Dear all,
I am interested in your opinion in the case Coman which was decided recently by the Court of Justice.
Find the judgment C-673/16 - Coman and Others at the Court of Justice webpage and be prepared to discuss it. 
Group 1 will first present the facts of the case (i.e. what the case is factually about, you have max. 3 minutes to sum up the facts).
Group 2 will present the strongest arguments in favour of the judgment, while Group 3 the strongest arguments against it (5 minutes for each group).
Then Groups 2 and 3 will have 5 minutes for thinking about replies to the arguments. Each group will have max. 5 minutes to respond to arguments. 
Group 1 is expected to pose at least 2 questions to each of the remaining groups, Groups 2 and 3 will also have a chance for . 
Later on, Group 1 will evaluate the whole debate and assess the persuasiveness of individual arguments.

Random team generator produced the following distribution to groups:
Group 1:
Pacheco Novais Sampaio, Mariana Alcina
Tsvetanov, Viliyan
Quentin, Rumeau Quentin

Group 2:
Maschlanka, Luisa
Aarnoudse, Diederick
Barrantes Sánchez, Johanna Beatriz
Werner, Jip

Group 3:
Wittenberg, Niels
Campaniello, Denise
Sarluska, Sebastian
Tavares, Rosina

Looking forward to a lively discussion,
Hubert.