Between East and West:
Geographic Metaphors of Identity
in Poland
MARYSIA H. GALBPAITH
ABSTRACT As Poland enters the European Union, questions of
national identity relative to wider group loyalties become particularly
salient. This study considers how individual life stories
contribute to the discourse on what constitutes thePolish nation,
and contemplates the implications ofrespondents'views for the
achievement of European integration. Ifocus on Polish youths'
use ofmetaphors of"betweenness," in which Polandfills the conceptual
space between East and West, and "nested identities,"
based on simultaneous attachments to region, nation, and
Europe, and consider how they might provide alternatives to
models ofidentity which assume conflict with outsidegroups. In
postcommunist Poland, more protectionist or conflict-based
stances are sometimes taken, not so much because of political
threats as in the past, but more in response to economic inequalities
within Poland, and between Poland and the West.
A
central question for contemporary Europe is whether the recent
trend toward unification will continue, orwhether ethnic
rivalries will defeat these efforts. At issue is a more basic question
about the ways in which group identities are formed, and
the functions that they serve. To the extent that conceptions
of "who we are" derive from assertions of "who we are not," they have the
potential to challenge stable, peaceful alliances across national boundaries.
However, in Poland, one of the new members of the European Union, the
discourse of some youths points toward alternative models of identity that
recognize contrasts between groups without assuming conflict. Specifically,
conversations and interviews with young Poles reveal "nested identities"
andidentities basedon "betweenness," aswell as models where rivalry
Ethos32(1):51-81. Copyright  2004, American Anthropological Association.
52 ˇ ETHOS
plays a more prominent role. By focusing on characterizations of Poland's
place "between East and West," I identify the shifting and varied ways in
which young Poles make use of models of Polishness when reflecting on
their personal and national identity, and I consider the implications of their
views for the achievement of European integration.
In this article, I consider the perspectives of two groups of Poles whom
I met when they were high school students in the early 1990s. Respondents
from the city of Krakow have mostly become college-educated professionals
with the skills and opportunities to thrive in postcommunist Poland.
The other group grew up in the rural Bieszczady Mountains; those who did
not emigrate or move to cities struggle to make a living in the changing
economy. Young Poles from Krakow in particular express the hope that
closer contact with Western Europe will pose little threat to their unique
identity as Poles but, rather, will provide opportunities for personal, economic,
and creative growth that enrich Krakow, Poland, and Europe generally.
Thus, their views provide a positive model for identity construction
in the new Europe in which an orientation toward integration can take the
place of historic rivalries. Everyday talk also reveals the fragility of this
optimism, and that divisive nationalism can easily gain prominence if,
once again, Poles feel their autonomy threatened. Even more critically,
economic inequalities in Europe, as well as growing economic inequalities
within Poland, especially between urban and rural residents, pose new
challenges to both national stability and international cooperation.
THE NATION IN EVERYDAY UFE
This study diverges from theories of nationalism developed by Benedict
Anderson (1991), Eric Hobsbawm (1990), and Ernest Gellner (1983) in
two significant ways: (1) the subjects of my study are not generalized intellectual
nationalists but, rather, ordinary citizens I came to know personally,
and (2) rather than explain the processes through which
institutions and institutional discourse construct nations, I view ways in
which young Poles articulate and use ideas about the nation in accounts
of their everyday lives. Though this is not his project, Hobsbawm states
that further study is needed to see how nation is perceived from below "in
terms of the assumptions, hopes, needs, longings and interests of ordinary
people, which are not necessarily national and still less nationalist"
(1990:10). This is the gap that my study seeks to fill.
Geoffrey White (2000) points to the need for a more developed theory
of national identity as a site for the production of personal and emotional
meaning. Specifically, White asserts "there is so much to be learned from
looking more closely at the stories that make up the imagined communities
of nations" (2000:501). lie emphasizes that the strength of nationalism
Between East and West ˇ 53
comes from its ability to establish emotional, personally meaningful connections
among a large number of people who will probably never have
any direct contact with each other. Anderson addresses this in his work
as well but seeks explanations in public discourse such as nationalist literature
and constructions of history. Nevertheless, just how national sentiments
gain significance still needs to be further investigated through
close attention to the ways in which individuals talk about their nation in
relation to their own experiences, hopes, and expectations. As White, Anthony
Cohen (1994), and Daniel Linger (1994) make clear, focus on discourse
and symbols independent of minds can only provide a partial
answer to this question. Indeed, consideration of thinking, feeling selves
who engage these representations is essential because it is through such
interaction and reflection that public symbols take on meaning and emotional
force.
In recent years, a small but growing number of scholars have studied
the interplay between higher-level rhetoric and individual lives. While
only some of them are explicitly psychological in their approach, all contribute
to a long-standing area of interest for psychological anthropologists
about constructions of "self and "person" in relation to the wider sociocultural
context. Dorinne Kondo (1990) views rhetoric that reinforces
occupational and gender hierarchies among factory workers in Japan, as
well as workers' resistance to those hierarchies. John Borneman (1992)
examines the influence of state narratives of the life course on citizens of
East and West Berlin just before unification. Nancy Ries (1997) identifies
the narrative genres that dominated talk about everyday life in Perestroika
Russia. Brian Sutton (1997) analyzes the multiple meanings and uses of
historical and family names on the Greek island of Kalymnos. Keiko Matsuki
(2000) shows how present-day public discourse about World War II
shapes the generational identity of Japanese who experienced the war as
children and adolescents. Charlotte Linde (2000) investigates the means
by which workers at an American insurance company adopt aspects of
institutional narratives when telling their own stories.
Below, I examine a specific kind of story about the Polish nation--one
that places Poland conceptually and geographically between East and
West--in order to elucidate the active, constructive role individuals, in
particular young Poles, play in establishing, legitimizing, or rejecting discourses
about the nation. Of particular concern is the place of contrasts
with other groups in conceptualizations of personal and national identity
and what these conceptualizations suggest about possible conflict or cooperation
across national boundaries. Ulf Hannerz (1996), Zdzisfaw Mach
(1993), Anthony Giddens (1991), Benedict Anderson (1991), and Slavoj
2iiek (1990) all emphasize that contrasts with other groups are as much
a part of identity as are commonalities within groups. Indeed, a perceived
54 ˇ ETHOS
threat from outside can be a powerful means of strengthening feelings of
attachment to onewn group. Anderson (1991) calls the nation an imag
ined community,(sand stresses that the same processes that provide the
basis for inclusion also determine what groups are excluded from the nation.
Similarly, according to Zdzistaw Mach (1993), symbolic differentiation
between groups has tended to increase despite growing technological
and structural similarities because people tend to want to preserve their
separate identities.
Katherine Verdery (1996) explains that before 1989, the dynamics of
identity construction in Eastern Europe were characterized by sharp distinctions
between "us" and "them" (see also Haraszti 1978; Holy 1996;
Lampland 1995; Ries 1997; Wedel 1986). Generally, the state, the Communist
Party, or some other institution of power was labeled "them," while
"the people" or "the nation" was conceived of as "us." As a result of "their"
repressive policies, identities under state socialism were split; state sanctioned
actions and values were expected in public realms, in contrast to
the "real beliefs" and "true self that people could only express in private.
Thus, "us" and "them" only made sense in relation to each other. Verdery
explains:
Like the second economy worked only in parasitic relation to the first, this "real" self
was meaningful and coherent only in relation to the public or official self. In other
words, people's sense of identity and personhood was not independent but required the
"enemy" Party, the "them" to complete it. Bipolarity, in short, became constitutive of
the social person. [1996:94)
Just as Zizek (1990) notes that nations often project onto their rivals the
characteristics they most fear or dislike in their own characters, Verdery
(1996) identifies associated processes in Romania, where gypsies are associated
with the most feared aspects of capitalism and Hungarians are
associated with the uncertainty that has accompanied "Westernization."
Polish history is filled with stories of "us" and "them" and periodic
conflict with enemies who have threatened Poland's autonomy from inside
and from outside (Davies 1982). Mach (1993, 1997) emphasizes the importance
of the idea of sovereignty in the formation of Polish national identity,
shaped largely by struggles against alien powers that dominated the
political realm throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. Jan Kubik (1994)
outlines the ongoing power of national symbols in the hands of the people
to show opposition to the communist state in the 1980s, and the state's
failed attempts to coopt these symbols.
Nevertheless, other stories of the Polish nation existed alongside
those based in contrasts, including notions of a multiethnic state made
strong through alliances with its neighbors, and local or religious allegiances
that superseded national ones in significance (Mach 1993). According
to Leszek Koczanowicz, because Polish identity has usually been
Between East and West ˇ 55
defined in opposition to nations trying to dissolve Poland, it becomes difficult
to characterize the nation when independence is achieved (Fischer
1993). He paraphrases author and essayist Witold Gombrowicz who said
that after the World War I, Poles gained passports (i.e., acquired their sovereignty)
but lost their souls, not having the adversity of partition to react
against. Koczanowicz goes on to say that Poles have usually characterized
themselves as more free, more imaginative, less orderly, and more anarchic
than the Germans, and more Western than the Russians. Despite such
elaborations of contrast among ethnicities, however, most of Poland's nationalistic
Romantic poets were also Lithuanian, Jewish, or both. In addition,
after World War II, Poles adopted many characteristics associated
with the now absent Jews--they traveled to earn money and got involved
in trade to improve their standard of living. This kind of borrowing brings
into question what makes Poland distinctive, but it also makes it harder to
place firm boundaries around "us" and "them." Instead, "being between"
becomes a central trope in the construction of identity.
My field research suggests that since 1989, young Poles draw from a
wide range of stories when discussing the significance of the Polish nation
in their lives. Perhaps most promising for European integration, they make
use of metaphors of "betweenness," in which being between East and West
is conceived of as a place in and of itself with its own positive and negative
attributes, or they demonstrate "nested loyalties," where attachment to
region, nation, and Europe do not compete, but rather are important to
varying degrees in different contexts. My analysis builds on group interviews
in which participants negotiate the significance of contemporary
issues, and "life stories"--how individuals tell and retell their experiences.
I am interested in the ways that young Poles make use of, or "consume"
(see de Gerteau 1984), cultural productions in both unique and conventional
ways to help them understand their social world. In other words, I
consider the extent to which ordinary citizens interpret their own lives by
employing official rhetoric produced by the state as well as public rhetoric
used in the media, and through this process contribute to the discourse on
what constitutes the Polish nation. I take full advantage of the fact that my
subjects are self-conscious and, thus, able to reflect on their own circumstances
(see Cohen 1994; Giddens 1991).
Person-centered ethnography emphasizes depth of knowledge of a
small number of individuals over responses of many people to targeted
questions on surveys. Where possible, I show the relationship between
respondents in my study to broader trends recorded in the rich surveybased
research conducted by Polish agencies such as the Public Opinion
Research Center (CBOS), and in popular periodicals such as the weekly
magazines Wprost and Polityka. I selected two fieldsites in southern Poland,
Krakow and Lesko, in order to be able to compare urban and rural
56 ˇ ETHOS
perspectives. Because the history of occupation has tended to be so important
to Polish national identity, both locations are in what was historically
Galicia, the region of Poland under Austrian rule when Poland was partitioned
by Austria, Russia, and Prussia from 1795 to 1918. The Austrians
were generally regarded as the least oppressive of the three occupiers,
allowing a flourishing of Polish language and culture despite the lack of
sovereignty during this period.
Krakow, Poland's third largest city with a population of 800,000, is
often characterized as the cultural "heart" of the nation; it was the seat of
the Polish kings until the capitol was moved to Warsaw in 1596, and is the
locale of the Jagiellonian University, Poland's oldest institution of higher
education, as well as numerous other universities. Historic buildings in the
city center, dating back to every century since the tenth, were relatively
undamaged during World War II, making Krakow a draw for domestic and
international tourism. In addition to ongoing events at the numerous theaters,
museums, and galleries, the city frequently hosts cultural festivals.
Lesko, a town of about six thousand residents, is located 250 km southeast
of Krakow at the edge of the Bieszczady Mountains near the Ukrainian
border. It, too, is a cultural and historical center, though on a much
smaller scale than Krakow. Most important for my study, four regional high
schools are located in the town, including one college preparatory lyceum
and three "group schools" that include technical programs that teach technical
skills along with general education classes, and trade programs that
provide a three year certificate in a trade specialty.1
I conducted group interviews in 1992, and then again in 1993 at six
secondary schools in Krakow (approximately 60 percent of students attended
lyceum, and 40 percent technical and trade group schools) and at
all four secondary schools in Lesko (25 percent of students attended lyceum
and 75 percent technical and trade group schools). All totaled, I
interviewed over 300 students in groups of eight. Following Linger (1994)
and Theodore Schwartz (1978), group interviews explore the categories of
problems that people negotiate. In other words, rather than seeking to
identify shared characteristics of Poles, or even shared answers to questions,
interviews focused on shared debates, or what Schwartz (1978) calls
the "litigation of culture." Similarly, Linger suggests that identity be reconceived
"in terms of a congeries of problems rather than a set of assumed
attributes or a prototype" (Linger 1994:304). Thus, group
interviews reveal ways in which young Poles negotiate a sense of themselves
and their nation through shared reflections about political issues,
economic policies, Polish history, relations with other nations, and visions
for the future.
In addition to the group interviews, my article draws from individual
"life story" interviews conducted in 1993 and 1999. I refer here to the
Between East and West ˇ 57
responses of those I interviewed during both of these periods, a total of 16
individuals originally selected because of their inclination to reflect on and
articulate their ideas about national identity, and because they attended a
range of schools and expressed varied goals and expectations for their fu-
ture.2
Thus, this is not a random sample; each respondent must be considered
individually in relation to their level of education, the region in which
they live, and the career choices they have made. As Geoffrey White
(2000) points out, life stories, as opposed to life histories, consider how
subjects actively create the past, at least as they understand it. These detailed
personal accounts show how respondents communicate and negotiate
their sense of self (Linde 1993). They also provide the personal background
to locate respondents relative to wider social trends. Because most
respondents also became my friends, I am able to supplement accounts
from formal interviews with less formal conversations and participant-
observation.
"BETWEEN EAST AND WEST' IN POliSH DISCOURSE
Ernest Gellner (1983) and Anderson (1991) explain that a shared
story about the nation, contained in patriotic literature and history, and
reproduced in school curricula, enabled large groups of people to imagine
themselves as a part of the national community even though they would
never have face-to-face relationships with most of its members. Typically,
the state is at the center of such efforts, using the idea of the nation to
solidify the legitimacy of its control. These processes took on a particular
form in the construction of Polish national identity, however, because Poland
lost its sovereignty at the end of the 18th century, just as the modern
concept of nation took hold throughout Europe. Thus, there was no Polish
state to promote identification with the nation. Instead, generations of
romantic Polish patriots made it their mission to preserve the idea of the
nation even though it had no political reality. Correspondingly, Polish sociologists
developed theories of nationalism based on cultural factors
rather than state political power (Chaiasiriski 1988, Ossowski 1967,
Znaniecki 1990). Particularly relevant to the concept of nested identities
is Stanisiaw Ossowski's distinction between two kinds of national allegiance--little
fatherland (mala ojczyzna) and ideological fatherland. Little
fatherland refers to attachment to place grounded in a specific locality and
associated people and experiences, while ideological fatherland is based
on ideas developed through more public forms such as literature and political
positions. In recent years, school curricula and popular media continue
to portray Poland's ideological fatherland in terms of historic fights
against foreign occupiers for Polish sovereignty. For instance, the most
popular Polish film productions of 1999 and 2000 included lavish adaptations
58 ˇ ETHOS
of Pan Tadeusz and Ogniem i Mieczem, both central works of Polish patriotic
literature in which conflicts with outside groups figure promi-
nently.3
These portrayals of the past should not be underestimated
because, as White contends, "constructions of history are inevitably discourses
of identity" and narratives of the past have the moral and emotional
power to create the agenda for future action (White 2000:496).
Reflections on the position of Poland between East and West run
through the work of numerous essays by Polish poets and writers (some
20th-century examples include Gombrowicz 1988, 1989; Mitosz 1990). It
is also an issue addressed in the periodical Kultura, which played an important
role in the formulation of the political and social opinions of the
Polish intelligentsia under communism (Kostrzewa 1990). Printed in Paris
to avoid censorship in Poland, copies of Kultura were smuggled into Poland,
passed from hand to hand, and discussed in clandestine meetings in
private residences and churches. The symbolic construction of Poland's
place between East and West may be seen in an article published in Kultura
in 1984 that described Poland as a lush valley between the steep
slopes of snow-capped mountains--symbolic of Germany and Russia
(Szrett 1990). As a result, the valley that was meant to flow with milk and
honey became a corridor for the nations on either side; no natural barrier
protects this "paradise" from these incursions, and the mountains cast
shadows that cannot be ignored. Again, conflict with other nations figures
prominently in portrayals of the Polish nation.
Such symbolism is often supported by reference to historic invasions.
From the west and north came the Teutonic Knights in the 13th century,
the Swedes in the 17th century, the Prussian Empire at the end of the 18th
century, and the Nazis in 1939. From the East came Tartars, Cossacks,
and Muscovites throughout the Middle Ages and into the 18th century, the
Russian Empire at the end of the 18th century, and the Soviets after 1945
(Davies 1982). Krakow artist Andrzej Mleczko (Figure 1), makes light of
this geographic vulnerability in a cartoon which depicts God pointing to
the globe and saying, "and we'll do a number on the Poles and place them
between Germany and Russia." Geography and politics have also interacted
in such a way that the physical borders of Poland have shifted significantly
over the past 1,000 years (see Figure 2). The united PolishLithuanian
kingdom extended from the Baltic to the Black Sea in 1500,
but 300 years later the Polish state disappeared from the map of Europe.
