The British vs. American Models in history n Drug addiction is illness n Medical model: based on controlled dispensation of drugs to addicts n Services are primaraly Harm reduction orianted n In favour of prescribing common drugs (e.g. Diamorphin/heroin) as part of treatment n Discussing liberalisation of cannabis and permit its medical use n Drug use is a criminal activity n Criminal justice model: based on repression and punishment n Services are primaraly abstinence orianted n Needle exchange programs are not on official agenda n Prescribing drugs (e.g. heroin) as part of treatment is an “undesirable development” n “War on drugs” n Harsh punishment even for minor possesion of cannabis Percentage drug use in the UK (16-24 year-olds) 1996 1998 2000 2001/2 2003/4 Any drug 30 32 30 30 28 Cannabis 26 28 27 27 26 Cocaine 1 3 5 5 5 Ecstasy 7 5 6 7 5 Amphetamines 12 10 6 5 4 Poppers 5 5 4 4 4 LSD 4 3 2 1 1 Heroin 0 0 1 0 0 Methadone 0 1 0 0 0 Percentage drug use in the US (16-24 year-olds) 2001 2002 2003 2004 Any drug 53.9 53.0 51.1 51.1 Cannabis 49.0 47.8 46.1 45.7 Cocaine 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.7 Ecstasy 11.7 10.5 8.3 7.5 Methamphetamines - 6.7 6.2 6.2 LSD 10.9 8.4 5.9 4.6 Heroin 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.5 Tranquilizers 10.3 11.4 10.2 10.6 Inhalants 13.0 11.7 11.2 10.9 European model today n Integrating both abstinence and Harm Reduction model = services run different programs = indication for sevices/interventions depend on: — good assassment of individual client situation = case management – work with a care plan in the community — Possibility of (clients) choice n Client has a right to be the co-author n Drug demand reduction policy/strategy has to reflect the need of: — Service Users — Service Providers — Service Donars n Funding being redirected from drugs suply reduction to drug demand reduction European model - Pragmatic measures for prevention of HIV-AIDS among IDUs n Early secondary prevention – dealing with the syndrom of the hidden population (low number of problematic drug users come to services alone n Pragmatic policy - harm-reduction orientated (including prescribing programmes, out reach work and low threshold services) n Networking - working with/through differences n Community cooperation n Multidisciplinary approach n Information campaign aimed at Theoretical backround n Drug problem is bio-psycho-social (BPS) problem n Out of 100% of people who tried drugs, only 10% get to chronical stage n There are two significant subgroups — Primary mental health problems — Socialy deprivated and/or excluded group Theoretical backround BPS model n Assessment – proces of drug problem development: — History of a drug use — Stages of drug problem — Development of awareness of the drug problem — Comorbid problems — Indication to efective intervention Theoretical backround – BPS model n What do we work with when we say a drug problem? Is it only drug addiction? — Withdrawal – physical addiction — Craving - psychological — Flashbacks — Overdoses — Social context issues – changes in traditional social structure = family, education, job situation, peer enviroment/socialising — Chaotic life style — Criminal behavior — Risky behavior in drug use, sex… — „Spiritual emptyness…“ Theoretical backround – forms of interventions n Medical n Psychological n Educational n Social n Self-support n Spiritual Network of Services – work with a drug user is a proces n Prevention Centre n Low threshold centre Drop-in centre (inc. Club “Sklenik”) n Street work/out reach (inc. Synthetic drugs prevention) Specific services n Spiritual support n Skills learning center – regarding a job market n Prison services n Self help groups, users forum n Training institute – IES Our values… n Regard for human life n Assistance and support for people n Primary human ethical principles based on the European culture n Tolerance, respect and equal opportunities n Openness n Trust n Innovation and creativity n Professionalism and professional ethics n Team work n Transparency n Perseverance and courage …and the determination to survive each day as it comes MUDr Prof Michael Gossop “The urgent need to respond to the threat of HIV and AIDS has radically altered the drugs agenda. The rhetoric of United States and some other countries may continue to promote the discredited ideals of the “war against drugs” and “zero tolerance”, but living with drugs has now become an imperative.”