Standards, specifications, XML processing APIs
Specifications and validity of XML
-
Original Specification W3C Recommendation XML 1.0 http://www.w3.org/XML/
-
5th Edition (corrections, updates, no major changes At Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition) http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml
-
commented version at XML.COM (Annotated XML specification): http://www.xml.com/axml/testaxml.htm
-
XML 1.1 (Second Edition) http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11 - changes induced by the introduction of UNICODE 3, easier normalization, the specification of handling procedure for "end of line" characters. XML 1.1 is not bound to specific version of UNICODE, but always on the latest version.
Which XML version to use?
In new applications - see W3C XML Core Working Group (http://www.w3.org/XML/Core/#Publications) for the answer:
-
Unless writing a parser or a XML-generating app. (editor), use XML 1.0 (backward-compatibility)
-
new parsers should "know" XML 1.1 but do not use it unless needed otherwise
Validity of XML documents
-
To repeat: every XML document must be WELL-FORMED.
-
New: an XML doc can be VALID – which means a more strict requirements than WELL-FORMEDNESS. Usually, the conformance to a DTD (Document Type Definition) of the doc is meant by the validity, ormore recently – conformance with an XML Schema or other schema (RelaxNG, Schematron).
Document Type Definition (DTD)
-
Document Type Definition (usage/reference to this definition is then a Document Type Declaration).
-
Specified in the (core) XML standard 1.0.
-
Describes allowed element content, attribute presence and content, their default values, defines used entities.
-
DTD might be either internal or external DTD (internal and external subset) or "mixed" – both.
-
A document conformant with a DTD is denoted as valid ("platný" in Czech).
-
DTD and languages for similar purpose are denoted as modeling languages – they model/define concrete markups.
-
Syntax of DTD IS NOT XML (in contrast to XML Schema and many others modeling languages).
Motivation for DTD, comparison
Problems with DTD?
-
Fundamental problem of DTD is its incompatibility with XML Namespaces and
-
lack of modeling expressiveness – some constructs cannot be constrained by DTD.
-
Direct, more powerful, but also more complex modeling language is W3C XML Schema (http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema).
-
Powerful and simpler alternatives of XML Schema are e.g. RelaxNG (http://relaxng.org, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RELAX_NG)
Why use DTD?
-
Simple. All parsers are fine with it.
-
Sufficient for many markups
-
Still widely used
DTD tutorials
- ZVON
-
http://www.zvon.org/xxl/DTDTutorial/General/contents.html (including a Czech version)
- DTD Tutorial
-
http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/DTD_tutorial (not just DTD but much more)
- W3Schools DTD Tutorial
DTDeclaration
DTDeclaration is placed immediately before the root element!
<!DOCTYPE root-elt-name External-ID [ internal part of DTD ]>
Internal or external part (internal or external subset) might or might not be present, or both can be present.
Identifiers in DTDeclaration
External identifier can be either
-
PUBLIC "PUBLIC ID" "URI"
(suitable for ”public”, generally recognized DTDs) or -
SYSTEM "URI"
for private- or other not-that-well-established DTDs (”URI” need not be just real URL on network, may also be a file on (local) filesystem, resolution according to system where it is resolved) The significancy of internal a external parts is the same (they must not be in conflict - eg. two defeinitions of the same element). DTD contains a list of definitions for individual elements, list of attributes of them, entities, notations
DTD - conditional sections
For "commenting out" portions of DTDs e.g. for experimenting:
<![IGNORE[ this will be ignored ]]>
<![INCLUDE[ this will be included into DTD (i.e. not ignored)]]>
DTD - element type definition
Describes allowed content of the element, in form of <!ELEMENT element-name … >
,
where … can be
- EMPTY
-
for empty element which may be represented as
<element/>
or<element></element>
with the same logical meaning - ANY
-
any element content allowed, i.e. text nodes, child elements, … may contain child elements -
<!ELEMENT element-name (specification of child elements)>
- mixed
-
containing both text and child elements given by enumeration
<!ELEMENT element-name (#PCDATA | specification of child elements)*>
For MIXED, the order or cardinality of concrete child elements cannot be specified.
The star (*
) is required and any number of occurencies is always allowed.
DTD - element type definition - child elements
For specifying the child elements, we use:
-
sequence operator (sekvence, follow with)
,
-
choice operator (výběr, select, choice)
|
-
parenthesis
()
have usual meaning -
Diferrent operators CANNOT be combined within a group!
-
The child elements cardinality (occurence) can be specified/limited by
*
,?
, + having usual meaning. -
No specifier means just one occurence allowed.
