MISSING WOMEN AND THE PRICE OF TEA IN CHINA: THE EFFECT OF SEX-SPECIFIC EARNINGS ON SEX IMBALANCE* Nancy Qian Economists have long argued that the sex imbalance in developing countries is caused by underlying economic conditions. This paper uses exogenous increases in sex-specific agricultural income caused by post-Mao reforms in China to estimate the effects of total income and sex-specific income on sex-differential survival of children. Increasing female income, holding male income constant, improves survival rates for girls, whereas increasing male income, holding female income constant, worsens survival rates for girls. Increasing female income increases educational attainment of all children, whereas increasing male income decreases educational attainment for girls and has no effect on boys' educational attainment. I. INTRODUCTION Many Asian populations are characterized by severe male biased sex imbalances. For example, whereas 50.1% of the cur rent populations in western European countries are female, only 48.4% are female in India and China.1 Amartya Sen (1990, 1992) referred to this observed deficit as "missing women." Most of the world's missing women are in China and India, where an es timated thirty to seventy million women are missing, but the phenomenon cannot be dismissed as a problem of the past or as one that is isolated to poor countries. Rich Asian countries such as South Korea and Taiwan have the same sex imbalance as their poorer neighbors, China and India. Figure I shows that in China, for cohorts born during 1970-2000, when the economy grew rapidly, the fraction of males increased from 51% to 57%. *I am grateful to the editors and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments. I thank my advisors Josh Angrist, Abhijit Banerjee, and Esther Du flo for their guidance and support; Daron Acemoglu, Ivan Fernandez-Val, John Giles, Ashley Lester, Steven Levitt, Sendhil Mullainathan, Dwight Perkins, Mark Rosenzweig, Seth Sanders, and David Weil for their suggestions; the Michigan Data Center, Huang Guofang, and Terry Sicular for invaluable data assistance; and the participants of the MIT Development Lunch and Seminar, the Applied Micro Seminar at Fudan University, the SSRC Conference for Development and Risk, the Harvard East Asian Conference, and the International Conference on Poverty, Inequality, Labour Market and Welfare Reform in China at ANU for use ful comments. I acknowledge financial support from the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, the SSRC Fellowship for Development and Risk, and the MIT George C. Schultz Fund. All mistakes are my own. 1. Source: 2005 WDI Indicators, available at http://go.worldbank.org/ 6HAYAHG8HO. ? 2008 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 2008 1251 This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 1252 QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 0.57 i-j 0.56 0.55 $ 0-54 - E ? 0.53 - j S ^X j -? i982~l1990 05 " j 2000 I 0.49 J-.-,-,-,-,-,-i-.-,-,-,-,-.-,-.-,-i-.-.-,-,-.-,-,-,-,-,-.-,-.? 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 Birth year Figure I Sex Ratios by Birth Year in Rural China Source. The 1% sample of the 1982 and 1990 China Population Censuses and the 0.05% sample of the 2000 China Population Census. The observed sex imbalance may be achieved in a variety of ways, from sex-selective abortion to neglect or even infanticide. This paper explores whether changes in relative female in come (as a share of total household income) affect the relative outcomes for boys and girls. Previous work on this subject has been impeded by identification problems: areas with higher fe male income may have higher income precisely because women's status is higher for other reasons, which makes it difficult to esti mate the effect of female income on boys and girls.2 I address this omitted variable bias problem by taking advantage of two post Mao reforms in China. During the Maoist era, centrally planned production targets focused on staple crops. In the early reform era (1978-1980), reforms increased the returns to cash crops, which 2. Empirical studies by Ben-Porath (1967, 1973) and Ben-Porath and Welch (1976), Rosenzweig and Schultz (1982a, 1982b), Das Gupta (1987), Thomas, Strauss, and Henriques (1991), Clark (2000), Burgess and Zhuang (2001), Du flo (2003), Foster and Rosenzweig (2001), and Rholf, Reed, and Yamada (2005) have shown that female survival rates are correlated with relative adult female earnings. A relatively new strand of the literature has argued over whether the observed sex imbalance can be partially explained by biological