Research Methodology

School assignment

Main assignement for students

To read assigned literature; to capture particularities of legal science as compared to social sciences; present findings.

Kantorowicz, Llewellyn, Gény and Ehrlich can be classified as authors (among others) engaged in the field of methodology of legal science. Although their work is located at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century, they deepen knowledge about legal science. Weber is a distinguished author engaged in the area of the methodology of legal science. The question is if the legal science is a social science – and the answers are contradictory.

The assignment is to read the literature mentioned above and try to ascertain the specific character of legal science. Then compare your findings to approach held by Max Weber. Try to find differences and correspondences (if there are any). Try to conceptualize the paradigm of legal science in the context of social sciences. 

Questions

  • What criteria are relevant to research methodology, especially in legal science?
  • Does legal science meet the requirements of social science?
  • Does legal research (as a part of legal science) meet requirements of research?
  • Has legal science a comprehensive methodological compendium suitable for legal research?
  • Can legal science contribute to any social research (on a general level)?

You will present your findings and answers on the seminar (no written output is expected; the seminar can be managed as an individual or joint meeting). The time (January/February) will be adjusted to your other duties at Brno (We will discuss time via e-mail; it is possible to present your findings and to answer asked questions by Microsoft Teams). 

Consultations

Individual consultations through reading time are possible and recommended.  

Následující