International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 2071–2092 1932–8036/20170005
Copyright © 2017 (Mar Guerrero-Pico). Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial
No Derivatives (by-nc-nd). Available at http://ijoc.org.
#Fringe, Audiences, and Fan Labor:
Twitter Activism to Save a TV Show From Cancellation
MAR GUERRERO-PICO
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain
This article describes how TV fans make strategic use of Twitter as a tool for activism to
launch “Save Our Show” campaigns and highlights a shift toward a collaborative
relationship between fan activists and producers in the context of these campaigns,
shaped by deep transformations in the media ecosystem and viewing measurement
techniques. Based on participant observation and qualitative content analysis, I explore
the case of the Twitter campaign led by a fandom dedicated to FOX’s science fiction
television series Fringe (2008–13). In my examination, I argue that fans’ expert
understanding of Twitter’s affordances and the audience measurement market are crucial
for a series to achieve renewal. In parallel, I suggest that the power negotiation between
fans and networks can be substituted by a direct cooperation that indirectly might benefit
both creators’ labor for the show and advertisers’ investments. However, despite this
scenario where fans enjoy a better position to influence networks’ decisions, their labor on
social media may be yet another device for self-commodification and exploitation.
Keywords: fan activism, social media, fan labor, television, Twitter
The acceleration of technological development since the creation of the World Wide Web in 1989
has dramatically changed how relationships between consumers and producers or distributors of different
types of goods and services are understood. There has been an empowerment of consumers, who, thanks to
the expansion of social media in recent years, now have more tools at their disposal to become more visible
and ensure their comments, opinions, and requests reach the interested parties without intermediaries.
As representatives of a specific type of consumer, TV series fans have a long history of activism,
and their claims are largely motivated by networks’ decisions to cancel those shows—that constitute the
fans’ object of fandom—due to low ratings (Brower, 1992; Coppa, 2006; Jenkins, 1992). Classic examples
of “Save Our Show” campaigns include Star Trek (NBC, 1966–69), Cagney & Lacey (CBS, 1982–88), Hill
Street Blues (NBC, 1981–87), Beauty & the Beast (CBS, 1987–90), and Twin Peaks (ABC, 1990–91).
These well-organized campaigns used the basic modus operandi of mass-mailed letters and telegrams,
phone calls to the network and studio headquarters, and word of mouth. Fans sought to influence the
executives’ judgment so that their favorite series would be kept on the air (Sabal, 1992).
Mar Guerrero-Pico: mar.guerreropico@gmail.com
Date submitted: 2015–04–14
2072 Mar Guerrero-Pico International Journal of Communication 11(2017)
Today the aim remains the same, but the methods have changed and the balance of power has
shifted. An increasingly convergent and participatory media ecosystem (Jenkins, 2006) has affected the
way Save Our Show campaigns are conceived and implemented. Television fans now make strategic use
of social media to protest show cancellation. However, these fans may not necessarily conduct renewal
campaigns from positions that confront networks. As Milner (2010) notes, “the ‘textual poachers’ reality of
the past (Jenkins, 1992) is shifting under increased digital connectivity, and increased communication
between media producers and fans” (p. 723).
This article contributes to the debate around fan activism and fan–producer relations by focusing
on the way fans make the most of Twitter’s affordances to organize successful Save Our Show campaigns;
the shifts in audience measurement; and the changing relationship among fans, creators, and networks. I
delve into the renewal campaign for the science fiction series Fringe (FOX, 2008–13) deployed on Twitter
by the fan organization Fringenuity. This illustrates a collaborative scenario where networks and fans, far
from embodying the antagonistic positions of the past, establish channels of collaboration for a common
cause. However, at the same time, this collaborative scenario raises concerns about labor exploitation.
Therefore, I will review the two main theoretical foundations of this work: media transformations and the
evolution of viewing measurement techniques that have affected both the development of Save Our Show
campaigns and fan–producer interactions. Using a methodology based on participant observation and
qualitative content analysis, I analyze the Fringenuity’s campaign in light of this theoretical framework. I
then introduce Fringenuity as a unique case to study fan activism and provide a brief history of the
different campaigns executed within the Fringe fandom.
Surviving the “Friday Night Death Slot” Twice in a Row
Fringenuity presents a unique case that sets Fringe apart from other online fandoms in general,
and from other experiences in Save Our Show activism in particular. First, Fringenuity’s highly strategic
understanding of both the affordances of Twitter and Nielsen’s audience measurement system resulted in
two unprecedented tie-in actions by a fandom located on Twitter at the time: the production of exclusive
hashtags not directly related to the series’ title and the sharing of detailed instructions to make those
hashtags trend during the show’s live broadcast. In fact, the prosperity of Fringenuity’s plan soon
extended to other communities formed around series in danger of cancellation. For example, the
campaign #SixSeasonsAndaMovie for the sitcom Community (2009–15)—initiated during the show’s third
season—based its online strategy on the unique hashtags model1
developed by Fringenuity.2
Second, the
diplomatic attitude of the initiative leaders toward the network, and FOX’s later involvement in
Fringenuity’s Twitter events to make Fringe trend, are indicative of a shift in the relationship between fan
activists and networks in the context of renewal campaigns. Historically, these have been filled with
tension between both parties, but in this case, cooperation and mutual recognition prevailed.
1
http://www.reddit.com/r/community/comments/11qlfq/darkest401_rallying_cry_final_reminder_of_details/
2
Although NBC eventually canceled Community in May 2014—after two consecutive renewals powered by
a dedicated fan base—the on-demand streaming service Yahoo! Screen ensured the production of the
much-desired sixth season, which began airing in spring 2015.
International Journal of Communication 11(2017) #Fringe, Audiences, and Fan Labor 2073
Fringenuity’s campaign was the second major effort undertaken by fans to save their beloved
series. Fringe is a science fiction series created by J. J. Abrams (Alias, Lost), Alex Kurtzman (Sleepy
Hollow), and Roberto Orci (Sleepy Hollow). The creators focus the plot on a special division of the FBI
investigating a plethora of supernatural events related to so-called fringe science. In November 2010,
while the third season was airing, the Fringe community was given its first major warning with the
announcement of a change in the series programming. FOX rescheduled Fringe from the stellar time slot
of Thursdays at 9 p.m. to the inferior time slot of Fridays at 9 p.m., popularly known as the “Friday Night
Death Slot” in American television, and which generally signals imminent cancellation for programs with
low performance ratings.
