BKM_DATS: Databázové systémy 3. Transactions Vlastislav Dohnal BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 2 Transactions Transaction Concept Transaction State Concurrent Executions Serializability Recoverability Implementation of Isolation Transaction Definition in SQL Testing for Serializability. BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 3 Transaction Concept A transaction is a unit of program execution that accesses and possibly updates various data items. E.g., transaction to transfer $50 from account A to account B: 1. read(A) 2. A := A – 50 3. write(A) 4. read(B) 5. B := B + 50 6. write(B) 7. commit Main issues to deal with: Transaction interruption due failures of various kinds such as hardware failures and system crashes Concurrent execution of multiple transactions Termination of transaction using abort command BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 4 Example of Fund Transfer Transaction to transfer $50 from account A to account B: 1. read(A) 2. A := A – 50 3. write(A) 4. read(B) 5. B := B + 50 6. write(B) 7. commit Atomicity requirement if the transaction fails after step 3 and before step 6, money will be “lost” leading to an inconsistent database state Failure could be due to software or hardware the system should ensure that updates of a partially executed transaction are not reflected in the database Durability requirement once the user has been notified that the transaction has completed (i.e., the transfer of the $50 has taken place), the updates to the database by the transaction must persist even if there are software or hardware failures. BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 5 Example of Fund Transfer (Cont.) Transaction to transfer $50 from account A to account B: 1. read(A) 2. A := A – 50 3. write(A) 4. read(B) 5. B := B + 50 6. write(B) 7. commit Consistency requirement E.g., the sum of A and B is unchanged by the execution of the transaction In general, consistency requirements include Explicitly specified integrity constraints such as primary keys and foreign keys Implicit integrity constraints E.g., sum of balances of all accounts, minus sum of loan amounts must equal value of cash-in-hand A transaction must see a consistent database. During transaction execution the database may be temporarily inconsistent. When the transaction completes successfully the database must be consistent Erroneous transaction logic can lead to inconsistency Example of Fund Transfer (Cont.) Transaction to transfer $50 from account A to account B: Isolation requirement – if between steps 3 and 6, another transaction T2 is allowed to access the partially updated database, it will see an inconsistent database The sum A + B will be less than it should be. Isolation can be ensured trivially by running transactions serially that is, one after the other. However, executing multiple transactions concurrently has significant benefits, as we will see later. BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 6 Transaction T11.read(A) 2.A := A – 50 3.write(A) 4.read(B) 5.B := B + 50 6.write(B) 7.commit Transaction T21.read(A) 2.read(B) 3.print(A + B) 4.commit BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 7 ACID Properties A transaction is a unit of program execution that accesses and possibly updates various data items. It is a sequence of operations that form a desired outcome (the unit of program). To preserve the integrity of data the database system must ensure: Atomicity. Either all operations of the transaction are properly reflected in the database or none are. Consistency. Execution of a transaction in isolation preserves the consistency of the database. Isolation. Although multiple transactions may execute concurrently, each transaction must be unaware of other concurrently executing transactions. Intermediate transaction results must be hidden from other concurrently executed transactions. That is, for every pair of transactions Ti and Tj, it appears to Ti that either Tj, finished execution before Ti started, or Tj started execution after Ti finished. Durability. After a transaction completes successfully, the changes it has made to the database persist, even if there are system failures. Transaction State Active the initial state the transaction stays in this state while it is executing Partially committed after the final statement has been executed. Committed after successful completion. Failed after the discovery that normal execution can no longer proceed. Aborted after the transaction has been rolled back and the database restored to its state prior to the start of the transaction. Two options after it has been aborted: restart the transaction can be done only if no internal logical error kill the transaction BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 8 BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 9 Concurrent Executions Multiple transactions are allowed to run concurrently in the system. Advantages are: increased processor and disk utilization, leading to better transaction throughput E.g., one transaction can be using the CPU while another is reading from or writing to the disk reduced average response time for transactions E.g., short transactions need not wait behind long ones. Concurrency control schemes – mechanisms to achieve isolation that is, to control the interaction among the concurrent transactions in order to prevent them from destroying the consistency of the database Analysis of conflicting operations Locking – of records, tables BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 10 Schedules Schedule – a sequence of instructions that specify the chronological order in which instructions of concurrent transactions are executed a schedule for a set of transactions must consist of all instructions of those transactions must preserve the order in which the instructions appear in each individual transaction A transaction that successfully completes its execution will have a commit instruction as the last statement by default, transaction assumed to execute commit instruction as its last step A transaction that fails to complete its execution will have an abort instruction as the last statement (rollback command) BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 11 Schedule 1 Let T1 transfer $50 from A to B, and T2 transfer 10% of the balance from A to B. A serial schedule in which T1 is followed by T2: BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 12 Schedule 2 A serial schedule where T2 is followed by T1 BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 13 Schedule 3 Let T1 and T2 be the transactions defined previously. The following schedule is not a serial schedule but it is equivalent to Schedule 1 (serial schedule). In Schedules 1, 2 and 3, the sum A + B is preserved. BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 14 Schedule 4 The following concurrent schedule does not preserve the value of (A + B). These changes to A will be discarded by write(A) in T1 BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 15 Conflict Serializability (Cont.) Schedule 3 can be transformed into Schedule 1, a serial schedule where T2 follows T1, by a series of swaps of nonconflicting instructions. Therefore Schedule 3 is (conflict) serializable. Schedule 3 Schedule 1 BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 16 Schedule 5 Example of a schedule that is not (conflict) serializable: We are unable to swap instructions in the above schedule to obtain either the serial schedule < T3, T4 >, or the serial schedule < T4, T3 >. BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 17 Weak Levels of Consistency Some applications are willing to live with weak levels of consistency, allowing schedules that are not serializable and recoverable E.g. a read-only transaction that wants to get an approximate total balance of all accounts database statistics computed for query optimization can be approximate Such transactions need not be serializable with respect to other transactions Tradeoff accuracy for performance BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 18 Levels of Consistency in SQL-92 Consistency levels (from highest to lowest): Serializable — default Snapshot isolation — (not part of SQL-92) only committed records to be read, reads must return the value present at the beginning of transaction; better performance while retaining most of serializability. Repeatable read — only committed records to be read, repeated reads of same record must return same value. However, a transaction may not be serializable: it may find some new records inserted by a committed transaction. Read committed — only committed records can be read, but successive reads of record may return different (but committed) values. Read uncommitted — even uncommitted records may be read. Lower degrees of consistency useful for gathering approximate information about the database Warning: some database systems do not ensure serializable schedules by default Phantom records Levels of Consistency Snapshot isolation does not mean serializable! Example: One transaction turns each of the white marbles into black marbles. The second transaction turns each of the black marbles into white marbles. BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 19 BKM_DATS, Vlastislav Dohnal, FI MUNI, 2022 20 Transaction Definition in SQL Data manipulation language must include a construct for specifying the set of actions that comprise a transaction. A transaction begins implicitly. Some systems may use begin to start a new transaction A transaction ends by: Commit: commits current transaction and begins a new one. Rollback: causes current transaction to abort. Often, SQL statement also commits implicitly if it executes successfully Mainly when libraries are used to access database. Implicit commit can be turned off E.g., in JDBC, connection.setAutoCommit(false);