PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISAL PROCESS Lucie Hejtmánková PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT u  CONTRIBUTE TO THE EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF INDIVIDUALS AND TEAMS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE HIGH LEVELS OF ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE u  SHARED UNDERSTANDING ABOUT WHAT IS TO BE ACHIEVED AND AN APPROACH TO LEADING AND DEVELOPING PEOPLE WICH WILL ENSURE IT IS ACHIEVED (FOOT&HOOK, 2011,p.249) APPRAISAL PROCESS u  FORMAL SYSTEM OF REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL OR TEAM PERFORMANCE THE MAIN GOALS OF APPRAISAL u  TO IDENTIFY HIGH PERFORMANCE EMPLOYEES u  TO DETECT PROBLEMS IN EARLY STAGE u  TO MOTIVATE AND TO DEVELOP EMPLOYEE HR PROCESSES RECRUITMENT INDUCTION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING& DEVELOPMENT TALENT MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SUCCESION PLANNING COMPENSATION& BENEFITS EXIT MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYER‘S BRAND COMPETETITIVENESS PROFIT COMPANY CULTURE WHY WE DO THE APPRAISAL? u  ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE u  ARE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS BEING MET? u  TRAINING NEEDS u  WHAT DOES THE EMPLOYEE NEED TO LEARN IN ORDER TO IMPROVE HIS/HER CURRENT WORK PERFORMANCE? u  CAREER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT u  ASSESSING AN EMPLOYEEʼ’S STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES TO DETERMINE ADVANCEMENT OPTIONS u  COMPENSATION PROGRAMS u  PROVIDES A BASIS FOR RATIONAL DECISIONS REGARDING PAY ADJUSTMENTS (RAISES AND BONUSES) WHY WE DO APPRAISAL? u  INTERNAL EMPLOYEE RELATIONS u  USED FOR DECISIONS IN SEVERAL AREAS OF INTERNAL EMPLOYEE RELATIONS, INCLUDING PROMOTION, DEMOTION, TERMINATION u  RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION u  GENERATES DATA TO VALIDATE SELECTION CRITERIA u  HUMAN RESOURCE PLANNING u  ASSESSMENT DATA IS HELPFUL IN BUILDING REPLACEMENT OR SUCCESSION CHARTS WHAT MATTERS? u  ORGANISATION’S STRATEGY AND OBJECTIVES u  ORGANISATION CULTURE u  ORGANISATION PROCESSES u  HRM APPROACH u  MISSION WHAT SHOULD BE DONE u  EXPECTATION SHOULD BE LINKED TO LONG-TERM GOALS AND BROAD ISSUES u  WE MUST ENSURE THAT OUR EMPLOYEES: u  KNOW AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IS EXPECTED FROM THEM u  HAVE THE SKILLS NECESSARY TO DELIVER ON THESE EXPECTATIONS u  ARE SUPPORTED BY ORGANISATION TO MEET THEIR GOALS u  ARE GICEN FEEDBACK ON THEIR PERFORMANCE u  HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS AND CONTRIBUTE TI TEAM AIMS HOW WE CAN CONDUCT APPRAISAL? u  MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES (MBO) u  RATING SCALES u  BEHAVIOURALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES (BARS) u  BEHAVIOURAL OBSERVATION SCALES u  CRITICAL INCIDENTS u  NARRATIVE REPORT ROLES IN THE APPRAISAL PROCESS HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT u  DESIGNS THE APPRAISAL SYSTEM u  ESTABLISHES AND MONITORS A REPORTING SYSTEM u  TRAINS MANAGERS IN CONDUCTING APPRAISAL u  ADVISORS FOR MANAGERS u  MAINTAINS APPRAISAL RECORDS MANAGERS & SUPERVISORS u  EVALUATE EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE u  COMPLETE THE APPRAISAL DOCUMENTS AND FORMS u  REVIEW APPRAISALS WITH EMPLOYEES SUPERVISORS AS AN APPRAISER SHOULD: u  BE AWARE OF THE OBJECTIVES & REQUIREMENTS OF THE EMPLOYEEʼ’S JOB u  HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO FREQUENTLY OBSERVE THE EMPLOYEE OR HIS/HER WORK u  BE CAPABLE OF EVALUATING AND RECORDING OBSERVED WORK BEHAVIOR OR PERFORMANCE u  AVOID OR MINIMIZE POTENTIAL APPRAISAL ERRORS AND BIAS AMO MODEL - PURCELL u  ABILITY – TO LEARN NEW SKILLS AND CAN BE DEVELOPED FURTHER u  MOTIVATION – MOTIVATING PEOPLE TO USE THEIR ABILITY TO ACHIEVE ORGANISATIONAL GOALS u  OPPORTUNITY – ORGANISATION SHOULD PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY TO PEOPLE TO USE THEIR SKILLS APPRAISAL ERRORS THE ATRIBUTION ERROR (Kelly, 1973) u  POOR WORK PERFORMANCE BY OTHERS u  THE PERSON IS THE REASON FOR FAILURE u  MY POOR WORK PERFORMANCE u  THE ENVIRONMENT IS THE REASON FOR FAILURE ENLIGHTENED SUPERVISOR RESPONSE LACKS ABILITY Training or Transfer LACKS EFFORT Motivational Strategy DIFFICULT TASK Job Redesign BAD LUCK Support APPRAISAL ERRORS u  APPRAISER DISCOMFORT u  TIME CONSUMING u  UNPLEASANT EXPERIENCES u  LACK OF OBJECTIVITY u  USED WRONG SCALE METHODS u  USED WRONG FACTORS u  HALO/HORN EFFECT u  APPRAISER USE JUST ONE POSITIVE/NEGATIVE SITUATION TO EVALUATE EMPLOYEE u  LENIENCY/STRICT EFFECT u  GIVING UNDESERVED HIGH RATINGS/BEING UNBDULY CRITICAL APPRAISAL ERRORS u  CENTRAL TENDENCY u  ERROR OCCURES WHEN EMPLOYEES ARE RATED INCORRECTLY NEAR TO AVERAGE u  RECENT BEHAVIOR u  EMPLOYEES BEHAVIOR OFTEN IMPROVES SEVERAL WEEKS BEFORE SCHEDULED EVALUATION u  PERSONAL BIAS u  DIFFERENT KIND OF STEREOTYPES CAN AFFECT APRAISER´S JUDGEMENT u  EMPLOYEE´S ANXIETY u  MANAGER DOES NOT WANT TO TREAT EMPLOYEES BADLY QUICK CARD - APPRAISAL PROCESS u  ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE CRITERIA u  OBSERVE EACH EMPLOYEE DURING THE WHOLE APPRAISAL PERIOD AND MAKE NOTES u  SET UP THE APPOINTMENT SEPARATELY AND MAKE TIME JUST FOR INTERVIEWING u  PREPARE NOTES ON YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT u  TALK ABOUT WORKING BEHAVIOR AND PERFOMANCE OF EMPLOYEES NOT ABOUT THEIR PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS u  APPRAISAL PROCESS IS NOT DISCIPLINARY PROCESS u  GIVE SPACE FOR EMPLOYEE TO TALK DURING THE INTERVIEW TOO u  LISTEN