P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\titulka.jpg
PV204 Security technologies
Trusted element, side channels attacks
•Petr Švenda
•
•      svenda@fi.muni.cz        @rngsec
•      https://crocs.fi.muni.cz/people/svenda
•Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Czech Republic

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Trusted element and side channels
•Lecture:
–Introduction (30min), course content, formal requirements
–Secure anchor in a system – trusted element
–Usage scenario for secure hardware as trusted point
–Attacks against trusted element
–Timing attacks against software implementations
–Power and fault analysis
–How to write robust code as a mitigation
•Lab:
–Correction of flawed implementation (timing analysis)
•
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
2

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
COURSE TRIVIA
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
3

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Introduction
•See PV204_overview_2017.ppt
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
4

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
TRUSTED ELEMENT
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
5

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
What is “Trusted” system (plain language)
•Many different notions
1.System trusted by someone
2.System that you can’t verify and therefore must trust not to betray you
–If a trusted component fails, security can be violated
3.System build according to rigorous criteria so you are willing to trust it
4.…
•Why Trust is Bad for Security, D. Gollman, 2006
–http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15710661/157/3
–
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
We need more precise specification of Trust
6

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
UNTRUSTED
VS.
TRUSTED
VS.
TRUSTWORTHY
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
7

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Untrusted system
•System explicitly unable to fulfill specified security policy
•Additional layer of protection must be employed
–E.g., Encryption of data before storage
–E.g., Digital signature of email before send over network
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
8

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Trusted system
•“…system that is relied upon to a specified extent to enforce a specified security policy. As
such, a trusted system is one whose failure may break a specified security policy.” (TCSEC, Orange
Book)
•Trusted subjects are those excepted from mandatory security policies (Bell LaPadula model)
•User must trust (if likes to use the system)
–E.g., you and your bank
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
9

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Trustworthy system (computer)
•“Computer system where software, hardware, and procedures are secure, available and functional and
adhere to security practices” (Black's Law Dict.)
•User have reasons to trust reasonably
•Trustworthiness is subjective
–Limited interface and hardware protections can increase trustworthiness (e.g., append-only log
server)
•Example: Payment card - Trusted? Trustworthy?
•
•Trusted does not mean automatically Trustworthy
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
10

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Trusted computing base (TCB)
•The set of all hardware, firmware, and/or software components that are critical to its security
•The vulnerabilities inside TCB might breach the security properties of the entire system
–E.g., server hardware + virtualization (VM) software
•The boundary of TCB is relevant to usage scenario
–TCB for datacentre admin is around hw + VM (to protect against compromise of underlying hardware
and services)
–TCB for web server client also contains Apache web server
•Very important factor is size and attack surface of TCB
–Bigger size implies more space for bugs and vulnerabilities
–
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_computing_base
11

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Cryptography on client
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Computer_Icon.png D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Key-icon.png
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Computer_Icon.png D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Key-icon.png
Which parts are trusted?
What are threads?
What are attacker models?
What is trusted computing base?
D:\Documents\Obrazky\question.png
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
12

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
On client, but with secure hardware
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Computer_Icon.png D:\Documents\Obrázky\SmartCard\sim-card-md_green.png
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Key-icon.png D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Computer_Icon.png
Which parts are trusted?
What are threads?
What are attacker models?
What is trusted computing base?
D:\Documents\Obrazky\question.png
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
13

Problem: how to get key where is necessary?
 - generate on device
 - import into device (securely)

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Plain-Blue-icon.png
Cryptography in cloud
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Computer_Icon.png D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Key-icon.png
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Plain-Blue-icon.png
WS API: JSON
Which parts are trusted?
What are threads?
What are attacker models?
What is trusted computing base?
D:\Documents\Obrazky\question.png
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
14

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Plain-Blue-icon.png
Cryptography in cloud in secure hardware
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Computer_Icon.png
Which parts are now trusted?
Are also trustworthy?
D:\Documents\Obrazky\question.png
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
15

