Front squat
vs.
back squat
Petra Hromád ková
O
3 studie
Úhly- kolena, trupkl Tlakové síly, momenty sil £3 ■Aktivita svalů IqDDq
cca 10 dobrovolníků Senzory na hlavních kloubech Senzory elektrické aktivity svalů Vysokorychlostní kamery
Knee ingle
	
—	
	
—	
0     J 0     20     30     40     50     60 ".
90 -u:
\ A.
2DD.DD 180.00 160.00 | 140.00 120.00 100.00 60.00 E0.00
<
4 5 G
Movement Phase
Figure 2: Mean (± SD) changes in relative knee joint angle throughout front and back squat performances.
BÜ.ÜÜ 50.ÜÜ -^ 40.ÜÜ -
3, 30.00 -■5 20.00 -1 -0.00
— - -Back Squat
Front Squat
-1-1-
4 5 6
Movomont Phaso
8
Figure 3: Mean {± SD) changes in relative absolute trunk lean angle throughout front and back squat performances. (* p < 0.05).
•
200 -. 100 -
0
Rectus Femoris
g.
LU
Q
LU
O
200 q 100 -
o
200 -100 -
o
Vastus Lateralis
Vastus Medialis
200 100 -| 0
Biceps Femoris
200 -100 -0
200 - Erector 100 4 Spinae
Semiten d i nos u s
1-r
(SGULLETT JQTILLMAN MD;GUTIERREZ GM;CHOW JW. A biomechanical comparison of back and front squats in healthy trained       *\ Q individuals. Journal Of Strength And Conditioning Research/National Strength[on[\ne]. 2009, 23(1), 284-92 [cit. 2016-11-27]. DOI: ® 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31818546bb. ISSN 15334287.
DIGGIN, D., C. O'REGAN, N. WHELAN, S. DALY, V. MCLOUGHLIN, L. MCNAMARA a REILLY. A BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF FRONT VERSUS BACK SQUAT: INJURY IMPLICATIONS. Portuguese Journal of Sport Sciences [online]. 2011, 2011(11), 1-4 [cit. 2016-11-27]. Dostupne z: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258363730AbiomechanicalAnal ysisoffrontandbacksquatinjuryimplications
©BRAIDOT, A. A., M. H. BRUSA, F. E. LESTUSSI a G. P. PARERA. Biomechanics of Front and Back Squat exercises. Journal of Physics: Conference Series [online]. 2007, 2007(90), 3-10 [cit. 2016-11-27]. Dostupne z:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231031307Biomechanicsoffron tandbacksquatexercises