Installed in its new schedule from January 2011, Fringe ratings kept dropping and the series kept
beating its own records of low ratings.3
Given this bleak outlook, fans launched an initiative called The
Fringe Movement, which had the support of specialized media critics—who had always praised the
complexity of the series’ narrative and the characters displayed in the scripts of the series—and the Fringe
production team and cast, headed by actor Joshua Jackson (Clarke Stuart, 2011). Jackson and Fringe’s
showrunners, Joel Wyman and Jeff Pinkner, often joined these conversations from their own Twitter
accounts, thereby creating a direct channel of communication between fans and the creative team. These
conversations mainly comprised firsthand updates on the series’ renewal status and constant calls to
American viewers to tune into FOX’s Fringe on Friday nights, and to participate using FOX’s official
hashtag #Fringe. Fans dubbed this campaign “Fringe Friday.” Finally, on March 24, 2011, Wyman tweeted
Fringe’s renewal for a fourth season, thanking the fandom for their support.
In November 2011, during the fourth-season hiatus, The Fringe Movement was practically
disbanded after their leaders had ceased participation in the fandom, and ratings were still low in the
Friday Night Death Slot. Given the clear lack of leadership and direction, U.S. female fans aimeeinchains,
birdandbear, and fringeship, veterans of the previous initiative that enjoyed some recognition within the
community, decided to join forces to relaunch Fringe’s renewal campaign through Twitter (aimeeinchains,
2013; birdandbear, personal communication, February 3, 2015). In this way, the fan blog owned by
birdandbear (Morethanoneofeverything.net, http://www.morethanoneofeverything.net) became the hub of
a new movement called “Fringenuity: Action at a Distance” (http://twitter.com/fringenuity), which was
determined to keep encouraging viewers to tune into Fringe and help improve its ratings. Despite the
rapid dissolution of The Fringe Movement’s leadership, the former members who reunited to create
Fringenuity were able to restore and expand the structure of the first initiative in a short time due to their
rich cultural and fan social capital. The team spent weeks preparing the new strategy for the new
episodes’ return after the hiatus, scheduled for January 13, 2012. It mainly consisted of creating exclusive
Twitter hashtags for the airing of each episode and spreading a protocol to enter the platform’s trending
topics list. Finally, the call to action for the first of a total of 28 events on Twitter was posted on January
3
For example, the broadcast of the 15th episode of the third season, “Subject 13,” on February 25, 2011,
resulted in a total viewership of 4.02 million and a new minimum rating at the time of 1.5/5 in the
demographic group aged 18 to 49 years (Gorman, 2011).
2074 Mar Guerrero-Pico International Journal of Communication 11(2017)
7.4
The next section discusses how the Fringe fandom is not unique in using Twitter to support a television
show, regardless of its ratings.
How Media and Audience Measurement Shifts Have Influenced
Save Our Show Activism and Fan–Producer Relations
At the peak of the broadcasting era, dominated by the one-to-many paradigm and few actors
either producing or distributing content, fan cultures flourished in the margins of the mainstream,
disregarded by prevailing sociocultural discourses (Bacon-Smith, 1992; Jenkins, 1992). Thus, it is not
surprising that in the United States, fans were invisible to a television audience measurement system that
has been under Nielsen Media Research’s monopoly since the 1950s. Each member of selected
households, the so-called Nielsen families, would fill out, by hand, diaries that reflected their viewing
choices and weekly schedule among the offering of the Big 3 networks—ABC, NBC, and CBS. However, in
1987, Nielsen introduced the first version of the device that would redefine audience measurement: the
People Meter. Distributed to a sample of 5,000 households at the time,5
the impact for U.S. networks was
immense because they were able to access overnight rating results instead of waiting until the traditional
sweeps rating periods—four weeks during November, February, and May—to collect updated information
from handwritten diaries.
Among the general consequences resulting from People Meters since their implementation in the
national audience measurement market—and later extension to local markets in 2004—we can highlight a
more competitive television market that shortened the time dedicated to ponder the fate of struggling
shows and advertisers ultimately embracing demographic data for their own decision making. This resulted in
a prioritization of the 18 to 49 age segment; the shows that gathered more viewership in the young segment
become more valuable for advertisers in the long term than those more appealing to older audiences
(Webster, Phalen, & Lichty, 2005). In this environment, fans and network executives constituted completely
separate entities with limited opportunities for dialogue that would often clash over poor-rated shows on the
verge of cancellation, emphasizing fans’ disadvantaged and marginalized position. Nevertheless, decades
before it was commonplace to own a personal computer with Internet access, fans managed to mobilize
around conventions and events, or through calls to action published in fanzines giving specific instructions on
whom to call or send letters to, or even how to write requests (Jenkins, 1992). The campaigns to save Star
Trek, Cagney & Lacey, and Beauty & the Beast relied on these methods in a scenario where network
executives and creators had very limited access to fans’ opinions.
This situation of invisibility took a 180-degree turn with the spread of the Internet in the mid-
1990s—an event that would profoundly change fandom’s forms of production and interaction (Busse &
Hellekson, 2006). Fans, now gathered around discussion forums, blogs, and specialized websites—such as
fan fiction archives—found a more effective and permanent way to contact one another and share an
inexhaustible source of information. Fans also found a cost-effective channel to make their campaigns and
4
For this study, I consider only 14 events during the fourth season.
5
Today Nielsen families comprise 35,000 households in the United States (Doe, 2016).
International Journal of Communication 11(2017) #Fringe, Audiences, and Fan Labor 2075
opinions more visible to “the powers that be” (the network executives) and “the guiding spirit” (the
creators and writers; Jenkins, 2013) as both figures were increasingly present online. For executives,
access to these online conversations, either held on official or unofficial sites, meant “having a focus group
right at your fingertips” (Sloane, 2004, cited in Scardaville, 2005, p. 885). However, these changes had a
deeper impact on creators and writers as the ability to interact with fans online and have an engaged fan
base began to be seen as a truly valuable asset to increase the chances of keeping a show on the air and
fulfilling their creative vision. Such goals have always clashed with networks’ economic and ratings-based
logic, but they tended to align with fan interests. As Jenkins (2013) accounts in relation to Star Trek’s
creator Gene Rodenberry’s influence in the trekkie fandom, creative team endorsements of fan initiatives
is not a new concept. Nonetheless, regular online interaction with fans means the ultimate conversion of
the creative team into “one of us,” a “guiding spirit” (Jenkins, 2013, p. 54) that defends the show at the
executives’ offices, uniting with the fandom who campaign outside of them.