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Example: different levels of trust
•CaaS with trusted CaaS provider
–Software operation only, HTTPS for in/out
–Trusted provider => insider attack, also valid target itself…
•CaaS with semi-trusted CaaS provider
–HTTPS for in/out, decrypted by server
–Data processed inside trusted hardware
–CaaS platform still target (data visible)
•CaaS with untrusted provider
–HTTPS for in/out + inner protection
–Data decrypted/processed/encrypted inside device
–
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
16

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
TRUSTED ELEMENT
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
17

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
What exactly can be trusted element (TE)?
•Recall: Anything user entity of TE is willing to trust J
–Depends on definition of “trust” and definition of “element”
–We will use narrower definition
•Trusted element is element (hardware, software or both) in the system intended to increase
security level w.r.t. situation without the presence of such element
1.By storage of sensitive information (keys, measured values)
2.By enforcing integrity of execution of operation (firmware update)
3.By performing computation with confidential data (DRM)
4.By providing unforged reporting from untrusted environment
5.…
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
18

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Typical examples
•Payment smart card
–TE for issuing bank
•SIM card
–TE for phone carriers
•Trusted Platform Module (TPM)
–TE for user as storage of Bitlocker keys, TE for remote entity during attestation
•Trusted Execution Environment in mobile/set-top box
–TE for issuer for confidentiality and integrity of code
•Hardware Security Module for TLS keys
–TE for web admin
•Energy meter
–TE for utility company
•Server under control of service provider
–TE for user – private data, TE for provider – business operation
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
19
For whom is TE trusted?
D:\Documents\Obrazky\question.png

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Risk management
•No system is completely secure (® risk is present)
•Risk management allows to evaluate and eventually take additional protection measures
•Example: payment transaction limit
–“My account/card will never be compromised” vs. “Even if compromised, then loss is bounded”
•Example: medical database
–central governmental DB vs. doctor’s local DB
•Good design practice is to allow for risk management
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
20

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
TRUSTED ELEMENT
MODES OF USAGE
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
21

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Element carries fixed information
•Fixed information ID transmitted, no secure channel
•Low cost solution (nothing “smart” needed)
•Problem: Attacker can eavesdrop and clone chip
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
laptop D:\Documents\Obrázky\SmartCard\card_cloner_800px.jpg D:\Documents\Obrázky\Id-icon.png
D:\Documents\Obrázky\Id-icon.png
Element is trusted with ID carriage
But is it trustworthy?
D:\Documents\Obrazky\question.png
22

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Element as a secure carrier
•Key(s) stored on a card, loaded to a PC before encryption/signing/authentication, then erased
•High speed usage of key possible (>>MB/sec)
•Attacker with an access to PC during operation will obtain the key
–key protected for transport, but not during the usage
–
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
Element is trusted as confidential key storage,
but cannot perform (or not trusted with) operation
23

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg laptop
D:\Documents\Obrázky\SmartCard\gc-tpm.jpg
Element as root of trust (TPM)
•Secure boot process, remote attestation
•Element provides robust storage with integrity
•Application can verify before pass control (measured boot)
•Computer can authenticate with remote entity…
•
–
–
•
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
D:\Documents\Obrázky\SmartCard\Header_TPM_module_onboard_IMGP6409_wp_800px.jpg
Element is trusted with integrity of stored values
24

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Element as encryption/signing device
•PC just sends data for encryption/signing…
•Key never leaves element
–personalized in secure environment
–protected during transport and usage
•Attacker must attack the element
–or wait until card is inserted and PIN entered!
•Potentially low speed encryption (~kB/sec)
–low communication speed / limited element performance
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
25

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Element as computational device
•PC just sends input for application on smart card
•Application code & keys never leave the element
–Element can do complicated programmable actions
–Can open secure channels to other entity
•secure server, trusted time service…
•PC act as a transparent relay only (no access to data)
•Attacker must attack the element or input
–
–
•
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
laptop sc word-file-icon word-file-icon if_switch_naive key_icon key_icon key_icon server key_icon
D:\Documents\Obrázky\Lock.png key_icon D:\Documents\Obrázky\Lock.png
26

