Foundations for Sustainability Brian D. Fath & Dan Fiscus Fulbright Distinguished Chair, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic Professor, Towson University, Maryland, USA Senior Research Scholar, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria Chapter 3: Holistic science of Life–Environment •Your reaction • 1)What is meant by conbiotic? 2)Which of the win-win examples do you think is most convincing? Why? 3)What part was most confusing or most difficult to understand? a new paradigm Environmental concerns have become of paramount importance. Certain global problems may soon be irreversible (e.g., deforestation, extinction, soil loss, climate change). These are systemic problems that cannot be understood in isolation but rather are interconnected and interdependent. Solutions may be simple but will require a radical shift in our perceptions, our thinking, and our values. Humans unwittingly express and incorporate their paradigmatic priorities – their societal organizing principles – in their surroundings Medieval cities dominated by churches 19th and early 20 century cities dominated by governance 21st century cities dominated by business http://forestry.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2015/07/ufheader.jpg http://www.livablecities.org/sites/default/files/article/Copenhagen.jpg A new paradigm that includes ecological principles and livability? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/Duck_of_Vaucanson.jpg/256px-Duck_of_Vaucan son.jpg Reductionism (analysis) taking apart to see the parts • domains - atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere • disciplines - ecology, economics, politics, sociology, etc. Holism (synthesis) - putting the pieces back together again Dominant paradigms in science MU.jpg image by orestesmantra http://ssp11si.stanford.edu/images/GEB.jpg Aside on holism/reductionism Gödel, Escher, Bach Douglas Hofstadter mechanism and reductionism Cartesian mechanism – study of phenomena that could be measured and quantified Analytic thinking – breaking up complex phenomena into pieces to understand the behavior of the whole from the properties of the parts. VERY SUCCESSFUL APPROACH!! …but Fragmentation •“A minor problem, perhaps, is the tendency of materialism to objectify the world, dividing it from the ‘objective observer’ who studies it. The world thus becomes ‘the environment,’ . . . which means ‘surroundings,’ a place that one is in but not of. The question raised by this objectifying procedure and its vocabulary is whether the problems of conservation can be accurately defined by an objective observer who observes at an intellectual remove, forgetting that he eats, drinks, and breathes the so-called environment.” • Berry (2001, pp. 25-26) http://image.slidesharecdn.com/11karlpoeticunderpinningsofholism-2-141209161615-conversion-gate01/9 5/karl-thidemann-the-poetic-underpinnings-of-holism-3-638.jpg?cb=1418163406 Premature, no tools to formulate and investigate wholeness – Systems analysis and networks In 1920s (biology, gestalt psychology, quantum physics) New norm? – lesson from holism •Fundamental, net human–environment relation is mutualistic or win-win • •A scientific theory is declared invalid only is an alternative candidate is available to take its place Image result for environment economy society Part of that change is recognition that environment is foundation for all aspects, others are subsets Evidence of directional change in ecosystems (p. 57) •Ecological goal functions to measure –Diversity –Energy density –Structural complexity –Functional complexity –Total energy flowing –Total energy stored – Trends to be expected in ecosystem development (Odum 1969) Ecosystem Attribute Developmental Mature Stage Stage Community energetics Gross production/community respiration (P/R ratio) >1 ~1 Gross Production/standing crop biomass (P/B ratio) high low Biomass supported/unit energy flow (B/E ratio) low high Food chains linear weblike Nutrient cycling Mineral cycles open closed Nutrient exchange rate rapid slow Nutrient conservation poor good Overall homeostasis Stability (resistance to external perturbations) poor good Entropy high low Information low high https://kristendeanproductis.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/lecture-03-3-26-2019-early-earth-32.jpg?w= 720 Origins of life covered in Chapter 4; brief intro here for win-win examples Life impacts the atmosphere "molecular currency" of intracellular energy transfer: ATP •ATP (Adenosine triphosphate ) is able to store and transport chemical energy within cells. Výsledek obrázku pro atp molecule Without oxygen •Glycolysis produces 2 ATP, 2 NADH, and 2 pyruvate molecules Oxygen in the atmosphere leads to the ozone layer Výsledek obrázku pro when did the ozone layer form Electromagnetic spectrum Související obrázek Výsledek obrázku pro uvb radiation The ozone layer •Protected life to move from the seas and colonize land around 600M years ago Výsledek obrázku pro colonization of land by plants Other theories of land colonization Homage to Gary Larson Soil formation Výsledek obrázku pro soil formation Výsledek obrázku pro soil formation Výsledek obrázku pro soil formation Soils •1. absorb, store, and release water in ways that aid plant, animal, and microbial life locally; •2. play a role in the purification of water and the global hydrological cycle; •3. absorb, store, and release organic and inorganic nutrients aiding myriad life forms locally; •4. play significant roles in global carbon, nitrogen, and other elemental cycles; •5. recycle wastes and dead organisms and regenerate key inorganic nutrients via decomposers; •6. provide habitat for diverse biotic organisms; and •7. provide a physical basis for anchoring plants, particularly large trees. http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/cool-space-picture-5.jpg We live in a world full of life. Nothing on Earth is entirely abiotic Rather it is With Life – conbiotic What is environment? •Before Darwin (1859) environment was considered an organic whole. Everything in it made some contribution and had some meaning with respect to everything else. Darwin subscribed to this view, but his emphasis, and that of his followers, on the evolving organism struggling to survive, suppressed the exploration of holistic aspects of the origin of species that might have been developed. •After Darwin, the organism came into great focus. •The result was two distinct things (dualism), organism and environment, supplanting the original organism-environment whole (synergism). Autocatalysis •Increase in the activity of any participant will tend to increase the activities of all the others as well. Coherence •“Each center is (recursively) dependent on other coherent centers for its own coherence” Alexander (2012) referring to urban planning Spiral up Spiral down – lack of coherence context Coupled transformers decomposer composer Most basic sustainable system requires a producer/composer and consumer/decomposer in an autocatalytic process “It may be that all self-sustaining systems are reciprocating” Jacobs, 1969, p. 126 Kafka ecosystem… Hmmm Discussion questions •What is something that is not conbiotic? • •Can we be truly objective/separate from any experiment or observation? –Why do we believe that we can be? – •What are the advantages of “failure to last”? • •How does autocatalysis induce competition? • As the community assembly process forms a food web, it selects only species that fit into the existing web Discussion questions Is this too simplistic? Which one fits your dissertation? – •1. Your mission is to make an incremental advance in scientific understanding of life and/or environmental process and to produce a pragmatic” (as based on social norms) contribution to science in the short term. •2. Your mission is to synthesize existing knowledge and to make an anticipatory contribution to science that has the potential to yield true human environmental sustainability in the long term.