This mind-set was, however, not coincidental. An increasing fragmentation in the television
market—characterized by the emergence of brand-new networks, cable television, video on demand, and
the rise of new media—played a part in the transition from the broadcasting model to one of
narrowcasting. Narrowcasting is based on highly loyal and fragmented niche audiences that, in addition to
consuming media content and artifacts, can produce and distribute their own (Jenkins, 2006). For some
authors (Fuchs, 2011; Terranova, 2000), this digitally produced content entails a new form of mostly
unpaid labor, to which fandom is certainly no stranger. Fans as prosumers and advocates constitute a
workforce fueled by affection for media texts (Busse, 2015; De Kosnik, 2013; Milner, 2009; Stanfill &
Condis, 2014). Any neglect of this workforce further compromises the professional media position in a
market where the increased number of players already hinders efforts to keep audiences captive. This is
why fans began to move from the outside to be positioned at the center of media industries’ strategies
(Gray, Sandvoss, & Harrington, 2007; Jenkins, 2006), gradually becoming a commodity (Hills, 2015;
Stork, 2014). As Milner (2009) aptly points out in his study of the Fallout fan community:
Fans work for the text. This is true whether they labor in support of or opposition to
producer-sanctioned goals. Indeed, it seems that fan culture would not exist without fan
labor, and producers would be not so interested in fan culture if its proper management
and appropriation did not have viable financial consequences for them. (p. 494)
Among the fandom campaigns that came to fruition in this period of transition, we must highlight
Farscape (Sci-Fi, 1999–2003), Firefly (FOX, 2002–3), Veronica Mars (UPN, The CW, 2004–7), Friday Night
Lights (NBC, Audience Network, 2006–11), Roswell (The WB, UPN, 1999–2001), Jericho (CBS, 2006–8),
and Chuck (NBC, 2007–12). In particular, the experience of the latter three caught the attention of media
outlets due to the imaginative methods used by fans to pressure executives, complemented by the usual
intense promotion on television forums, websites, and blogs. Reproducing an initiative deployed by Twin
Peaks followers,6
The WB’s Roswell fandom sent in thousands of Tabasco sauce bottles—the series’ alien
characters’ favorite condiment—while Jericho fans filled CBS offices with about 20 tons of peanuts in
6
In addition to 10,000 letters, Twin Peaks fans sent to ABC a log, a plastic hand, several boxes of
doughnuts, and chess pieces—all objects belonging to the series’ storyworld (Savage, 2014).
2076 Mar Guerrero-Pico International Journal of Communication 11(2017)
addition to letters. By causing these mail inconveniences for the networks, fans sought to make executives
realize the audience commitment to those shows.
The strategies to renew Chuck were more sophisticated in comparison, laying the groundwork for
“a new style of campaign that focused its attention outside the network” (Savage, 2014, para. 2). As a
consequence, Chuck fans’ activism was devoid of the hostile connotations of the Roswell and Jericho
campaigns, therefore setting an immediate precedent for this study on Fringe fandom. The actions of the
fandoms of Roswell and Jericho were focused on capturing executives’ attention. However, Chuck targeted
perhaps the most crucial piece in the chain of decision makers: advertisers. Advertisers were normally
uninvited guests at Save Our Show campaign debates, despite their power and proximity to the network
executives. At a time when digital video recorders (DVRs) and online streaming joined the increasing list
of alternative methods of watching, television audiences constituted a clearly hyperfragmented mosaic
where advertisers and sponsors still operated by the rules of traditional, live television. That is, because
DVR allows viewers to skip commercials, advertisers paid no attention to the Nielsen ratings pertaining to
forms of viewing where commercials might not have been seen. Networks, following advertisers’ logic, did
not include DVR data in their reports to advertisers. According to Savage (2014), this circumstance forced
Save Our Show campaigns “to rethink their strategies in selling audience size” (para. 13). Thus, with the
cooperation of the creative team, but without monetary reward, Chuck fans launched an organized action
to buy Subway’s $5 footlong sandwich in spring 2009. It was the show’s most significant sponsor, on
whose flagship product screenwriters had structured the plot of an entire episode.7
Revenues from the
sales of this sandwich guaranteed the production of a third season, but beyond the favorable results, the
campaign was a renewed demonstration of the fandom’s intelligence and skills:
The idea was simple: demonstrate to both the network and the sponsor that there was
not only an audience for the show but also an audience that was paying attention to the
advertising for the show and supporting those sponsors. This would leverage the power
of the audience: in addition to fan viewers, the sponsors would also work to persuade
the network to renew the show on the fans’ behalf. By focusing on Chuck as a business
transaction, fans used their knowledge of the television industry to garner support for
their goals. (Savage, 2014, para. 25)
The fact that Chuck’s fandom is perceived as a keen and savvy media planner that officiously
sells viewership to advertisers illustrates, once again, how fans draw on their cultural and social capital to
carry out labor that can directly benefit the networks and creators in charge of the shows they love.
During the second half of the 2000s, the emergence of social media opened the door for the
migration of television fandoms toward these platforms, allowing fans to enhance their exposure and have
a greater influence on the way they promote and vouch for their favorite shows (Bury, Greenwood, &
Jones, 2013). The Fringe campaigns cannot be understood without taking into account this process, and,
indeed, Fringe’s most active fan base was located in Twitter (Clarke Stuart, 2011). Similar to the
experiences of other fandoms such as for Glee (Wood & Baughman, 2012) and for Scandal (Everett,
7
The episode was titled “Chuck Versus the First Kill” (2.20).
International Journal of Communication 11(2017) #Fringe, Audiences, and Fan Labor 2077
2015), fans from around the world appropriated the habit of live-tweeting. Fans would watch television
and discuss the experience simultaneously on a second screen—a computer or a cell phone—making use
of Twitter-specific features—140-character tweets, hashtags, retweets, following and unfollowing people,
adding pictures and footage—which can be seen as a materialization of the platform’s affordances as a
social network site. In this sense, Bucher and Helmond (2017) distinguish between two dimensions of
affordances: on the one hand, a “more concrete feature-oriented low-level” (p. 17); and on the other
hand, a high level consisting of the dynamics facilitated by devices, platforms, and media. In regard to
this high level, boyd (2011) refers to social network sites facilitating four types of affordances: persistence
(every message is recorded and archived), replicability (content can be replicated), scalability (great
visibility of content), and searchability (content can be searched). All of these affordances can be found on
Twitter, and they “showcase salient issues that participants most regularly contend with when engaging in
these environments” (p. 40). Similar to the Chuck fandom, the Fringe fan practices were rooted in utilizing
replicability and scalability, but they ultimately differed in how these affordances were brought about at
the feature-oriented level. While the Chuck campaign showed a basic fan activist approach to Twitter with
a simple strategy that consisted of mentioning NBC’s account (@nbc) along with the hashtags #savechuck
or #chuck, it was not until January 2012 when the Fringe fandom executed the first methodical fan
activist approach on the platform. Here, Twitter’s replicability and scalability were exploited in a highly
strategic manner by creating unique hashtags—as opposed to using the same hashtag every time—and
providing technical expertise through a detailed Twitter protocol that helped fans to coordinate efforts and
increase their efficiency.
