microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. microtitle.jpg microedition.jpg varianname.jpg 4 Utility microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Preferences - A Reminder ux y: x is preferred strictly to y. ux ~ y: x and y are equally preferred. ux y: x is preferred at least as much as is y. Textové pole: p p ~ f microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Preferences - A Reminder uCompleteness: For any two bundles x and y it is always possible to state either that x y or that y x. ~ f ~ f microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Preferences - A Reminder uReflexivity: Any bundle x is always at least as preferred as itself; i.e. x x. ~ f microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Preferences - A Reminder uTransitivity: If x is at least as preferred as y, and y is at least as preferred as z, then x is at least as preferred as z; i.e. x y and y z x z. ~ f ~ f ~ f microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions uA preference relation that is complete, reflexive, transitive and continuous can be represented by a continuous utility function. uContinuity means that small changes to a consumption bundle cause only small changes to the preference level. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions uA utility function U(x) represents a preference relation if and only if: x’ x” U(x’) > U(x”) x’ x” U(x’) < U(x”) x’ ~ x” U(x’) = U(x”). ~ f Textové pole: p p p microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions uUtility is an ordinal (i.e. ordering) concept. uE.g. if U(x) = 6 and U(y) = 2 then bundle x is strictly preferred to bundle y. But x is not preferred three times as much as is y. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves uConsider the bundles (4,1), (2,3) and (2,2). uSuppose (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). uAssign to these bundles any numbers that preserve the preference ordering; e.g. U(2,3) = 6 > U(4,1) = U(2,2) = 4. uCall these numbers utility levels. Textové pole: p p microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves uAn indifference curve contains equally preferred bundles. uEqual preference Þ same utility level. uTherefore, all bundles in an indifference curve have the same utility level. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves uSo the bundles (4,1) and (2,2) are in the indiff. curve with utility level U º 4 uBut the bundle (2,3) is in the indiff. curve with utility level U º 6. uOn an indifference curve diagram, this preference information looks as follows: microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves U º 6 U º 4 (2,3) (2,2) ~ (4,1) x1 x2 Textové pole: p p microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves uAnother way to visualize this same information is to plot the utility level on a vertical axis. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› U(2,3) = 6 U(2,2) = 4 U(4,1) = 4 Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves 3D plot of consumption & utility levels for 3 bundles x1 x2 Utility microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves uThis 3D visualization of preferences can be made more informative by adding into it the two indifference curves. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves U º 4 U º 6 Higher indifference curves contain more preferred bundles. Utility x2 x1 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves uComparing more bundles will create a larger collection of all indifference curves and a better description of the consumer’s preferences. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves U º 6 U º 4 U º 2 x1 x2 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves uAs before, this can be visualized in 3D by plotting each indifference curve at the height of its utility index. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves U º 6 U º 5 U º 4 U º 3 U º 2 U º 1 x1 x2 Utility microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves uComparing all possible consumption bundles gives the complete collection of the consumer’s indifference curves, each with its assigned utility level. uThis complete collection of indifference curves completely represents the consumer’s preferences. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 x2 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 x2 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 x2 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 x2 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 x2 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 x2 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves x1 microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions & Indiff. Curves uThe collection of all indifference curves for a given preference relation is an indifference map. uAn indifference map is equivalent to a utility function; each is the other. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions uThere is no unique utility function representation of a preference relation. uSuppose U(x1,x2) = x1x2 represents a preference relation. uAgain consider the bundles (4,1), (2,3) and (2,2). microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions uU(x1,x2) = x1x2, so U(2,3) = 6 > U(4,1) = U(2,2) = 4; that is, (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). Textové pole: p p microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions uU(x1,x2) = x1x2 (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). uDefine V = U2. Textové pole: p p microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions uU(x1,x2) = x1x2 (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). uDefine V = U2. uThen V(x1,x2) = x12x22 and V(2,3) = 36 > V(4,1) = V(2,2) = 16 so again (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). uV preserves the same order as U and so represents the same preferences. Textové pole: p p Textové pole: p p microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions uU(x1,x2) = x1x2 (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). uDefine W = 2U + 10. u Textové pole: p p microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions uU(x1,x2) = x1x2 (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). uDefine W = 2U + 10. uThen W(x1,x2) = 2x1x2+10 so W(2,3) = 22 > W(4,1) = W(2,2) = 18. Again, (2,3) (4,1) ~ (2,2). uW preserves the same order as U and V and so represents the same preferences. Textové pole: p p Textové pole: p p microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Utility Functions uIf –U is a utility function that represents a preference relation and – f is a strictly increasing function, u then V = f(U) is also a utility function representing . ~ f ~ f microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Goods, Bads and Neutrals uA good is a commodity unit which increases utility (gives a more preferred bundle). uA bad is a commodity unit which decreases utility (gives a less preferred bundle). uA neutral is a commodity unit which does not change utility (gives an equally preferred bundle). microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Goods, Bads and Neutrals Utility Water x’ Units of water are goods Units of water are bads Around x’ units, a little extra water is a neutral. Utility function microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Some Other Utility Functions and Their Indifference Curves uInstead of U(x1,x2) = x1x2 consider V(x1,x2) = x1 + x2. What do the indifference curves for this “perfect substitution” utility function look like? microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Perfect Substitution Indifference Curves 5 5 9 9 13 13 x1 x2 x1 + x2 = 5 x1 + x2 = 9 x1 + x2 = 13 V(x1,x2) = x1 + x2. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Perfect Substitution Indifference Curves 5 5 9 9 13 13 x1 x2 x1 + x2 = 5 x1 + x2 = 9 x1 + x2 = 13 All are linear and parallel. V(x1,x2) = x1 + x2. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Some Other Utility Functions and Their Indifference Curves uInstead of U(x1,x2) = x1x2 or V(x1,x2) = x1 + x2, consider W(x1,x2) = min{x1,x2}. What do the indifference curves for this “perfect complementarity” utility function look like? microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Perfect Complementarity Indifference Curves x2 x1 45o min{x1,x2} = 8 3 5 8 3 5 8 min{x1,x2} = 5 min{x1,x2} = 3 W(x1,x2) = min{x1,x2} microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Perfect Complementarity Indifference Curves x2 x1 45o min{x1,x2} = 8 3 5 8 3 5 8 min{x1,x2} = 5 min{x1,x2} = 3 All are right-angled with vertices on a ray from the origin. W(x1,x2) = min{x1,x2} microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Some Other Utility Functions and Their Indifference Curves uA utility function of the form U(x1,x2) = f(x1) + x2 is linear in just x2 and is called quasi-linear. uE.g. U(x1,x2) = 2x11/2 + x2. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Quasi-linear Indifference Curves x2 x1 Each curve is a vertically shifted copy of the others. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Some Other Utility Functions and Their Indifference Curves uAny utility function of the form U(x1,x2) = x1a x2b with a > 0 and b > 0 is called a Cobb-Douglas utility function. uE.g. U(x1,x2) = x11/2 x21/2 (a = b = 1/2) V(x1,x2) = x1 x23 (a = 1, b = 3) microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Cobb-Douglas Indifference Curves x2 x1 All curves are hyperbolic, asymptoting to, but never touching any axis. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Marginal Utilities uMarginal means “incremental”. uThe marginal utility of commodity i is the rate-of-change of total utility as the quantity of commodity i consumed changes; i.e. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Marginal Utilities uE.g. if U(x1,x2) = x11/2 x22 then microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Marginal Utilities uE.g. if U(x1,x2) = x11/2 x22 then microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Marginal Utilities uE.g. if U(x1,x2) = x11/2 x22 then microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Marginal Utilities uE.g. if U(x1,x2) = x11/2 x22 then microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Marginal Utilities uSo, if U(x1,x2) = x11/2 x22 then microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Marginal Utilities and Marginal Rates-of-Substitution uThe general equation for an indifference curve is U(x1,x2) º k, a constant. Totally differentiating this identity gives microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Marginal Utilities and Marginal Rates-of-Substitution rearranged is microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Marginal Utilities and Marginal Rates-of-Substitution rearranged is And This is the MRS. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Marg. Utilities & Marg. Rates-of-Substitution; An example uSuppose U(x1,x2) = x1x2. Then so microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Marg. Utilities & Marg. Rates-of-Substitution; An example MRS(1,8) = - 8/1 = -8 MRS(6,6) = - 6/6 = -1. x1 x2 8 6 1 6 U = 8 U = 36 U(x1,x2) = x1x2; microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Marg. Rates-of-Substitution for Quasi-linear Utility Functions uA quasi-linear utility function is of the form U(x1,x2) = f(x1) + x2. so microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Marg. Rates-of-Substitution for Quasi-linear Utility Functions uMRS = - f (x1) does not depend upon x2 so the slope of indifference curves for a quasi-linear utility function is constant along any line for which x1 is constant. What does that make the indifference map for a quasi-linear utility function look like? ¢ microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Marg. Rates-of-Substitution for Quasi-linear Utility Functions x2 x1 Each curve is a vertically shifted copy of the others. MRS is a constant along any line for which x1 is constant. MRS = - f(x1’) MRS = -f(x1”) x1’ x1” microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Monotonic Transformations & Marginal Rates-of-Substitution uApplying a monotonic transformation to a utility function representing a preference relation simply creates another utility function representing the same preference relation. uWhat happens to marginal rates-of-substitution when a monotonic transformation is applied? microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Monotonic Transformations & Marginal Rates-of-Substitution uFor U(x1,x2) = x1x2 the MRS = - x2/x1. uCreate V = U2; i.e. V(x1,x2) = x12x22. What is the MRS for V? which is the same as the MRS for U. microlower.jpg © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. ‹#› Monotonic Transformations & Marginal Rates-of-Substitution uMore generally, if V = f(U) where f is a strictly increasing function, then So MRS is unchanged by a positive monotonic transformation.