DTD - attribute definition
Describes (data) type and/or implicit attribute values for the respective element.
<!ATTLIST element-name attribute-name attribute-value-type implicit-value>
DTD - definition of attribute value type
Allowed value types are as follows:
CDATA
NMTOKEN
NMTOKENS
ID
IDREF
IDREFS
ENTITY
ENTITIES
-
enumeration - eg.
(value1|hodnota2|hodnota3)
-
enumeration of notations - eg.
NOTATION (notace1|notace2|notace3)
DTD - cardinality of attributes
Attributes may have obligatory presence:
-
#REQUIRED
-
attribute is required
-
#IMPLIED
-
attribute is optional
-
#FIXED "fixed-value"
-
is required and must have the value fixed-value
DTD - implicit attribute value
Attribute (incl. optional one) might have an implicit value: then the attribut is optional, but if not present, then the implicit value is used instead.
Physical Structure (Entities)
Entity - declaration and usage
We distinguish:
-
declaration
-
reference (ie. use) of a (declared) entity.
General entities
- parsed
-
files with a (well formed) markup,
- not-parsed
-
eg. binary files,
- character entities
-
eg.
>
refers to a char entity.
Parametric entities
-
only inside of DTD, somehow similar to ”macros” in pg. languages
-
suitable eg. for declations of attribute lists (if long and multiply used)
-
see DTD for HTML 4.01 - http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd. html
-
definition of a parametric entity is eg. <!ENTITY % heading "H1|H2|H3|H4|H5|H6">
XML Base
-
XML Base (second edition), W3C Recommendation 28 Jan 2009: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/
-
Standard for evaluation of relative URLs in links to/from XML docs. Facility similar to that of HTML BASE, for defining base URIs for parts of XML documents.
-
Defines how to use a reserved attribute xml:base denoting the base URI for relative URIs.
-
It complements with the XLink spec.
-
It works based on ”overriding” of XML base from parent (ancestor) elements.
XML Base - example
Example from XML Base specification http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<e1 xml:base="http://example.org/wine/">
<e2 xml:base="rosé"/>
</e1>
In the example below, the base URI of element e2 should be returned as "http://example.org/wine/rosé".
[Note the use of the reserved prefix xml
]
XML Namespaces
- XML Namespaces 1.0
-
W3C Recommendation, currently Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Third Edition) W3C Recommendation 8 Dec 2009: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names
- Namespaces in XML 1.1
-
W3C Recommendation (http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names11/) (Second Edition) 16 August 2006. Andrew Layman, Richard Tobin, Tim Bray, Dave Hollander
XML Namespaces
-
Namespaces define logical spaces for names of elements, attributes in XML document.
-
They give the elements and attributes the "third dimension".
-
To each NS in XML, there is exactly one ("globally") unique identifier, given by URI (URIs is a superset of URLs).
-
NS corresponding to an URI does not anyhow relate to content that would potentially be available under the URL.
["nothing is downloaded when processing NSs"]
Prefixes and Equivalence of NS
-
Instead of URIs for denoting a namespace in document, one uses prefixes for the NS mapped to the respective URI using
xmlns:prefix="URI"
. -
Element or attribute name containing colon (
:
) is denoted as so-called Qualified Name, QName. -
Two NS are equal iff their URIs are one-to-one-character the same (in UNICODE).
-
NS do not apply to text nodes.
Prefixes and Equivalence of NS
-
Element/attribute need not be in a namespace.
-
NS prefix declaration or declaration or the implicit NS recursively applies to all descendants (child elements, their children etc.), unless another declaration "remaps" the given prefix.
-
One NS is co-called implicit (default) NS, declared by attribute
xmlns=
-
Default NSs are NOT applied to attributes!!!, thus attributes without an explicit prefix do not belong to any NS.
Default NS – example
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<body>
<h1>Hurááááá</h1>
</body>
</html>
Explicit (prefixed) NS – example
<xhtml:html xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<xhtml:body>
<xhtml:h1>Huráááááá</xhtml:h1>
</xhtml:body>
</xhtml:html>
Issues related to NS
-
NS are not compatible with DTD.
-
DTD strictly differentiates between eg. names
xi:include
andinclude
differ according to DTD even if they belong to the same NS and should thus have the same interpretation/meaning for applications.
XML Information Set
-
XML Infoset 2nd Edition W3C Recommendation First published on 24 October 2001, revised 4 February 2004, John Cowan, Richard Tobin, http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/
-
Infoset describes "what all info can we get from a node (element, document, attribute…)"
-
In other words: an application should not rely on any other info, such as attribute order etc.