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
ATTACKS AGAINST TRUSTED ELEMENT
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
27

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Trusted hardware (TE) is not panacea!
1.Can be physically attacked
–Christopher Tarnovsky, BlackHat 2010
–Infineon SLE 66 CL PE TPM chip, bus read by tiny probes
–9 months to carry attack, $200k
–https://youtu.be/w7PT0nrK2BE (great video with details)
2.Attacked via vulnerable API implementation
–IBM 4758 HSM (Export long key under short DES one)
3.Provides trusted anchor != trustworthy system
–weakness can be introduced later
–E.g., bug in securely updated firmware
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
28

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
How to reason about attack and countermeasures?
1.Where does an attack come from (principle)?
–Understand the principles
2.Different hypothesis for the attack to be practical
–More ways how to exploit the same weakness
3.Attack’s countermeasures by cancel of hypothesis
–For every way you are aware of
4.Costs and benefits of the countermeasures
–Cost of the assets protected
–Cost for an attacker to perform attack
–Cost of a countermeasure
•
•Important: Consider Break Once, Run Everywhere (BORE)
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
29

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Motivation: Bell’s Model 131-B2 / Sigaba
•Encryption device intended for US army, 1943
–Oscilloscope patterns detected during usage
–75 % of plaintexts intercepted from 80 feets
–Protection devised (security perimeter), but later forgot
•CIA in 1951 – recovery over ¼ mile of power lines
•Other countries also discovered the issue
–Russia, Japan…
•More research in use of (eavesdropping) and defense against (shielding) ® TEMPEST
–
•
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
30

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Common and realizable attacks on TE
1.Non-invasive attacks
–API-level attacks
•Incorrectly designed and implemented application
•Malfunctioning application (code bug, faulty generator)
–Communication-level attacks
•Observation and manipulation of communication channel
–Side-channel attacks
•Timing/power/EM/acoustic/cache-usage/error… analysis attacks
2.Semi-invasive attacks
–Fault induction attacks (power/light/clock glitches…)
3.Invasive attacks
–Dismantle chip, microprobes…
•| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
31

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Where are frequent problems with crypto nowadays?
•Security mathematical algorithms
–OK, we have very strong ones (AES, SHA-3, RSA…)
•Implementation of algorithm
–Problems ® implementation attacks
•Randomness for keys
–Problems ® achievable brute-force attacks
•Key distribution
–Problems ® old keys, untrusted keys, key leakage
•Operation security
–Problems ® where we are using crypto, key leakage
32
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
NON-INVASIVE ATTACKS
•Non-invasive side-channel attacks
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
33

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
TRNG ® Key: What if faulty TRNGs?
•Good source of randomness is critical
–TRNG can be weak or malfunctioning
•How to inspect TRNG correctness?
1.Analysis of TRNG implementation (but usually blackbox)
2.Output data can be statistically tested (100MB-1GB stream, NIST STS, Dieharder, TestU01
batteries) http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/General/dieharder.php
3.Behaviour in extreme condition (+70/-50° C, radiation…)
•Analyse data stream gathered during extreme conditions
4.Simple power analysis of TRNG generation
•Is hidden/unknown operation present?
•
•
–
–
–
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
34

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Serial test: Histogram of 16bits patterns
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
Normal distribution (expected)
Biased distribution (lower entropy)
35

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
POWER ANALYSIS
•Non-invasive side-channel attacks
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
36

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Basic setup for power analysis
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
osci
Smart card
Smart card reader
Inverse card connector
Oscilloscope
Resistor
20-80 ohm
Probe
37

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
More advanced setup for power analysis
scsat04_board_noboundary
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
Ethernet
Tested smartcard
External power supply
SCSAT04 measurement board
38

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Simple vs. differential power analysis
1.Simple power analysis
–Direct observation of single / few power traces
–Visible operation => reverse engineering
–Visible patterns => data dependency
2.Differential power analysis
–Statistical processing of many power traces
–More subtle data dependencies found
–
39
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
DPAspikes

