Lecture 2: The intertemporal approach to the current account cont'd. Open economy macroeconomics, Fall 2006 Ida Wolden Bache August 28, 2006 i What determines the world interest rate? • A two-region world economy — Abandon assumption of small open economy — World is composed of two countries: Home and Foreign (*) — Ignore government spending • Endowment economy — Global market clearing requires Yt + Yt* = Ct + Ct or St + st = o 2 - Walras's law: with two markets, only need to check that one of them clears to verify general equilibrium — World market equlibrium in two-period model Sl(r) + St(r) = 0 3 How does saving depend on the interest rate? — Key concept: the intertemporal elasticity of substitution u\C) a(C) = Cu"(C) — The sensitivity of intertemporal consumption allocations to interest rate changes depends on a — Class of preferences with constant elasticity of intertemporal substitution (isoelastic preferences) i 1 C1-^ - 1 u{C) = In C 4 — Euler equation with isoelastic preferences C~° = ß(l + r)C2"-C2 = ßa(l + r)CTCi Ci — Define subjective rate of time-preference (5 1 , 1-/3 /3 =-----------=*►<* =---------- l + <5 /3 — Euler equation becomes a C2= n + r Consumption grows over time if the real interest rate exceeds the subjective rate of time-preference i.e., if r > ö 5 Derivation of the saving schedule (saving as a function of interest rates) with isoelastic preferences - Substitute in for budget constraint Q? = (1 + r)(Y± — C\) + I2 'n the Euler equation Gl = ß~a{l + r)-aC2 = /?"-(!+ r)--((l + r)(Y1-C1)+Y2) Differentiate = - lower current consumption (increase saving) * Terms-of-trade effect: • if Y\ — C\ > 0 interest rate increase makes the country richer (improves intertemporal terms of trade) —> higher current consumption (lower saving) • if Y\ — C\ < 0 interest rate increase makes the country poorer (worsens intertemporal terms of trade) —> lower current consumption (higher saving) 8 — Closed form solution for consumption with isoelastic preferences ß^l + r^d = (l + r)(Y1-Ci) + Y2 (ßa(l + r)a + l + r)C1 = (l + r)Y1 + Y2 Y2 ci = „„,. , w-1 , . n + )Sť7(l + r)ť7-1 + l V 1 + r. * Three effects of an increase in the interest rate 1. Substitution effect (-=-) 2. Income effect (+) 3. Wealth effect (-=-) * Income effect dominates substitution effect if a < 1 * With a = 1 (log case) income and substitution effects cancel —> dC\/dr always negative * Income effect + wealth effect = terms of trade effect Interest rate, r S* Home saving, S Foreign saving, ST Figure L5 Global exchange equilibrium Comparative statics - Increase in Y\ shifts saving schedule SS1 out —> r falls - Increase in Y r increases - Increase in /3 shifts saving schedule SS7 out —> r falls Immiserizing growth' (Bhagwati, The Review of Economic Studies Vol 25, 1958): Under certain circumstances, economic expansion may harm the growing country. The increase in output might lead to a sufficient deterioration in the terms of trade to reduce the real income of the growing country 11 • World equilibrium in the two country model with investment - Allow for different productivity levels Y = AF(K), F* = A*F*(K*) — Equilibrium requires n + n* = Ci + cí + h + it or Si + SJ = ii + ij or CAX + CAJ = 0 12 7585 Investment schedules A2F\K1 + li) A$F*'{K{ + I{) r r Production functions concave: investment schedules slope downward Saving schedules with isoelastic preferences — Substitute in for budget constraint in the Euler equation Ci = ß-a(l + r)-aC2 = ß-a(l + r) —a A2F(K1 + h) + K1 + I1 +(1 + r) (AiF(ifi) -d- h)) 13 Differentiate = - r increases — A rise in future home productivity A2 * Shift in investment schedule II' A2Ff{Kľ + Ii) = r dA2Ff(K2) + A2F"{K2)dI1 = 0 dlľ dA2 F'{K2) r constant A2F"(K2) >0 * Shift in saving schedule SS' )Sť7(l + r)ť7-1 + l dCx dA2 AlF(Ki) - h + F(K2) A2F(K1 + /Q - I2 1 + r r constant /3(J(l + r)(J + 1 + r >0 16 Interest ratet r Interest rate, r Home saving, S Home investment, I Foreign saving» S* Foreign investment, Figure 1.8 A rise in future Home productivity 10.0 E.O 5 0 4 0 2.0 0 0 -2.0 Figure 1. United States' 10-Year Bond Rate (Percent a year) U ~~ Expected In3. — Actual Inf. -P-V K Ajw ■v W^ ,.« i J-4 \ -4.0 I iiiiiiii im iiiiiiiiiiiiii 'ii. in ill ill iii iii in ii in ii in ii m nim ii.in 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 19B3 19E5 19S7 19S9 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 • Case study: The U.S. real interest rate and current account imbalances • The Global Saving Glut and the U.S. Current Account Deficit (Speech by Chairman of the Board of Governors Ben Bernanke, April 14 2005. Can be downloaded from: http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2005/20050414/default.htm) — A significant increase in the global supply of saving helps explain the increase U.S. current account deficit and the low level of world real interest rates - What has caused the increase in global saving? * Strong saving motive of rich countries with ageing populations * Low prospetive returns to domestic investment in many mature industrialised countries (due to e.g., slowly growing workforces and high capital-to-labour ratios) 19 * Movement from large deficit to large surplus in the current account positions of developing countries • Response to the financial crises in the 1990s • High oil prices - High inflow of capital to the U.S. because of technology boom and high productivity in 1990s — Low U.S. saving because of high stock prices, increase in housing wealth and later, low real interest rates. 20