factors completely unrelated to cultural or economic conditions. See studies by Norberg (2004), Oster (2005), and Lin and Luoh (2006). And a recent study by the Lin, Liu, and Qian (2007) investigates the effect of access to sex-selective abortion on sex ratios at births and sex-specific survival rates. This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms MISSING WOMEN AND THE PRICE OF TEA IN CHINA 1253 included tea and orchards. Women have a comparative advan tage in producing tea, whereas men have a comparative advan tage in producing orchard fruits. Therefore, areas suitable for tea cultivation experienced an increase in female-generated income, whereas areas suitable for orchard cultivation experienced an in crease in male-generated income. This makes it possible to use a differences-in-differences (DID) strategy to identify the causal effect of an increase in sex-specific income on outcomes for boys and girls. To estimate the effect of a change in sex-specific incomes, I compare sex imbalance for cohorts born before and after the re forms, between counties that plant and do not plant sex-specific crops, where the value of those crops increased because of the reform.3 I first estimate the effect of an increase in adult female income on sex imbalance (holding adult male income constant) by comparing the fraction of males born in counties that plant tea to counties that do not, between cohorts born before and af ter the price increase. Then I repeat the same strategy using orchard production to estimate the effect of an increase in rela tive male income (holding adult female income constant). These estimates together allow me to distinguish the effects of increas ing sex-specific (relative) incomes from the effects of increasing total household incomes. Finally, using the same strategy with educational attainment as an outcome, I estimate the effects of increasing sex-specific incomes on the educational attainment of boys and girls. The results show that an increase in relative adult female income has an immediate and positive effect on the survival rate of girls. In rural China, during the early 1980s, increasing annual adult female income by US$7.70 (10% of average rural annual household income) while holding adult male income constant in creased the fraction of surviving girls by one percentage point and improved educational attainment for both boys and girls by ap proximately 0.5 years. Conversely, increasing male income while holding female income constant decreased both survival rates and educational attainment for girls, and had no effect on educational attainment for boys. These results show that the effect of an in crease in the value of sex-specific crops is due to the change in the 3. This identification strategy is similar to Schultz's (1985) study of Swedish fertility rates in the late nineteenth century, which used changing world grain prices to instrument for changes in the female-to-male wage ratio. This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 1254 QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS relative share of income between men and women rather than the change in total household income. This is consistent with the addi tional finding that an increase in the value of all cash crops, most of which do not especially favor male or female labor, had no effects on either sex-specific survival rates or educational attainment. The empirical results have several theoretical implications for household decision making. The effects on survival can be easily explained by either a model of intrahousehold bargaining or a unitary model of the household in which parents view chil dren as a form of investment. The results on education favor a nonunitary model of household decision making. The implication for policy makers is straightforward: factors that increase the eco nomic value of women are also likely to increase the survival rates of girls and to increase education investment in all children. This study has several advantages over previous studies. A number of potentially confounding factors were fixed in China during this period. Migration was strictly controlled, little tech nological change occurred in tea production, sex-revealing tech nologies were unavailable to the vast majority of China's rural population (Zeng et al. 1993; Diao, Zhang, and Somwaru 2000), and stringent family planning policies largely controlled family size. The paper is organized as follows. First, I describe the empir ical strategy and policy background. Second, I discuss the concep tual framework. Third, I present the empirical results. Fourth, I