Parallel to its fan activist applications, engaging in Twitter is distinctive of the social TV
phenomenon (Proulx & Shepatin, 2012) that has caught industry players’ attention, further blurring the
lines that separate producers and fans:
Television shows and networks have increasingly incorporated social media into their
programming, for example by promoting the use of Twitter hashtags to channel user
interaction with televised content and by showing a selection of incoming hashtagged
tweets during live shows; by establishing dedicated Facebook fan pages and Twitter
accounts for shows, presenters, or even fictional characters; or by providing their own
bespoke social networks and apps. (Association of Internet Researchers, 2014, p. 1)
As social media facilitates audience engagement with TV and fosters a more active audience
(Jenkins, 2006), measuring this engagement and dealing with “the explosion of raw and customized data
on audience behavior” (Woodford, Goldsmith, & Bruns, 2015, p. 141) derived from television and social
media integration, have become key topics for researchers and industry players. Specifically, there is a
need for understanding how much social media shapes audience ratings (Moe, Poell, & van Dijck, 2016).
In Twitter’s case, for example, this need includes a focus on studying a possible correlation between the
most tweeted and most watched shows given the platform’s input in reinforcing live viewing so that “it
requires the gathering of a social media community on the same platform at the same time” and “makes
viewers less likely to use time shifting technologies” (Harrington, Highfield, & Bruns, 2013, p. 407).
Consequently, this may increase viewers’ exposure to commercials (Midha, 2014).
2078 Mar Guerrero-Pico International Journal of Communication 11(2017)
In December 2012, months after the Fringenuity campaign had come to an end, Nielsen and
Twitter announced a partnership to create the Nielsen Twitter TV Rating—a new system for the analysis of
social TV audiences that would be released to the U.S. market the following year (Nielsen, 2012). The
system measures the “unique audience”: the estimated number of Twitter users exposed to a tweet
related to a show and the demographics of said users. However, for Woodford et al. (2015), this
measurement is far from satisfactory because it does not include the different contexts in which shows air.
For instance, it equates shows regardless of the type of broadcaster—national network or cable—genre,
programming schedule, and time slot. Likewise, “it ignored the number of tweets posted by user,” and “it
fails to differentiate between . . . broad but shallow engagement by a larger number of moderately
committed viewers . . . and deep but narrow engagement by a dedicated niche audience of fans” (p. 151).
At a superficial level it can be said that social media enables a locale for democratizing fan–
producer interactions as both parties share a common ground that exposes networks to fans’ claims and
provides fans with the means to swiftly mobilize and, at the very least, make their messages viral and
reach nonfan audiences to gain traction. This is not to say, though, that social media has erased the latent
power negotiation between fans and networks, and between fans and creators, over shows. Besides
protesting show cancellation, confronting questionable creative decisions linked to social matters—such as
the positive representation of racial and sexual minorities in the media—continues to be a significant part
of fan activism. This can be seen, for instance, in the publicized social media campaign against The 100’s
writers’ decision to kill off an LGBT character (Ryan, 2016).
In the case of Save Our Show campaigns, the emergence of social media can add extra layers of
complexity to the already manifold scenarios of fan activism. For example:
• The traditional power negotiation between fans and networks can be replaced by a direct
cooperation that indirectly might benefit, on the one hand, creators’ labor for the show
and, on the other hand, advertisers’ investments.
• Fan activists’ labor on social media may be yet another device for fan commodification
and exploitation in this amicable landscape, and yet, at the same time, fans have never
enjoyed a better basis for trying to influence networks’ final decisions on shows.
Method
To study how fans used Twitter as an activist tool to execute Save Our Show campaigns and the
shifting relationship between fans and producers, I relied on the ethnographic method of participant
observation, widely applied in the fan studies field, and the qualitative content analysis of online materials
such as blog posts and fan art.
As a Fringe fan, I was already up to date with the series’ chronic struggle with ratings by
following other fans’ Twitter accounts and regularly visiting fan blogs and forums. This activity allowed me
to participate as any other fan supporter in both The Fringe Movement and Fringenuity’s campaigns
between January 2011 and May 2012. I became familiar with Fringenuity’s Twitter events and the
guidelines posted on Morethanoneofeverything.net by applying them while live tweeting. At the same
International Journal of Communication 11(2017) #Fringe, Audiences, and Fan Labor 2079
time, I examined the content of the instructions as well as other campaign-related articles and art
featured on the site.
My hybrid positioning as an aca-fan—that is, an academic or scholar researching a fandom who is
also a part of that fandom (Jenkins, 1992)—was convenient for a faster and broader understanding of the
routines and codes of Fringenuity. However, there was a concern that such reflexivity might affect the
interpretation of the actions and events that I was observing and the scientific relevance of the case study
itself. Once the renewal was achieved, I took the necessary critical distance and time to evaluate my own
experience and so diminish the implementation of an overly emotional or celebratory approach that could
lead to biased and inaccurate assumptions (Silverman, 2006)—the ever-present risk in the work of an
aca-fan (Cristofari & Guitton, 2016; Hills, 2002).
Nonetheless, seeing other fandoms making use of Fringenuity’s methods and Nielsen launching a
system to measure social TV audiences in 2012 provided reasons to review Fringenuity’s experience and
adopt a more direct approach to collect in-depth data related to the organization of the Twitter events. I
set out to contact the campaign leaders. Birdandbear, aimeeinchains, and fringeship could be identified as
such since they were the only members posting on Morethanoneofeverything.net. So, after reaching
birdandbear through her Twitter handle in February 2015, I conducted an interview via e-mail with
birdandbear, based primarily on a questionnaire of 16 open questions and a follow-up conversation.8
Analysis
Once the data were collected, I structured the analysis around the two main aspects that defined
Fringenuity’s plan to renew Fringe, and that can be considered characteristic of this kind of Save Our
Show activism: fans’ methodical use of Twitter affordances and the intricacies of fan–producer
collaborative relationships when confronted with the issue of fan labor.
Twitter, a Strategic Tool for Fan Activism
“There are ways in which we legion of Non-Nielsens can let them know we’re here, we’re
watching, and most importantly, we’re paying attention to the paid advertising that keeps our shows
afloat,” notes birdandbear (2011, para. 4).
We’re breaking new ground: To my knowledge, no fandom has ever done anything quite
so cohesive before—they never had the tools. Fringe has been the beneficiary of some
very unique circumstances; the show needed support at a time when social media was
really coming into its own, and for the first time ever, fans without Nielsen boxes had
quantifiable ways to show that we’re watching too. Faced with ratings that would have
been a show’s death knell a few years ago, FOX chose to use Fringe as a testing ground
8
Ideally I wanted to interview the three leaders, but aimeeinchain’s death in 2013 and fringeship’s retreat
from fandom made it possible to contact only birdandbear.
2080 Mar Guerrero-Pico International Journal of Communication 11(2017)
for a boatload of new data: namely DVR and other alternative viewing habits, and the
growing influence of social buzz. (birdandbear, 2012, para. 1)
Both excerpts from informative entries posted on Morethanoneofeverything.net summarize the
strategy that lies beneath Fringenuity’s campaign: to overcome the limitations offered by Nielsen’s People
Meters. These limitations, as explained above, are related to the emergence of DVR and online streaming
that have contributed to dramatic audience fragmentation. At the same time, it is no coincidence that these
alternative ways of viewing, liberated from the constraints of a live broadcast, have become genre fan
favorites. Shows such as Fringe and Lost harbor complex narratives that are easier to understand after a
second or third viewing; they are stories that demand viewers’ attention and encourage rewatching. These
features fuel the emergence of an online forensic fandom (Mittell, 2009) that dissects each episode frame by
frame with clinical precision, looking for hidden messages and clues about future plots within the narrative.