-
Any well-formed XML document conformant to XML Namespaces has its Infoset.
XML Infoset - structure
-
Infoset comprises of Information items
-
Infoset relates to document with expanded (resolved) entities
-
We distinguish among infoset of document, element, attribut, character, PI, not-expanded entity, not-analysed entity, notation.
Canonical Form
-
Canonical XML Version 1.0, W3C Recommendation 15 March 2001, http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n
-
The goal of CF is to describe criteria and algorithm how to define equivalence on XML documents that are "logically" the same and expose just differences in physical form (entities, attribute order, character encoding)
-
Canonication "wipes-out" differences that are not significant for applications.
-
Canonication in inevitable in some important applications, e.g. electronic signature of XML data (when calculating digest).
Canonical Form - principles
Main principles for constructing the canonical form of an XML document:
-
encoding in UTF-8
-
line breaks (CR, LF) normalized according to the algorithm mentioned in XML 1.0 Spec.
-
attribute values normalized
-
references to character and parsed entites replaced by their content
-
CDATA
section also replaced by their content -
prolog
xml
and DTD reference removed
Canonical Form - principles (contd)
-
whitespaces outside of the root element normalized
-
otherwise (except of line breaks), the whitespaces are preserved
-
attribute values always in double quotes "
-
special chars in attr. values replaced by refs to character entities
-
superflous NS declarations removed
-
default attribute values added to all element where relevant
-
attributes and NS declarations will be ordered lexikographically
Issues with Canonical Form
Certain information loss (mostly info from DTD):
-
not-parsed entity (eg. binary ones) are not accessible anymore after canonicalization
-
notations
-
attribute types (incl. default values)
API for XML Processing
-
APIs offer simple standardized XML access.
-
APIs connect application to the parser and applications together.
-
APIs allow XML processing without knowledge of physical document structure (entities).
-
APIs optimize XML processing.
XML APIs Fundamental Types
-
Tree-based API
-
Event-based API
-
API based on pulling events/elements off the document (Pull API).
Tree-based API
-
They map an XML document to a memory-based tree structure.
-
allows to traverse the entire DOM tree.
-
best-known - Document Object Model (DOM from W3C, see http://www.w3.org/DOM)
Programming Language Specific Models
-
Java: JDOM - http://jdom.org
-
Java: dom4j - http://dom4j.org
-
Java: XOM - http://www.xom.nu
-
Python: 4Suite - http://4suite.org
-
PHP: SimpleXML - http://www.php.net/simplexml
Event-based API
-
Generates Sequence of Events while parsing the Document.
-
Technical implementation: using callback methods
[The Hollywood Principle: Do not call us, we will call you!]
-
Application implements handlers (which process generated events).
-
Works on lower-level than tree-based.
-
Application should do further processing.
-
It saves memory - does not itself create any persistent objects.
Event Examples
-
start document
,end document
-
start element
- contains the attributes as well,end element
. -
processing instruction
-
comment
-
entity reference
-
Best-known event-based API: SAX http://www.saxproject.org
SAX - Document Analysis Example
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<doc>
<para>Hello, world!</para>
<!-- that’s all folks -->
<hr/>
</doc>
SAX - Document Analysis Example
It generates following events:
start document start element: doc
list of attributes: empty
start element: para
list of attributes: empty
characters: Hello, world!
end element: para
comment: that’s all folks
start element: hr
end element: hr
end element: doc end document
When to use event-based API?
-
Easier to parser programmer, more difficult to application programmer.
-
No complete document available to application programmer.
-
She must keep the state of analysis herself.
-
Suitable for tasks, that can be solved without the need of entire document.
-
The fastest possible processing usually.
-
Difficulties while writing applications can be solved using extensions like Streaming Transformations for XML (STX) http://stx.sourceforge.net
Optional SAX Parser Features
-
The SAX parser behavior can be controlled using so called features a properties.
-
For optional SAX parser’s features see http://www.saxproject.org/?selected=get-set
-
For more details on properties and features see Use properties and features in SAX parsers (IBM DeveloperWorks/XML).
SAX filters
-
The SAX filters (implementation of
org.xml.sax.XMLFilter
interface) can be programmed using the SAX API. -
Such a class instance accepts input events, process them and sends them to the output.
-
For more information on event filtering see Change the events output by a SAX stream http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tipsaxfilter/ (IBM DeveloperWorks/XML) for example.
Additional SAX References
-
Primary source: http://www.saxproject.org
-
SAX Tutorial on JAXP: http://java.sun.com/webservices/reference/tutorials/jaxp/html/sax.html
Pull-based APIs
-
Application does not process incoming events, but it pulls data from the processed file.
