Beth  Stratford  |  Masaryk  University  |  March  2015   ¡  What  money  is,  where  money  comes  from   ¡  What  are  the  implications  of  the  current   system  for  environmental  sustainability   ¡  Critical  review  of  proposals  for  monetary   reform   Often  defined  by  functions   §  unit  of  account   §  means  of  exchange   §  store  of  value     Money  is  a  social  relationship   §  “An  agreement  within  a  community  to  use   something  as  a  medium  of  exchange”  Bernard  Lietar   §  “Money  is  not  metal;  it  is  trust  inscribed”  Niall   Ferguson   §  What  we  use  as  money  is  a  social  contract  –  a   “promise  to  pay”     Control  of  the  money  supply  is  a  social  and   political  issue   ¡  Conventional  accounts  see  money  as  a   ‘neutral  veil’  lying  over  the  ‘real’  economy  of   production  and  exchange.     ¡  Money  is  largely  ignored  in  economic  models   ¡  This  follows  from  a  view  of  money  as  a   convenient  alternative  to  barter   §  In  fact,  our  standard  account  of  monetary  history  is   precisely  backwards.  We  did  not  begin  with  barter,   discover  money,  and  then  eventually  develop  credit   systems.  It  happened  precisely  the  other  way  around.   (Greaber,  2011,  p.  40)   §  The  reason  that  economic  textbooks  now  begin  with   imaginary  villages  is  because  it  has  been  impossible  to   talk  about  real  ones.  Even  some  economists  have  been   forced  to  admit  that  Smith's  Land  of  Barter  doesn't   really  exist.  (Greaber,  2011,  p.  43)   §  See  Felix  Martin   Lending our savings out to businesses and fellow citizens? Where did this come from in the first place? “When  banks  make  loans  they  create   additional  deposits  for  those  that  have   borrowed”    Bank  of  England  (2007)     “...  changes  in  the  money  stock  primarily   reflect  developments  in  bank  lending  as  new   deposits  are  created”  Bank  of  England  (2007)     “Each  and  every  time  a  bank  makes  a  loan,   new  bank  credit  is  created  –  new  deposits  –   brand  new  money.”    Graham  Towers  (1939),   former  Governor  of  the  central  bank  of  Canada     “The  actual  process  of  money  creation  takes   place  primarily  in  banks.”  Federal  Reserve  Bank   of  Chicago  (1961)     “In  the  Eurosystem,  money  is  primarily   created  through  the  extension  of  bank   credit…  The  commercial  banks  can  create   money  themselves.”  Bundesbank  (2009)     “Over  time…  Banknotes  and  commercial   bank  money  became  fully  interchangeable   payment  media  that  customers  could  use   according  to  their  needs.”  European  Central  Bank   (2000)     “The  Bank  supplies  base  money  on  demand   at  its  prevailing  interest  rate,  and  broad   money  is  created  by  the  banking  system”   Bank  of  England  (1994)     Assets   Liabilities   Central  bank  reserves   Bonds  &  other  liquid  assets   Derivatives   Customer  loans   Gilts   Equity  capital   Bonds  in  issue   Derivatives   Interbank  borrowing   Deposits   Interbank  lending   This  is  money   created  by   commercial  banks   How  much  they  expand  (or   contract)  depends  primarily   on  confidence,  as  well  as   regulation.   This  is  money  created   by  the  Bank  of  England   They  lend  it  to  the  commercial   banks  in  whatever  quantities   they  need.   Source: Bank of England, Interactive Database, data series LPQAUYM (M4) LPQVQKT (notes and coins), YWMB43D (Central bank reserves). (graphic taken from Positive Money) Increase  in  bank  lending  UK  1997-­‐  2007   (graphic  from  Positive  Money)   1.  Private  profit-­‐seeking  organisations  have  a   near-­‐monopoly  influence  over  the  scale  and   allocation  of  new  purchasing  power.     2.  Indebtedness  is  required  to  maintain  money   supply   1.  Private  profit-­‐seeking  organisations  have  a   near-­‐monopoly  influence  over  the  scale  and   allocation  of  new  purchasing  power.     2.  Indebtedness  is  required  to  maintain  money   supply   3.  Money  supply  is  elastic;  Investment  no  longer   constrained  by  savings   “The  invention  of  bank  money  –  money  that  did  not  depend   on  existing  economic  activity,  but  created  economic  activity   –  meant  that  borrowers  could  end  their  dependency  on   those  who  were  already-­‐rich….  [T]o  the  astonishment  and   delight  of  many,  money  was  no  longer  a  scarce  resources.     Once  banks  are  able  to  create  credit,  investment  is  no  longer   constrained  by  saving”  (Pettifor,  2006:67).   The  ‘capitalist  engine’  cannot  be  understood  at  all  without   reference  this  distinctive  monetary  system  (Schumpeter   1994  [1954]:318).         ¡  Does  increasing  an  increase  in  the  money   necessarily  lead  to  an  increase  in  economic   activity?   M  is  the  quantity  of   money  in  circulation   V  is  the  velocity  of   circulation   P  is  the  price  paid  for   each  ‘good’   Y  is  the  total   quantity  of  goods   ¡  Conventional  view:  ‘the  dominant  influence  ….of  monetary   changes  is  on  prices,  rather  than  output’  (Friedman  and   Schwarz  1982:  623)   ¡  Others  argue  that  expansion  and  contraction  of  money  supply   can  have  a  big  effect  on  output.     ¡  Growth  of  money  supply  is  probably  a  necessary  (though   insufficient)  condition  for  growth  in  output.  It  depends  for   what  purpose  money  is  created.   The  ‘quantity  equation’  given  by  economic  textbooks  states  that   MV  =  PY   1.  A  firm  takes  a  loan  to  fund  productive  investment.  They  hire  more   staff  and  buy  new  equipment.     2.  A  household  takes  out  a  loan  to  fund  consumption  spending  when   money  is  tight.  The  firm  that  gets  an  unexpected  sale  as  a  result  of   this  uses  increased  earnings  to  hire  more  workers,  and  invest  in  new   equipment   3.  Another  household  takes  out  a  loan  to  fund  consumption  spending,   but  the  firms  who  get  an  unexpected  increase  in  sales  as  a  result  of   this  spending  decides  to  simply  to  put  prices  up,  instead  of  increasing   output.     4.  A  financial  institution  takes  out  a  loan  to  directly  speculate  on  the   price  of  financial  assets.     5.  A  person  working  in  real  estate  takes  out  a  loan  to  buy  three  existing   houses,  to  renovate,  and  then  sell  them  on  at  a  profit.     On the one hand, [the ready availability of creditmoney] can have inflationary consequences – where debt-financed investment and consumer demand are driven beyond the productive capacity of the economy. On the other hand, debt inevitably entails the threat of default and the subsequent ‘disappearance’ of money in a process of debt deflation. (Ingham: 2008:66).   Deflation  …  involves  a  transference  of  wealth  from  the  rest  of  the  community   to  the  rentier  class  and  to  all  holders  of  titles  to  money;  just  as  inflation   involves  the  opposite.    In  particular  it  involves  a  transference  from  all   borrowers,  that  is  to  say  from  traders,  manufacturers,  and  farmers,  to  lenders,   from  the  active  to  the  inactive.    But  whilst  the  oppression  of  the  taxpayer  for   the  enrichment  of  the  rentier  is  the  chief  lasting  result,  there  is  another,  more   violent,  disturbance  during  the  period  of  transition…  Modern  business,  being   carried  on  largely  with  borrowed  money,  must  necessarily  be  brought  to  a   stand  still  by  such  a  process  (Keynes,  1972:166).   £1! £2! £2! £2! £1! If  I  take  out  a  loan   for  £100  I  only  need   to  sell  50  apples  to   pay  it  back!   No  one  wants  my   apples  at  £2.     I’ll  have  to  drop  the   price,  and  sell  more   apples.   “Credit  enables  us  to  build  up  the   present  at  the  expense  of  the   future.    