‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 1 Elliptic curves cryptography CHAPTER 8: Elliptic Curves Cryptography and factorization Cryptography based on manipulation of points of so called elliptic curves is getting momentum and has a tendency to replace the public key cryptography based on unfeasibility of the factorization of integers, or on unfeasibility of the computation of discrete logarithms. For example, US-government has recommended to use elliptic curve cryptography. The main advantage of elliptic curves cryptography is that to achieve a certain level of security shorter keys are required than in case of “usual cryptography”. Using shorter keys can result in a considerable savings in hardware implementations. The second advantage of the elliptic curves cryptography is that quite a few of attacks available for cryptography based on factorization and discrete logarithm do not work for elliptic curves cryptography. It is amazing how practical is the elliptic curve cryptography that is based on very strangely looking theoretical concepts. IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 2 Elliptic curves cryptography Elliptic Curves An elliptic curve E is the graph of the relation defined by the equation E: y2 = x3 + ax + b (where a, b will be either rational numbers or integers (and computation may be done modulo some n)) extended by a “point at infinity”, denoted usually as ∞ (or 0) that can be regarded as sitting, at the same time, at the very top and very bottom of the y-axis. We will consider mainly only those elliptic curves that have no multiple roots - what is equivalent to the condition 4a3+27b2 ≠ 0. In case coefficients and x, y can be any rational numbers, a graph of an elliptic curve has one of the form shown in the following figure that depends on whether polynomial x3+ax+b has three or one real root. IV054 elliptic_curve_1 elliptic_curve_2 y2=x(x+1)(x-1) y2=x3+73 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 3 Elliptic curves cryptography Historical Remarks Elliptic curves are not ellipses and therefore it seems strange that they have such a name. Elliptic curves actually received their names from their relation to so called elliptic integrals IV054 that arise in the computation of the arc-length of ellipses. It may also seem puzzling why not to consider curves given by more general equations The reason is that if we are working with rational coefficients or mod p, where p>3 is a prime, then our general equation can be transformed to our special case. In other cases, it may be necessary to consider the most general form of equation. > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 4 Elliptic curves cryptography Addition of Points on Elliptic Curves (1) Geometry On elliptic curves we can define addition of points in such a way that points of the corresponding curve with such an addition form an Abelian group. If the line through two different points P1 and P2 of an elliptic curve E intersects E in a point Q=(x,y), then we define P1+P2=P3=(x,-y). (This also implies that for any point P on E it holds P+∞ = P.) If the line through two different points P1 and P2 is parallel with y-axis, then we define P1+P2=∞. In case P1=P2, and the tangent to E in P1 intersects E in a point Q=(x,y), then we define P1+P1=(x,-y). It should now be obvious how to define subtraction of two points of an elliptic curve. It is now easy to verify that the above addition of points forms Abelian group with ∞ as the identity (null) element. IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 5 Elliptic curves cryptography If p≠2 Weierstrass equation can be simplified by transformation to get the equation for some constants d,e,f and if p≠3 by transformation to get equation IV054 An elliptic curve over where p is a prime is the set of points (x,y) satisfying so-called Weierstrass equation for some constants u,v,a,b,c together with a single element 0, called the point of infinity. ELIPTIC CURVES - GENERALITY ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 6 Elliptic