Fringenuity’s Twitter campaign was therefore focused on making the underground audience—with
a high degree of engagement with TV programs—visible to FOX and its sponsors. The underground
audience is not usually taken into account during decision-making processes and is not represented by the
Nielsen standard. As birdandbear explains, besides saving Fringe, the goal was to pass the message onto
other genre shows on the brink of cancellation:
Genre television is a chronically endangered species and one of our goals was to try and
start that conversation, to get networks looking at a show’s social buzz as opposed to
just its ratings. We hoped that if a network could measure the cult status of a show
while it was still on the air, it might help keep other bubble shows alive based on the
loyalty and engagement of their audience. (birdandbear, personal communication,
February 3, 2015)
The Fringenuity team, like other fan organizations devoted to preventing the cancellation of their
favorite shows, exhibits a broad understanding of the factors involved in measuring U.S. television audiences.
The process of learning these media competences occurs in parallel to fans’ dedication in watching their
favorite TV shows. In other words, fans’ intense relationship with their object of fandom fosters their own
media literacy and the acquisition of other useful skills. And, when put into practice, this whole set of
competences can be translated into useful tools for online-based forms of activism (Lopez, 2011).
Getting Fringe renewed for a fifth season required Fringenuity to gain some of the skills associated
with a community manager’s position.9
As frequent Twitter users, the leaders of the organization were aware
of the advertising possibilities offered by the platform, but were unaware of the operating logic behind its
trending topics and hashtags, the key features behind the affordance of scalability. For this reason, they
conducted a self-learning process to find a hashtag that would uniquely identify the online activity related to
Fringe and, at the same time, be considered as relevant content by Twitter:
9
No campaign leader holds a media job.
International Journal of Communication 11(2017) #Fringe, Audiences, and Fan Labor 2081
We learned about hashtags and what makes them trend. We learned that #Fringe, or
#SaveFringe would never trend because of their constant usage, and that topics trend
when they spring up suddenly and are used by a lot of different people, whereas a few
people tweeting a hashtag over and over can’t make it trend no matter their level of
enthusiasm. We needed a spike in usage if we wanted a shot at trending. (birdandbear,
personal communication, February 3, 2015)
Trends are identified through a combination of novelty, and number and location of
participants: 1000 people in Texas sending 100 tweets an hour containing a tag that’s
used all the time are less likely to trend than 1000 people all over the world sending 10
tweets an hour on a topic that’s never been seen before. (birdandbear, 2012, para. 7)
The team met through Skype every weekend. After discussing that week’s episode, the members
analyzed the trailer of the next week’s episode for elements they could add to the hashtag to be used
during its broadcast on Friday. The goal was to create a label that was attractive to fans but also captured
the interest of viewers outside the fandom to increase the hashtags’ exposure and reach.10
Hashtags such
as #CrossTheLine, #BeABetterMan, and #LoveIsTheAnswer reflect the optimism that characterized the
Fringe fandom. The initiative focused on tags that were inspirational for the general public, who, by
clicking on one, would find a stream of tweets about the series. Fringenuity also intended to set a different
tone from previous renewal campaigns, emphasizing the strong bond among Fringe fans:
We felt that “Save Our Show” campaigns often do more harm than good because of the
desperation of their tone, and negativity toward the network or the Nielsen system would
diminish the spirit of the message we were trying to send. Instead we focused on fandom
as family and people responded wholeheartedly. Part of the reason the campaigns worked
so well was because we always had something to celebrate; even if we’d been unable to
help Fringe, we still had each other, and the way the show had drawn us together into a
tightly knit, caring, global community. Wherever we were able, we chose hashtags that
reflected the strength of that community and its desire to see the world through a brighter
lens. (birdandbear, personal communication, February 3, 2015)
Fringenuity kept no performance records of its first event on Twitter, which used the hashtag
#CrossTheLine. Although the first event’s results can be deemed as modest compared with later ones, the
hashtags reached the top three in the list of worldwide and U.S. trending topics on Friday night. This is a
feat that is especially remarkable considering AMC’s show The Walking Dead appeared in the first position
as a promoted (paid) hashtag.11
Collected through the TwitterReach tool, the events would experience a
striking rise with #BeABetterMan, the hashtag used in the sixth week of the campaign, which gathered an
impressive 23.4 million impressions and 8.2 million unique users (see Table 1). The reason behind this
10
Reach represents the total number of unique Twitter users that received tweets about a specific search
term, and exposure is the total number of times tweets about the search term were received by users.
Each received tweet is called an impression.
11
http://morethanoneofeverything.net/2012/02/15/breakingout-breakthroughs-campaign-report/
2082 Mar Guerrero-Pico International Journal of Communication 11(2017)
spike can be found in #BeABetterMan trending worldwide for several hours after the episode aired in the
U.S. West Coast, a situation favored by the different time zones among the United States, Canada,
France, and Spain—countries where the hashtag was popular.12
Table 1. Fringenuity Hashtags During Fringe’s Season 4.
Hashtag Exposurea
Reachb
Episode
#CrossTheLine — — “Back to Where You’ve Never Been” (4.08),
January 13, 2012
#EnemyofMyEnemy 4.7 633,967 “Enemy of My Enemy” (4.09),
January 20, 2012
#ObserveItLive 4.0 498,506 “Forced Perspective” (4.10),
January 27, 2012
#TakeTheLead 4.9 846,255 “Making Angels” (4.11),
February 3, 2012
##BreakingOut 4.4 765,141 “Welcome to Westfield” (4.12),
February 10, 2012
#BeABetterMan 23.4 8.2 million “A Better Human Being” (4.13),
February 17, 2012
#LoveIsTheAnswer 12.2 3.9 million “The End of All Things” (4.14),
February 24, 2012
#WhereYouBelong 26.8 11.4 million “A Short Story About Love” (4.15),
March 23, 2012
#ChangeYourWorld 30.0 13.9 million “Nothing As It Seems” (4.16),
March 30, 2012
#FaceYourself 11.5 3.5 million “Everything in Its Right Place” (4.17),
April 6, 2012
#AcrossTheUniverse 14.5 5.8 million “The Consultant” (4.18),
April 13, 2012
#FightTheFuture 13.1 3.3 million “Letters of Transit” (4.19),
April 20, 2012
#WorldsApart 12.5 3.2 million “Worlds Apart” (4.20),
April 27, 2012
#DarkestBeforeDawn 13.4 2.6 million “Brave New World Part I” (4.21),
May 4, 2012
Source. Author’s elaboration based on birdandbear (2012, personal communication, February 3, 2015).
a
Millions of impressions.
b
Number of unique users.