interpret the results. Finally, I offer concluding remarks. II. Empirical Strategy This paper uses the value of tea to proxy for female wages and the value of orchards to proxy for male wages. Tea is picked mainly by women in China.4 Data on labor input by sex and crop from the 1990 Population Census are not available for ex amining sex specialization directly. Instead, I use household-level survey data from the Ministry of Agriculture's RCRE National Fixed Point Survey (NFS) from 1993 to examine the correlation between the fraction of female laborers and the amount of tea sown.5 Table I, columns (l)-(4), shows that the amount of tea 4. See Lu (2004) for a detailed anthropological analysis of the historical role of women in tea picking. 5. Please see De Brauw and Giles (2006) and Padro-i-Miquel, Qian, and Yao (2007) for detailed descriptions of the RCRE data. This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms TABLE I ^ The Correlation between Sex Ratios of Adult Laborers and Tea and Orchard Production Dependent variabl Tea land sown Tea land/total Fru (mu = 1/15 hectare) arable land (m (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) No. male/No. total -0.115 -0.086 -0.040 -0.01labor in HH (0.056) (0.055) (0.021) (0.022) (0 Village fixed effects N Y N YNYN Observations 3,488 3,488 3,457 3,457 3,488 R2 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.18 0.00 0 Notes. Coefficients of the fraction of males amongst adult labor Agricultural Census. Data Source: RCRE 1993 Household Survey. This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 1256 QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS sown per household and the fraction of arable land that is de voted to tea per household are both negatively correlated with the fraction of male laborers within households. Tea bushes are approximately 2.5 ft (0.76 ms) tall. Picking requires the careful plucking of whole tender leaves. This gives adult women absolute and comparative advantages over children and men. For China, women's specialization in tea picking may have been increased by strictly enforced household grain quotas that forced every house hold to plant grain. This means that in households that wished to produce tea after the reform, men continued to produce grain while women switched to tea production. Moreover, the monitor ing of tea picking is made difficult by the fact that the quality and value of tea leaves increases greatly with the tenderness of the leaf. This decreases the desirability of hired labor.6 In contrast, height and strength yield a comparative advantage for men in orchard-producing areas.7 Columns (5)-(8) in Table I show that the amount of orchards sown per household and the fraction of a household's arable land devoted to orchards are positively corre lated with the fraction of male laborers within a household. In the 1982 Population Census, 56% of laborers in tea production (which includes picking, pruning, and drying) are male, whereas 62% of laborers in orchard production are male.8 Since female compara tive advantage is in picking, this six-percentage-point difference should be interpreted as a lower-bound estimate of female compar ative advantage in tea-picking. The magnitude of the advantage does not affect the internal validity of the empirical strategy.9 6. Agricultural households in general rarely hired labor from outside the fam ily. In 1997, 1 per 1,000 rural households hired a worker from outside of the im mediate family (Diao, Zhang, and Somwaru 2000). Because migration and labor market controls were more strict in the 1980s, it is most likely that the households studied in this paper hired even fewer nonfamily members. Plentiful cheap adult labor also would reduce the demand for child labor. 7. Adult men have a comparative advantage in orchard production during both sowing and picking periods. Sowing orchard trees is strength-intensive, as it requires digging holes approximately 3 ft (0.91 ms) deep. The height of the trees means that adult males have advantages, both in pruning and picking, over adult females and children. 8. This is the sample of adults who report living in rural areas and working in agriculture in the provinces of this study between the ages of 15-60. The data do not report hours worked. Due to problems of under-reporting girls at young ages due to the One Child Policy (1979/80), I cannot use the 1982 Census for the analysis in this paper. 