curves cryptography Addition of Points on Elliptic Curves (2) Formulas Addition of points P1=(x1,y1) and P2=(x2,y2) of an elliptic curve E: y2=x3+ax+b can be easily computed using the following formulas: P1 + P2 =P3=(x3,y3) where x3 = λ2 - x1 – x2 y3 = λ(x1 – x3) – y1 and IV054 If P1 ≠ P2 If P1 = P2 All that holds for the case that λ is finite; otherwise P3 = ∞. Example For curve y2=x3+73 and P1=(2,9), P2=(3,10) we have P1 + P2 = P3= (-4,-3) and P3 + P3 = (72,611). > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 7 Elliptic curves cryptography Elliptic Curves mod n The points on an elliptic curve E: y2=x3+ax+b (mod n) are such pairs (x,y) mod n that satisfy the above equation, along with the point ∞ at infinity. Example Elliptic curve y2=x3+2x+3 (mod 5) has points (1,1),(1,4),(2,0),(3,1),(3,4),(4,0), ∞. Example For elliptic curve E: y2=x3+x+6 (mod 11) and its point P=(2,7) holds 2P=(5,2); 3P=(8,3). Number of points on an elliptic curve (mod p) can be easily estimated. Hasse’s theorem If an elliptic curve E (mod p) has N points then |N-p-1|<2 IV054 The addition of points on an elliptic curve mod n is done by the same formulas as given previously, except that instead of rational numbers c/d we deal with cd-1 Example For the curve E: y2=x3+2x+3 it holds (1,4)+(3,1)=(2,0); (1,4)+(2,0)=(?,?). > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 8 Elliptic curves cryptography Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithm Let E be an elliptic curve and A, B be its points such that B = kA = (A + A + … + A) - k times - for some k. The task to find such a k is called the discrete logarithm problem for elliptic curves. No efficient algorithm to compute discrete logarithm problem for elliptic curves is known and also no good general attacks. Elliptic curves based cryptography is based on these facts. A general procedure for changing a discrete logarithm based cryptographic protocols to a cryptographic protocols based on elliptic curves: § Assign to the message (plaintext) a point on an elliptic curve. § Change, in the cryptographic protocol, modular multiplication to addition of points on an elliptic curve. § Change, in the cryptographic protocol, exponentiation to multiplication of a point on the elliptic curve by an integer. § To the point of an elliptic curve that results from such a protocol one assigns a message (cryptotext). IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 9 Elliptic curves cryptography Mapping Messages into Points of Elliptic Curves (1) Problem and basic idea The problem of assigning messages to points on an elliptic curve is difficult because there are no polynomial-time algorithms to write down points of an arbitrary elliptic curve. Fortunately, there is a fast randomized algorithm, to assign points of any elliptic curve to messages, that can fail with probability that can be made arbitrarily small. Basic idea: Given an elliptic curve E (mod p), the problem is that not to every x there is an y such that (x,y) is a point of E. Given a message (number) m we therefore adjoin to m few bits at the end of m and adjust them until we get a number x such that x3 + ax + b is a square mod p. IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 10 Elliptic curves cryptography Mapping Messages into Points of Elliptic Curves (2) Technicalities Let K be a large integer such that a failure rate of 1/2K is acceptable when trying to encode a message by a point. For j from 0 to K verify whether for x = mK + j, x3 + ax + b (mod p) is a square (mod p) of an integer y. If such an j is found, encoding is done; if not the algorithm fails (with probability 1/2K because x3 + ax + b is a square approximately half of the time). In order to recover the message m from the point (x,y), we compute: IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 11 Elliptic curves cryptography Elliptic Curve Key Exchange Elliptic curve version of the Diffie-Hellman key generation goes as follows: Let Alice and Bob agree on a prime p, on an elliptic curve E (mod p) and on a point P on E. § Alice