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Reverse engineering of Java Card bytecode
•Goal: obtain code back from smart card
–JavaCard defines around 140 bytecode instructions
–JVM fetch instruction and execute it
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
R32_JCBytecode_example
(source code)
m_ram1[0] = (byte) (m_ram1[0] % 1);
(bytecode)
getfield_a_this 0;
sconst_0;
baload;
sconst_1;
srem;
bastore;
(power trace)
compiler
oscilloscope
40

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Conditional jumps
•may reveal sensitive info
•keys, internal branches, …
41
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
ifeq_w_nojump_cut ifeq_w_jump_cut
(bytecode)
     sload_1;
      ifeq_w L2;
L1: getfield_a_this 0;
      sconst_0;
      sconst_0;
      bastore;
      goto L3;
L2: getfield_a_this 0;
      sconst_0;
      sconst_1;
      bastore;
     goto L3;
L3: …

(source code)
if (key == 0) m_ram1[0] = 1;
else m_ram1[0] = 0;
compiler
oscilloscope
(power trace, k != 0)
(power trace, k == 0)
Can you use
timing attack?
D:\Documents\Obrazky\question.png

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Simple power analysis – data leakage
•Data revealed directly when processed
–e.g., Hamming weight of instruction argument
•hamming weight of separate bytes of key (256® 238)
•
•
•
•
•
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
42

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Differential power analysis
DPAspikes
43
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
DPAspikes
•Very Powerful attack on secret values (keys)
–E.g., KEY Å INPUT_DATA
1.Obtain multiple power traces with (fixed) key usage and variable data
–103-105 traces with known I/O data => S(n)
–KEY Å KNOWN_DATA
2.Guess key byte-per-byte
–All possible values of single byte tried (256)
–D = HammWeight(KEY Å KNOWN_DATA > 4)
–Correct guess reveals correlation with traces
–Incorrect guess not
3.Divide and test approach
–Traces divided into 2 groups
–Groups are averaged A0,A1 (noise reduced)
–Subtract group’s averaged signals T(n)
–Significant peaks if guess was correct
•No need for knowledge of exact implementation
–big advantage

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Tool: DPA simulator
•Generate simulated DPA traces
•Perform DPA
•Can be used to inspect influence of noise, number of traces…
•https://github.com/crocs-muni/PowerTraceSimulator
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
44

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
TIMING ATTACKS
•Non-invasive side-channel attacks
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
45

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Timing attack: principle
•
46
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
D:\Documents\Obrázky\SmartCard\sim-card-md_green.png D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Key-icon.png
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Key-icon.png
+
devil
® 57ms
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Key-icon.png
+
® 49ms
D:\Documents\Obrázky\is2\Key-icon.png

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Timing attacks
•Execution of crypto algorithm takes different time to process input data with some dependence on
secret value (secret/private key)
1.Due to performance optimizations (developer, compiler)
2.Due to conditional statements (branching)
3.Due to cache misses
4.Due to operations taking different number of cycles
•Measurement techniques
1.Start/stop time (aggregated time, local/remote measurement)
2.Power/EM trace (very precise if operation can be located)
3.
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
47

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Naïve modular exponentiation (RSA/DH)
•M = Cd mod N
•
•
•M = C * C * C * … * C mod N
•
•Easy, but extremely slow for large d (1000s bits)
–Faster algorithms exist
•
48
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
d-times
Is there dependency
of time on secret value?
D:\Documents\Obrazky\question.png

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Square and multiply algorithm
•
•
•
•
•
•
•How to measure?
–Exact detection from simple power trace
–Extraction from overall time of multiple measurements
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
49
Gilbert Goodwill, http://www.embedded.com/print/4408435
// M = C^d mod N
// Square and multiply algorithm
x = C                         // start with ciphertext
for j = 1 to n {           // process all bits of private exponent
    x = x*x mod N       // shift to next bit by x * x (always)
    if (d_j == 1) {      // j-th bit of private exponent d
      x = x*C mod N    // if 1 then multiple by Ciphertext
    }
}
return x       // plaintext M
•Executed always

How to attack:
-What if you have debugger?
-What if you have just breakpoint inside d_j condition?

