Memory Wars Part I: Poland and Russia Part II: Ukraine and Russia Before the Invasion Outline •Abstract- 200 words •Contains question •Why it is important •How you are going to approach the question •What is you conclusion •Introduction: Quick background, question, importance, argument •Background: Explain a little about the event and the case •Discussion of which concepts from the literature you are using for analysis •The analysis •Conclusion • • • The Importance of Paragraphs •One Paragraph One Idea •Topic Sentence Presents Idea •The rest of the Paragraph Develops It •Don’t make paragraphs too long Review: When do memory wars occur? •Opposing or Mutually Exclusive Memories •Ontological Insecurity •Rise of Warrior narrative(s) •Securitization of Memory •Mnemonic Security Dilemma • • The Polish Narrative: Poland-Lithuania in 1648 europe__ad_1648____the_peace_of_westphalia_by_undevicesimus-d61mavp.jpg Partition •Partitioned in Late 1700s—Between Three Empires •Rise of Nationalism—Identity Defined in Part by Nobility •Emphasis on Catholic Church Interwar •Independence and the Defeat of the Bolsheviks •Constitutional Beginnings Degrade into: •Right-Wing Nationalist Authoritarianism •Legal Discrimination against Jews and • Ukrainians The War Experience •Divided by Germany and Soviet Union •Elites murdered under both regimes--Katyn •Deportations in East and West •Atrocities not seen in France, Denmark, Holland, Belgium, •General Plan Ost •The Holocaust Polish Traditions of Resistance •Against Prussia, Russia • 1794, 1830, 1863 •Against the Nazis • Home Army • Ghetto Uprising, • Warsaw Uprising •Against the Communists • 1956, 1968, 1970, 1976 • Solidarity, 1980 The Polish Martyr Narrative Among Post-Communist Right •POLAND AS VICTIM •POLAND AS SACRED: The Christ of Nations •SACRIFICE IS ENNOBLING • images.jpg Polish-Russian Divide •Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and The Secret Protocol—1939 •The Polish Account: •Soviet Union and Nazi Germany divide Poland •Aggression by Totalitarian countries •Soviet Union just as bad as Nazis •Russian regime account: •Defensive Action by Stalin after West rejected cooperation •West abandoned Czechoslovakia, tried to push war eastward •Poland not innocent: anti-Semitism, taking part of Czechoslovakia as well •Katyn- The Murder of 20,000 Polish Officers, Elites •Soviets blame Germans •Persist in lie until 1989 •Poles say attempt at decapitating Polish society •Katyn 2010 •Several attempts at reconciliation, all failed • • The 2019 Dispute •The European Parliament Resolution: •“The European Parliament…” •1. Recalls that, as enshrined in Article 2 of the TEU, the Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities; recalls that these values are common to all Member States; •2. Stresses that the Second World War, the most devastating war in Europe’s history, was started as an immediate result of the notorious Nazi-Soviet Treaty on Non-Aggression of 23 August 1939, also known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, and its secret protocols, whereby two totalitarian regimes that shared the goal of world conquest divided Europe into two zones of influence; •3. Recalls that the Nazi and communist regimes carried out mass murders, genocide and deportations and caused a loss of life and freedom in the 20th century on a scale unseen in human history, and recalls the horrific crime of the Holocaust perpetrated by the Nazi regime; condemns in the strongest terms the acts of aggression, crimes against humanity and mass human rights violations perpetrated by the Nazi, communist and other totalitarian regimes; • Putin’s Response •I believe that such ‘paperwork’ – for I cannot call this resolution a document – which is clearly intended to provoke a scandal, is fraught with real and dangerous threats. Indeed, it was adopted by a highly respectable institution. And what did it show? Regrettably, it revealed a deliberate policy aimed at destroying the post-war world order whose creation was a matter of honour and responsibility for the countries a number of representatives of which voted today in favour of this deceitful resolution. …And those who deliberately put this consensus into question undermine the foundations of the entire post-war Europe. • •The creation of the modern system of international relations is one of the major outcomes of World War II. Even the most insurmountable contradictions – geopolitical, ideological, economic – do not prevent us from finding forms of peaceful coexistence and interaction, if there is the desire and will to do so. Today the world is going through quite a turbulent time. Everything is changing, from the global balance of power and influence to the social, economic and technological foundations of societies, nations and even continents. In the past epochs, shifts of such magnitude have almost never happened without major military conflicts. Without a power struggle to build a new global hierarchy. Thanks to the wisdom and farsightedness of the political figures of the Allied Powers, it was possible