TO YOUR EMPLOYEE CAREFULLY u  CREATE GOALS FOR OTHER APPRAISAL PERIOD Training&Development Lucie Hejtmánková PŘÍSTUPY KE VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ u  NAHODILÝ u  SYSTEMATICKÝ u  UČÍCÍ SE ORGANIZACE u  ATMOSFÉRA PERMANENTNÍHO VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ u  VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ SE ODEHRÁVÁ CO NEJBLÍŽE SAMOTNÉ PRÁCI u  PRACOVNÍK JAKO SUBJEKT ROZVOJE u  TÝM EXTERNÍCH I INTERNÍCH LEKTORŮ u  DŮRAZ NA MULTIMEDIÁLNOST A DIFERENCIALIZACI FUNKCE VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ u  ORIENTAČNÍ A ADAPTAČNÍ u  INTEGRAČNÍ u  KVALIFIKAČNÍ u  SPECIALIZAČNÍ u  INOVAČNÍ A ZMĚNOVÁ u  MOTIVAČNÍ OBLASTI VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ u  FUNKČNÍ (PROFESNÍ) u  DOPLŇKOVÉ u  MANAŽERSKÉ u  JAZYKOVÉ u  IT u  ÚČELOVÉ u  ZÁKONNÁ CYKLUS VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ V ORGANIZACI (Hroník, 2007) 1/ IDENTIFIKACE VZDĚLÁVACÍCH POTŘEB 2/ DESIGN VZDĚLÁVACÍ KTIVITY 3/ REALIZACE VZDĚLÁVACÍ AKTIVITY 4/ ZPĚTNÁ VAZBA (VYHODNOCENÍ EFEKTIVITY) IDENTIFIKACE POTŘEB 1/ POTŘEBY ZAMĚSTNANCE u  VLASTNÍ ZPĚTNÁ VAZBA u  IDENTIFIKACE ROZVOJOVÝCH POTŘEB NASŘÍZENÝM (ZNÁ?,UMÍ?,CHCE?,MŮŽE?) u  DEVELOPMENT CENTRUM u  360° ZPĚTNÁ VAZBA u  ROZVOJOVÝ PLÁN IDENTIFIKACE POTŘEB 2/ POTŘEBY ORGANIZACE - STRATEGIE, CÍLE, KULTURA KOMPETENCE VÝKON Individual development plan DESIGNOVÁNÍ VZDĚLÁVACÍ AKTIVITY u  CÍL AKTIVITY u  OBSAH u  ÚČASTNÍCI u  FORMA u  LEKTOR u  PROSTŘEDÍ METODY VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ u  PŘEDNÁŠKA, INSTRUKTÁŽ u  PANEL, FŔUM u  WORKSHOP u  PŘÍPADOVÁ STUDIE u  SKUPINOVÁ DISKUZE u  HRANÍ ROLÍ, MODELOVÁ SITUACE u  UČENÍ V AKCI u  PRÁCE NA PROJEKTU u  SUPERVIZE u  EXKURZE u  SDÍLENÍ u  OUTDOOR AKTIVITA METODY A PŘÍSTUPY u  METODU VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ VOLÍTE PODLE TOHO ZDA ROZÍJÍTE u  ZNALOST u  DOVEDNOST u  PRAKTICKOU APLIKACI u  POSTOJ REALIZACE u  LEKTOR u  MÍSTNOST u  UČEBNÍ POMŮCKY u  UČEBNÍ MATERIÁLY u  3P - POSELSTVÍ, PŘÍKLAD, PŘEKVAPENÍ (Hroník, 2007) EFEKTIVITA VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ KIRKPATRICKŮV MODEL 1/ HODNOCENÍ VZDĚLÁVACÍ AKCE ÚČSTNÍKY 2/ ZHODNOCENÍ ZNALOSTÍ 3/ HODNOCENÍ ZMĚNY CHOVÁNÍ 4/ ZHODNOCENÍ DOPADU NA BUSINESS CÍLE HODNOCENÍ EFEKTIVITY VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ NÁSTROJE HODNOCENÍ u  360°ZPĚTNÁ VAZBA u  HODNOTÍCÍ FORMULÁŘ u  HODNOCENÍ NADŘÍZENÝM u  TESTOVÁNÍ ZNALOSTÍ u  DEVELOPMENT CENTRUM u  REPORTING u  NÁVRATNOST INVESTIC DO VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ u  DOSAHOVÁNÍ BUSINESS CÍLŮ LITERATURA Hroník, F.(2007): Rozvoj a vzdělávání pracovníků, Grada, praha. Foot, K.& Hook, K.(2011): Introduction to HR management, + PROSTOR PRO DOTAZY + DĚKUJI ZA POZORNOST PŘEJI PŘÍJEMNÝ DEN