12
http://morethanoneofeverything.net/2012/02/21/trending-beabetterman-a-phenomenal-outcome/
International Journal of Communication 11(2017) #Fringe, Audiences, and Fan Labor 2083
Fringenuity needed not only to promote events through Twitter or popular fan blogs within the
community such as FringeTelevision (http://www.fringetelevision.com), but to make the strategy
intelligible and transferable to other fans wishing to join the initiative. The team occasionally posted
entries on Morethanoneofeverything.net explaining the reasons behind the need for an organized fandom,
or information about the growing impact of social networks in television consumption.13
But it was in the
entries introducing the new hashtag for Friday night’s event where the overall campaign strategy was
detailed.
Posted four days before the airing of each episode, along with its corresponding hashtag, the
“Twitter Event Protocol” (see Figure 1) is a simple compendium of instructions common to all events. On
the one hand, they encapsulate the knowledge acquired by the Fringenuity team during the brainstorming
of the initiative; on the other hand, they break down each of the steps that are part of the general slogan
of Fringe’s renewal campaign: “Watching Live + Social Media + Thanking Sponsors + Sharing The Love =
Season Five” (aimeeinchains, 2012b).
Following the example of Chuck’s renewal campaign, Fringenuity leaders made a point of
supporting Fringe’s advertisers, discarding hostile tactics and opting for a more collaborative and
television-market-integrated activist approach. Twitter events were complemented with specific actions in
the former TV social network GetGlue to reinforce the message of support for sponsors and, above all, to
state that Fringe fans were paying attention to the products advertised during the show’s airing. Fringe
Television joined these efforts to be recognized by advertisers by posting a list of the sponsors of each
episode with links to their Twitter and Facebook accounts for fans to send words of gratitude for having
chosen Fringe to air their commercials or do product placement.14
In conjunction with the publication of the protocols on Morenthanoneofeverything.net, Fringenuity
designed a series of fan art every week (see Figure 2) inspired by the hashtags to use as avatars or profile
pictures on Twitter during the events. One of the team members, Nikolai3d, created a Web application15
to
store all the avatars designed during the campaign and to enable users to add them to their profile with a
single click (birdandbear, personal communication, February 3, 2015). At the same time, the initiative
encouraged others to create and share their own promotional material, mostly icons and videos, such as
“FRINGE February 17—Be a Better Man” by the Spanish fan sujeto13,16
which helped to spread the word
of events in other languages and on other platforms.
13
http://morethanoneofeverything.net/2012/04/05/social-fringe-fans-shaping-the-future-of-television-
viewing-marketing-and-interaction/
14
http://www.fringetelevision.com/2011/11/commercials-from-fringe-episode_18.html
15
http://observer-n3.com/FSRR/unified_icon_matrix/index.php
16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8wszikh0s8
2084 Mar Guerrero-Pico International Journal of Communication 11(2017)
Figure 1. “Twitter Event Protocol” for the hashtag
#ChangeYourWorld (aimeeinchains, 2012c).
International Journal of Communication 11(2017) #Fringe, Audiences, and Fan Labor 2085
Figure 2. #BeABetterMan avatar featuring the Peter Bishop character,
by @cheribot. Source: Morethanoneofeverything.net
The participation of fans around the world in creating videos and images to reinforce the
campaign’s deployment on Twitter is an example of the fast reception Fringenuity’s plan received among
the show’s overseas fandom. This international support is directly tied to the emergence of social media
and its capacity to bring together dispersed audiences around the same topic of discussion. In addition,
the Fringenuity community’s strong sense of togetherness allowed it to obtain support from other fan
blogs and Twitter accounts about the series in other countries. Such is the case of @FringeGermany
(Germany), @Fringe__UK, @FringeUKIreland (United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland),
@SerieFringeBR (Brazil), and @Fringespain and @ZonaFringe (Spain), and others.
Fan–Producer Interactions and the Thin Line of Fan Labor
Until Fringe’s return after a month-long hiatus on March 23, 2012, with the broadcast of the
episode “A Short Story About Love” (4.15), FOX had been using the standard hashtag #Fringe—the same
one that the fandom had rejected after considering it ineffective for their goal to trend on Twitter. During
the hiatus, FOX representatives contacted Fringenuity to communicate their intention to use the hashtag
#WhereYouBelong on screen (fringeship, 2012). Specialized media such as TV Guide reported the
agreement, calling it “a nod of appreciation” (Holbrook, 2012, para. 2) to Fringe fans’ efforts in their viral
2086 Mar Guerrero-Pico International Journal of Communication 11(2017)
campaigns, implying the network’s close following of the campaign. The results of the experiment (see
Table 1) encouraged FOX to continue using Fringenuity’s hashtags until the end of Season 4.
FOX’s official support materialized through the figure of Ari Margolis, who was in direct
communication with the Fringenuity team. The creative director had been following the campaigns in a
personal capacity as any other Fringe fan since the first event, #CrossTheLine (aimeeinchains, 2012a). As
a courtesy to the network, Fringenuity allowed Margolis to choose the week’s hashtag from a list of four or
five possibilities that were provided for him by the campaign team after its online meeting (birdandbear,
personal communication, February 3, 2015).
Despite the official support and Margolis’s role as a “guiding spirit,” the relationship
between the network and the fans was noted for its unilateral nature because
Fringenuity had no other contact with the network beyond its interaction with Margolis.
FOX’s decision to use fan-created hashtags was an unprecedented collaboration between
a television network and a fandom. This move demonstrates the breakdown of barriers
between producers and consumers so characteristic of the contemporary media
ecosystem. However, none of the three leaders received any material compensation
beyond a piece of amber from the set and an exclusive DVD screener for the series
finale “The Boy Must Live” (5.13): “That [the piece of amber and the screener] was our
only perk and it was entirely unexpected, but cool as hell and very much appreciated”
(birdandbear, personal communication, February 3, 2015).
The absence of a financial reward highlights the extent to which fans may consciously work for
free while trying to save the shows they love. In this sense, Milner’s (2009) argument about fans seeing
their uncompensated labor as a “foregone conclusion” or “business of usual” (p. 499) is useful in a context
where no benefit whatsoever was anticipated by the fans, as noted by birdandbear’s comment above.
Motivated only by their loyalty to the text as a brand, Fringenuity worked for Fringe’s longevity on air and
a self-perceived ability to influence the television measurement market as ultimate goals. The enthusiasm
for demonstrating, through data, the existence of alternatives to measure engagement was equally shared
by the members of the team, and so Fringenuity posted several entries on Morenthanoneofeverything.net
to encourage fans with the premise of “making history” (aimeeinchains, 2013; birdandbear, 2011). In
such posts, it is apparent how fans’ labor and willing self-commodification are beyond any monetary gain,
or perks, and closer to immaterial reward (Milner, 2009).
