7 x 7 Rochester Resilience Project Co-Directors Peter Wyman, Ph.D. Wendi Cross, Ph.D. }Jennifer West, PhD }Karen Schmeelk-Cone, PhD }Mike Teisl, PhD }Luke Sworts }Katharine Burke }Erin Walsh } }Administration and Staff of Schools: }19, 22, 30, 45, 50 } }RCSD Administration; Special thanks to: Gladys Pedraza-Burgos, Gary Hewitt, Andrew MacGowan } ØApply ‘state-of-art’ knowledge about emotional development to strengthen children’s self-control skills Ø ØPromote successful ‘life course’ – prevent future problems – ØBuild a sustainable program that enhances the school setting and engages parents Ø ØOngoing quality improvement ◦ } Resilience Project 7 x 7 }Focus: 1st – 3rd grade ØCritical period for academic skills, achievement motivation ØLanguage and emotion competence burgeoning Ø }Complement primary education focus by: ØStrengthening children’s behavioral self-control ØChild-Adult Mentoring relationship ØParent engagement and support of child skills Ø } 7 x 7 Resilience Project mentors Resilience Mentors Resilience Project 7 x 7 ◦ ◦‘Hot’ Emotions – under challenging emotions, individuals rely on old learning ◦ ◦Learning new skills is optimal under ‘cool’ situations ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ } }Generalization to “hot” situations -- classroom and ‘whole school’ (e.g., lunchroom) } }School-Based Resilience Mentor } }‘Coaching’ by Mentor in challenging situations for child; support by teacher and parent ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Child Mentoring & Coaching Parent Meetings & Outreach Teacher & School Collaboration Resilience Project Components 7 x 7 Resilience Project ◦ 1. Building positive relationship ◦ ◦ 2. Exploring/Learning about feelings ◦ ◦ 3. Managing Feelings and coping skills ◦ ◦4. Using new skills in challenging situations ◦ ◦ ◦ Ø2 years of formal 1:1 skill building meetings ØOngoing practice of skills ØOngoing coaching in ‘hot zones’ for transfer ◦ ØEmotion Regulation Skills ØTo manage behavior ØRecognition & Labeling feelings, identifying feeling intensity, ‘hot zone’ ØMental Muscles, “DB”, Step back-Count Back, Imaginary Umbrella ØSelf-soothing Ø ØAttribution, Control, Problem-Solving } 7 x 7 Resilience Project •Increase self-control } •Identifying emotions (e.g. heart racing) •Comfortable/Uncomfortable Feelings •Feelings small-BIG gradient (e.g., annoyed or furious’) •Feelings can Change •Can Feel 2 Ways (e.g. excited and scared) •Increase self-control } •Two People Can Feel the Same Way or Different Way •Can Help to Tell Someone How you Feel • •When Feelings Get in Hot Zone – it can be hard to control behavior •Increase self-control } • ? M.M. •Increase self-control } •Help yourself to ‘Stop’ and keep feelings from entering Hot Zone •‘Belief’ and ‘Identity’ – I’m a kid who uses MM •Increase self-control } Take time to use a strategy to calm down, regain equilibrium exhale D.B. SBCB Adult models each skill Adult guided role- Adult cues child Adult reinforcement & verbal teaching play & integrate skills ‘in vivo’ settings Refresher learning as needed Imitation of adult model Purposeful practice w/ Child uses skills in some Increasingly child initiated Child verbalizes skill concepts adult prompts in-vivo contexts skill use Scaffolding model for teaching emotion self-regulation skills Unchallenging Neutral Increasingly challenging emotions ‘In vivo’ emotionally challenging Contextualized in diverse settings Situational Contexts Sequence of Adult-Child Interactions Monitoring Emotions (Self-others) Maintaining Control-Regaining Equilibrium Self-Control Reducing Escalation Monitoring Emotions (Self-others) Maintaining Control-Regaining Equilibrium Self-Control Reducing Escalation Primary Skill Components }Parent Component }Classroom Component n n2 year relationship } nParent-Mentor meetings at home or school } nTeach parent child’s skills nReinforce with activities nFamily goals/needs -information nEnhance positive connection to school } qTeachers identify target children (Screening) qMentors ‘coach’ in classroom with teacher collaboration qTeacher -Mentor Lessons §Developed with RCSD teachers §15 min group skill building §Parallels child program } 7 x 7 Resilience Project 1.Program Development and ‘proof of concept’ (SAMHSA, UR, NYS funding; 2000 – 2003 in 2 schools) 2. 2.‘Efficacy’ Study ($2.4 mil NIMH grant; 2005 – 2010) –Schools # 19, 22, 30, 45, & 50 –400 children/parents; 100+ teachers 3. 3.Quality improvement , sustainability and expansion 4. 4. Resilience Project 7 x 7 Resilience Project 7 x 7 p<0.01 Resilience Project Mentored Group 40% fewer suspensions 7 x 7 1.Adult Introduces Skill to Child 2. 2.Practice 3. 3.Adult ‘Coaches’ Child 4. 4.Child Independently Uses Skills } 5 SCHOOLS Random assignment to: Individual Mentoring or Classroom Skills Teacher 1 Classroom Teacher 2 Classroom Teacher 3 Classroom Teacher 4 Classroom Teacher 5 Classroom C E E E E E C C C C Design for Ongoing Phase 2 30-month follow-up with each child/parent: Children’s learning of resilience skills Child behavior, classroom adaptation, emotional development Teacher, parent engagement 7 x 7 Resilience Project 7 x 7 Resilience Project Intervention Component Total Number Students Receiving Individual Skill Mentoring 383 Individual Mentoring Lessons 5,694 ‘Coaching’ students to use skills in school setting 8,800 + Parent meetings with Mentors # individual Parents engaged 806 197 Teacher-Mentor Resilience Lessons in the Classroom 720 }1) Declarative Knowledge ◦Verbal, generic, accessible ◦ }2) Procedural Knowledge ◦Embodied, sub-symbolic, specific ◦ }3) Generalized Procedural Knowledge ◦Proceduralized and flexible to allow use in diverse settings }30-min interactive interview }Declarative Knowledge ØChild can verbalize what “DB” is and why use it Ø‘How’, ‘When’, ‘Why’ = Function in ER’ }Procedural Knowledge ØOther-Directed: child demonstrates a ‘DB’ with prompt by examiner (“can you show me how’d you’d use DB to handle this situation?”) ØSelf-Directed: child fully demonstrates ‘DB’ without prompt (child ‘generalizing skill’ to a new setting) } Resilience Project 7 x 7 }Children receiving Resilience Mentoring learn more skills than controls } }Analyses are ongoing… } } Resilience Project 7 x 7 }Peer to peer group component }Extend to novel settings }Teacher engagement in ‘lessons’ }Parent engagement }Mentor training }Spread of skills across students }Teaching skills to ‘other personnel’ (e.g., lunch staff; ISS/ ATS) }Which students do not respond and why? How to improve outcomes? }