to create a system that has restrained from extreme manifestations of such objective competition, historically inherent in the world development. The Entangled Memory Seeing Through An Imperial Lens The Little Brother Who Came Back •Shared Founding: Kyivan Rus’--Vikings •Vladimir (Volodymyr) the Great—Conversion to Christianity 988 •The Separation: 13-17th Centuries •The Cossacks •1654: Bohdan Khmelnitsky and the Treaty of Pereyaslav •Late 18th Century: The Partition of Poland and • the First Annexation of Crimea • Most of Ukraine Becomes Part of Russia, • but Western Ukraine part of Austria •Russification in Russia and the Soviet Union •The Experience of World War II Ukraine’s Differentiation from Russia •**After Collapse of Kyivan Rus’: ”Ukrainians” Under Lithuania and Poland until 1600s: Conversion to Eastern Rite Catholicism •Cossacks: The Battle of Poltava: Cossacks Realign with Poland •**Ukrainian Nationalism in early 1800s: Taras Shevchenko •**Nationalism in Western Ukraine: Stepan Bandera •Ukrainian People’s Republic, 1918-1920 •**The Holodomor and the Purge of Ukrainian Political and Cultural Elite •Ukrainian National Resistance Before, During and After WWII •Stepan Bandera • • • • • • TWO UKRAINES? EAST VRS. WEST Two Approaches to Ukrainian populations Russian Empire: Ukraine = “Little Russians” Russification, No Mass Education Austro-Hungarian Empire—Mass Education In Local Languages In Western Ukraine: Poles Dominate Cities, Ukrainians more rural The Interwar Period Soviet Ukraine Polish Ukraine The Twentieth Century Independent Ukraine •1987-1991: Ukrainian Nationalist Movement in West, then spreads •1991: Yuriy Kravchenko, Former head of secret police and First Party Secretary, becomes First President. •Referendum: More than 90% for independence •Kravchenko’s and Kuchma’s Presidency (1991-2004) •Fairly superficial reforms •Patronal networks tied to Russian economy •Recognizes nationalism, but downplays differences, looks to future •2004. The Orange Revolution •Yushchenko—Ukrainian Nationalist •Yanukovich-Embedded in oligarchic networks with Russia •2010 Yanukovich wins-fair Elections •2014: Partnership with EU or membership in Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union • Maidan protests • Corruption a Key Issue • •In a truncated Ukraine, Russian interests diminish in power • • Ukrainian Identity: Before and After 2014 •Join European Union or Eurasian Economic Union? •2013: 42% for EU, 37% for EAEU •2016: 47% for EU, 16% for EAEU •Positive Attitudes towards Russia? •February 2014: 78% Positive; May 2015: 30% Positive •Independence Referendum? •2011: 61% for independence; but in East only 53% and in South only 37% •2016: 87% for independence including 71% in East and 78% in South •HOLODOMOR A GENOCIDE? 2010- 60% said yes; 2017- 80% •Bandera and others? May 2012—21%; 2013—31% Ukrainian Memory and Other Laws •2015: Four Decommunization Laws • Remembering Victory over Nazism: • Great Patriotic War to World War II; • Prohibits “falsification of the history of World War II” • Condemning Nazist and Communist Totalitarianism and Symbols • Renaming streets, taking down statues, etc. • Recognition of Fighters of Independence: More Controversial • Also upsets Poles •2019: De-Russification Laws • The 2012 Law-Ukrainian state language but regions can declare Russian a minority • language and use in governmental business, schools • 2019 limits use of Russian throughout public life, including education and the media • Restrictions of Russian books sold in Ukraine • Restrictions of Russian movies, television available in Ukraine • • • Putin Denies Existence of Ukrainian Nation •It should be noted that Ukraine actually never had stable traditions of real statehood. And, therefore, in 1991 it opted for mindlessly emulating foreign models, which have no relation to history or Ukrainian realities. • •I will start with the fact that modern Ukraine was entirely created by Russia or, to be more precise, by Bolshevik, Communist Russia. This process started practically right after the 1917 revolution, and Lenin and his associates did it in a way that was extremely harsh on Russia – by separating, severing what is historically Russian land. Nobody asked the millions of people living there what they thought. • •Lenin … suggested making concessions to the nationalists, whom he called “independents” at that time. Lenin’s ideas of what amounted in essence to a confederative state arrangement and a slogan about the right of nations to self-determination, up to secession, were laid in the foundation of Soviet statehood. • •If Ukraine does not exist but is part of Russia, then all people who fight for Ukrainian independence are Nazis like Bandera • Debates Over Different Laws •CRITIQUES •Expensive •Freedom of speech •Human Rights •DEFENSE •National Security •Russia’s Hybrid War •Possibility of infiltration, subversion •Economic Development •Russia has a huge market, can produce books, movies, etc on a larger scale •Decolonization—Persistent efforts of Russification have to be undone • • • •