When Poland reappeared as a sovereign country in 1918, its borders were
considerably farther east than they are today. After World War II, Poland
acquired its contemporary borders, including Silesia and territory along
the Baltic Sea coast, and excluding the western parts of Ukraine, Belarus,
and Lithuania. Thus, one outcome of World War II was that, geographically,
Poland moved closer to Western Europe.
Between East and west ˇ 59
0 \h
Figure 1. "And we'll do a number on the Poles and place them between Germany and
Russia." Cartoon by Andrzej Mleczko.
The political divide between East and West, however, grew wider than
ever during the Gold War. Poland was grouped together with the So\iet
Union and its neighboring countries in what was described as "Eastern
Europe." The rhetorical labels "Iron Curtain" and 'Eastern Bloc" reinforced
the conceptual line between the democratic "\\ est' and the communist
"East." Then in 1989, with the end of Soviet power in the region,
this political rationale for the sharp division between East and West also
ceased to exist, leading some scholars to argue for the reconeeptualization
of Europe, placing Poland, Germany, Austria, the Czech Republic, and
Hungary in "Central Europe" (see, eg., Purchla 1997). Evidence used to
support this categorization includes reference to cultural and religious
links to Western Europe and the fact that, geographically Prague i.s farther
west than Vienna
60 ˇ ETHOS
Figure 2. Polish borders in 1634,1939, and 2000.
In the postcommunist period, where the enemy Poles had defined
themselv es in opposition to no longer existed, there emerged an opportunity
for constructions of Polish identity based less on conflict. Some Polish
intellectuals proposed ways of thinking about Poland as a part of Europe,
while also maintaining its own distinctiveness as a nation (Bohdanowicz
1992 Fischer 1993; Gabryel 1994, Kot 1993). In 1992, politician Lech
MaZewski wrote in Pnlityka, "Poland's retreat from communism is often
described as a return to Europe. At the same time, it is said that Poland
need not return to Europe because it has alwa\s been in it' (1992:4) Furthermore,
he advocates the recognition of nested knalties in which commitments
to local region, to the nation-state, and to Europe neither
conflict, nor replace each other. HLs comments emphasize that connections
with the rest of Europe strengthen the Polish nation. Similarly, in
Wprast, Kot poses the challenge for the next generation, to either trust
itself, meaning Polish w ays of thinking w ithout fear of ri\ alr\ or s\ mbiosis
with the West, or separ.ite itself from Europe with a secret feeling that we
.ˇire not partners with them, and all that we have to offer is a tourist pamphlet
with Wawel [Castle] on the cover (1W.V24).4
Kot uiges Poles to
reeogni/e th.it the\ will be better off if the\ choose to view the West as a
source of opportunity rather than a threat to Poland's economic arid cultural
autoiionn
Between East and West ˇ 61
A number of sociological studies suggest that conceptions of identity
based in nested loyalties are common in postcommunist Poland. Most significantly,
a study of "nested identities," in particular Polish and European
identities, conducted in 2001 shows that 65 percent of respondents say
they identify both with Poland and Europe, including 41 percent who identify
more with Poland, and 23 percent who identify themselves as "equally
Polish and European" (McManus-Gzubiriska et al 2003). Significantly,
European identity almost never replaces allegiance to the nation (only 1
percent identify exclusively with Europe), but rather is an "optional addon"
to Polish identity. In addition, slightly more respondents claimed more
"sympathy and belonging" to their vovoidship (a regional administrative
district) than to the Polish nation, reflecting the strength of local identities.
The youngest one-third of respondents (born between 1967 and 1983)
who are well educated and whose fathers completed university are most
likely to claim equal attachment to Poland and to Europe. The study also
found that "dual identifiers" tend to be "cosmopolitans" rather than
"Eurofascists"--they subscribe to a wider, more open, more inclusive
identity. Those who feel exclusively Polish, by contrast, are more likely to
fear the impact of a different culture. Below, I consider the ways in which
young Poles made use of various discourses on Poland's place "between
East and West," and the degree to which their remarks suggest nested
identities, "between" identities, or identities grounded in assumptions of
conflict with other groups.
GROUP INTERVIEWS: POUNDS ECONOMY "BETWEEN EAST AND WEST
During group interviews in 1992 and 1993, students' generalizations
about the East and the West tended to assume a continuum, from bad in
the East, to better in Poland, and best in the West. Their comments were
in response to open ended questions about recent changes in Poland,
hopes and fears of the future, and Poland's position relative to neighboring
countries. Key words used by both urban and rural residents to describe
differences from west to east include the following:
West East
developed (rozwiniqty) less developed (mniej rozwiniqty)
civilized (cywilizowany) primitive (prymitywny), backward (zacqfany)
rich (bogaty) poor (biedny)
clean (czysty) POLAND dirty (brudny)
colorful (kolorowy) gray (szary)
happy (wesofy), relaxed (na luzie) sad (smutny)
order (porzqdek) mess (baiagan)b
Respondents from every school in my study--including nondiploma
trade programs, technical programs that taught an occupation as well as
62 ˇ ETHOS
general education, or college track lycea--contributed to the discourse on
Poland's place "between West and East." The majority of their comments
focused upon economic factors such as the standard of living in the various
regions, while fewer considered political and cultural factors. Sometimes
characterizations remained vague, referring simply to the higher level
(wyzszy poziom) in the West compared with the lower level (nizszy poziom)
in the East. Other comments involved relative comparisons such as:
"Poland is to the Soviet Union like the West is to Poland," "for Easterners,
Poland is like the West is for Poles," or "those from the East are worse off.
Poland is America by comparison."
When describing economic conditions in Poland, respondents commonly
made claims such as "we have Western prices, but Eastern salaries,"
or "economically, we have more than the East, but less than the
West." Similarly, many complained, "Now everything is available, but we
have no money to buy anything." More specific economic claims included
comparisons of the number of monthly salaries a new car would cost Poles
in contrast to the cost for Westerners whose salaries are much higher. Of
particular concern for some was the availability of part-time employment
for students in the West, in contrast to the relative lack of work for students
in Poland. Respondents also compared Poles' economically motivated
trips to their Western neighbors with the growing numbers of
citizens of the former Soviet Union flooding Polish markets: "A few years
ago Poles sold kielbasa in Austria, now people from the east come here";
"Russians want to come here just like we want to go to the West." Often
contained within these comments were feuding sentiments that these temporary
economic migrants were primitive or dirty, on the one hand, or that
they should be well treated, just as Poles wish to be treated in the West,
on the other.
Discourse tended to center on the issue of relative economic development.
A student at a technical school in Krakow remarked, "It's impossible
to develop in a few years what took 50 years to develop in the West." A
classmate added, "Western countries have developed their higher level of
development for many years--maybe not in terms of intelligence, but economically."
A third classmate said, "Poland is too backward, too small, too
weak [to profit from open borders)." Recognition of economic differences
also sometimes suggested for some feelings that they, personally, or their
culture was somehow better or worse by comparison. One student who
attended lyceum in Krakow explained, "When I travel to less developed
countries such as Bulgaria I feel self worth, but when 1 go to well developed
countries it's a completely different situation."
One lyceum student from Krakow compared her impressions of Italy,
where there is order, peace, and people are happy, in contrast to Poland,
where there is "a complete mess," anarchy, and where people are sad.
Between East and West ˇ 63
Another student who attended the agricultural high school in Lesko contrasted
the order of Germany with the complete mess farther east. A classmate
responded that in Poland, by contrast, "everything is in the middle,
not the best and not the worst." Similarly, students in other classes characterized
Poland as more orderly than its Eastern neighbors. After returning
from a hiking trip in Ukraine, a group of technical school students in
Lesko commented on how wealthy and how fortunate they felt in comparison
with the poverty that plagues the region east of the border. One also
remarked that he has increased respect for Ukrainians. Although Ukrainians
struggle with real poverty at home, they still were glad to help his
friends and him without expecting anything in return. As a result, he is no
longer so critical of them when he sees them in Poland, unwashed and
selling cheap trinkets in outdoor markets. In other words, he distinguished
between economic and cultural characteristics--Ukrainians may be
poorer, but they display admirable human qualities. Direct personal experience
had a strong impact on these students, some of whom expressed
more critical views in a group interview just a month earlier, calling the
West more "civilized" in contrast to the more "primitive" East.
One of the most visible transformations during the early 1990s was
the introduction of colorful packaging on imported goods, bright signs advertising
new stores and products, and the renovation of gray, crumbling
buildings in city and town centers. Correspondingly, young Poles talked
about the presence or absence of color as signs of Poland's membership in
the West or the East, respectively, or viewed the process of colorization as
reflective of Poland's increased contact with the West. Lyceum students in
Krakow said of changes in recent years, "Poland is beginning to look like
the West on the outside" and it is "more colorful." A lyceum student in
Lesko said she wants to emigrate, at least for a short time, to a Western
country where it is "happier and more relaxed." A student who attended
technical school in Lesko remarked, "The West is all colorful and pretty.