-
Can be used when programmer knows the structure of an input data and she can pull them off the file.
-
… opposite to event-based API.
-
Very comfortable to an application programmer, but implementations are usually slower the push event-based APIs.
-
Java offers the XML-PULL parser API - see Common API for XML Pull Parsing http://www.xmlpull.org/ and also
-
newly develop API - Streaming API for XML (StAX) http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=173 developed like a product of JCP (Java Community Process).
Streaming API for XML (StAX)
-
The API may become the part of the Java API for XML Processing (JAXP) in the future.
-
It offers two ways to pull-based processing:
-
pulling the events using iterator - more comfortable
-
low-level access using so called cursor - it is faster.
StAX - an Iterator Example
(from Oracle Java Tutorials http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/jaxp/stax/example.html)
StAX - source XML document
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<BookCatalogue xmlns="http://www.publishing.org">
<Book>
<Title>Yogasana Vijnana: the Science of Yoga</Title>
<author>Dhirendra Brahmachari</Author>
<Date>1966</Date>
<ISBN>81-40-34319-4</ISBN>
<Publisher>Dhirendra Yoga Publications</Publisher>
<Cost currency="INR">11.50</Cost>
</Book>
<Book>
<Title>The First and Last Freedom</Title>
<Author>J. Krishnamurti</Author>
<Date>1954</Date>
<ISBN>0-06-064831-7</ISBN>
<Publisher>Harper & Row</Publisher>
<Cost currency="USD">2.95</Cost>
</Book>
</BookCatalogue>
StAX - source XML document
In this example, the client application pulls the next event in the XML stream by calling the next method on the parser; for example:
try {
for (int i = 0 ; i < count ; i++) {
// pass the file name.. all relative entity
// references will be resolved against this
// as base URI.
XMLStreamReader xmlr = xmlif.createXMLStreamReader(filename,
new FileInputStream(filename));
// when XMLStreamReader is created,
// it is positioned at START_DOCUMENT event.
int eventType = xmlr.getEventType();
printEventType(eventType);
printStartDocument(xmlr);
// check if there are more events
// in the input stream
while(xmlr.hasNext()) {
eventType = xmlr.next();
printEventType(eventType);
// these functions print the information
// about the particular event by calling
// the relevant function
printStartElement(xmlr);
printEndElement(xmlr);
printText(xmlr);
printPIData(xmlr);
printComment(xmlr);
}
}
}
Document Object Model (DOM)
-
Basic interface to process and access the tree representation of XML data
-
Three versions of DOM: DOM Level 1, 2, 3
-
DOM - does not depend on the XML parsing.
-
Described using IDL + API descriptions for particular programming languages (C++, Java, etc.)
HTML Documents Specific DOM
-
The HTML Core DOM is more less consolidated with the XML DOM
-
Designated to CSS
-
Used for dynamic HTML programming (scripting using VB Script, JavaScript, etc)
-
Contains the browser environment (windows, history, etc) besides the document model itself.
DOM references
-
JAXP Tutorial, part dedicated to the DOM Part III: XML and the Document Object Model (DOM) (http://java.sun.com/xml/jaxp/dist/1.1/docs/tutorial/dom/index.html)
-
Portal dedicated to the DOM http://www.oasis-open.org/cover/dom.html
-
DOM 1 Interface visual overview http://www.xml.com/pub/a/1999/07/dom/index.html
-
Tutorial ”Understanding DOM (Level 2)” available at http://ibm.com/developer/xmlhttp://ibm.com/de (http://ibm.com/developer/xml)
DOM Implementation
-
Included in many parsers, the. Xerces (http://xml.apache.org) parserfor example.
-
Part of the JAXP (Java API for XML Processing) - http://java.sun.com/xml/jaxp/index.html
-
Standalone implementations independent on parsers: – dom4j http://dom4j.org – EXML (Electric XML) http://www.themindelectric.net
Using DOM in Java
-
Native DOM support in the new Java versions (JDK and JRE) - no need of additional library.
-
Applications need to import needed symbols (interfaces, classes, etc.) mostly from package
org.w3c.dom
.
What will we need often?
