Self and Identity Youth Development Ondřej Bouša Who am I?  Try to answer three times to this simple (?) question. Self, selfsystem  „It is much easier feel the self than define what is the self“ (Allport, 1961). Two Sides of Self: Me & I  self as an acting and experiencing subject  knower  I, Ich  awareness of psychological presence  connected with memory  agency, continuity, distinctness  self as a known object  content of self-reflection  „object of realizing“  known  Me, Self, Selbst self-reflection „I“ as an experiencing subject Agency Continuity Distinctness „Me“ Self-system, self cognitive affective executive Self-system  The cognitive aspect - self-concept  includes all self-relevant cognitions, i.e., knowledge and imaginations of the self  self-cognitions are organized into a particular whole (structure) and this is so at various levels of generality  The executive aspect  connected with behavior, self-presentation strategies Affective aspect  every piece of knowledge related to the self is alwaysin connected with some feelings  in adolescence it is predominantly a result of interpersonal comparison with peers, parents, other adult authorities, or group and social standards (Higgins, 1987)  self-concept comprises various selfrepresentations including also some selfassessment and self-evaluation Self-esteem  individuals' more general self-evaluation, empirically distinguishable from self-concept  overall feeling from oneself or as global self- evaluation  adolescent's self-esteem cannot be always simply derived from his/her partial self-evaluation; it implies being aware of one’s value and overall self-satisfaction. It is related to individual’s general feelings of worth and competence. Self-esteem during adolescence  self-esteem declines in early adolescence and again increases in the period of late adolescence and during the period of emerging adulthood (Arnett, 2010)  self-esteem remains nearly constant during adolescence (Baldwin & Hoffman, 2002).  self-esteem increases moderately during adolescence and continues to increase more slowly during young adulthood (Erol & Orth, 2011). Two approaches  self-esteem as a static construct  self-esteem as a dynamic construct  in cross-sectional research, sufficient attention cannot be paid to intra-individual changes  results are usually based on comparing the mean scores for a particular age cohort  If self-esteem increases in some adolescents and declines in others, then the differences cancel out due to the approach focused on mean scores and hence self-esteem makes an impression of being static (Hirsch & DuBois, 1991). Cluster analysis approach Trajectory A: Permanently high self-esteem  a low degree of neuroticism and higher emotional stability.  in comparison with other respondents, they have stable and positive relationships with parents — they do not have many problems with them and they trust each other.  less dependent on the evaluation and opinions of their peers.  little self-doubt and are more oriented on their future perspective than a majority of others (they exhibit a higher degree of commitments). Trajectory B: Growing self- esteem  a higher degree of neuroticism, self-blame and alienation at 15 years of age  lower degree of commitments in relation to their parents at 17 years of age.  at 17 years of age, they also showed an overall higher degree of general commitment (which can be also interpreted as a clear vision of their own future).  In peer relationships, this subgroup does not significantly differ from other respondents. Trajectory C: Stable moderate self-esteem  the most numerous subgroup  Stability of self-esteem over time can be expected to be based especially on relevant personality traits — in particular on a higher degree of extraversion and lower degree of neuroticism.  Otherwise, these respondents are in many ways similar with the profile of their psychosocial characteristics to the subgroup with permanently high self-esteem (trajectory A).  What makes them different are more problems and a lower degree of trust in relationships with parents. Trajectory D: Decreasing self- esteem  Lower trust and higher alienation in relationships with parents, a higher frequency of problems with parents and self-blame for an interparental conflict.  More complicated relationship also with peers: firstly, they often give evidence of problems in relationships; secondly, they show higher dependence on peer opinion and emotional response.  U-shape trajectory? Trajectory E: Permanently low self-esteem  The permanently low level of self-esteem is related to the constellation of personality traits: these respondents have a higher neuroticism score and a lower extraversion score. Strong impact of emotional stability/instability (i.e. neuroticism) and extraversion/introversion on the level of the selfesteem trajectory highlighted by Erol & Orth (2011).  They report a higher degree of problems in relationships with parents and their peer relationships are problematical as well. Self and/or Identity?  Self and identity are often used interchangeably.  Some clarity can be attained by considering them as a series of nested constructs, with self as the most encompassing term, self-concepts being embedded within the self, and identities being embedded within self-concepts ( Leary & Tangney, 2012).  Identity refers to the traits and characteristics, social relations, roles, and social group memberships that define who one is (Leary & Tangney, 2012). Identity Conceptualization  The process of identity formation involves the exploration and testing of alternative ideas, beliefs, and behaviours, marking this period as one of both dramatic change and uncertainty for adolescent development.  Identity refers to the identification with roles, values, beliefs, and life styles that mark a person’s individuality.  Social identity refers to a person’s self-definition in terms of group belongingness and embedding in social and cultural systems Identity Conceptualization  Identity can be defined as the concept of self that continues throughout the lifecycle and correlates strongly with the perception of what others have of them.  Identity is thus the continued perception of self that is made up of the following components: physical, sexual, social, occupational, moral, ideology. Example of different work with identity (adolescents) Coat-of-arms(pictures intentionally removed)  Coat-of-arms no. 1  Johnny 007 – an example of personal identity  Coat-of-arms no. 2  Vlasta (aka Emo) – an example of social identity What is different?(picture intentionally removed)  T-shirt picture – an example of work on identity in the field of substitute family care Identity within Youth development  Examples of your own work  Tom (school age) Jess (adolescence) Elizabeth (emerging adulthood)