9. The magnitude of the advantage will affect the interpretation of the elas ticity of demand for girls with respect to relative female earnings that underlies the reduced form effects estimated in this paper. For a given estimate of the effect of increasing tea prices on female survival, a smaller female advantage implies a larger elasticity. This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms MISSING WOMEN AND THE PRICE OF TEA IN CHINA 1257 A simple cross-sectional comparison of the fraction of males in counties that plant no tea to counties that plant some tea shows that the latter have one percentage point fewer males, or one per centage point more females (see Table II). But these estimates do not prove that planting tea, or higher relative female earnings, has a positive causal effect on female survival. The main confounding factor is that regions that choose to plant tea may be regions with weaker boy preference. In this case, the cross-sectional compari son will not be able to disentangle the effect of planting tea from the effect of the underlying boy-preference. To address this, I take advantage of two post-Mao reforms that increased the value of planting tea and orchards relative to staple crops. Hence, in ad dition to the cross-sectional comparison of the fraction of males between regions that produce tea and regions that do not, I can examine the second difference between cohorts born before the reform and those born afterward (i.e., differences-in-differences). The two reforms of interest to this paper are the increases in procurement prices of cash crops such as tea and orchards rela tive to staple crops and the Household Production Responsbility System (HPRS), which allowed households to take advantage of the price increases. Before 1978, Chinese agriculture was charac terized by an intense focus on grain production, allocative ineffi ciency, lack of trade, lack of incentives for farmers, and low rural incomes due to suppressed procurement prices (Perkins 1966; Lin 1988; Sicular 1988b). Central planning divided crops into three categories. Category 1 included crops necessary for national wel fare: grains, all oil crops, and cotton. In Category 2 were cash crops, including orchard products and tea (Sicular 1988a). Cate gory 3 included all other agricultural items (mostly minor local items). This last group was not under quota or procurement price regulation. The central government set procurement quotas for crops in Categories 1 and 2 that filtered down to the farm or col lective levels. Quota production was purchased by the state at very low prices. These quotas were set so that farmers could re tain enough food to meet their own needs but leave very little in surplus (Perkins 1966). Nongrain producers produced grain and other foodstuffs they needed for their own consumption. Reforms in the post-Mao era (1978 and afterwards) focused on raising rural income, increasing deliveries of farm products to the state, and diversifying the composition of agricultural pro duction by adjusting relative prices and profitability. Two sets of policies addressed these aims. The first set gradually reduced This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 1258 QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS TABLE II Descriptive Statistics I. Counties that plant no tea II. Counties that plant some tea Mean Mean Obs. (Std. error) Obs. (Std. error) A. Demographic variables Fraction male 41,665 0.51 10,101 0.52 (0.0003) (0.0007) Age 41,665 14.00 10,101 14.00 (0.0410) (0.0833) Han 41,665 0.95 10,101 0.88 (0.0009) (0.0027) Decollectivized 41,665 0.99 10,101 0.99 (0.0002) (0.0004) Household size 41,665 5.22 10,101 5.16 (0.0132) (0.0261) Married 23,641 0.62 7,164 0.62 (0.0002) (0.0004) Years of education 32,785 6.63 7,996 6.38 (0.0095) (0.0205) (Female) 37,653 4.70 9,465 4.39 (0.0082) (0.0148) (Male) 37,618 6.01 9,465 5.69 (0.0072) (0.0130) Father's education 40,647 6.17 10,043 5.82 (0.0067) (0.0127) Mother's education 40,655 4.53 10,054 4.33 (0.0082) (0.0146) School enrollment 40,781 0.24 10,009 0.22 (female) (0.0018) (0.0036) School enrollment 40,636 0.27 9,977 0.25 (male) (0.0019) (0.0038) B. Industry of occupation of hou Agricultural 41,665 0.94 10,101 0.94 (0.0006) (0.0013) Industrial 41,665 0.04 10,101 0.04 (0.0005) (0.0009) Construction 41,665 0.01 10,101 0.00 (0.0001) (0.0002) Commerce, etc. 41,665 0.01 10,101 0.01 (0.0001) (0.0002) C. Agricultural production and land use (mu = Farmable land per 23,018 4.87 10,101 4.06 household (0.0150) (0.0211) Rice sown area 23,018 1.66 10,101 2.55 (0.0106) (0.0106) Garden sown area 23,018 0.23 10,101 0.34 (0.0029) (0.0047) This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms MISSING WOMEN AND THE PRICE OF TEA IN CHINA 1259 TABLE II (continued) I. Counties that plant no tea II. Counties