Critical Theory and Welsh School of Security Studies Nikita Minin KMVES FSS MUNI Traditional vs. Critical Theory Traditional Theory Explain and control certain phenomena Value-neutral Critical Theory Explain certain phenomena from systemic perspective State a clear social goal Propose a practical solution Max Horkheimer 1937 In IR: Problem-Solving vs. Critical Theories (Robert Cox, 1981) Critical Theory: Assumptions Social actors are rational and capable to transform their environment The social world primarily consists of socioeconomic structures, which are legitimized by dominant ideology These structures are objective (researcher-independent) Key questions What are these structures? How can these be removed? Galtung’s Triangle of Violence Critical Security Studies (CSS) Welsh School Broadening Inclusion of non-military issues Deepening Both philosophical and political assumptions à Instrumental use of security (no substantive definition) Extending Inclusion of non-state actors (especially human beings) Focusing A clear normative objective (which one?) 4 dimensions of CSS (Jones, 1990) Established at the University of Aberystwyth K. Booth R. Jones A. Linklater Dimensions of CSS Broadening “Military questions will obviously continue to have an important part in the concerns of all students of international politics. However, it is doubtful whether they will be as central a preoccupation, except for some obvious regional conflicts. This is because the institution of inter-state war is in historic decline” (Booth, 1991:316). Extending “Those entities called ‘states’ are obviously important features of world politics, but they are unreliable, illogical and too diverse in their character to use as the primary referent objects for a comprehensive theory of security” (Booth, 1991: 320). Methodological Individualism Interregnum: “The old is dying, and the new cannot be born” (Gramsci) What is security? What is emancipation? How would you relate those? What structural constraints can you think of? Security vs. Emancipation Security (Booth 1991: 319): “the absence of threats” Emancipation (Booth 1991: 319): “the freeing of people from those physical and human constraints which stop them carrying out what they would freely choose to do.” It calls for action => transformational potential The “real security” is provided by emancipation: holistic and non-statist approach Focusing: Security as Emancipation “We can begin or continue pursuing emancipation in what we research, in how we teach, in what we put on conference agendas, in how much we support Greenpeace, Amnesty International, Oxfam and other groups … and in how we deal with each other and with students. in pursuing emancipation, the bases of real security are being established.” (Booth 1991: 326) Emancipatory Realism Critical Theory • General formula (Spegele 2002): I study international relations to emancipate [X] from structure or condition [Y] in order to achieve [Z] • E.g.: I study IR to emancipate workers in sweatshops [X] from exploitative work conditions [Y] in order to achieve more just society [Z] Let’s watch something =) Deadly fashion Niger delta