«Copying and Learning from Outsiders? Assessing Diffusion from Transnational Insurgents in the Chechen Wars» by Kristin M. Bakke MVZ489 Anna Kosenko UČO: 454888 Introdaction I Aim: to research diffusion mechanisms through which transnational insurgents affect domestic challengers to the state, based on empirical analysis of the Chechen wars. Areas of interest: -intrastate conflicts (Chechen war model) -social movements -transnationalism -correlation between domestic and transnational insurgents. Introdaction II Hypothesis I: -transnational and domestic non-state actors can equally influence the intrastate conflict. Hypothesis II: -participation of transnational insurgents in an intrastate conflict can radically change not only the process, but also the main goal of this conflict. Literature = research base: -Nye, Joesph S., and Robert O. Keohane “Transnational Relations and World Politics:An Introduction.” -Malet, David “The More Irregular the Service’: Transnational Identity Communities and the Foreign Fighter.” -Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. “Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Introduction.” Transnational insurgents, who they are ? They are «non-state actors that for either rational or material reasons opt to participate in an intrastate conflict outside their own home country, siding with the challenger to the state» (David Malet). Interaction Formula unfavorable balance of power + fragmented domestic movemen=coalitions between domestic and transnational fighters. ethnic affinity ideological bonds manipulation of such ties location in a bad neighborhood + weak state + traits of the transnational actors + domestic balance of power + cohesiveness of the domestic insurgent movement Diffusion mechanism How transnational insurgents affect domestic ones? relational mediated (Chechen wars case) non-relational shifts in domestic insurgents’ frame—attribution mosques +charitable organizations+ schools TOOLS new ideology tactical innovations resource mobilization Shifts in Framing Framing of conflict = actors define what they are fighting for and who they are fighting against + relational diffusion mediated diffusion transnational insurgents engender learning or emulation of new frames new contributes = Tactical innovations -more radical tone; -new ideas about morally accepted or effective and efficient forms of (collective) action; - tactics that go beyond the laws of war=killing of civilians, torture, hostage-taking, degrading treatment, and extra-judicial executions. Resource Mobilization fighters weapons know-how communication finance teaching how to use those weapons skillfully increase the coercive strength of the domestic movement result Transnational Insurgents in the Chechen Wars I Research Design: task=to examine Chechnya’s conflict with the Russian federal government over time = investigate the mechanisms that create variation across processes of domestic mobilization. the key question=framing process How it was in Сhechen wars? Transnational Insurgents in the Chechen Wars II Who they are? -Emir Ibn Al-Khattab (Saudi Arabia) + unit of eight Afghan-Arab fighters; -Sheikh Ali Fathi al-Shishani (broker); -Arabs from the Middle East, North Africa, Turkey, Pakistan and from Central Asia. What they brought? -tactical innovations=suicide terrorism + kidnapping; -substantial funding; -advanced weapons -propaganda=new ideology = radical Islam=salafia+jihad; - Totally new scales of the conflict Framing Effect in Chechen Wars I war Aim: self-determination, nationalism II war Aim:djihad, establishment of an Islamic emirate! new resource base transnational insurgents transnational insurgents New inspiration to fight= Islamism=salafija! Conclusions: • transnational insurgents can affect a domestic movement’s framing of goals, tactical innovation, and resource mobilization through both relational and mediated diffusion. Critical reflection -sufficiently informative; -overall understandable; -meticulous analysis; -filled with statistical data and interviews. + - -not clear structure=difficult to follow; -disrupted presentation logic; -frequent repeats. No answers? 1.At what stage of the war does the diffusion of transnational insurgents happen? 2.What is the motivation for transnational insurgents? 3.Why does the legitimate authority of the state let this diffusion happen? Thank you for attention! Questions?