that plant some tea Mean Mean Obs. (Std. error) Obs. (Std. error) Tea sown area 41,665 0.00 10,101 0.15 (0.0000) (0.0034) Orchard sown area 23,018 0.20 10,10 (0.0029) (0.0034) Notes. The matched data set of the 1% sample of the 1990 popula agricultural census. Sample of those born in during 1962-1990. Da China Agricultural Census. Observations are birth year x county planning targets and represented a retu used procurement price as an instrume tion (Sicular 1988b). Although Category 1 price increases, the increase in prices w from Category 2. The second set of po enacted in 1980. It devolved all produc responsibilities to individual household ing a collective responsibility, and effe to take full advantage of the increase expanding production to cash crops w Johnson 1966).10 The two reforms con of agricultural production, greater re less extensive grain cultivation (Sicula Although agricultural households may cific reform as permanent, they were overall regime shift as permanent. Conse this initial regime shift as plausibly ex Figure Ha shows that the reforms tea and orchards relative to income crops.11 It also shows that income from 10. During the period of this study, there was or selling land. Agricultural land is allocated to f characteristics such as the number of household m village to farmers (Carter, Liu, and Yao 1995; J and Liu 1997; Rozelle and Li 1998; Benjamin an Rozelle 2002; and Burgess 2004). There is no ev systematically differed between tea- and non-tea 11. I use yearly data from the Ministry of Agric standard day of labor by crop and procurement pr that there are 257 labor days in a year and calcul yearlyinc = outputperday x 257 x pric This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 1260 QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 8 "S 6.0, ,2.70 ? -o-OrchardProd j\ j?*" 25?| U-Tea I . c 5.0- ?Orchard Price \\JT/ ov, _ 2 t0 ?Orch Jl $ . Melon Price JJv %2 h-CaMi /\ g [--MelonProd j /"M 210 * I / \ v 40 A///' * i8 Vs h mv-^i1 / II 3.0 rjH 170 I | / |? # 1.50 ? I 4 / y^ J i ^? *-^ ^^_ 1 -^^a Ol .*..'.* *. * "..-,. - .,?,?,-,-,1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 ? 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 Year ? Year (a) (c) 1.6 30 | . Rice . * 1.4 j- -W 9 1 2 / ,/\ __ I 0.8 ^?/" , I ?- f > jf . / | 0.6 ,/ " | 10 ^V /X^^^^ 8 1970 T 5 E i| ?01 w ^ 0 - - V^"(|' > V^>-^^1 ,,, + ?,>-.E ? C CO .2 75 -0.01 o ? co -Q s% - ca -0.02 - Z -^ Cat 1 -o- Cat 3o *i -0.03 i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i? o 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 Year (a) 0.54 -i | 0.52 k t\ I VX// \ / V ? No Tea ? Tea 0.49 H?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 Birth Year (b) Figure III (a) The effect of Category 1 and 3 crops on sex ratios. Coefficients of the interactions birth year amount of Category 1 crops planted and birth year x amount of Category 2 crops controlling for year and county of birth FE. (b) Fraction of males in counties that plant some tea and counties that plant no tea. Source. 1% sample of 1990 population census. Note. Tea counties are defined as all counties that plant some tea. This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 1264 QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS for each county i, and postc, a dummy variable that indicates if an individual is born after 1979; the interaction terms between orchard;, the amount of orchard planted for each county i, and postc; the interaction terms between cashcrop;, the amount of all cash crops planted for each county i, and postc; Han;c, the fraction that is ethnically Han; /;, county fixed effects; and \jrc, cohort fixed effects. The reference group is composed of individuals born during 1970-1979. It and all of its interaction terms are dropped. If the increase in value of tea improved female survival, then it should be reflected in a decrease in the fraction of males born after the reforms, (5 < 0. Conversely, if an increase in the value of orchards worsened female survival, we would expect 8 > 0. One pitfall of the DID approach is that it may confound the effects of the reform with the effects of other changes that may have occurred during the pre- or postreform period. For example, tea-producing regions may have been experiencing different pre trends in sex ratios relative to other regions, which may cause the DID estimate to be capturing differences between tea and non tea areas besides the increase in tea value. An illustration of the DID estimate shows that this is not the case. Figure Illb plots the fraction of males in each birth year cohort for tea-planting and