Instructions
Upload this homework into the homework vaults in the IS no later than on 24/4 at 23.59.
The homework submitted after this date can be evaluated only if you have an excuse in the
IS for at least 3 working days in the week between the given lectures and seminars (from
these five: Wed, Thu, Fri, Mon, Tue) and the teacher has given you an alternative date when
you submit your homework. We expect that you write the homework on your own. Should
your answers resemble with the answers in someone else’s homework, we might deduct
points from your score. We appreciate the effort and thorough thinking (whether your
answers make sense, whether you have supported all your claims by careful argumentation,
whether your answers are informed by data). Try to formulate ideas as concisely as possible.
Certainly do not add any "dummy text" just in order to get closer to the maximum extent.
The final document can be inserted into the System in all standard formats (doc, docx, odt,
pdf, ...). Print your homework and take it to the seminar on 25/4. Title the document
Homework 5 (your name and surname will be added to the name of the document
automatically). Put your name and surname on the top of your homework.
Task (6 points, maximum 500 words)
Read the paper by Normann (2011) (see the study materials). Answer the following
questions. Please, use your own formulations. Do not copy sentences or formulations from
the paper:
1. What is the aim of the paper?
2. What is the problem with the OSS (1990) model? How do they reply to the critique?
3. Explain carefully the difference between foreclosure in narrow and broad sense.
4. How many and what treatments are used in the experiment? Suppose that the
narrow definition of foreclosure is valid. What results would you expect in these
treatments?
5. Why does the author have different number of sessions with random matching and
fixed matching?
6. Interpret the results in the table 4. Does it fit to a broadly or narrowly defined
foreclosure?