Subjects of international law Public International Law: Alternative Seminar The Initial Paradigm ´Only state is subject of international law !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity Evolution ´International organization (20th century) !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity Individual ´Subject v beneficiary ´Direct versus derivate rights theories !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity The content of the concept of individual ´Natural Persons ´Artificial persons (HR, investment protection) ´Tertium non datur? ´The Reparation of Injuries case before the ICJ (1949): ´No exhaustive list of subjects of international law !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity The relationship between international and national subjectivity ´Subjectivity versus capacity? ´Both natural and artificial persons were first subjects of a domestic law ´Is there ay link between national and international subjectivity? !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity Diplomatic protection ´Natural person – protected by the state of nationality (The Nottebohm case) ´Artificial person – protected by the state of registration (The Barcelona Traction Case) ´Both persons embedded in a national law !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity The specific problem of nasciturus ´Is nasciturs subject of international rights? ´What are the consequences of positive or negative answer? ´What can we gather from Vo versus France? !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity The specific problem of partnership ´Should a partnership (and its functional equivalents) be considered subjects of international law? ´Should a partnership be condiered tom meet criteria of “juridical person” under an investment treatz< ´What is the consequence of positive or negaitve answer to this question for the jurisdiction of the investment tribunal? ´ !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity It depends… ´Dualism versus monism ´“Autonomous” versus “derived” subjectivity ´Interpretation of the treaty conferring rights on an entity is important (VCLT) !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity Amici curiae ´Involved in international dispute procedures more often than ever ´Why is it so? ´What is theri role? !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity My view on amici ´States and indivudials (like investors or petitioners ot the ECtHR) seek their own interest in litigation ´Thus some interesta are under-represented (e.g. Of a tribe in an arbitration between the US and investor) ´Amici may provide an expert insight into the matter (medical, religious, working conditions etc.) ´A disdvantage: Their participation may extent the time of the litigation !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity Beyond… ´Animals ´Rivers ´Robots !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity ´Thank you. !st seminar/ a few thoughts on subjectivity