Poles see this and want it but they don't have the basis for getting it."
Similarly, a technical school student in Krakow said, "When I was in Austria,
it was clean and happy. Here, it's still gray." While the characterization
"gray" was often meant literally, it also was used metaphorically
to describe Poland or places farther east as depressing and undeveloped.
Similarly, even citizens of these countries were sometimes referred to as
gray because of their lack of vibrancy, distinctiveness, or cheerfulness.
Respondents expressed attraction and repulsion toward Western imported
goods, reflecting their ambivalence about the kind of relationship
that was being established as Poland opened up to the West. They commonly
contrasted poorly packaged Polish goods to foreign goods in nice, brightly
colored packages that were increasingly available in stores. Many also described
Western goods as deceptive--despite their appealing appearance,
64 ˇ ETHOS
they were often of inferior quality or they contained harmful ingredients,
and they were dumped on the ignorant Eastern market. Polish goods, by
contrast, were described as higher quality despite their minimal, gray
packaging. Polish agricultural produce, in particular, was defended as
healthier because it contained fewer chemical additives. Students expressed
concern about the selfish interests of foreign investors. They complained,
"We're a big market for the West," and "they're buying Poland."
Some spoke specifically about the need to build up Polish industry so that
it would be competitive with imported goods. A technical school student
from Lesko said, "Poland is being sold to the West. Foreign agricultural
products kill the market for local produce." A classmate added, "We need
to learn to package our products better. We need to be more patriotic and
buy Polish goods." One lyceum student from Krakow urged, "We should
take what is best from the West, not everything." A classmate agreed, "Just
because something is colorful doesn't mean that it's good."
Just as some expressed skepticism about the quality of foreign material
imports, others expressed concern about cultural imports. They criticized
other Poles for accepting without discrimination everything that
came from the West, including pornography, and drugs. They accused the
West of introducing AIDS and crime. A lyceum student from Krakow said,
"I'm afraid of the influence Western culture is having on Poland. Their TV,
music, and painting--very little is new and valuable." In Lesko, perhaps
under the influence of a local priest who gave fiery sermons condemning
immoral influences from the West, some students made remarks such as
Rafal, who attended technical school:
Now there's this saying, "Poland aspires to reach Europe." I think it already is a part of
Europe. I think the West is not always the best model. Still, we accept everything
uncritically, like sex shops. Television shows what life is like there--youth see Rambo,
narcotics, weapons, and sex. Is this the Europe we aspire to?7
Most youths, despite their preoccupation with economic differences, defended
Polish culture as equal to anybody else's.
Many students' comments reveal a fascination with the West and a
curiosity about everything that was newly accessible to them. In some
cases, the West functioned as an ideal of what life should be like, containing
everything they lacked in their own lives (see Galbraith 2003). A lyceum
student in Krakow remarked, "In every developed country, even
people with a basic office job can live on a (decent) level. Here, you only
can if you own your own company, and it still depends on luck. It will be
terribly hard for a while longer." However, this idealization was wearing
thin with increased contact, as can be seen in disillusionment with Western
imports. A number of respondents instead romanticized their connection
with Eastern culture, talking about a closer cultural affinity, or even
a similar "soul," to other Slavs.
Between East and West ˇ 65
Though far less common than discourse on economic issues, some
respondents echoed historic discourse about the political threat posed by
acquisitive neighbors. Piotrek, a lyceum student from Lesko, expressed
concern that "Ukrainians will take a piece of us here [in the East,) Germans
will take a piece of us in the west. . . what will be left? Warsaw?" A
few remarked on the continuing threat posed by Russian troops in Poland
(the last departed in 1993) or the need to maintain a strong Polish military
just in case territorial violence broke out in disputed border regions. In
Lesko, some respondents repeated their grandparents' stories about World
War II, when German occupiers of the Bieszczady region treated Poles
civilly, but Russian and Ukrainian troops treated Bieszczady residents brutally.
Some said that Poland is more threatened from the East by "less
civilized" nations than by Westerners whose only interest in the region is
economic. Others, by contrast, complained that "[political) occupation by
the East has been replaced by [economic) occupation by the West."
In sum, comments of young Poles during group interviews clearly
demonstrate the richness of discourse around the issue of Poland's place
between East and West. They also reflect the period--in the early 1990s,
Poles tended to be more preoccupied with economic concerns than with
political ones. In addition, idealized perceptions of the West were being
challenged by increasing contacts that were not always so positive. Nevertheless,
at least among those interviewed, many expressed the desire to
"get closer to the West" or "get into Europe," though there was less agreement
about how quickly this should or could be done. Thus, the place
"between East and West" was not a stable location, but was rather a conceptual
category subject to different characterizations and evaluations.
UFE STORIES: PERSONAL IDENTITY, NATIONAL IDENTITY AND THE
EUROPEAN UNION
While group interviews are valuable for revealing the range of discourse
about Poland's place between East and West, they do little to show
its impact on individuals' constructions of personal and national identity.
Below, I consider how the young Poles with whom I conducted individual
interviews in 1993 and 1999 make use of conceptions of East and West
when reflecting upon their own lives, the Polish nation, and the European
Union. Their life stories contain complex reflections about identity, and
diverse opinions about European integration. As John Eidson (2000)
notes, variable discourses are important because they have different implications
for cultural identity. Notably here, respondents' articulation of
contrasts "between East and West" does not always assume relationships
based on conflict. Two notable alternatives in respondents' life stories include
"betweenness" as a viable, and even desirable location in and of
itself, and "nested identities," where loyalties to larger or smaller social
66 ˇ ETHOS
groups are held simultaneously, although they may be more or less salient
in different contexts.
In June 2003, after five years of negotiation and even longer speculation,
the Polish people voted on a referendum to become a member of the
European Union. To be valid, over 50 percent of the eligible public had to
cast their vote, a majority of whom had to support unification. Despite a
tense first day, in which only 17.6 percent went to the poles, by the second
day, 59 percent had voted and 77 percent favored Poland's entrance to the
European Union (Kublik and Pacewicz 2003). Expressions of triumph
dominated in the Polish press (BBC News 2003) and President Aleksander
KwaSniewski proclaimed "We are back! Back to the great European Family.
We are back to the place where Poland and Poles deserve after their
1000 year history and the great courage Poles have shown over the past
several years" (Gazeta.pl 2003). Despite this show of support for stronger
connections with Western Europe, a great deal of ambivalence was expressed
about entrance into the EU by my respondents and in surveys
conducted in Poland by GBOS, one of several Polish agencies that track
opinions about a wide range of social issues.
Already in the early 1990s, young Poles debated Poland's likely place
within a united Europe (at the time, it was called the European Community).
Group interviews provided a particularly fruitful context for viewing
the "litigation of culture." For instance, lyceum students in Lesko had the
following discussion:
Rafat: There's this ideal that nations can blend--I don't see it happening . . . if
Poles were to emigrate and Poland became 60 percent German, what would
you become?
Elka: A European.
Staszek: The problem is rather that Poland will not be admitted [into the European
Community).
Marta: We need to work on our economy so that we can be an equal partner.
When asked if there is a place for Poland within the European Community,
one responded yes, one responded no, one said "yes, but Poles
have to be prepared," and one said "there might be, but not yet." This
conversation illustrates the range of opinions on the subject. A united
Europe was alternately seen as a source of opportunity for Poles, a threat
to Polish autonomy, or something in between.
Respondents in 1993 already articulated the central issues that would
shape the negotiations for entrance into the European Union for the next
ten years. They were most concerned about economic factors, though they
also considered political and cultural implications of unification.** The
most critical areas of disagreement in future negotiations were anticipated,
as well. Specifically, existing EU members were concerned about a
flood of economic migrants from Poland to the stronger economies of
Western Europe, while Poles feared Poland would be "bought up" by
Between East and West ˇ 67
wealthier Western neighbors, and the market for native agricultural and
industrial products would be weakened. A number of students expressed
concern about the kind of relationship Poland would have with other
members--would Poland be a "parasite" on more powerful nations or
would those more powerful economies occupy Poland? Some distinguished
between "moving closer" to the West and "mixing" with other
nations. Many objected to anything that might compromise Polish cultural
uniqueness. Still others saw Poland's entrance into the European Community
as a "return to normalcy" or pointed out that Poland has always been
a part of Europe.