non-tea-planting counties. The vertical distance between the two lines shows that prior to the reform, tea counties had more males, whereas after the reform, tea counties consistently had fewer males. The DID estimate will be the difference in the aver age vertical distance before and after the reform. The figure shows clearly that before the reform, tea areas had more boys than non tea areas, whereas after the reform, there were consistently fewer boys in tea areas. Hence, the DID estimate will not be captur ing differences in prereform trends in sex ratios between tea and non-tea regions. I can examine whether the effect of planting tea on sex ratios occured for the birth years close to the reform more rigorously by regressing the fraction of males by county and year of birth on the interaction terms of the amount of tea sown in the county of birth and birth year dummy variables for all birth years: 1990 1990 sex;c = J2 (tea* x <4)jfy Z=1963 Z=1963 1990 (3) + Y. (cashcrop; x di)pt + Han;Z=1963 This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms MISSING WOMEN AND THE PRICE OF TEA IN CHINA 1265 The fraction of males in county i, cohort c is a function of the interaction terms between tea;, the amount of tea planted for each county i, and di, a dummy variable which indicates if a cohort is born in year I; the interaction terms between orchard;, the amount of orchard planted for each county i, and ck; the interaction terms between cashcrop;, the amount of all cash crops planted for each county i, and dk; Han;c, the fraction that is ethnically Han; yt, county fixed effects; and \f/c, cohort fixed effects. The dummy vari able for the 1962 cohort and all of its interactions are dropped. pt is the effect of planting tea on the fraction of males for cohort I. If increasing the price of tea improved female survival, then pt should be constant until approximately the time of the reform, after which it should become negative. Similarly, Si is the effect of planting orchards on the fraction of males for cohort I. If increas ing orchard prices worsened female survival, then 81 should be constant until approximately the time of the reform, after which it should become positive. Another problem of the empirical strategy is that if, at the time of the reforms, there is a change in the attitudes that drive sex preference in tea-planting counties, then the estimate of the effect of planting tea will capture both the relative female income effect and the effect of the attitude change. Or, if the increase in the value of tea changed the reason for women to pick tea, then the prereform cohort will not be an adequate control group. Although I cannot resolve the former problem, the latter is addressed by instrumenting for tea planting with time-invariant geographic data.14 Tea grows under very particular conditions: on warm and semihumid hilltops, shielded from wind and heavy rain. There fore, hilliness is a valid instrument for tea planting if it does not have any direct effect on differential investment decisions and is not correlated with any other covariates in equation (5). I check this assumption by estimating the impact of planting tea on sex ratios for a sample containing only tea counties and those non-tea counties that share a boundary with tea counties. Hilliness varies gradually. County boundaries are straight lines drawn across spa tial areas. The results for this restricted sample are similar to the estimate for the whole sample, although the precision is reduced 14. I also find that planting tea had no effect on sex ratios for nonagricultural households living in tea planting counties. This suggests that between-county comparison is unlikely to capture spillover effects between agricultural and nona gricultural households. This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 1266 QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS due to the smaller sample size. This adds to the plausibility of the identification strategy, unless potentially confounding factors change discretely across county boundaries. Note that because the amount of orchards sown is also an endogenous regressor, the 2SLS specification does not separately control for it. The follow ing equation estimates the first-stage effects of hilliness on tea production after the reform: tea; x postc = (slope; x postc)A + (cashcrop x postc)