Most often used interfaces are:
-
Element
corresponds to the element in a logical document structure. It allows us to access name of the element, names of attributes, child nodes (including textual ones). Useful methods: -
Node getParentNode()
- returns the parent node -
String getTextContent()
- returns textual content of the element. -
NodeList getElementsByTagName(String name)
- returns the list of ancestors (child nodes and their ancestors) with the given name. -
Node
super interface ofElement
, corresponds to the general node in a logical document structure, may contain element, textual node, comment, etc. -
NodeList
a list of nodes (a result of callinggetElementsByTagName
for example). It offers the following methods for its processing: -
int getLength()
- returns the number of nodes in a list -
Node item(int index)
- returns the node at position index -
Document
corresponds to the document node (its a parent of a root element)
Example 1 - creating DOM tree from file
import java.io.IOException;
import java.net.URL;
import javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder;
import javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory;
import javax.xml.parsers.ParserConfigurationException;
import org.w3c.dom.Document;
import org.xml.sax.SAXException;
public class Uloha1 {
/**
* Constructor creating new instance of Uloha1 class by reading XML document
* on the given URL.
*/
private Uloha1(URL url) throws SAXException, ParserConfigurationException, IOException
// We create new instance of factory class
DocumentBuilderFactory factory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
// We get new instance of DocumentBuilder using the factory class.
DocumentBuilder builder = factory.newDocumentBuilder();
// We utilize the DocumentBuilder to process an XML document
// and we get document model in form of W3C DOM
Document doc = builder.parse(url.toString());
}
}
Example 2 - DOM tree modification
import org.w3c.dom.Document;
import org.w3c.dom.Element;
import org.w3c.dom.NodeList;
public class Uloha1 {
Document doc;
/**
* ***********************************************************************
* Method for a salary modification. If the person’s salary is less then
* <code>minimum</code>, the salary will increased to
* <code>minimum>.
* No action is performed with the rest of persons.
*/
public void adjustSalary(double minimum) {
// get the list of salaries
NodeList salaries = doc.getElementsByTagName("salary");
for (int i = 0; i < salaries.getLength(); i++) {
// get the salary element
Element salaryElement = (Element) salaries.item(i);
// get payment
double salary = Double.parseDouble(salaryElement.getTextContent());
if (salary < minimum) {
// modify the text node/content of element
salaryElement.setTextContent(String.valueOf(minimum));
}
}
}
}
Example 3 - storing a DOM tree into an XML file
Example of the method storing a DOM tree into a file (see Homework 1). The procedure utilizes a transformation we do not know yet. Let use it as a black box.
import java.io.File;
import java.io.IOException;
import javax.xml.transform.Transformer;
import javax.xml.transform.TransformerConfigurationException;
import javax.xml.transform.TransformerException;
import javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory;
import javax.xml.transform.dom.DOMSource;
import javax.xml.transform.stream.StreamResult;
import org.w3c.dom.Document;
public class Uloha1 {
Document doc;
/**************************************************************************
* Method for a salary modification. If the person’s salary is less then
* <code>minimum</code>, the salary will increased to
* <code>minimum>.
* No action is performed with the rest of persons.
*/
public void serializetoXML(File output) throws IOException,
TransformerConfigurationException {
// We create new instance of a factory class.
TransformerFactory factory = TransformerFactory.newInstance();
Transformer transformer = factory.newTransformer();
// The input is the document placed in a memory
DOMSource source = new DOMSource(doc);
// The transformation output is the output file
StreamResult result = new StreamResult(output);
// Let’s make the transformation
transformer.transform(source, result);
}
}
Alternative tree-based models
XML Object Model (XOM)
-
XOM (XML Object Model) created as an one man project (author Elliote Rusty Harold).
-
It is an interface that strictly respect XML data logical model.
-
For motivation and specification see the XOM home page (http://www.xom.nu).
-
You can get there the open-sourceXOM implementation and
-
the API documentation, too.
DOM4J - practically usable tree-based model
-
comfortable, fast and memory efficient tree-oriented interface
-
designed and optimized for Java
-
available as open-source at http://dom4j.org
-
perfect ”cookbook” (http://dom4j.org/cookbook/cookbook.html) available
-
dom4j is powerful, seetree-based models efficiency comparison (http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-injava/)
Tree and event-based access combinations
Events → tree::
- Allow us either to skip or to filter out the ”uninteresting” document part using the event monitoring and then
- create memory-based tree from the ”interesting” part of a document only and that part process.
Tree → events::
- We create an entire document tree (and process it) and
- we go through the tree than and we generate events like while reading the XML file.
- It allows us easy integration of both processing types in a single application.
Virtual object models
-
Document DOM model is not memory places, but is created on-demand while accessing particular nodes.
-
combines event-based and tree-based processing advantages (speed and comfort)
-
There is an implementation: the Sablotron processor, http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/03/13/sablotron.html