Pipeline Policy Jan Osička Pipeline Policy  European gas network 1960 - 1990  Pipeline policy: some thoughts on definition  Case Study: Russia‘s pipeline strategy Discussion topics  Nabucco and South Stream: competent or compliant?  Diversification of routes or diversification of sources?  What impact would the new major projects have onV4 countries?  Iran as a gas supplier to the EU  Turkey‘s energy strategy  Russia as an energy bully European gas network  1920s – 1930s: first experiments with natural gas as a substitute for manufactured gas in Europe  WW II: scarce oil, coal locally unavailable (Romania, Austria, n. Italy, sw. France, e. Poland)  1960s: before Dutch, Algerian, Ukrainian, Siberian, Central Asian discoveries the markets were scattered and localized.  1970s: rapid growth in gas use and network development  1965: EU consumption of 39 bcm  1975: EU consumption of 216 bcm  wider portfolio of customers (fuel, feedstock) European gas network Formative years of transnational links  1966: Groningen – Germany, Belgium (1967)  1967: Groningen – Belgium, Ukraine – Czechoslovakia (1944: Ukraine – Poland)  Gas interaction between policaly similar countries  Netherlands ,W. Germany, Belgium, France (NATO, ECSC, EURATOM)  SU, Czechoslovakia, Poland (COMECON) European gas network Formative years of transnational links  Late 1960s: gas emerges as an „European issue“  Competition between Dutch, Libyan and Algerian gas  Two pan-European pipelines planned  Algeria – Spain – France – Britain  Algeria – Italy  First LNG projects on stream (Britain, France, Italy, Yugoslavia, Spain)  The SU steps in… European gas network Soviet gas inWestern Europe  Initiator: Austria  No coal  A forerunner of European gas industry  ÖMV struggling to meet demand  The Brotherhood ppl passing just 16 km away from Austrian network  Established cooperation with CS over joint development of border-situated large gas field  The SU lacks spare export capacity European gas network Soviet gas inWestern Europe  1965: Italian ENI starts negotiations over development of recently discoveredW. Siberian fields  Italy/ENI  Best relations with the SU among the W. European companies  Oil importer and exporter of oil industry equipment to the communist block  Strong Italian CP seeking stronger relations with the SU  Trans-European Pipeline project (SU-Hungary- Yugoslavia-Italy) European gas network Soviet gas inWestern Europe  1965: Italian ENI starts negotiations over development of recently discoveredW. Siberian fields  Italy/ENI  Best relations with the SU among the W. European companies  Oil importer and exporter of oil industry equipment to the communist block  Strong Italian CP seeking stronger relations with the SU  Trans-European Pipeline project (SU-Hungary- Yugoslavia-Italy) European gas network Soviet gas inWestern Europe  Austrian reaction: new series of negotiation with the SU.  Austrian steel companyVÖEST will provide the SU with large-diameter steel pipes in exchange for rerouting the pipeline  Germany (the supplier of the pipes) decided not to back up the plan, despite strong Bavarian support  The Soviets finally agree after Austria getting closer to EEC. European gas network Soviet gas inWestern Europe  1968: Soviet supplies to Austria come on stream  1970: agreements with Italy and Germany (Ost Politik)  1973: First Soviet deliveries to Germany, GDR also linked to the system  1974: First Soviet deliveries to France  All through the same pipeline European gas network Changes of 1970s  Reconsideration of energy policies  environmental opposition to coal  Economical opposition to nuclear  Political opposition to oil  Reconsideration of Dutch export policy  North Sea deliveries on stream European gas network Changes of 1970s  With new suppliers the gas markets became regionalized and possibly globalized  Gas-to-gas competition  Consumer competition (LNG)  1970s/1980s:  Iran revolution  Deteriorating East-West relations (Afghanistan, Reagan) Pipeline policy definition  Different actors , different perspectives, different motives  Characteristic features:  Yes/no nature of the decision making  Long-term planning and consequences  Both economic and politic factors Pipeline policy definition Producing country: Economy-based political decision on a connection with a consuming state(s). - Supplies to GDR through CS (avoiding transit) Pipeline policy definition Transit country: Economy-based political decision on whether to become a transit country or not. - Austria x Azerbaijan, Pakistan Pipeline policy definition Consuming country: Economy-based political decision on whether to connect itself with a particular supplier. - Austria, the Czech Republic, the Nabucco states x Germany, Poland, Pipeline policy definition Overall, pipeline policy is a degree to which economy matters in the decision making process, ranging from purely economicaly motivated pipelines such as Groningen – Germany to purely politicaly driven projects such as CS-Austria connection. Case study: Russia‘s pipeline strategy Case study: Russia‘s pipeline strategy Case study: Russia‘s pipeline strategy Case study: Russia‘s pipeline strategy Case study: Russia‘s pipeline strategy Discussion topics  Nabucco and South Stream: competent or compliant?  Diversification of routes or diversification of sources?  What impact would the new major projects have onV4 countries?  Iran as a gas supplier to the EU  Turkey‘s energy strategy  Russia as an energy bully