It's  founded  on  the   assumption  that  our  future   resources  are  bound  to  be  far   more  abundant  than  our  present   resources.  A  host  of  new  and   wonderful  opportunities  open  up   if  we  can  build  things  in  the   present  using  future  income.”   Yuval  Noah  Harari,  2011      “It  is  significant  that  the  Sumerian  word  amargi,  the  first  recorded  word   for  “freedom”  in  any  known  human  language,  literally  means  “return  to   mother”  –  since  this  is  what  freed  debt  peons  were  finally  allowed  to  do.”     Graeber,  2011:65   ‘Debt  peonage  continues  to  be  the  main  principle  of  recruiting   labor  globally:  either  in  the  literal  sense,  in  much  of  East  Asia  or   Latin  America,  or  in  the  subjective  sense,  whereby  most  of   those  working  for  wages  or  even  salaries  feel  that  they  are  doing   so  primarily  to  pay  off  interest-­‐bearing  loans.’  (Graeber,  2011:368).       YES!  All  money  systems  before  1694!     We  tend  to  think  of  the  monetary  system  as  natural  or  inevitable.   But  our  monetary  system  has  “come  about  by  agreement,  therefore  it  is   within  our  power  to  change  it  or  render  it  useless”  if  we  so  decide   (Aristotle,  350BC,  quoted  in  Graeber,  211:298).     People-­‐Produced  (“complementary  currency”)   ¡ created  by  people  by  mutual  agreement,  eg  strings  of  seashells,  Swiss  WIR  ,  LETS   and  timebanks.   Government-­‐Produced   ¡ spent  into  circulation  by  state  and  collected  as  tax   ¡ danger  of  ‘sovereign  abuse’  and  hyperinflation     community   building   alternative    values   alternative   livelihoods   eco-­‐   localization       "There  is  no  good  reason  for  a  community  to  be  without  money.     To  be  short  of  money  when  there's  work  to  get  done  is  like  not   having  enough  inches  to  build  a  house.     We  have  the  materials,  the  tools,  the  space,  the  time,  the  skills  and  the   intent  to  build  …  but  we  have  no  inches  today?  Why  be  short  of  inches?   Why  be  short  of  money?”    (Michael  Linton,  LETS  creator)   ¡  Membership  clubs  using  currency  created  at   the  moment  of  transaction  as  a  credit  for  the   seller  of  a  good  or  a  service,  and  a  debit  for  the   buyer.   ¡  All  participants  start  their  accounts  at  zero,  and   can  spend  before  they  have  earned  any   currency.   ¡  Individual  account  balances  are  disclosed  to   deter  abuse,  and  some  apply  debit  limits,  but   no  interest  is  charged  on  negative  balances   ¡  formalizes  the  exchange  of  personal  services  by   means  of  a  time-­‐denominated  currency  that   assigns  a  uniform  value  to  everyone’s  labour  time   §  (i.e.  one  hour  of  time  is  worth  one  Time  Credit/Dollar,   regardless  of  the  service  provided  in  one  hour  or  how  much   skill  is  required  to  perform  the  task  during  that  hour).   ¡  Different  forms     §  Person  to  person     §  Person  to  Agency   §  Agency  to  Agency   ¡  Associated  with  idea  of  ‘co-­‐production’  which  aims   to  make  social  welfare  services  more  effective  and   humane  through  a  participatory  approach     ¡  Time  Banks  have  been  established  in  34  countries,   with  at  least  300  Time  Banks  established  in  40  US   states  and  300  throughout  the  United  Kingdom   ¡  This  is  the  most  straightforward  of  local  currencies   –  a  printed  piece  of  paper  allowed  to  circulate   freely  in  a  locality  with  no  backing  from  legal   tender   ¡  Best  known  example  is  Ithica  HOURS,  created  in   1991,  in  context  of  recession.     §  (LETS  scheme  had  failed  a  few  years  earlier,  and  the   objective  was  to  estbalish  “a  more  fluid  and  inclusive   medium  of  exchange”.)   §  Although  the  currency  was  called  ‘hours’,  the  exact  rate  of   exchange  for  any  given  transaction  was  to  be  decided  by  the   parties  themselves   §  Support  from  a  credit  union,  through  which  one  of  the   initiators  obtained  a  grant  to  work  as  a  full-­‐time  developer   §  Centrally  controlled  issuance,  high  quality  design   §  Businesses  signed  up  to  accept  a  limited  number  of  HOURS   in  return  for  free  advertising  in  the  newspaper  produced  by   Glover   ¡  Most  recent  type.  Less  of  a  radical  break  with  the   official  monetary  system,  because  the  norm  is  for  full   backing  with  main  currency   §  i.e.  One  Brixton  pound  costs  one  Pound  Sterling,  so  issuance   does  not  generate  additional  purchasing  power,  only  subjects   the  existing  stock  to  more  spatial  friction.     ¡  Designed  for  businesses  appeal.  Principally  aimed  at   localising  economy.   ¡  German  Chiemgauer  has  c.  600  business  members   and  an  annual  turnover  of  6.2  million  Euros  in  2011   (Gelleri,  2012).     §  A  demurrage  charge  is  meant  to  deter  hoarding  and  speed  up   the  circulation  (but  does  this  drive  additional  consumption?)     ¡  In  Bristol  UK,  the  local  government  has  agreed  to   accept  Bristol  Pounds  in  payment  of  council  taxes   from  businesses  in  the  city  (Brown  and  Kuchler,  2012)     ¡  “This  is  not  to  belittle  the  usefulness  of  non-­‐   convertible  paper  currencies  for  coping  with   situations  where  the  formal  economy  and  the   state  withdraws  from  covering  the   consumption  needs  of  the  population.  Coping   with  chaotic,  involuntary  degrowth,  as  non-­‐ convertible  barter  currencies  helped  millions   of  Argentineans  do  in  2001-­‐02,  is  nevertheless   different  from  advancing  the  project  of   voluntary  degrowth…”  (Dittmer,  2012)   ¡  PROBLEM   §  Great  Depression,  1500  local  unemployed   ¡  SOLUTION   §  issued  a  demurrage  currency  known  as  labour   certificates  ‘backed’  by  40,000  shillings  public  funds   §  Undertook  an  impressive  series  of  public  works  paid  in   labour  certificates  (re-­‐paved  streets,  new  water   system,  new  bridge,  new  houses,  a  ski  jump)   ¡  RESULT   §  The  demurrage  charge  encouraged  circulation:  “every   one  of  the  schillings  in  stamp  scrip  created  between   12  and  14  times  more  employment  than  the  normal   schillings  circulating  in  parallel”  (Bernard  Lietaer)   §  earned  an  international  reputation  as  the  ‘miracle  of   Wörgl’   §  200  towns  ready  to  copy   §  1933:  outlawed  by  the  central  bank   See  Leitaer  (2001)  The  Future  of  Money   ¡  Two  basic  types  of  private  bank   §   deposit  banks  (limited  to  providing  payment   system  and  safe-­‐keeping)   §  lending  banks  (pure  intermediaries  between   savers  and  borrowers)   ¡  New  money  is  spent  into  the  The  central  bank   would  conduct  monetary  policy  through   quantity  control  of  the  money  stock,  not   through  interest  rates   Private  banks  have  a  near  monopoly  on   the  creation  and  allocate  of  new   purchasing  power  in  the  economy.   When  money  is  created  for  productive   purposes,  output  tends  to  increase.  When   money  is  created  for  unproductive   purposes  (i.e.  to  buy  exiting  assets)  prices   tend  to  increase  (See  Werner,  2005)   A  serious  problem  arises  if  inflation  is  so   high  that  banks  can’t  maintain  a  positive   real  interest  rate  within  causing   widespread  defaults.     The  job  of  Central  Banks  is  supposedly  to   raise  interest  rates  to  discourage   borrowing  when  if  inflation  is  too  high.   But  this  is  difficult  job:  “the  function  of   the  federal  reserve  is  to  take  away  the   punch  bowl  just  as  the  party  is  getting   good.”  (former-­‐Federal  Reserve  Chairman   William  Martin)   Hence,  widespread  contagious  defaults   are  ‘normal  functioning  events’  in  a   debt-­‐financed  capitalist  system  (Minksy   1982:37)   ¡  Frederick  Soddy  –  chemistry  nobel  laureate   §  Aimed  to  set  out  a  system  in  line  with  physical  principles  which  he  believed  to   underlie  wealth   ¡  Frank  Knight  picked  up  the  idea  and  wrote  a  memo  outlining  the   scheme  to  Roosevelt  signed  by  Henry  Simons  and  others  colleagues   at  University  of  Chicago:   §  presented  as  a  free-­‐market  alternative  to  the  danger  of  bank  nationalization.   “...most  of  us  suspect  that  measures  at  least  as  drastic  as  those  described  in  our   statement  can  hardly  be  avoided,  except  temporarily,  in  any  event.”  (Knight   (1933)   ¡  Irving  Fisher  became  most  conspicuous  advocate,  and  outlined  four   main  advantages  (Fisher,  1936):   §  better  control  of  increases  and  contractions  of  bank  credit     §  eliminate  bank  runs;  protect  payment  system  from  risk  of  bad  lending   §  dramatic  reduction  of  (net)  government  debt     §  Potential  for  dramatic  reduction  of  private  debts   ¡  The  idea  is  enjoying  a  resurgence!   §  See  IMF  Working  Paper:  Benes  and  Kumhof  (2012)  .  The  Chicago  Plan  Revisited     This  system  “would  restrict  borrowing  for  new  investment  to   existing  savings,  greatly  reducing  speculative  growth   ventures”,  so  that  “the  classical  balance  between  abstinence   and  investment”  would  be  re-­‐established  (Daly  2013;  see  also  Daly  1999:  154).     ¡  Dittmer  (2015)  argues  that  this  would  cause  higher/more   volatile  interest  rates  -­‐>  high  discount  rate;  perverse   allocation  effects;  Regressive  distributional  effect.   §  But  this  assumes  that  demand  for  credit  remains  high,  which  may   not  be  the  case  if  other  measures  also  implemented  (such  as   financial  transaction  tax,  CO2  caps,  measures  to  bring  house  prices   down,  etc).   §  Also,  perhaps  the  state  ensure  credit  for  investment  in   “social  goods”  at  low  interest  through  state  banks?   Reduce  the  dominance  of  profit  maximization  over  other   criteria  for  allocating  the  productive  resources  of  society     (Farley  et  al.  2013;  Mellor  2010a;  2010b;  Robertson  2012).   ¡  allow  the  government  to  issue  more  money  without   causing  inflation   §  assumption  that  a  savings-­‐constrained  banking  sector  would  lend  less   than  today,  freeing  up  existing  productive  resources  –  such  as  labour-­‐ power  and  natural  resources  –  to  be  claimed  by  public  spending.   (Dittmer,  2015)     ¡  steer  commercial  bank  lending  in  certain  directions   §  Practical  and  political  problems,  in  particular  the  specification  of   eligibility  criteria  for  borrowers  (Dittmer,  2015)     ¡  NB  Monetary  reform  is  not  necessarily  required  to  do  either   of  these  things  (see  Campiglio,  2014;  Strategic  QE  reports  from  NEF  and  The  Green  New   Deal)  but  might  make  it  easier  for  state  to  hold  onto  the  reigns.   Debt  creates  growth  imperative.  Monetary  reform   would  lower  debt  levels.     ¡  Some  versions  of  argument  emphasize  the  effect  of  compound  interest   on  behaviour:  ‘Highly  indebted  protagonists  get  trapped  into  hurried,   short-­‐term  growth  paths’  (Leitear  et  al,  2012:  203).   ¡  Evidence  to  support  this  idea  is  mixed  at  firm  and  country  level.  (ask  me  for   references)   ¡  In  UK  80%  of  firm  investment  comes  from  savings.  Pressure  for  firms  and   countries  to  grow  exists  independently  of  debt  levels.  See  e.g.  Gordon  and   Rosenthal  (2003).   ¡  But  clear  that  indebtedness  stands  in  the  way  of  working  hour  reduction   Other  versions  of  this  argument  emphasize  that  if  we  are   paying  interest  on  our  entire  money  supply,  then  the  money   supply  must  expand  in  order  for  interest  to  be  paid.     §  See  e.g.  Hixson  (1991:  188)  Douthwaite  (1999b:28)  and  Brown  (2008:31).  