By the late 1990s, the Polish media was abuzz with news of the expansion
of the European Union. Government officials negotiated the details of
integration--would Poland succeed in being one of the first postcommunist
countries to be admitted? Would the expansion occur in three years,
in five years, or at some later date? Would Poland enter as a full member
with all the same rights and responsibilities as existing members, or would
some sort of alternative status be established? In a radio interview on July
2, 2000, President Kwasniewski outlined his position. He said that the idea
of the expansion of the European Union is already agreed on, but negotiations
remain about just how and when it will occur. He also expressed
concern about the establishment of two tiered membership, where new
members would be allowed in but with a status different from long-standing
members. This decision, he emphasized, has implications for the kind
of Europe people will live in. He pointed out the danger of institutionalizing
divisions rather than promoting unity, making it harder for poorer countries
ever to reach the level of wealthier countries.
While the Polish government pushed for full membership as soon as
possible, I heard expressions of caution in everyday conversations. Is Poland
really ready to join Europe? Is the economy strong enough that it will
benefit from membership, or will it just open Polish markets to foreign
firms? How much autonomy will be lost, and is it worth the extra security
that comes with stronger alliances with the West?
Survey data collected by GBOS help to place the remarks of my small
sample into a broader context. From a high of 80 percent in 1996, there
has been a steady decrease in support for entrance into the European Union;
since 1999 the percentage of Poles who said they would vote in favor
of Polish membership has fluctuated between 55 and 61 percent (Roguska
2002; Wenzel 2001). This single figure obscures significant variations in
support among various age and occupational groups, however (see Bielasiak
2002; Roguska 1999, 2000a, 2002).9
Generally, Poles with higher incomes
and higher levels of education are more likely to favor integration. The
professions that are most supportive include managers, white-collar workers,
and private business people while the most critical include farmers
68 ˇ ETHOS
and unskilled workers. Students, and young people in general, show
greater support for Poland's entrance into the European Union, as do residents
of large cities in contrast to villagers. Just as Poles who are young,
urban, educated, and well employed are more likely to support the European
Union, they are also more likely to express nested identities to both
Poland and Europe (McManus-Gzubiriska et al. 2003).
Overall, Poles support the idea of integration, but they have found it
much harder to agree on the details. Hesitation seems to be fueled largely
by uncertainty. They fear that economic cooperation will in fact become
economic occupation and the loss of the autonomy they so recently
gained. Answers to other survey questions reflect these fears. When asked
if they believe that Poland will more easily decrease the distance in economic
development by joining the European Union or by staying out of it,
48 percent of those surveyed in 2000 and 49 percent of those surveyed in
2001 said that membership would help decrease that distance. However,
in the same study, 63 percent said Poland should only become a member
of the European Union when it can benefit from all of the opportunities
associated with membership (Roguska 2000b; Wenzel 2001). Similarly, in
another survey, 58 percent responded that Poland should first fix its problems
and then enter the European Union (Roguska 2000a). Perhaps even
more telling, 40 percent of those surveyed said they believe the European
Union has more to gain from the expansion and only 25 percent said they
believe Poland has more to gain (Roguska 2000b).
Euroadvocates
In the interviews I conducted, respondents most supportive of the
European Union tend to believe membership can strengthen Poland. They
emphasize that Poland is in the process of economic and political development,
and the West provides a model for Poland. They tend to assume
European integration does not threaten Polish cultural distinctiveness.
Rather, these changes will provide Poles with the material means and with
the freedom to fully express their Polishness not only within Poland but
also to the world at large. Ewelina, an advocate of EU expansion studying
law in Krakow, points out that in 1989, Poland's membership in NATO
seemed as difficult to accomplish as membership in the European Union
appeared in 1999.
In order to understand Ewelina's support for the European Union, it
helps to look at the way she describes herself. She grew up and still lives
in a working-class neighborhood of Soviet-style apartments; five people,
including her parents, grandmother, and brother, share two rooms. Despite
neighborhood and family ties to the working class, Ewelina identifies
more with the intelligentsia and Krakow's historic center. She attended
lyceum near the city center and now studies at the Jagiellonian University.
Between East and West ˇ 69
She attributes her views, in part, to her father, a strong supporter of democratic
and market reform, who was active in the Solidarity Movement
when it opposed the state socialist government. Ewelina believes that it is
the government's responsibility to provide opportunities for employment
and education, but it is up to individuals to take advantage of those opportunities.
For instance, she is proud of her own family's tendency to make
the most of what they have. She contrasts the improvements they have
made on their small apartment, including wood paneling, new bathroom
fixtures, and Japanese electronics, with their neighbors who dirty the public
staircases and neglect basic maintenance on their apartments. She recognizes
that many are unemployed, but she also criticizes their
unwillingness to take responsibility for their own fate.
Ewelina characterizes the changes since 1989 as follows:
What happened is fantastic. What is difficult now will pay off in the future. . . . So much
has changed--you can decide for yourself, have a career, start your own firm. You can
freely travel abroad. It wasn't like that before. People don't remember what was before
and say that communism should return, that it was safer, and everyone had work. But
there was nothing then. I think that the price we are paying now is the price of progress.
If there hadn't been economic reform, it would have been like it is in Russia, where
they pretended reforms in order to get money [i.e., foreign aid).
A self-proclaimed patriot and optimist about Poland's future, she recognizes
the difficulties created by economic and political changes since
1989, especially for people who have lost their jobs and are unable to find
new ones, but she is confident that these hardships are necessary for the
long-term improvement of living conditions in Poland. Ewelina expresses
a strong attachment to nation, but she clearly identifies with certain segments
of Polish society more than with others.
Ewelina's support for reforms does not mean that she accepts all
Western influences uncritically. In 1993 she explained:
There shouldn't be a Europe without borders, with one language and monetary system
forced on everyone ... I don't want a nationalistic feeling of patriotism either . . .
what's more important is to have a feeling that I belong to something, that I am a Pole
with a certain culture and history. I feel like a European but it's also necessary to have
a feeling of national consciousness and connection, to maintain something of our own.
If everything were collective, like during socialist times, it would never work out.
Thus, she identifies herself as a Pole and as a European, and she does not
want to see either of these groups supersede the other. Similarly, in 1999,
Ewelina said "It's our little fatherland [mala ojczyzna]--local society, city,
family--that gives us our identity and makes us different from others." She
goes on to say that although people fear that open borders with Europe will
threaten Poland's uniqueness, "it doesn't mean there won't be a fatherland
because it is something we have in our hearts, something immaterial. We'll
always be different." Ewelina believes that being a European does not
70 ˇ ETHOS
require giving up one's distinctiveness as a Pole, nor does patriotism require
resisting European integration.
Similarly, Staszek, a computer specialist in a Polish firm that does
business in a number of European countries, makes the point, "In the
European Union, no one commits murder over the fact that a German goes
to work in France, or vice versa. The EU can consolidate nations, but that
doesn't pose such a danger that we need to separate ourselves. It doesn't
threaten our statehood. Itjust means free flow." Staszek believes the opening
to the West has made life in Poland better. He illustrates this by comparing
the opportunities he has with the restrictions his father faced under
state socialism. His father, for instance, only started building his own
house when Staszek was in high school, and until the system changed, he
was required to follow state approved plans. Staszek proudly described
how his father very cleverly redesigned the interior (out of sight of official
controls) so that the placement of doors, rooms, and halls made more
sense. Nevertheless, small acts of resistance like this took energy his father
might otherwise have spent in more productive ways. Staszek feels that in
contrast to the limits his father faced, his world is full of opportunity. His
job pays well enough that, by 2000, he bought a house; his son already has
a room of his own at age four. Staszek can achieve his dreams--a good job,
a stable family life, and his own house--right in Poland. He told me he
hopes his younger sister will not be restrained by the communist legacy at
all, but will rather be "an open kind of person in the Western European style."
Notably, even euroadvocates express strong sentiments toward their
nation. "European" is not a distinct, separate identity for them so much
as they consider themselves European because Poland is a part of Europe.
Euroskeptics
Most of my respondents, even those who support European integration,
expressed some reservations about the economic and cultural impact
of Poland's membership in the European Union.10
They do not want Polish
culture to be diluted by foreign models, and they worry that foreign capital
could threaten Poland's weaker economy. Jurek, for instance, says he supports
Poland's membership in the European Union only because there is
no other option. He explains, "If Poland does not join, we will end up alone.
And someone will rule over us. So it is better to be in something bad than
outside." Similarly, in a GBOS survey of the motives for supporting integration,
42 percent of the respondents said "there really isn't any other
option for Poland besides membership in the European Union" compared
with 55 percent who expect that Poland will benefit from membership
(Strzeszewski 2003).
Jurek, who is an architect from Krakow, sees tremendous potential in
Poland. lie told me, "for the time being, there is no war and this gives us
Between East and West ˇ 71
a chance. [Because of war), we never had the opportunity to develop all
the way. No one has seen what we are capable of, and now we can show
them." He seeks to make use of the benefits of the changing economic
system and of increased connections with the West by promoting an architectural
style that is distinctly Polish. He believes that the rich regional
G6rale culture, found in the Tatra Mountains south of Krakow, represents
the best Poland has to offer within an integrated Europe. He works with
Gorale carpenters to incorporate traditional design features into projects
that also accommodate contemporary functions.