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Example: Remote extraction OpenSSL RSA
•Brumley, Boneh, Remote timing attacks are practical
–https://crypto.stanford.edu/~dabo/papers/ssl-timing.pdf
•Scenario: OpenSSL-based TLS with RSA on remote server
–Local network, but multiple routers
–Attacker submits multiple ciphertexts and observe processing time (client)
•OpenSSL’s RSA CRT implementation
–Square and multiply with sliding windows exponentiation
–Modular multiplication in every step: x*y mod q (Montgomery alg.)
–From timing can be said if normal or Karatsuba was used
•If x and y has unequal size, normal multiplication is used (slower)
•If x and y has equal size, Karatsuba multiplication is used (faster)
•Attacker learns bits of prime by adaptively chosen ciphertexts
–About 300k queries needed
50
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Defense introduced by OpenSSL
•RSA blinding: RSA_blinding_on()
–https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20030317.txt
•Decryption without protection: M = cd mod N
•Blinding of ciphertext c before decryption
1.Generate random value r and compute re mod N
2.Compute blinded ciphertext b = c * re mod N
3.Decrypt b and then divide result by r
•r is removed and only decrypted plaintext remains
–
–
–
–
–
51
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Example: Practical TEMPEST for $3000
•ECDH Key-Extraction via Low-Bandwidth Electromagnetic Attacks on PCs
–https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/129.pdf
•E-M trace captured (across a wall)
52
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Example: Practical TEMPEST for $3000
•ECDH implemented in latest GnuPG's Libgcrypt
•Single chosen ciphertext – used operands directly visible
53
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Example: How to evaluate attack severity?
•What was the cost?
–Not high: $3000
•What was the targeted implementation?
–Widely used implementation: latest GnuPG's Libgcrypt
•What were preconditions?
–Physical presence, but behind the wall
•Is it possible to mitigate the attack?
–Yes: fix in library, physical shielding of device, perimeter…
–What is the cost of mitigation?
54
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Example: Acoustic side channel in GnuPG
•RSA Key Extraction via Low-Bandwidth Acoustic Cryptanalysis
–Insecure RSA computation in GnuPG
–https://www.tau.ac.il/~tromer/papers/acoustic-20131218.pdf
•Acoustic emanation used as side-channel
–4096-bit key extracted in one hour
–Mobile phone 4 meters away
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
55

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Example: Cache-timing attack on AES
•Attacks not limited to asymmetric cryptography
–Daniel J. Bernstein, http://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf
•Scenario: Operation with secret AES key on remote server
–Key retrieved based on response time variations of table lookups cache hits/misses
–225 x 600B random packets + 227 x 400B + one minute brute-force search
•Very difficult to write high-speed but constant-time AES
–Problem: table lookups are not constant-time
–Not recognized by NIST during AES competition
–
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
56

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Other types of side-channel attacks
•Acoustic emanation
–keyboard clicks
–capacitor noise
–Speech eavesdropping based on high-speed camera
•Cache-occupation side-channel
–Cache miss has impact on duration of operation
–Other process can measure own cache hits/misses if cache is shared
•…
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
57

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
MITIGATIONS
•
58
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Side-channels mitigation
•Don’t use own implementation
–Very hard to prevent side-channels
•Don’t do data dependency
–Fixed or completely randomized timings
•Be very careful with optimizations
–Data-dependent pre-computed tables
–Data-dependent conditional branches (naïve Montgomery)
•Lower layer leakage can be prevented on higher level
–Blinding/masking…
–Don’t use vulnerable constructions (ifeq instruction)
–Implementation secure on higher level can be compromised on lower level
–
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
59