Unlike other doomed Save Our Show campaigns of the past, Fringe’s fandom endeavors were
rewarded when, on March 26, 2012, Joel Wyman announced on Twitter the series’ renewal for a fifth and
final season that would begin airing in the fall.17
With the mission already accomplished, FOX and
Fringenuity continued with the Twitter events over the last 13 episodes as a way to celebrate Fringe.
However, the initiative never received any economic compensation that confirmed its pioneering work in
recognizing viewers who did not belong to the “Nielsen families,” emphasizing once again the immaterial
motives that steered Fringenuity’s actions in the first place:
17
https://twitter.com/jwfringe/status/195650701416869889
International Journal of Communication 11(2017) #Fringe, Audiences, and Fan Labor 2087
When Nielsen announced their new social media tracking program it was hard not to
take it as a kind of vindication. Whether or not our activities had any direct bearing on
that move (and Nielsen would never admit to it if they did), it still bore out things we’d
been trying to say all along: that there are more ways to measure the engagement of
today’s TV audience than through a system devised more than half a century ago.
(birdandbear, personal communication, February 3, 2015)
Discussion
The case of the fan initiative Fringenuity: Action at a Distance is a clear example of the potential
of social media for the development and implementation of fan activist projects in the transmedia context.
On the one hand, social media increases the campaigns’ reach and, on the other hand, provides leaders
with accessible and affordable tools for spreading their messages through a variety of media. As we have
seen, Twitter affordances have proven cost-effective in amplifying fan voices when used methodically.
However, it would be naive to think that FOX’s approach to Fringe activist fans could have materialized
without the obvious impact of Twitter on television consumption, resulting in an increase in the
effectiveness of commercials (Midha, 2014).
In-depth knowledge of the television market rules enabled Fringenuity to develop the skills
needed to detect shifts in the structure of the market—such as the rise of social TV—and to mobilize other
fans in order to make those transformations visible to audiences unaware of the possibilities. The
peculiarity of Fringenuity’s approach lies, however, in the simultaneous use of Twitter as both a tool for
and an object of activism. The organization used the platform to spread a self-referential message that
defends the value of the social network as a reliable indicator to measure the actual engagement of
television audiences being sold to advertisers by networks. These indicators move beyond an outdated
system, based on measuring massive audiences that, in reality, have been—and continue to be—
fragmented by the multiplication of consumption alternatives through more services and platforms.
The unusual fan–producer partnership between Fringenuity and FOX and the advantages this bore
for creators and advertisers (i.e., guaranteeing more time to implement the writers’ vision and exposing
audiences to commercials) describe an increasingly interdependent landscape where fans have renegotiated
their share in the power structure and have achieved a more decisive position in terms of influence capacity.
However, from a critical point of view, it could be argued that this improvement does not come without
caveats. For instance, successfully positioning a network show’s brand online, like Fringenuity did, involved
fans carrying out unpaid or free labor as a “necessary evil” to fulfill its goal. According to Stork (2014), “the
strategic exploitation of fan activities as labor . . . portends a marketing strategy that promotes ‘the
colonization of consumer/producer agency by markets’ (Deuze, 2009, p. 148)” (para. 38). Granted, this is an
issue where a simple answer does not exist, as fans’ own perceptions about their labor and agency tend to
be, as some scholars have argued, deeply rooted in immaterial motives. But, paradoxically, when some
individual fans become aware of the materialistic implications of their labor, they still choose selfcommodification
over profit, albeit often at their fan peers’ expense (e.g., pulled-to-publish fan fiction as
seen in Jones, 2014). This deepens the intricacies of fan labor, not just between fans and industry players
but also within fan communities, and presents a challenging scenario for fan scholarship in years to come.
2088 Mar Guerrero-Pico International Journal of Communication 11(2017)
References
aimeeinchains. (2012a, January 15). There and back again—Fringe trending campaigns #CrossedTheLine.
Fringenuity. Retrieved from http://morethanoneofeverything.net/2012/01/15/there-and-back-
again-fringe-trending-campaigns/
aimeeinchains. (2012b, February 6). Sharing the love of Fringe with others. Fringenuity. Retrieved from
http://morethanoneofeverything.net/2012/02/06/sharing-the-love-of-fringe-with-others/
aimeeinchains. (2012c, March 26). Twitter event: Nothing as it seems—Change your world 03/30/12.
Fringenuity. Retrieved from http://morethanoneofeverything.net/2012/03/26/twitter-event-
nothing-as-it-seems-033012/
aimeeinchains. (2013, January 6). #CrossTheLine was the first step in a year-long Fringe fan journey.
Fringenuity. Retrieved from http://morethanoneofeverything.net/2013/01/06/crosstheline-was-
the-first-step-in-a-year-long-fringe-fan-journey/
Association of Internet Researchers. (2014). Social TV: Quantifying the intersections between television
and social media (panel overview). In Selected Papers of Internet Research 15: The 15th annual
meeting of the Association of Internet Researchers (pp. 1–23). Daegu, Korea: Author. Retrieved
from https://spir.aoir.org/index.php/spir/article/view/1006/670
Bacon-Smith, C. (1992). Enterprising women: Television fandom and the creation of the popular myth.
Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
birdandbear. (2011, October 27). Not Nielsen: How to overcome invisibility. Fringenuity. Retrieved from
http://morethanoneofeverything.net/2011/10/27/not-neilsen-how-to-overcome-invisibility/
birdandbear. (2012, February 21). The science of Fringenuity. Fringenuity. Retrieved from
http://morethanoneofeverything.net/2012/02/21/the-science-of-fringenuity/
boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z.
Paparachissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites
(pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
Brower, S. (1992). Fans as tastemakers: Viewers for quality. In L. A. Lewis (Ed.), The adoring audience:
Fan culture and popular media (pp. 163–184). London, UK: Routledge.
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, T. Poell, & A.
Marwick (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (Prepublication print). London, UK: SAGE
Publications. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/27438172/The_Affordances_of_Social
_Media_Platforms
International Journal of Communication 11(2017) #Fringe, Audiences, and Fan Labor 2089
Bury, R., Deller, R., Greenwood, A., & Jones, B. (2013). From Usenet to Tumblr: The changing role of
social media. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 10(1), 299–318.
Retrieved from http://www.participations.org/Volume%2010/Issue%201/14%20Bury
%20et%20al%2010.1.pdf
Busse, K. (2015). Fan labor and feminism: Capitalizing on the fannish labor of love. Cinema Journal,
54(3), 110–115. doi:10.1353/cj.2015.0034
Busse, K., & Hellekson, K. (2006). Introduction. In K. Hellekson & K. Busse (Eds.), Fan fiction and fan
communities in the age of the Internet: New essays (pp. 5–32). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Clarke Stuart, S. (2011). Into the looking glass: Exploring the worlds of Fringe. Toronto, Canada: ECW
Press.