1979. Data for land area sown are from the 1997 China Agricultural Census. V. Empirical Results V.A. Results for Survival Rates The difference-in-differences estimates from equation (2) are shown in column (1) of Table III. It shows that planting one addi tional mu of tea decreased the fraction of males by 1.2 percentage points; planting one additional mu of orchards increased the frac tion of males by 0.5 percentage points; and planting cash crops in general had no effect. The estimates for planting tea and orchards are statistically significant at the 10% and 5% level, respectively. The estimates for pt, 8i and pt from equation (3) are shown in Appendix I.A. The coefficients for fa and <$/ are plotted in Figure V. They show that for cohorts born prior to the reform, the effects of planting tea and orchards on the fraction of males were similar to each other and constant across cohorts. The effects diverge for cohorts born around the time of the reform, when planting tea is associated with fewer males, while planting orchards is associated with more males. The differential effects persist over time. These results lend credibility to the interpretation that the effect of tea and orchard production on the fraction of males is attributable This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms MISSING WOMEN AND THE PRICE OF TEA IN CHINA 1273 | 0.04 -| .g -o- Orchard -*- Tea ? I 0.03 - p $ i 0.02 - . A, / o ? 0.01 - [\K>~~\ A / \ /\ // \r \/y/ o *? -0.03 -I?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i?i? O 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 Birth year Figure V The Effect of Planting Tea and Orchards on Sex Ratios Coefficients of the interactions of birth year x amount of tea planted and birth year x amount of orchards planted controlling for year and county of birth FEs. to the post-Mao agricultural reforms and not to other changes in these regions. Cohort fixed effects control for variation across cohorts that do not also vary across counties. They cannot control for county varying cohort trends that may have occurred over the 29 years of this study. I address this issue by controlling for linear cohort trends at the county level (e.g., interaction terms of county dummy variable with linear time trends). In order to make the estimates comparable to the 2SLS estimates, I restrict the sample to only counties for which there is geographic data and estimate the same specification as the second stage of the 2SLS. This differences-in differences specification does not explicitly control for orchards because planting orchards is likely to be endogenous. Column (2) in Table III shows the basic fixed effects estimates. Column (3) shows the estimate when I control for county-level cohort trends. The point estimates are similar. They show that planting tea de creased the fraction of males by 1.3 and 1.2 percentage points. Estimates from both specifications are statistically significant at the 5% level. Thus, the OLS estimates are robust to differential linear changes across cohorts between counties. This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 1274 QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Two problems motivate the use of instrumental variables. First, using 1997 agricultural data to proxy for agricultural con ditions in earlier years introduces measurement error that may bias the estimate toward zero. Second, the OLS estimate will suf fer from omitted variable bias if families that prefer girls switch to planting tea after the reform. In this case, the OLS estimate will overestimate the true effect of an increase in the value of female labor because it will confound the aforementioned effect with the sex-preferences of households that switched to planting tea. I ad dress both problems by instrumenting for tea planting with the average slope of each county. Figure IVb shows the slope variation in China, where the darker areas are steeper. The predictive power of slope for tea planting can be seen by comparing the tea planting counties in Figure IVa with the hilly regions in Figure IVb. I use the GIS data pictured in Figure IVb to calculate the average slope for each county and estimate the following first-stage equation, where both the amount of tea planted and the slope is time-invariant. Column (4) of Table III shows the first-stage estimate from equation (4). The estimate for the correlation between hilliness and planting tea, X, is statistically significant at the 5% level. Col umn (5) shows the 2SLS estimate from equation (5). The estimate is larger than the OLS estimate and statistically significant. Col umn (6) shows the 2SLS estimate after controlling for county-level cohort trends. The estimate is similar in magnitude to the OLS es timate, but no longer statistically significant. The estimates with and without trends are not statistically different from each other. The