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Generic protection techniques
1.Shielding - preventing leakage outside
–Acoustic shielding, noisy environment
2.Creating additional “noise”
–Parallel software load, noisy power consumption circuits
3.Compensating for leakage
–Perform inverse computation/storage
4.Harden algorithm
–Ciphertext blinding…
60
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
How to test real implementation?
1.Be aware of various side-channels
2.Obtain measurement for given side-channel
–Many times (103 - 107), compute statistics
–Same input data and key
–Same key and different data
–Different keys and same data…
3.Compare groups of measured data
–Is difference visible? => potential leakage
–Is distribution uniform? Is distribution normal?
4.Try to measure again with better precision J
•
61
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Example: NaCl (“salt”) library
•Relatively new cryptographic library (2012)
–Designed for usable security and side-channel resistance
–D. Bernstein, T. Lange, P. Schwabe
–https://cr.yp.to/highspeed/coolnacl-20120725.pdf
–Active fork is libsodium https://github.com/jedisct1/libsodium
•Designed for usable security (hard to misuse)
–Fixed good algs (AE: Poly1305, Sign: EC Curve25519)
–c=crypto_box(m,n,pk,sk), m=crypto_box_open(c,n,pk,sk)
•Implemented to have constant-time execution
–No data flow from secrets to load addresses
–No data flow from secrets to branch conditions
–No padding oracles (recall CBC padding oracle in PA193)
–Centralizing randomness and avoiding unnecessary randomness
62
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
SEMI-INVASIVE ATTACKS
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
63

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Semi-invasive attacks
•“Physical” manipulation (but card still working)
•Micro probes placed on the bus
–After removing epoxy layer
•Fault induction
–liquid nitrogen, power glitches, light flashes…
–modify memory (RAM, EEPROM), e.g., PIN counter
–modify instruction, e.g., conditional jump
•| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
64

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
PINverif_1
PIN verification procedure
• [Decrease counter, verify, increase] - correct
•
•
•
•
–
• [Verify, decrease/increase]
•
PINverif_2
65

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Fault induction
•Attacker can induce bit faults in memory locations
–power glitch, flash light, radiation...
–harder to induce targeted then random fault
•Protection with shadow variable
–every variable has shadow counterpart
–shadow variable contains inverse value
–consistency is checked every read/write to memory
•
•
•Robust protection, but cumbersome for developer
•| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
•01011010
•10100101
•01011010
•10100101
•if (a != ~a_inv) Exception();
•a = 0x55;
•a_inv = ~0x55;
•01010101
•10101010
•01010000
•if (a != ~a_inv) Exception();
•a = 0x13;
•a
•
•a_inv
66

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
CONCLUSIONS
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
67

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Morale
1.Preventing implementation attacks is extra difficult
–Naïve code is often vulnerable
•Not aware of existing problems/attacks
–Optimized code is often vulnerable
•Time/power/acoustic… dependency on secret data
2.Use well-known libraries instead of own code
–And follow security advisories and patch quickly
3.Security / mitigations are complex issues
–Underlying hardware can leak information as well
–Don’t allow for large number of queries
–
•
68
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Mandatory reading
•G. Goodwill, Defending against side-channel attacks
–http://www.embedded.com/print/4408435
–http://www.embedded.com/print/4409695
•Focus on:
–What side channels are inspected?
–What step in executed operation is misused for attack?
–What are proposed defenses?
•
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
69

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Optional reading
•Why Trust is Bad for Security, D. Gollman, 2006
–http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15710661/157/3
•Focus on:
–Which definition of Trust Gollman uses?
–Why Gollman claims that Trust is bad for security?
•
70
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
Conclusions
•Trusted element is secure anchor in a system
–Understand why it is trusted and for whom
•Trusted element can be attacked
–Non-invasive, semi-invasive, invasive methods
•Side-channel attacks are very powerful techniques
–Attacks against particular implementation of algorithm
–Attack possible even when algorithm is secure (e.g., AES)
•Use well-know libraries instead own implementation
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017
71

P:\CRCS\2012_0178_Redesign_loga_a_JVS\PPT_prezentace\sablona\pracovni\normalni.jpg
•
72
| PV204 Trusted element 21.2.2017