumných organizací a hodnocení výsledků ukončených programů (platná pro léta 2013 až 2016) [Internet]. [Brno]: [Vláda ČR]; 2014 [cited 2016 May 5]. 60 p. Available from: http://www.vyzkum.cz/storage/att/471EC8E44A7C3AA09C01B666F1ED6B30/M2013-0815-kor2.pdf

  44. Web of Science Group. Journal Citation Reports: Suppression policy [Internet]. [USA]: Clarivate Analytics; 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 11]. Available from: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/essays/journal-self-citation-jcr/

  45. Web of Science Group. Web of Science journal evaluation process and selection criteria [Internet]. Web of Science Group. c2019 [cited 2019 Nov 3]. Available from: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/journal-evaluation-process-and-selection-criteria/

Zdroje ukázek v textu

  1. Araliya. Home [Internet]. Indian Journal of Advanced Nursing. c2014 [cited 2020 Feb 6]. Available from: http://ijan.co.in/

  2. Caister Academic Press. Instructions for Authors (CIMB) [Internet]. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 31]. Available from: https://www.caister.com/cimbauthor

  3. David Publishing Company. China-USA Business Review: Indexing [Internet]. David Publishing Company. c2015 [cited 2020 Feb 4]. Available from: http://www.davidpublisher.org/index.php/Home/Journal/detail?journalid=13&jx=CUBR&cont=indexing

  4. European Medical Group. Authors - EMJ [Internet]. European Medical Journal. c2020 [cited 2020 Jan 29]. Available from: https://www.emjreviews.com/contributors/authors/

  5. Hindawi. Editorial board [Internet]. Parkinson’s Disease. 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 31]. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/pd/editors/

  6. John Wiley & Sons. Editorial Board [Internet]. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 31]. Available from: https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/15424863/homepage/editorialboard.html

  7. Lambert Academic Publishing. Why you should publish with Lap Publishing [Internet]. Lambert Academic Publishing. 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.lap-publishing.com/site/why-choose-us/47

  8. Open Access Publisher. Home [Internet]. Vitamins & Minerals. c2020 [cited 2020 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.omicsonline.org/vitamins-minerals.php

  9. SciMed Central. About the Journal [Internet]. JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence. c2016 [cited 2019 Dec 12]. Available from: https://www.jscimedcentral.com/Bioavailability/

  10. Springer Nature. Editorial criteria and processes [Internet]. Nature. c2020 [cited 2020 Jan 29]. Available from: https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/editorial-criteria-and-processes

  11. Wolters Kluwer. Login [Internet]. Noise and Health. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 12]. Available from: http://www.noiseandhealth.org/subscriberlogin.asp?rd=article.asp?issn=1463-1741;year=2018;volume=20;issue=97;spage=217;epage=222;aulast=Lim;type=2

  12. Wolters Kluwer. November-December 2018 | Vol 20 | Issue 97 [Internet]. Noise and Health. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 12]. Available from: http://www.noiseandhealth.org/

  13. Wolters Kluwer. Home [Internet]. Wolters Kluwer. 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 31]. Available from: https://wolterskluwer.com/

  14. Wolters Kluwer. Medicine [Internet]. Wolters Kluwer. c2020 [cited 2020 Jan 31]. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/pages/default.aspx

  15. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry: Indexing [Internet]. Scientific Research: An Academic Publisher. 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/journal/AJAC/

  16. Home [Internet]. Neuropsychiatry (London). c2020 [cited 2020 Feb 3]. Available from: http://www.jneuropsychiatry.org/

5 Závěr