South Caucasus: a geopolitical crossroad (discussion with the expert: Dr. Zinaida Bechná) + Position paper 4 - 1 April 2025
In the
framework of this seminar, we will start with a block topic on the European
Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership in the context of the South
Caucasus region. Attention will be paid to Georgia as a candidate state (but
with problematic internal developments), Armenia as a country which, although a
member of the Eurasian Economic Union, has in the past also sought an
association agreement with the EU and currently has an enhanced cooperation and
partnership agreement with the EU. At the same time, there have been important
internal political developments in the country in recent years, and also under
the influence of the current security situation in the region. Attention will
also be paid to Azerbaijan as a very specific actor in the region (and in the
context of the Eastern Partnership as a whole), also in the context of the
events of recent years concerning the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and the
conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
The
region is interesting in that the countries have quite different quality of
their relations with the EU, while Georgia has applied for EU membership
(although the accession negotiations have been suspended recently), Armenia has
the specific relationship described above and Azerbaijan plays a significant
role in EU policy on energy and energy security. One factor that has become
increasingly important recently (including in the context of the war in
Ukraine) is the issue of the conflicts in the South Caucasus, not only the
Nagorno-Karabakh issue but also the issue of the separatist areas in Georgia
and the limits and possibilities of EU action in these areas as a crisis
manager.
The
countries of the South Caucasus are often presented in a regional perspective.
On the other hand, the quality of relations between the individual countries
and the EU varies considerably, which raises the question of whether the EU
should try to devise a general strategy towards the South Caucasus, or whether
it should rather develop differentiated attitudes towards individual countries.
The EU's role as an actor in relation to the South Caucasus region is further
complicated and challenged by the active participation of other actors, notably
Russia, but also Turkey, China (partly) and regional actors (e.g. Iran). The
South Caucasus as a region at the 'crossroads' among different geopolitical
interests will also be an important aspect to be discussed at the seminar.
The second part of our meeting will also include the discussion with the expert: Dr. Zinaida Bechná.
Paper 4:
The EU as an actor in relation to the countries of the South Caucasus and as an
actor in conflict resolution and crisis management in the South Caucasus
In the
paper you can either address the question of the EU as an actor in the region
in general, or focus on just 1 country or on a particular phenomenon (e.g.
conflict potential in the perspective of Armenian-Azerbaijani relations and the
context of the current war in Ukraine). In the policy paper, you can address
the following topics (of your choice):
Georgia -
problems and limits of the EU as an actor of democracy promotion in the
country; Georgia and the EU - the future? (viewed through the perspective of
current events in Georgia and the actions of the Georgian government, which is
often criticized by the EU; Georgia and its position on the current conflict in
Ukraine; the EU as an actor in crisis management in Georgia, etc.)
Armenia
and the dilemmas of its relations with the EU (Armenia and its close relations
with Russia, seen through the lens of the current conflict in Ukraine; efforts
to diversify Armenian foreign and security policy, etc.).
Azerbaijan
as one of the specific actors of the Eastern Partnership policy: Azerbaijan as
an important actor in energy security; Azerbaijan and Turkey's role in the
region (seen through the perspective of the current conflict in Ukraine) etc.
The texts
available in the literature (see below) as well as other texts
from relevant sources (academic articles in Google Scholar, Sage, Ebsco, Jstor,
etc.) will serve as background.
DEADLINE: 31st March 2025, 1 p.m.
Readings (indicative):
Bekiarova, Natalia (2019): "South Caucasus as a Region of Strategic Importance". In: International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, Vol. V, Issue 14, August 2019, pp. 1016-1025.
Bidzina Lebanidze (2020): Resilience and democracy: Can a pragmatic EU still promote democracy in Georgia? Policy Brief. GIP. February 2020 / Issue #21.
Régis Genté (2022): Broken Dream: The oligarch, Russia and Georgia´s drift from Europe. ecfr.eu. Policy Brief. 21 December 2022. On-line: https://ecfr.eu/publication/broken-dream-the-oligarch-russia-and-georgias-drift-from-europe/
Kiril Krivosheev (2023): Could the New EU Mission Sideline Russia in Armenia-Azerbaijan Settlement? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 16.02.2023. On-line: https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/89060
Pawel Stawarz (2020) "ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN IN THE ENP - MISSED OPPORTUNITIES?". Online Journal Modelling the New Europe 32:111-128.
Recommended:
Samkharadze, N. (2020): Ethnic Minorities in the context of Georgia´s European Integration: Is there a Room for Scepticism? Georgian Institute of Politics. Policy brief. July 2020. On-line: http://gip.ge/ethnic-minorities-in-the-context-of-georgias-european-integration-is-there-a-room-for-skepticism/
Salome Minesashvili, "EU and Ethnic Minorities in Georgia: How to Counter Misinformation and Disruptive Communication", Policy Brief #29, Georgian Institute of Politics, July 2020.
Givi Silagadze (2020) Is Georgian Populism Eurosceptic? GIP Policy Memo. May 2020 / Issue # 36.
Video: Conflict in Nagorno Karabakh in 2020: https://youtu.be/YU2v38hRRbg
PRESENTATIONS: