MODALS The same modal verb can be used in different ways, and with different meanings. We only know the meaning from the situation. For example, could: I could get to work in 30 minutes in my last job. (ability: past time) Could you pass the salt, please? (request: present time) That could be difficult. (uncertainty: future time) Ability o Can – can´t/ cannot to be able to Can you deliver in two weeks? – No, we can´t. Past Ability o Could describes past ability When I was young I could run very fast. o Was able to describes the ability to successfully complete an action. Marry was able to help us. (She actually helped us) Marry could help us. (But perhaps she didn’t) Will o When will expresses the idea of “willingness” – such as in requests and offerings, it can be used as a modal verb Will you hold the lift for me, please? Will you have some more coffee? Necessity (obligation) o To say that something is necessary we use have to, need to and must. We must finish the meting by eleven at the latest. o To make a question, we avoid using must as we can sound annoyed then. Do you have to/ need to work this evening? x Must you work this evening? Past Necessity o had to and needed to No necessity, permission, prohibition o When something is not necessary we use don´t have to and don´t need to You don´t have to pay right now, we can give you credit. o When something is permitted we use can and be allowed to. When something is prohibited we use can´t, be not allowed to and mustn´t. Mustn´t is more usual when telling someone what not to do. You´re not allowed to park on a double yellow line. (that´s the law) You mustn´t talk about politics if they invite you to dinner. (I´m telling you) o Notice that have to and must have similar meanings in their affirmative forms but different meanings in their negative forms. I have to/ must leave now. (it is necessary for me to leave) I don´t have to leave. (it is not necessary, I have a choice whether to leave) I mustn´t leave now. (it is prohibited, I cannot leave) No necessity, permission and prohibition IN THE PAST o No necessity – didn´t have to and didn´t need to. o Permission – could, was allowed o Prohibition – couldn´t, wasn´t allowed to Opinions and advice o To give an opinion, advice or recommendation about what is the best thing to do we use should, should not, ought to and ought not. You should speak to your boss. o Had better (not) is used for strong options. Had is usually contracted. You´d better not interrupt him while he is on the phone. o When we use these verbs in the past (+ have + past participle) we mean that we didn´t do the right thing and now we are making a criticism. We shouldn´t have spent all the advertising budget on television spots. Certainty and uncertainty 100 % will, be certain to 95% must, can’t 80% should, ought to, be likely to, shouldn’t, ought not to, be unlikely to 30-70% might, may, could, may not, might not 0% won’t Past Certainty and uncertainty o Must have and can´t have – these are used to make deductions about past actions. The have form does not change. I must have left my wallet in the car. Jim can´t have noticed you. o May have, might have and could have – these express possibility and uncertainty about past actions. The have form does not change. He may not have received the letter. You could have been killed. REMEMBER: Must muset Needn’t nemuset May, be allowed to smět Mustn’t nesmět