chooses an integer na, computes naP and sends it to Bob. § Bob chooses an integer nb, computes nbP and sends it to Alice. § Alice computes na(nbP) and Bob computes nb(naP). This way they have the same key. IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 12 Elliptic curves cryptography Elliptic Curve Version of ElGamal Cryptosystem Standard version of ElGamal: Bob chooses a prime p, a generator q < p, an integer a, computes y = qa (mod p), makes public p,q, y and keeps a secret. To send a message m Alice chooses a random r, computes: y1 = qr ; y2 = myr and sends it to Bob who decrypts by calculating Elliptic curve version of ElGamal: Bob chooses a prime p, an elliptic curve E (mod p), a point P on E, an integer a, computes Q = aP, makes E, p, and Q public and keeps a secret. To send a message m Alices expresses m as a point X on E, chooses random r, computes y1 = rP ; y2 = X + rQ And sends the pair (y1,y2) to Bob who decrypts by calculating X = y2 – ay1. IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 13 Elliptic curves cryptography Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Eliptic curves version of ElGamal digital signatures has the following form for signing (a message) m, an integer, by Alice and to have the signature verified by Bob: Alice chooses p and an elliptic curve E (mod p), a point P on E and calculates the number of points n on E (mod p) – what can be done, and we assume that 0 < m < n. Alice then chooses a random integer a and computes Q = aP. She makes public p, E, P, Q and keeps secret a. To sign m Alice does the following: § Alice chooses a random integer r, 1 ≤ r < n such that gcd(r,n) = 1 and computes R = rP = (x,y). § Alice computes s = r–1(m – ax) (mod n) § Alice sends the signed message (m,R,s) to Bob. Bob verifies the signature as follows: § Bob declares the signature as valid if xQ + sR = mP The verification procedure works because xQ + sR = xaP + r–1(m – ax)(rP) = xaP + (m – ax)P = mP Warning Observe that actually rr–1 = 1 + tn for some t. For the above verification procedure to work we then have to use the fact that nP = ∞ and therefore P + t ∞ = P IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 14 Elliptic curves cryptography Factoring with Elliptic Curves Basis idea: To factorize an integer n choose an elliptic curve E, a point P on E and compute (modulo n) either iP for i=2,3,4,… or 2j P for j=1,2,…. The point is that in doing that one needs to compute gcd(k,n) for various k. If one of these values is between 1 and n we have a factor of n. Factoring of large integers: The above idea can be easily parallelised and converted to using an enormous number of computers to factor a single very large n. Each computer gets some number of elliptic curves and some points on them and multiplies these points by some integers according to the rule for addition of points. If one of computers encounters, during such a computation, a need to compute 1 < gcd(k,n) < n ,factorization is finished. Example: If curve E: y2 = x3 + 4x + 4 (mod 2773) and its point P=(1,3) are used, then 2P=(1771,705) and in order to compute 3P one has to compute gcd(1770,2773)=59 -- factorization is done. Example: For elliptic curve E: y2=x3+x-1 (mod 35) and its point P=(1,1) we have 2P=(2,2); 4P=(0,22); 8P=(16,19) and at the attempt to compute 9P one needs to compute gcd(15,35)=5 and factorization is done. The only things that remains to be explored is how efficient is this method and when it is more efficient than other methods. IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 15 Elliptic curves cryptography Important Observations (1) § If n = pq for primes p,q, then an elliptic curve E (mod n) can be seen as a pair of elliptic curves E (mod p) and E (mod q). • § It follows from the Lagrange theorem that for any elliptic curve E (mod n) and its point P there is an k ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 16 Elliptic curves cryptography Practicality of Factoring Using ECC (1) Let us continue to discuss the following key problem for factorization using elliptic