Coppa, F. (2006).A brief history of media fandom. In K. Hellekson & K. Busse (Eds.), Fan fiction and fan
communities in the age of the Internet: New essays (pp. 41–59). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Cristofari, C., & Guitton, M. (2016, January 15). Aca-fans and fan communities: An operative framework.
Journal of Consumer Culture, 1–19. doi:10.1177/1469540515623608
De Kosnik, A. (2013). Interrogating “free” fan labor. Spreadable Media. Retrieved from
http://spreadablemedia.org/essays/kosnik
Doe, P. (2016, February 9). Nielsen panel expansion and national ratings modeling: What’s happening?
Clypd. Retrieved from http://clypd.com/nielsens-panel-expansion-and-national-ratings-modeling-
whats-happening/
Everett, A. (2015). Scandalious. The Black Scholar: Journal of Black Studies and Research, 45(1), 34–43.
doi:10.1080/00064246.2014.997602
fringeship. (2012, March 27). #WhereYouBelong—Fringies come back strong on Twitter and GetGlue
campaigns. Fringenuity. Retrieved from http://morethanoneofeverything.net/2012/03/27/
whereyoubelong-fringies-come-back-strong-on-twitter-and-getglue-campaigns/
Fuchs, C. (2011). Foundations of critical media and information studies. London, UK: Routledge.
Gorman, B. (2011). Friday final ratings: “CSI: NY” adjusted up; no adjustments for “Fringe,”
“Supernatural,” “Smallville.” TV by the Numbers. Retrieved from
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/02/28/friday-final-ratings-csiny-adjusted-up-no-
adjustments-for-fringe-supernatural-smallville/83993/
2090 Mar Guerrero-Pico International Journal of Communication 11(2017)
Gray, J., Sandvoss, C., & Harrington, C. L. (2007). Why study fans? In J. Gray, C. Sandvoss, & C. L.
Harrington (Eds.), Fandom: Identities and communities in a mediated world (pp. 1–16). New
York, NY: New York University Press.
Harrington, S., Highfield, T., & Bruns, A. (2013). More than a backchannel: Twitter and television.
Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 10(1), 405–409. Retrieved from
http://www.participations.org/Volume%2010/Issue%201/30%20Harrington%20et%20al%2010.
1.pdf
Hills, M. (2002). Fan cultures. London, UK: Routledge.
Hills, M. (2015). Veronica Mars, fandom, and the “affective economics” of crowdfunding poachers. New
Media & Society, 17(2), 183–197. doi:10.1177/1461444814558909
Holbrook, D. (2012, March 22). Exclusive: Fox helps out Fringe fans on Twitter. TV Guide. Retrieved from
http://www.tvguide.com/news/fox-fringe-twitter-1045173/#cb=f316a5944b5971c&origin
=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tvguide.com%2Ffa6f67db78e7c4&relation=parent.parent&transport=pos
tmessage&type=resize&height=21&ackData%5Bid%5D=1&width=130
Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York
University Press.
Jenkins, H. (2013). The guiding spirit and the powers that be: A response to Suzanne Scott. In A.
Delwiche & J. Jacobs Henderson (Eds.), The participatory cultures handbook (pp. 53–58). New
York, NY: Routledge.
Jones, B. (2014). Fifty shades of exploitation: Fan labor and Fifty Shades of Grey. Transformative Works
and Cultures, 15. doi:10.3983/twc.2014.0501
Lopez, L. K. (2011). Fan activists and the politics of race in The Last Airbender. International Journal of
Cultural Studies, 15(5), 431–445. doi:10.1177/1367877911422862
Midha, A. (2014, February 5). TV x Twitter: New findings for advertisers and networks. Twitter. Retrieved
from https://blog.twitter.com/2014/tv-x-twitter-new-findings-for-advertisers-and-networks
Milner, R. M. (2009). Working for the text: Fan labor and the new organization. International Journal of
Cultural Studies, 12(5), 491–508. doi:10.1177/1367877909337861
Milner, R. M. (2010). Negotiating text integrity: An analysis of fan–producer interaction in an era of digital
connectivity. Information, Communication and Society, 13(5), 722–746.
doi:0.1080/13691180903456538
International Journal of Communication 11(2017) #Fringe, Audiences, and Fan Labor 2091
Mittell, J. (2009). Lost in a great story: Evaluation in narrative television (and television studies). In R.
Pearson (Ed.), Reading LOST (pp. 119–138). London, UK: I. B. Tauris.
Moe, H., Poell, T., & van Dijck, J. (2016). Rearticulating audience engagement: Social media and
television. Television and New Media, 17(2), 99–107. doi:10.1177/1527476415616194
Nielsen. (2012, December 17). Nielsen and Twitter establish social TV rating (Press release). Retrieved
from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/press-room/2012/nielsen-and-twitter-establish-social-tv-
rating.html
Proulx, M., & Shepatin, S. (2012). Social TV: How marketers can reach and engage audiences by
connecting television to the Web, social media and mobile. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Ryan, M. (2016, March 14). What TV can learn from “The 100” mess. Variety. Retrieved from
http://variety.com/2016/tv/opinion/the-100-lexa-jason-rothenberg-1201729110/
Sabal, R. (1992). Television executives speak about fan letters. In L. A. Lewis (Ed.), The adoring
audience: Fan culture and popular media (pp. 185–188). London, UK: Routledge.
Savage, C. (2014). Chuck versus the ratings: Savvy fans and “Save Our Show” campaigns.
Transformative Works and Cultures, 15. doi:10.3983/twc.2014.0497
Scardaville, M. C. (2005). Accidental activists: Fan activism in the soap opera community. American
Behavioral Scientist, 48, 881–901. doi:10.1177/0002764204273174
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Stanfill, M., & Condis, M. (2014). Fandom and/as labor [Editorial]. Transformative Works and Cultures, 15.
doi:10.3983/twc.2014.0593
Stork, M. (2014). The cultural economics of performance space: Negotiating fan, labor, and marketing
practice in Glee’s transmedia geography. Transformative Works and Cultures, 15.
doi:10.3983/twc.2014.0490
Terranova, T. (2000). Free labour: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58.
Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/schock/www/docs/18.2terranova.pdf
Webster, J. G., Phalen, P. F., & Lichty, L. W. (2005). Rating analysis. The theory and practice of audience
research (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wood, M., & Baughman, L. (2012). Glee fandom and Twitter: Something new, or more of the same old
thing? Communication Studies, 63(3), 328–344. doi:10.1080/10510974.2012.674618
2092 Mar Guerrero-Pico International Journal of Communication 11(2017)
Woodford, D., Goldsmith, B., & Bruns, A. (2015). Social media audience metrics as a new form of TV
audience measurement. In R. A. Lind (Ed.), Producing theory in a digital world 2.0: The
intersection of audiences and production in contemporary theory (pp. 141–158). New York, NY:
Peter Lang.