2691115301_f3b8699d5a_b.jpg Justice & Home Affairs ‘Schengen’ Area of freedom, security and justice Police cooperation AFSJ External Border Control Assigned readings for this session: •Vermeulen & De Bondt (2014), pp. 15-25, 28-47 •Mortera-Martinez (2016), 1-12 ●position paper on assigned topic & in-class presentation (42%) ●topic of the paper answers the question as presented for each class ●paper serves as position taking for (in-class) debate ●Presentation will be held after each lecture ●Presentation is around 15 minutes (followed by a debate) ●Written exam (42%) ●consist of 4 open questions based upon assigned readings – students will choose from 6 questions, 2 questions can be dropped ●Participation in classes (16%) ●active participation during ‘travel debates’ Grading and assignments 2691115301_f3b8699d5a_b.jpg ‘Schengen’ Origins Schengen ‘acquis’ ‘Flanking’ policies Integration into EU Variable geometry Origins and ‘acquis’ •Schengen Agreement •Schengen Implementation Convention (SIC) •Flanking measures • •‘Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’ (AFSJ) Variable geometry •‘Non-EU –Schengen’ and •‘Non-Schengen EU’ ‘Schengen Integration’ Protocol to Amsterdam Treaty ●‘Schengen’ is abolition of border controls on the movement of persons within the EU ●prompted by the creation of internal market ●the 1984 (Franco-German) Saarbrucken Agreement ●The 1985 Schengen Agreement ●the 1990 Schengen Implementation Convention (SIC) ● ●initially as a separate system outside EU law (until 1999): the ‘Schengen acquis’ ● ●Schengen as the ‘core’ of justice and home affairs ● ● Origins: ‘Schengen’ ●The Schengen ‘core’ and its ‘flanking’ policies ●a ‘border-free area’ and, as a corollary: ●external border control ●common visa and asylum policies ●policy and judicial cooperation ● ●Integration of ‘Schengen acquis’ (1997) ●the ‘acquis’: the ‘package’ of all decisions, conventions, etc. ●‘Integration’ Protocol to Amsterdam Treaty ●actual integration: done in piecemeal steps ● ●‘Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’ (AFSJ) ●divided across two different EU pillars in 1997 ●reunited in 2011 (Lisbon Treaty) Schengen ‘acquis’ ●‘Schengen’ and AFSJ have become a tailor-made process to suit the different tastes of member states ● ●‘Non-EU-Schengen’ member states ●Schengen cooperation agreements with Norway, Iceland (1996) ●Switzerland and Liechtenstein in 2009 ●COMIX (no voting rights, only recommendations) ● ●‘Non-Schengen’ EU member states ●Opt-out arrangements for UK, Ireland ●Denmark: opt-in position ●Bulgaria, Romania,Cyprus (though formally member) are not part of the Schengen free-travel area ●Croatia has become full member since March 2021 ‘Variable geometry’ in JHA Leading statement for in-class debate of tomorrow: Member states should (continue to) be able to participate in the JHA field through ‘opt-in’ and ‘opt-out’ arrangements END Santino Lo Bianco PhD Email: santinolobianco@outlook.com •