estimate without trends is larger but also less precisely esti mated. The 2SLS estimate in column (6) shows that conditional on county-level cohort time trends, the OLS estimate is not biased. Furthermore, the OLS and 2SLS estimates in columns (3) and (6) are almost numerically identical to the initial OLS estimate in column (1). These results give confidence to the robustness of the initial OLS estimates. V.B. Results on Educational Attainment This analysis uses county-birth year level data from a 0.05% sample of the 2000 Population Census. The sample is selected based on the same criteria as the main sample from the 1990 Population Census. To confine the sample to children who had completed their education, I restrict it to cohorts born between This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms MISSING WOMEN AND THE PRICE OF TEA IN CHINA 1275 1962 and 1982. Individuals in the sample should not be af fected by the Cultural Revolution because disruptions to schools generally were isolated to urban areas.23 I use cohorts that were born before 1976 and thus had not yet reached public preschool age at the beginning of the reforms as the prereform control.24 The empirical strategy is the same as before. I estimate equa tion (2) with years of education as the dependent variable to ex amine the effect of planting tea, orchards, and all Category 2 cash crops on educational attainment for all individuals. I repeat the estimation for the sample of girls, the sample of boys, and the difference in education between boys and girls. This is first done with dummy variables indicating whether any tea, orchards, or cash crops are planted in a county, and then with continuous vari ables for the amount of each crop that is planted. The estimates in Panel A of Table IV show that planting any tea at all increased all, female, and male educational attainment by 0.2, 0.25, and 0.15 years, respectively. On the other hand, planting any orchards at all decreased female educational attainment by 0.23 years and had no effect on male educational attainment. These estimates are statistically significant at the 1% level. Planting orchards had no effect on male educational attainment. The estimates in column (4) show that planting tea decreased the male-female difference in educational attainment, whereas planting orchards increased the difference. The latter is statistically significant at the 1% level. The sample size for the estimate in column (4) is smaller than the sample size for the estimate in column (1) because not ev ery county-birth year cell contains both males and females. The estimates for all category 2 cash crops are close to zero and sta tistically insignificant. I repeat this estimate with continuous variables for the amount of tea and orchards planted in each county i. Columns (5)-(8) of Table IV show that the estimates have the same signs as the estimates with the dummy variables in columns (l)-(4). The estimates show that one additional mu of tea planted increases fe male educational attainment by 0.38 years and male educational 23. For robustness, I repeat the experiment on a sample of cohorts born af ter 1967 who did not begin primary school until after 1974, when schools were reopened. The results are similar and statistically significant. 24. Children entered public preschools at age 4 or 5 in China during this period. Public nursery schools, targeted at children aged 1-4, are not available to most rural populations. This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms TABLE IV The Effect of Planting Tea, Orchards, and Category 2 Cash C A. Dummy variable for crops sown B. Cont _ _(l)All (2) Female (3) Male (4) Diff (5) All (6 Tea x post 0.199 0.247 0.149 -0.069 0.449 (0.043) (0.057) (0.049) (0.063) Orchard x post -0.124 -0.226 -0.029 0.174 -0.0(0.037) (0.050) (0.040) (0.056) (0.056) Cat2 x post -0.036 -0.024 -0.037 -0.020 -0.065 -0 (0.026) (0.032) (0.028) (0.040) (0 Observations 68,522 33,538 34,984 58,314 6R2 0.37 0.48 0.34 0.14 0.37 0.48 Notes. Coefficients of the interactions between dummies indicating whether a cohort wa of birth. Dependent variable: years of education. All regressions include controls for Han, co level. Post = 1 for cohorts born after 1976. This content downloaded from 176.74.150.24 on Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:26:14 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms MISSING WOMEN AND THE PRICE OF TEA IN CHINA 1277 ? 0.15 - _0.10*_* -o- Orchards -*-Tea A ? 0 10 - / \ ^ s f--/ ' 0.05- o / V S o o.oo - ,^_/\\ a / "5^-0.05- \^\//^^e > V^^sr \ Va / 2| -0-10- ^vX-I -m* N( \ ---0.90 1 |~ -D -0.15 - A *