Case selection Lukas Lehotsky & Petr Ocelik Should offer more insight than cross-case Case selection Cross-case • Sample selection • Random • Based on knowledge about population • Sampling and analysis sequential tasks • Large sample = easy elaboration of external validity • Internal validity more concerning Case study • Specific case selection prone to bias (cherry- picking) • Sampling and analysis not separate from each other • “Casing” – what is this case a case of? • External validity more concerning Case selection • Does case study provide any advantage? • What is the population? What is this case a case of? • Am I interested in particular case? Why? What is it that I want to study? • Do I want to test or build theory? Normal (typical) case • Represents typical relation between variables • Least residuals – closest to the linear model prediction – onlier • Representative by nature • Theory testing Diverse cases • Two or more cases • Full scope of variation of the variable/variables • Standard-deviation • Theory testing/building • Represents full spectrum of variation (but not distribution) Extreme case • One or more cases • Extreme value of variable/variables • Many standard deviations from the mean • Theory building • Representative in comparison with larger population Deviant case • One or more cases • Outlier – the most distant case from the linear model prediction – highest residual • Theory building, modification • Unrepresentative by nature Influential case • One or more cases • Similar to deviant case – seemingly disproves theory and has high leverage – influences the model • Special configuration of variables – exception which (if explained) strengthens theory • Theory testing, modification • Representativeness irrelevant Crucial case • One or more cases • Case which must fit the theory – proves validity of theory • Least-likely • Predicted to contradict the hypothesis, but does not • Confirms the theory • Most-likely • Predicted to support the hypothesis, but does not • Disconfirms the theory • Most-difficult test for an argument • Theory testing • Selecting on theoretical grounds Pathway case • One or more cases • Case, where value of dependent variable is most likely caused by independent variable – apparent impact of indep. X on dependent Y • Cross-tabulation or analysis of residuals (residuals of full model vs. model without causal variable) • Theory testing – especially causal mechanisms Most similar cases • Two or more cases • Comparative design • All variables except those of interest are similar/same • Selection from cross-case based on values of variables • Theory testing and theory building Case V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Case 1 0 + + + Case 2 + + + - Most similar cases Most different cases • Two or more cases • Comparative design • All variables except those of interest are different • Selection from cross-case based on values of variables • Theory testing and theory building Most diverse cases Case V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Case 1 + - 0 - + Case 2 + + + - - Comparability • Cases must be comparable for a comparative CS to be valid. • Achieving comparability • Synchronical/spatial - more units in same time period • Diachronical - same unit in more time periods Overview Case type Theory # Case selection Test Build Normal + 1 Min. ε of linear regression Y=aX+bZ+ε Diverse + + 2 Max. range of variance of X, Y, X/Y, … Extreme + 1 Max. variance of Y Deviant + 1 Max. ε of linear regression Y=aX+bZ+ε Crucial + 1 ML predicts H1, proves to be H0 LL predicts H0, proves to be H1 Influential + 1 Max. influence of a case on slope a of Y=aX+bZ+ε Pathway + 1 X1 and not X2 likely to have caused Y Most similar + + 2 Cases similar on var. other than X1/Y Most different + + 2 Cases different on var. other than X1/Y SelectionResearch goalFocus Case study Theory-centered Building hypothesis/theory Distribution-based (Div., Ext., Dev., MS, LS) Testing hypothesis/theory Distribution-based (Norm., Div., Infl., Path., MS, LS) Theory-based (Crucial ML, Crucial LL) Modifying hypothesis/theory Distribution-based (Deviant, MS, LS) Theory-based (Crucial ML, Crucial LL) Case-centered