curves: Problem: How to choose k such that for a given point P we should try to compute points iP or 2iP for all multiples of P smaller than kP? Idea: If one searches for m-digits factors, one chooses k in such a way that k is a multiple of as many as possible of those m-digit numbers which do not have too large prime factors. In such a case one has a good chance that k is a multiple of the number of elements of the group of points of the elliptic curve modulo n. Method 1: One chooses an integer B and takes as k the product of all maximal powers of primes smaller than B. Example: In order to find a 6-digit factor one chooses B=147 and k=27∙34∙53 ∙ 72∙11∙2∙13∙… ∙139. The following table shows B and the number of elliptic curves one has to test: IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 17 Elliptic curves cryptography Practicality of Factoring Using ECC (2) IV054 Digits of to-be-factors 6 9 12 18 24 30 B 147 682 2462 23462 162730 945922 Number of curves 10 24 55 231 833 2594 Computation time by the elliptic curves method depends on the size of factors. > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 18 Elliptic curves cryptography Elliptic curve factorization - details Given an n such that gcd(n, 6) = 1 and let the smallest factor of n be expected to be smaller than an F. One should then proceed as follows: Choose an integer parameter r and: (1) Select, randomly, an elliptic curve E : y2 = x3 + ax + b such that gcd(n, 4a2 + 27b2) = 1 and a random point P on E. (2) Choose integer bounds A,B,M such that for some primes p1 < p2 < . . . < pl £ B and apj , being the largest exponent such that pjaj £ A. Set j = k = 1 (3) Calculate pj P. (4) Computing gcd. • If pj P ¹ O (mod n), then set P = pj P and reset k ¬ k + 1 1. If k £ apj , then go to step (3). IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 19 Elliptic curves cryptography Elliptic curve factorization – details II 2. If k > apj , then reset j ¬ j + 1, k ¬ 1. If j £ l, then go to step (3); otherwise go to step (5) • If pj P º O (mod n) and no factor of n was found at the computation of inverse elements, then go to step (5) (5) Reset r ¬ r − 1. If r > 0 go to step (1); otherwise terminate with ”failure”. The ”smoothness bound” B is recommended to be chosen as B = and in such a case running time is IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 20 Elliptic curves cryptography Elliptic Curves: FAQ • § How to choose (randomly) an elliptic curve E and point P on E? An easy way is first choose a point P(x,y) and an a and then compute b = y2 - x3 - ax to get the curve E: y2 = x3 + ax + b. • § What happens at the factorization using elliptic curve method, if for a chosen curve (E mod n) the corresponding cubic polynomial x3 + ax + b has multiple roots (that is if 4a3 + 27b2 = 0) ? No problem, method still works. • § What kind of elliptic curves are really used in cryptography? Elliptic curves over fields GF(2n) for n > 150. Dealing with such elliptic curves requires, however, slightly different rules. IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 21 Elliptic curves cryptography FACTORIZATION Factorization of integers is a very important problem. A variety of techniques has been developed to deal with this problem. So far the fastest classical factorization algorithms work in time The fastest quantum algorithm for factorization works in both quantum and classical polynomial time. In the rest of chapter several factorization methods will be presented and discussed. IV054 ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 22 Elliptic curves cryptography 1990 A. K. Lenstra+… found factorization for F9 (155 digits) Fermat numbers factorization Factorization of so-called Fermat numbers 22^i + 1 is a good example to illustrate progress that has been made in the area of factorization. Pierre de Fermat (1601-65) expected that all numbers Fi = 22^i + 1 i ł 1 are primes. This is true for i = 1,…,4. F1 = 5, F2 = 17, F3 = 257, F4 = 65537. 