NB  Similarilty   with  ‘profit  puzzle’  –  see  Tomasson  and  Bezemer  (2010:  3).     But  this  argument  is  based  on  a  confusion  of  stocks  &  flows!     §  Both  Keen  (2010)  and  Andreson  (2006)  have  developed  mathematical  models  to   demonstrate  that  –  at  least  in  theory  -­‐  it  is  possible  to  sustain  a  steady  amount  of   economic  activity,  and  pay  interest  on  the  entire  money  supply.     §  But  their  models  assume  that  interest  flows  are  re-­‐circulated  into  the  economy  in  a  way   that  does  not  increase  inequality.  E.g.  that  bank  profits  are  not  used  for  further   accumulation;  that  credit  allocation  decisions  do  not  cause  asset  bubbles  etc..   So  perhaps  the  real  problem  is  the  contribution  of  the   monetary  system  to  inequality?   ¡  NB  Interest  and  debt  could  still  build  up  after  monetary  reform   How  the  current  system  works,  and  implications  for  financial  instability   ¡  Ryan-­‐Collins,  J.  et  al.,  (2011).  Where  does  money  come  from?  New   Economics  Foundation.  See:  http://www.neweconomics.org/ publications/entry/where-­‐does-­‐money-­‐come-­‐from   ¡  Read  ‘Chapter  1:  Introduction’  and  ‘Chapter  2:  The  Chicago  Plan  in   the  History  of  Monetary  Thought’,  in  Benes  and  Kumhof  (2012)  The   Chicago  Plan  Revisited,  IMF  Working  Paper  WP/12/202               The  "green"  case  for  monetary  reform   ¡  Douthewaite,  R.  (1999b).  The  Ecology  of  Money.  Green  Books.  Read   online: http://www.feasta.org/documents/moneyecology/contents.htm   ¡  Douthwaite,  R.,  2012.  Degrowth  and  the  supply  of  money  in  an   energy-­‐scarce  world.  Ecological  Economics  84,  187–193     ¡  Mary  Mellor  (2010)  Could  the  money  system  be  the  basis  of  a   sufficiency  economy?  real-­‐  world  economic  review  54   www.paecon-­‐net/PAEReview/issue54/Mellor54.pdf   ¡  Lietaer,  B.,  Arnsperger,  C.,  Goerner,  S.,  and  Brunnhuber,  S.  (2012).   Money  and  Sustainability:  the  missing  link.  Triarchy  Press.  Read   online:  http://www.money-­‐sustainability.net/read-­‐the-­‐book/   ¡  Farley,  J.;  Burke,  M.;  Flomenhoft,  G.;  Kelly,  B.;  Murray,  D.F.;  Posner,   S.;  Putnam,  M.;  Scanlan,  A.;  Witham,  A.  (2013)  Monetary  and  fiscal   policies  for  a  finite  planet.  Sustainability,  5,  2802-­‐  2826.   ¡  Scott  Cato,  M.  and  Suárez,  M.  (2012).  STROUD  POUND:  A  LOCAL   CURRENCY  TO  MAP,  MEASURE  AND  STRENGTHEN  THE  LOCAL   ECONOMY.  International  Journal  of  Community  Currency  Research.   Volume  16  (2012)  Section  D  106-­‐115       Critical  responses   ¡  Dittmer,  K.  (2015),  "100  percent  reserve  banking:  A  critical  review  of   green  perspectives",  Ecological  Economics,  Volume  109,  January  2015,   Pages  9–16     ¡  Dittmer,  K.  (2013).  Local  currencies  for  purposive  degrowth?  A  quality   check  of  some  proposals  for  changing  money-­‐as-­‐usual.  Journal  of   Cleaner  Production,  Volume  54,  1  September  2013,  Pages  3–13       Alternative  proposals  that  stop  short  of  monetary  reform:   ¡  See  argument  for  Strategic  QE  report  from  NEF:   http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/entry/strategic-­‐ quantitative-­‐easing   ¡  For  monetary  tools  to  guide  finance  in  direction  of  green  investment:   Campiglio,  E.  (2014).  Beyond  Carbon  Pricing:  The  role  of  banking  and   monetary  policy  in  financing  the  transition  to  a  low-­‐carbon  economy.   Centre  for  Climate  Change  Economics  and  Policy  Working  Paper  No.   181.   ¡  Also  see  argument  for  credit  guidance  in  Werner,  Richard  A.  (2005).   New  Paradigm  in  Macroeconomics:  Solving  the  Puzzle  of  Japanese   Macroeconomic  Performance,  Basingstoke:  Palgrave  Macmillan       History  of  money  creation:   ¡  Ingham,  G.,  (2004).  The  Nature  of  Money.  Polity  Press.     ¡  Felix  Martin  Money:  the  unauthorised  Biography