For Jurek, the nation and an idealized vision of a particular region
(significantly, not the region in which he himself grew up) are deeply interwoven.
He lives in Krakow, where his family has been for generations,
but he says that the future of Poland lies in its villages and towns where
communities remain strong, not in the cities that have been corrupted by
the increasing commercialization of life. In 1999, his view of Polish identity
was based on his experiences with the Gorale who maintain and celebrate
their cultural distinctiveness. He explains,
During mass when the Pope [who is a native of the region) was in Zakopane . . . the
Gorale [who all dressed in their traditional clothing] showed me what we have lost. In
the 1990s we took everything that was the worst in the West--like pornography. We
started to call these Western models "European," and all the people with faith and
national traditions are starting to be called from the Dark Ages.
Jurek's "return" to traditional culture is thus also linked to his "return" to
the Catholic faith after several years of rebellion during and after high
school. Jurek's orientation toward rural traditions also colors his perception
of Poland's place in Europe. He believes Polish family and religious
values can provide a model for Europeans whose lack of values is leading
in directions that could be destructive to the whole world.
Jurek also told me on a number of occasions that Poland can be a
model of what he calls "incorrectness." He explains:
You can either laugh or cry about life in Poland. I prefer to laugh. Our flaws--nonproductivity,
dirt--don't bother me. In our country it's nice that we can act with a certain
kind of freedom, even at work. A Polish kind of freedom. The ease you see on Western
television isn't real because there, people are controlled by work on all levels. In Poland,
if I want, I can accomplish anything, but in another way--by finagling. I can feel
unthreatened and reasonably free. It's still possible to shape my own personality. And
this is a chance for us. I don't know if it will stay this way. We aspire to correctness. I
don't like this. "Incorrectness" is a Polish national trait, as can be seen in both disorder
and romanticism.
By way of example, he says Europeans must follow rigid rules at work, in
contrast to Poles who tend to have a looser attitude toward rules and regulations
and are more likely to see what they can get away with. Jurek
clearly considers Poland a part of Europe, but he is more oriented toward
the local level of nested identities than the European level.
72 ˇ ETHOS
Wojtek, a doctoral student at the Academy of Agriculture in Krakow,
similarly grounds his construction of Polish national identity in a particular
rural region. Unlike Jurek, however, he grew up in a tiny mountain
village and attended secondary school in Lesko. Because he was raised in
the country but now lives in the city, he also has some unique insights into
the differences between urban and rural life in Poland. Generally, Wojtek
expresses a strong nostalgia for rural life, and romanticizes the distinctiveness
of his native region. He says that growing up in an ethnically mixed
village near the Ukrainian border, he developed a strong Polish identity
because he had to choose it; in many ways, it would have been easier to
identify as a Ukrainian in his village. He expresses ambivalence about the
opportunities he has found in the city because he also values the slower
pace of life he associates with his village. Clearly, contrasts with other
ethnic and regional groups are central to the way in which Wojtek constructs
his own identity, and, yet, he rejects the necessity of conflict between
groups. Indeed, intensifying conflict between Poles and Ukrainians
or between urban and rural Poles would require denying part of his own
heritage in favor of another. Wojtek prefers to acknowledge and even advertise
his multiple allegiances. For instance, he likes to surprise his
friends in Krakow by using words from the regional dialect of his native
village. He also makes the point that "the middle is essential," thus highlighting
the value of Poland's multiple Eastern and Western connections.
Wojtek emphasized that he wants to be sure that Poland will "join
Europe" on an equal footing with their Western neighbors. He says, "if a
Pole is only going to be a gray worker in Europe, and nothing else, we don't
have to crawl into Europe, because we're already there." He also worries
that Poland will become a market for the rest of Europe. He describes the
situation with the following metaphor:
It's like giving one person a speed boat and another person a row boat, and then saying
they should meet across the bay in 50 minutes. It's clear who will get there on time and
who will not. Poland can't compete because they don't have the economic base to do
so.
Wojtek underscores the unequal start Poles have in contrast to their Western
neighbors. He emphasizes that although Poland's economy may lag
behind, there should be no doubt about Poland's cultural equality with
other Europeans.
Wojtek is also proud of the distinctive place Poles have among Slavs,
between East and West. In 1999, he told me that he had recently done
some research about the early history of the Polish language, and he
learned that the bible was translated into three languages 1,000 years ago:
Latin, Greek, and Old Slavic.11
He also pointed out that the Poles use the
Latin alphabet rather than Cyrillic. For him, these facts show that the vital
roots of Polish language and religion lie in Western European culture, not
Between East and West ˇ 73
in the East. Nevertheless, he disapproves of uncritical efforts to join the
West, and looks instead for ways that Central Europeans could unite and
create a powerful political bloc of their own. He gave an example from his
own field of forestry, saying that Ukrainians, Poles, Slovaks, and Czechs
should unite and seek region-specific strategies for forest management. In
1999, during the U.S./NATO intervention in Kosovo, Wojtek suggested that
Poles might be more successful at negotiating a peaceful compromise than
would Western powers. "Serbs are more likely to listen to other Slavs," he
said, "because even though they are outsiders, they are closer than Western
Europeans." These sentiments suggest that Wojtek is putting into
practice a concept of nested identities. His sense of self emerges from the
negotiation of multiple subject positions. Sometimes he falls between categories,
but from that space emerges a unique and worthy identity.
Viewing the influence of the West as beneficial does not guarantee
that individuals feel comfortable with the changes that are occurring. Ania,
for instance, graduated from the Academy of Fine Art in Krakow and now
teaches art at a primary school while slowly building her reputation as an
artist. In response to my question whether things have changed for the
better or for the worse, she responded, "Definitely for the better. People
are definitely free, first of all, and can do what they want. But you have to
pay for that freedom in such a way that there is less time for family, and
you have to fight for every grosz [1/100 of a zloty, the rough equivalent of
a penny)." In other words, the price they pay for their growing affluence
is time.
Ania also expressed her ambivalence about another cultural dimension
of the changing economic climate--the need to sell oneself in order
to get ahead. She explains:
Poles are afraid, or they can't think for themselves. Now individualism is coming to
Poland. As long as someone is intelligent and has the personality, he can really do
something, and the road to success can be very straight. If a person can fight for himself.
I didn't have that myself; I was afraid to go to the store and buy bread when I was
a child. Now I can do everything.
On another occasion, Ania admitted that it took her a whole year to get up
the nerve to bring some of her works to a local gallery. When I asked her
where her hesitation came from, she admitted she was not sure, except
that in the past she (and Poles in general) were not expected, and, therefore,
not taught, to sell themselves. Thus, she explains her difficulty not as
an inherent part of her character so much as the product of the particular
time and place in which she lives.
Ania describes herself as a patriot who is generally in favor of European
integration. The following statement shows how her loyalties shift
from level to level of nested identities:
74 ˇ ETHOS
I love Poland but I hate nationalism. If someone speaks to me about nationalism, at
once it makes me feel like a citizen of the world. And then I say that I love the whole
world, and the whole world is my fatherland. It depends what you are talking about.
Inside, I love Poland, and its traditions, but we also know its negative sides. I love Polish
land, climate, beauty, but people can be terribly primitive. When I travel and compare
other societies, Poles aren't even just simple, they are primitive.
Here, Ania expresses her ambivalent feelings toward her own nation. On
one hand, she loves Poland, but on the other, she gets frustrated by what
she calls the nationalism and primitivity of her fellow Poles. This kind of
prideful criticism was often expressed among my respondents. Such divided
feelings form the basis for allegiances to higher level groups (in
Ania's case, the world) under some circumstances, or alternately can justify
stronger local allegiances.
Aneta, an independent filmmaker and television producer, speaks
critically of the Polish nation and even more critically of the European
Union, but during her interview in 1999, the patriotic values she learned
as a child emerged as well. She speaks strongly in opposition to integration
even though she has produced television programs that promote entrance
into the European Union. Thus, her position is far from consistent. "The
European Union can only make things worse in this country," she says.
"When they come here, we'll be marionettes. In Poland, there's only kielbasa
and the Pope. They don't have any respect for us. First, we have to
learn to respect and trust our own government, and then we can get involved
in world structures."
Aneta says that she used to want to live in the United States, but not
anymore because she does not need to travel to America to accomplish
her goals. She wants to write and direct "Polish films." When I asked what
she means by this, she responded, "They're sad. In Polish films, you don't
have any money . . . what's important is a document of everyday life. We
don't create fictional events. Everything is based on our experiences, or
the experiences of our friends. Characters cry, smoke cigarettes, drink
vodka." Aneta thus expresses a fierce local identity with Poland, but at the
same time makes use of media-related opportunities that are a direct outgrowth
of opening to the West. She explains, "If the system hadn't
changed, I wouldn't have been able to do what I do. I probably would have
been some kind of horribly desperate television journalist. I wouldn't have
been able to work with Americans, nor to do an independent film. I would
have had to escape from here to do these things."