1732 L. Euler found that F5 = 4294967297 = 641 · 6700417 IV054 1880 Landry+LeLasser found that F6 = 18446744073709551617 = 274177 · 67280421310721 1970 Morrison+Brillhart found factorization for F7 =(39 digits) F7 = 340282366920938463463374607431768211457 = = 5704689200685129054721 · 59649589127497217 1980 Brent+Pollard found factorization for F8 ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 23 Elliptic curves cryptography FERMAT TEST It follows from the Little Fermat Theorem that if p is a prime, then for all 0 ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 24 Elliptic curves cryptography Pollard ρ-Method A variety of factorization algorithms, of complexity around O(p1/2) where p is the smallest prime factor of n, is based on the following idea: •A function f is taken that “behaves like a randomizing function” and f(x) ≡ f(x mod p) (mod p) for any factor p of n usually f(x) = x2 + 1 •A random x0 is taken and iteration xi+1 = f(xi) mod n is performed (this modulo n computation actually “hides” modulo p computation in the following sense: if x’0 = x0 , x’i+1 = f(x’i) mod n, then x’i = xi mod p) •Since Zp is finite, the shape of the sequence x’i will remind the letter ρ, with a tail and a loop. Since f is “random”, the loop modulo n rarely synchronizes with the loop modulo p •The loop is easy to detect by GCDcomputations and it can be shown that the total length of tail and loop is O(p1/2). 1. IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 25 Elliptic curves cryptography Loop Detection In order to detect the loop it is enough to perform the following computation: a ¬ x0; b ¬ x0; repeat a ¬ f(a); b ¬ f(f(b)); until a = b Iteration ends if at = b2t for some t greater than the tail length and a multiple of the loop length. 1. IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 26 Elliptic curves cryptography First Pollard ρ-algorithm Input: an integer n with a factor smaller than B Complexity: O(B1/2) of arithmetic operations x0 ¬ random; a ¬ x0; b ¬ x0; do a ¬ f(a) mod n; b ¬ f(f(b) mod n) mod n; until gcd(a – b, n) ≠ 1 output gcd(a – b, n) The proof that complexity of the first Pollardρ factorization algorithm is given by O(n1/4) arithmetic operations is based on the following result: Lemma Let x0 be random and f be “random” in Zp, xi+1 = f(xi). The probability that all elements of the sequence x0, x1, . . . , xt are pairwise different when t = 1 + floor((2λp)1/2) is less than e-λ. IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 27 Elliptic curves cryptography Second Pollard ρ-algorithm Basic idea 1. Choose an easy to compute f: Zn ® Zn and x0 Î Zn. Example f(x) = x2 + 1 2. Keep computing xi+1 = f(xj), j = 0,1,2,… and gcd(xj - xk, n), k Ł j. (Observe that if xj º xk mod p for a prime factor p of n, then gcd(xj - xk, n) ł p.) Example n = 91, f(x) = x2+1, x0 = 1, x1 = 2, x2 = 5, x3 = 26 gcd(x3 - x2, n) = gcd(26 - 5, 91) = 7 Remark: In the ρ-method, it is important to choose a function f in such a way that f maps Zn into Zn in a ”random'' way. Basic question: How good is the ρ-method? (How long we expect to have to wait before we get two values xj, xk such that gcd(xj - xk, n) ¹ 1, if n is not a prime?) IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 28 Elliptic curves cryptography Basic lemma Given: n, f:Zn ® Zn and x0ÎZn We ask how many iterations are needed to get xj º xk mod r where r is a prime factor of n. IV054 Lemma Let S be a set, r = |S|. Given a map f:S ® S, x0ÎS, let xj+1 = f(xj), j ł 0. Let l > 0, Then the proportion of pairs (f, x0) for which x0, x1,…, xl are distinct, where f runs over all mappings from S to S and x0 over all S, is less than e-l. Proof Number of pairs (x0, f) is r r+1. How many pairs (x0, f) are there for which x0,…, xl are distinct? r choices for x0, r-1 for x1, r-2 for x2,… The values of f for each of the remaining r - l values are arbitrary - there are r r - l possibilities for those values. Total number of ways of choosing x0 and f such that x0,…, xl are different is and the proportion of pairs with such a property is For we have ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 29 Elliptic curves cryptography