Gartner Magic Quadrant Tool
J.Skorkovský , KPH


Agenda related to MQ Matrix
•Positioning Technology Players Within a Specific Market •Giving you a wide-angle view of the
relative positions of the market's competitors •Helps to digest how well technology providers are
executing against their stated vision
•
•

MQ Matrix
Challengers
Leaders
Niche players (gap in the market)

Visionaries
Niche=mezera na trhu

MQ Matrix explanation
•Leaders execute well against their current vision and are well positioned for tomorrow (make money
now and in the future- TOC statement).
•
•Visionaries understand where the market is going or have a vision for changing market rules, but
do not yet execute well.
•
•Niche Players focus successfully on a small segment, or are unfocused and do not out-innovate or
outperform others
•
•Challengers execute well today or may dominate a large segment, but do not demonstrate an
understanding of market direction.

MQ Matrix
„A“ better than „B“ and „B“ Better than“C“
Challengers
Leaders
Niche players

Visionaries
A
B
C

MQ Matrix
Using colors in order  to show progress (Red =bad, Green  = good)
Challengers
Leaders
Niche players
Visionaries
A
B
C
A
B

MQ for BI



MQ for ERP



Front runners
Masters
Leaders
Conteders
Pacesetters
Contender- uchazeč, protivník
Pacesetter= tahoun, společnost udávající
                             směr vývoje

Frontrunners for manufacturing SW
•https://www.softwareadvice.com/manufacturing/#top-products


Evaluations and review and templates
•EASE –OF – USE
–Pros - Once you are comfortable working in NAV it is very easy to navigate
–Cons
•FUNCTIONALITY
–Pros – Posibility to add 3rd party application to increas function horizon
–Cons
•PRODUCT QUALITY
–Pros
–Cons
•CUSTOMER SUPPORT
–Pros
–Cons
•VALUE FOR MONEY
–Pros
•  -   Cons -Often bad advice is received, where the NAV consultants don't even know how their own
system works (Example)
–

https://www.softwareadvice.com/erp/#top-product