Jurek, Wojtek, Ania, and Aneta's negotiation of local, national, and
transnational allegiances helps to illustrate the way nested identities function.
Allegiances to ever broader groups can be added layer by layer, but
larger groups rarely replace connections based on more immediate contacts.
Their stories also show that conflict does not always emerge out of
identities based on contrasts, although the potential for conflict remains.
Between East and West ˇ 75
While most support (to a greater or lesser degree) European integration,
all four express concern that Polish distinctiveness not be overrun by
European influences. Similar sentiments were expressed by other respondents
who said Poland should maintain contacts with other nations and at
the same time develop their own distinctiveness, or emphasized the difference
between adopting and giving in to foreign influences.
Rural Residents
In 1999, most rural respondents had little to say about the European
Union although one issue they tended to discuss was the impact of foreign
trade on Polish agriculture. Some expressed concern that foreign products
will take away what little domestic market remains for local produce. By
and large, young people, even if they live on an active farm, have seasonal
or intermittent service or manufacturing jobs. They do not see a future for
farming even if Poland stays out of the European Union. For instance,
Zosia, who went to the agricultural trade school in Lesko, lives on her
family's farm. Her parents raise sheep, but they do not know how much
longer it will be worth their while. The only reason they make any profit
is because of government subsidies. Zosia and her sister supplement the
family income with jobs as a store clerk and a cook, respectively. While
expressing concern about the demise of Polish agriculture, Zosia knows
too little about the European Union or the national policies affecting farming
in Poland to establish any opinion about them.
Both urban and rural residents voice particular concern about foreigners
buying up agricultural lands (see Kudzia and Pawelczyk 1999).
Wojtek, who grew up in a village but now lives in Krakow, explained this
reluctance:
Poles don't have a phobia against capitalism, but we don't have enough money to compete
with it. For example, regarding the sale of land. If we enter the European Union,
we will have to make land available to everyone. But our land is cheaper. Everyone will
be able to buy it. And this is not such a straightforward matter for us. Because for many
people, land is not just a place to work, but also their home, their tree. Because someone
else has money, he will be able to buy a piece of that other person's history. It isn't
a phobia, but rather uneven starting conditions.
Rural residents agree with their urban counterparts that Poland is
becoming more like the West, but whereas the urban residents who participated
in my study are confident they can achieve what they want in
their native Poland, rural residents feel they are moving progressively farther
from the power and opportunity associated with Western Europe.
Bogdan, a native of Bieszczady who attends university in Krakow, put it as
follows, "Maybe things look pretty on the outside, but inside things remain
the same. The outside is for show. But it's necessary to fix what's inside."
Economic hardship tends to strengthen rural Poles' perception of a sharp
76 ˇ ETHOS
divide between themselves and the rest of Europe, and even between
themselves and urban Poles, thus keeping local identity more salient for
them than broader levels of nested identities.
Whereas Wojtek and Staszek, as noted above, had to go to university
and settle outside of rural Bieszczady to take full advantage of opportunities
associated with stronger ties to the West, Joasia decided she does not
like the noise, dirt, and crowds of the city, and only wants to live in her
native Bieszczady Mountains. The daughter of teachers, she never intended
to become one herself. After finishing technical school in Lesko,
however, she studied library science because there was a program not far
from home, and then spent three years commuting to Krakow on weekends
to earn her masters degree. By chance, an opening for a librarian
came up in her former high school, and since school officials remembered
her from her student days, they hired her.
Joasia criticizes the Polish government for focusing too much on establishing
a good reputation abroad in order to facilitate acceptance into
the European Union. For instance, she criticized the country's involvement
in Kosovo in 1999. Rather, her sympathies lie with her colleagues
who have had to emigrate in order to get a decent job. She told me, "I feel
connected to this place and to the fatherland, also. Because that's the kind
of Pole I am. But I also have enough of politics. I try not to watch because
the more I see, the more I fall into depression. Nevertheless, I'm very connected
to the region, and to my family." Joasia recognizes Poland's place
within the broader European arena, but her strongest loyalties are local
ones--to the Bieszczady Mountains and to friends and family.
Although Polish sociologist Stanistaw Ossowski (1967) characterizes
"ideological fatherland" and "private fatherland" as complementary dimensions
of national loyalty, Joasia's story reveals a tendency among
some young Poles to disregard or even reject the broader ideological dimensions
of national identity. Nevertheless, private attachments to the
place associated with close friends and family ("little fatherland") remain
important. The relatively peaceful political situation, in which no outside
power threatens Polish autonomy, allows them to choose local loyalties
over broader ones. Economic hardship makes rural residents more likely
to focus on the material needs of their closest relations, and can thus work
counter to the assertion of broader levels of nested identities.
CONCLUSION
The ambivalence expressed by most of my respondents about "getting
closer to the West" and membership in the European Union helps to explain
the decline in support for the European Union as negotiations proceeded,
and, yet, the overwhelming endorsement of the referendum when
Between East and West ˇ 77
it actually came time to vote on Poland's entry. As an ideological goal,
"returning to Europe" was considered the restoration of Poland to its rightful
place after being artificially held in the East by Soviet domination, and
so it was widely supported. However, once negotiations for membership in
the European Union began in earnest in the late 1990s, challenges and
possible dangers of accession became apparent. Specific conditions of entrance,
particularly allowing foreigners to purchase Polish agricultural
lands and further opening the Polish market to foreign products, aroused
concerns about new forms of foreign domination. Thus, views on membership
in the European Union also reflect a shift in perceptions of Poland's
place between East and West. Whereas historical discourse situated Poland
between Eastern and Western political forces that threatened the nation's
autonomy, contemporary discourse tends to emphasize economic
factors.
Young Poles' life stories do not discount the concept of nested identities,
but they do show its limits. Respondents do not only want to be Europeans.
They want Poland to be recognized as a legitimate member of
Europe. To be precise, loyalty to Europe rarely replaces lower level loyalties,
but rather is sometimes felt in addition to local and national loyalties.
As such, they allow for contrasts between groups without assuming conflict.
However, recent debates suggest that economic insecurity may reinforce
regional and class loyalties within Poland, and lead to protectionist
policies against foreign investors. Here we see the limits of nested identities
and the return to geographic and political divisions. By and large, Poles
are not willing to consider a system that threatens their national sover-
eignty.
MARYSIA H. GALBRAITH Department of Anthropology and New College Program, University of Alabama, Box 870229,
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, mgalbrai@nc.ua.edu.
NOTES
Acknowledgments. This article is based on fieldwork that was funded by the International
Research and Exchanges Board (IREX) in 2000, The University of Alabama Research
Advisory Committee in 1999, and HE Fulbright and the Institute on Global Conflict and
Cooperation in 1991-93. I am particularly grateful to the participants in the study who generously
shared their time and their life stories with me. A version of the manuscript was
presented at the European Association of Social Anthropologists meeting in Krakow, Poland,
in 2000. Special thanks to Kevin Birth, Jeremy Butler, the participants in the Interdisciplinary
and Interpretive Writing Group at The University of Alabama, and the Ethos reviewers
for their thoughtful comments on earlier drafts of this article.
1. Since the early 1990s, the Polish education system has undergone considerable reforms
leading to a restructuring of schools. Most significantly, there has been a move away
from trade education to general education that emphasizes academies. Correspondingly, the
78 ˇ ETHOS
group schools in Lesko, Krakow, and throughout Poland have replaced trade programs with
programs that last longer and provide graduates with a high school diploma as well as job
training. For instance, the agriculture school introduced a lyceum program of economics
and technical programs in new specialties such as agrobusiness, while canceling their trade
programs in areas like animal husbandry.
These reforms are consistent with the movement away from an economy dominated by
state managed industries toward a more service and consumer-based economy. Rather than
learning specialized skills that quickly become obsolete, emphasis has moved toward general
education courses that, ideally, provide students with the ability to change careers as
professional opportunities shift.
2. My original sample included 21 respondents. Three of the eleven rural respondents
were not included in the second round of interviewing for a variety of reasons. One immigrated
to Italy, though we remain in contact via letters, e-mails, and phone calls. Another
did not want to be recorded but agreed to speak with me informally on a number of occasions,
and a third, very sadly, committed suicide. In addition to more extended research
trips in 1992-93, 1999, and 2000, I met with some respondents during visits in 1997 and
1998.
3. Pan Tadeusz is an epic poem by Adam Mickiewicz (1798-1855) written in the mid-
1800s about an attempted insurrection during the partitions of Poland. The narrator recalls
the events of 1812, when the memory of a free Poland was still strong, and when Polish
patriots hoped that Napoleon would help Poland regain its independence. The story takes
place in Lithuania. In the poem, one family uses the planned uprising as an opportunity to
exact revenge on another, thus contributing to the failure of the insurrection. Ogniem i
Mieczem (The Fire and the Sword) is an adaptation of the first novel in Henryk Sienkiewicz's
patriotic trilogy; films based on the other two novels in the series were made between
1969 and 1974. In these 19th-century novels, historic struggles for Polish sovereignty
provide the backdrop against which idealized Polish heroes fight foreign villains.