RHO-ALGORITHM A simplification of the basic idea: For each k compute gcd(xk - xj, n) for just one j < k. Choose f:Zn ® Zn, x0, compute xk = f(xk-1), k > 0. If k is an (h +1)-bit integer, i.e. 2h Ł k Ł 2h+1, then compute gcd(xk, x2^h-1). IV054 Example n = 4087, f(x) = x2 + x + 1, x0 = 2 x1 = f(2) = 7, gcd(x1 - x0, n) = 1 x2 = f(7) = 57, gcd(x2 - x1, n) = gcd(57 – 7, n) = 1 x3 = f(57) = 3307, gcd(x3 - x1, n) = gcd(3307 - 7, n) = 1 x4 = f(3307) = 2745, gcd(x4 - x3, n) = gcd(2745 - 3307, n) = 1 x5 = f(2746) = 1343, gcd(x5 - x3, n) = gcd(1343 - 3307, n) = 1 x6 = f(1343) = 2626, gcd(x6 - x3, n) = gcd(2626 - 3307, n) = 1 x7 = f(2626) = 3734, gcd(x7 - x3, n) = gcd(3734 - 3307, n) = 61 Disadvantage We likely will not detect the first case such that for some k0 there is a j0 < k0 such that gcd(xk0 - xj0, n) > 1. This is no real problem! Let k0 has h +1 bits. Set j = 2h+1 -1, k = j + k 0 - j0. k has (h+2) bits, gcd(xk - xj, n) > 1 k < 2h+2 = 4 · 2h Ł 4k0. ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 30 Elliptic curves cryptography RHO-ALGORITHM Theorem Let n be odd + composite and 1 < r < sqrt(n) its factor. If f, x0 are chosen randomly, then rho algorithm reveals r in bit operations with high probability. More precisely, there is a constant C > 0 such that for any l > 0, the probability that the rho algorithm fails to find a nontrivial factor of n in bit operations is less than e - l. IV054 Proof Let C1 be a constant such that gcd(y - z, n) can be computed in C1log3n bit operations whenever y, z < n. Let C2 be a constant such that f(x) mod n can be computed in C2log2n bit operations if x < n. If k0 is the first index for which there exists j0 < k0 with xk0 º xj0 mod r, then the rho-algorithm finds r in k Ł 4k0 steps. The total number of bit operations is bounded by -> 4k0(C1log3n + C2log2n) By Lemma the probability that k0 is greater than is less than e - l. If , then the number of bits operations needed to find r is bounded by If we choose C > 4sqrt(2)(C1 + C2), then we have that r will be found in bit operations - unless we made uniformed choice of (f, x0) the probability of what is at most e - l. ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 31 Elliptic curves cryptography COMMENTS Pollard ρ-method works fine for integers n with a small factor. Next method, so called Pollard (p-1)-method, works fine for n having a prime factor p such that all prime factors of p-1 are small. When all prime factors of p-1 are smaller than a B, we say that p-1 is B-smooth. > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 32 Elliptic curves cryptography POLLARD ’s p-1 algorithm Pollard’s algorithm (to factor n given a bound b). a := 2; for j=2 to b do a:= aj mod n; f:= gcd(a-1,n); f=gcd(2b! -1,n)} if 1 < f < n then f is a factor of n otherwise failure Indeed, let p be a prime divisor of n and q < b for every prime q|(p-1). (Hence (p-1)|b!). At the end of the for-loop we have a Ξ 2b! (mod n) and therefore a Ξ 2b! ( mod p) By Fermat theorem 2p-1 Ξ 1 (mod p) and since (p-1)|b! we get aΞ2b! Ξ1 (mod p).and therefore we have p|(a-1) Hence p | gcd(a-1,n) > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 33 Elliptic curves cryptography Important Observations (2) Pollard ρ-method works fine for numbers with a small factor. The p-1 method requires that p-1 is smooth. The elliptic curve method requires only that there are enough smooth integers near p and so at least one of randomly chosen integers near p is smooth. This means that the elliptic curves factorization method succeeds much more often than p-1 method. Fermat factorization and Quadratic Sieve method discussed later works fine if integer has two factors of almost the same size. • IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 34 Elliptic curves cryptography Fermat factorization If n = pq, p < , then Therefore, in order to find a factor of n, we need only to investigate the values x = a2 − n for a = + 1, + 2, . . . , (n − 1)/2 until a perfect square is found. IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 35 Elliptic curves