This is interesting literature we think you should read and be familiar with. It is not necessary to go through all the sources, this should however offer you good understanding of the DNS and all the relevant theory also connected to online dispute resolution. Other relevant sources are present in the presentations and also in the Interactive syllabi (this is "only" interesting literature, not all the sources). This should be understood as general overview, relevant sources connected with particular topic are either in Interactive syllabi or in the PowerPoint presentations themselves. 

The presentations can be accessed here: https://is.muni.cz/auth/el/law/jaro2021/MVV1568K/um/

• LOUTOCKÝ, Pavel. Are We Getting Good Decisions by Top-level Domain Name Dispute Resolution Providers? Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2015, year 9, no. 1, p. 111-128. ISSN 1802-5943. 
  
• GOLINVEAUX, Jennifer. What's in a Domain Name: Is 'Cybersquatting' Trademark Dilution? University of San Francisco Law Review, 1999, no. 33, p. 641-658. ISSN 00420018. 
  
• LIPTON, Jacqueline D. Beyond Cybersquatting: Taking Domain Name Disputes Past Trademark Policy. Wake Forest Law Review, 2005, year 40, no. 4, p. 1361-1425. ISSN 0043003X. 
  
• COOPER, Scott, Colin RULE, Louis DEL DUCA. From lex mercatoria to online dispute resolution: lessons from history in building cross-border redress system. Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal, 2011,  year 43, no. 3., p. 749-772. ISSN 0041672X 

• VEZZANI, Simone. ICANN's New Generic Top-Level Domain Names Dispute Resolution Procedure Viewed against the Protection of the Public Interest of the Internet Community: Litigation regarding Health-Related Strings. Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 2014, year 13, no. 3, p. 306-346. ISSN 15691853 
  
• SCHULTZ. Thomas. Private Legal Systems: What Cyberspace Might Teach Legal Theorists. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 2008, year 10, no. 1, p. 151-193. 
  
• FORREST, Heather Ann. Domain Name Allocation and Government Super-Prioritization: Lessons Learned From the UDRP Keep ICANN Out of the Business of Deciding What Is or Is Not a Country. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2015, year 18, no. 1, p. 1-38. ISSN 1942678X. 
  
• GEIST, Michael. Fair.com? An examination of the Allegations of Systemic Unfairness in ICANN UDRP. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 2002, year 27, no. 3, p. 903-938. ISSN 07404824.
  
• HOFMANN, Jeanette, Christian KATZENBACH, Kirsten GOLLATZ. Between Coordination and Regulation: Finding the Governance in Internet Governance. New Media and Society, 2016, year 19, no. 9, p. 1406-1423. ISSN 14617315.