4. Wawel Castle, located in Krakow, is the historic seat of Polish kings.
5. Na luzie refers to lack of constraint, being able to behave freely and to not be serious.
The expression is used fairly often to describe life in the West.
6. All of these terms emerged out of taped group interviews. I also heard them all in less
formal discussions and everyday conversations.
7. This statement reflects the conflation of European and American influences, both of
which were included in general assumptions about "the West."
8. Blazyca (1999) gives a thorough outline of the economic and political factors likely to
influence Poland's accession to the European Union.
9. Although 77 percent of those who voted on the referendum supported membership, 39
percent of those who did not plan to participate had no opinion, and 34 percent were opposed
(Roguska 2002).
10. The term has been used in the Polish press and by social scientists, both (see
Bielasiak 2002 and Kublik and Pacewicz 2003).
11. Wojtek elaborated that the Bible was written in Macedonian, which all Slavs at the
time would have understood.
12. Rural residents have told me that there is a Polish saying that a man becomes a man
when he has his own house, tree, and son. Wojtek may well have had this in mind.
References Cited
Anderson, Benedict
1W1 Imagined Communities Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.
Revised edition. New York: Verso.
Between East and West ˇ 79
BBC News
2003 Polish Press Basks in 'Yes' Vote. Electronic document, http://news.bbc.co.uk/
go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/2075100.stm, accessed June 10.
Bielasiak, Jack
2002 Determinants of Public Opinion Differences on EUAccession in Poland. Europe-Asia
Studies 54(8): 1241-1266.
Blazyca, George
1999 Polish Socioeconomic Development in the 1990s and Scenarios for EU Accession.
Europe-Asia Studies 51(5):799-819.
Bohdanowicz, Wojciech
1992 Nasi w Patacu Europy. Spotkania, February 13-19: 2-3.
Borneman, John
1992 Belonging in the Two Berlins: Kin, State, Nation. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Ghaiasidski, J6zef
1988 Tradycje: Perspektywy, Przysztosc, i Kultury Polskiej. Warsaw: Ludowa Sp61dzielnia
Wydawnicza.
Cohen, Anthony P.
1994 Self Consciousness: An Alternative Anthropology of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Davies, Norman
1982 God's Playground: A History of Poland. Vols. 1 and 2. New York: Columbia University
Press.
de Certeau, Michel
1984 The Practice of Everyday Life. Steven F. Rendall, trans. Berkeley. University of
California Press.
Eidson, John
2000 Which Past for Whom? Local Memory in a German Community during the Era of
Nation Building. Ethos 28(4):575-607.
Fischer, Michael M. J.
1993 Working through the Other: The Jewish, Spanish, Turkish, Iranian, Ukrainian,
Lithuanian, and German Unconscious of Polish Culture or One Hand Clapping: Dialogue,
Silences, and the Mourning of Polish Romanticism [Interview with LeszekRoczanowicz).
In Perilous States: Conversations on Culture, Politics, and Nation. G. Marcus, ed. Pp.
187-234. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gabryel, Piotr
1994 Krok ku Europie. Conversation with Andrzej Olechowski, Foreign Minister. Wprost,
June 24: 13-4.
Galbraith, Marysia
2003 "We Just Want to Live Normally": Intersecting Discourses of Public, Private, Poland,
and the West. Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe 3(l):3-22.
Gazeta.pl
2003 Aleksander KwaSniewski: Wracamy na Swoje Miejsce. Electronic document, http-7/
wwwl.gazeta.pl/ue/1,42343,1520677.html, accessed June 10.
Gellner, Ernest
1983 Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Giddens, Anthony
1991 Modernity and Self Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
Gombrowicz, Witold
1988 Diary: Volume 1. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
1989 Diary: Volume 2. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
80 ˇ ETHOS
Hannerz, Ulf
1996 Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. New York: Routledge.
Haraszti, Miklos
1978 Worker in a Worker's State. Michael Wright, trans. New York: Universe Books.
Hobsbawm, Eric J.
1990 Nations and Nationalism since 1790: Programme, Myth, Reality. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Holy, Ladislav
1996 The Little Czech and the Great Czech Nation: National Identity and the PostCommunist
Social Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kondo, Dorinne
1990 Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kostrzewa, Robert, ed.
1990 Between East and West: Writings from Kultura. New York: Hill and Wang.
Kot, Wiestaw
1993 Zabojcza Europa? Wprost, April 25: 22-4.
Kubik, Jan
1994 The Power of Symbols against the Symbols of Power. University Park: Pennsylvania
State Press.
Kublik, Agnieszka, and Piotr Pacewicz
2003 Niedziela Wygrata z Sobota.. Gazeta.pl. June 9. Electronic document, http://wwwl.
gazeta.pl/ue/1,42343,1522688.html, accessed June 11.
Kudzia, Piotr, and Grzegorz Pawelczyk
1999 Ziemia Obiecana. Wprost, August 1: 22-23.
Lampland, Martha
1995 The Object of Labor: Commodification in Socialist Hungary. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Linde, Charlotte
1993 Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.
2000 The Acquisition ofa Speaker by a Story: How History Becomes Memory and Identity.
Ethos 28(4):608-632.
Linger, Daniel T.
1994 Has Culture Theory Lost Its Minds? Ethos 22(3):284-315.
Mach, Zdzistaw
1993 Symbols, Conflict, and Identity. Albany: State University of New York.
1997 Heritage, Dream, and Anxiety: The European Identity of Poles. In European Enlargement
and Identity. Z. Mach and D. Niedzwiedzki, eds. Pp. 35-50. Krakow: Univeristas.
Matsuki, Keiko
2000 Negotiation of Memory and Agency in Japanese Oral Narrative Accounts of Wartime
Experiences. Ethos 28(4):534-550.
Maiewski, Lech
1992 By6 Europejczykiem. Polityka 39:4.
MeManus-Czubirisku, Clare, William L. Miller, Radosiaw Markowski, and Jacek Wasilewski
2003 Understanding Dual Identities in Poland. Political Studies 51( 1): 121-143.
Miiosz, Czestaw
199()[ 1958) Rodzinna Europa. Warsaw: Czytelnik.
Ossowski, StnnLstaw
1967 Dziehi: z zagadnieri psychologii spotecznej. Vol. 3. Warsaw: Parfstwowe Wydnwnietwo
Naukowe.
Between East and West ˇ 81
Purchla, Jacek
1997 Europa Minor: The European Heritage of Bohemia, Poland, and Hungary. In European
Enlargement and Identity. Z. Mach and D. Niedzwiedzki, eds. Pp, 31-34. Krakow:
Univeristas.
Ries, Nancy
1997 Russian Talk. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Roguska, Beata
1999 Polacy, Wej*rzy, i Czesi o Integraeji z Unia. Europejska.. Public Opinion Research
Center. June report, (www.cbos.com.pl.)
2000a Polacy, Wogrzy, Czesi, Litwini i Ukrairicy o Integracji z Unia. Europejska.. Public
Opinion Research Center. June report, (www.cbos.com.pl.)
2000b Opinie o Skutkach Integracji Polski z Unia. Europejska. i Przebiegu Negocjacji
Akcesyjnych. Public Opinion Research Center. July report, (www.cbos.com.pl)
2002 Stopniowy Wzrost Poparcia dla Integracji z Unia. Europejska.. Public Opinion Research
Center. November report, (www.cbos.com.pl.)
Schwartz, Theodore
1978 Where Is the Culture? Personality as the Distributive Locus of Culture. In The
Making of Psychological Anthropology. G. D. Spindler, ed. Pp. 419-441. Los Angeles:
University of California Press.
Strzeszewski, Michaf
2003 Motywy Poparcia lub Odrzucenia Integracji. Public Opinion Research Center.
January report, (www.cbos.com.pl.)
Sutton, David E.
1997 Local Names, Foreign Claims: Family Inheritance and National Heritage on a Greek
Island. American Ethnologist 24(2):415-437.
Szrett, Jozef
1990 The Valley Between the Mountains. Maya Latynski, trans. In Between East and West:
Writings from Kultura. R. Kostrzewa, ed. Pp. 25-38. New York: Hill and Wang.
Verdery, Katherine
1996 What Was Socialism, and What Comes Next? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wedel, Janine
1986 The Private Poland. New York: Facts on File.
Wenzel, MichaJ
2001 Opinie o Integracji z Uniq Europejska.. Public Opinion Research Center. June report.
(www.cbos.com.pl.)
White, Geoffrey M.
2000 Histories and Subjectivities. Ethos 28(4):493-510.
Zizek, Slavoj
1990 Eastern Europe's Republics of Gilead. New Left Review 183:50-62.
Znaniecki, Florian
1990 Wspotczene Narody. Warsaw: Paiistwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.