cryptography FERMAT FACTORIZATION Basic idea: Factorization is easy if one finds x, y such that n | (x2 - y 2) Proof: If n divides (x + y)(x - y) and n does not divide neither x+y nor x-y, then one factor of n has to divide x+y and another one x-y. Example n = 7429 = 2272 -2102, x = 227, y = 210 x – y = 17 x + y = 437 gcd(17, 7429) = 17 gcd(437, 7429) = 437. How to find such x and y? First idea: one tries all t starting with until is a square . Second idea: One forms a system of (modular) linear equations and determines x and y from the solutions of such a system. number of digits of n 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 number of equations 3000 4000 7400 15000 30000 51000 120000 245000 IV054 > ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 36 Elliptic curves cryptography Method of Quadratic Sieve to factorize an integer n Step 1 One finds numbers x such that x2 - n is small and has small factors. Example 832 – 7429 = -540 = (-1) · 22 · 33 · 5 872 – 7429 = 140 = 22 · 5 · 7 relations 882 – 7429 = 315 = 32 · 5 · 7 IV054 Step 2 One multiplies some of the relations if their product is a square. For example (872 – 7429)(882 – 7429) = 22 · 32 · 52 · 72 = 2102 Now (87 · 88)2 º (872 - 7429)(882 - 7429) mod 7429 2272 º 2102 mod 7429 Hence 7429 divides 2272-2102. Formation of equations: For the i-th relation one takes a variable li and forms the expression ((-1) · 22 · 33 · 5)l1 · (22 · 5 · 7)l2 · (32 · 5 · 7)l3 = (-1)l1 · 22l1 + 2l2 · 32l1 + 2l2 · 5l1 + l2 + l3 · 7l2 +l3 If this is to form a quadrat the following equations have to hold . ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 37 Elliptic curves cryptography Method of quadratic sieve to factorize n Problem How to find relations? Using the algorithm called Quadratic sieve method. IV054 u -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 (m + u)2 - n -540 -373 -204 -33 140 315 492 Sieve with 2 -135 -51 35 123 Sieve with 3 -5 -17 -11 35 41 Sieve with 5 -1 7 7 Sieve with 7 1 1 Step 1 One chooses a set of primes that can be factors - a so-called factor basis. One chooses an m such that m2 - n is small and considers numbers (m + u)2 - n for –k Ł u Ł k for small k. One then tries to factor all (m + u)2 - n with primes from the factor basis, from the smallest to the largest. In order to factor a 129-digit number from the RSA challenge they used 8 424 486 relations 569 466 equations 544 939 elements in the factor base ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 38 Elliptic curves cryptography Factorization of a 512-bit number On August 22, 1999, a team of scientifists from 6 countries found, after 7 months of computing, using 300 very fast SGI and SUN workstations and Pentium II, factors of the so-called RSA-155 number with 512 bits (about 155 digits). IV054 RSA-155 was a number from a Challenge list issue by the US company RSA Data Security and “represented'' 95% of 512-bit numbers used as the key to protect electronic commerce and financial transmissions on Internet. Factorization of RSA-155 would require in total 37 years of computing time on a single computer. When in 1977 Rivest and his colleagues challenged the world to factor RSA-129, he estimated that, using knowledge of that time, factorization of RSA-129 would require 1016 years. ‹#› Elliptic curves cryptography 39 Elliptic curves cryptography LARGE NUMBERS Hindus named many large numbers - one having 153 digits. Romans initially had no terms for numbers larger than 104. Greeks had a popular belief that no number is larger than the total count of sand grains needed to fill the universe. Large numbers with special names: googol - 10100 golplex - 1010^100 IV054 FACTORIZATION of very large NUMBERS W. Keller factorized F23471 which has 107000 digits. J. Harley factorized: 1010^1000 +1. One factor: 316,912,650,057,350,374,175,801,344,000,001 1992 E. Crandal, Doenias proved, using a computer that F22, which has more than million of digits, is composite (but no factor of F22 is known). Number was used to develop a theory of the distribution of prime numbers.