Biologics or biological drugs ●officially (WHO) „biological and biotechnological substances“ Basic characterisation of biologics ●typically acquired by other way than by classical chemical synthesis (semisynthetic modifications are possible) ●typically Mr > 1000 (up to 1000 „small molecules“) - greater, more complex, usually exhibit a primary structure (a sequence of amino acids or nucleotides), a secondary structure (α-helix, “folded sheet”, influence of -S-S- bridges), a tertiary structure (general space arrangement of a monomeric molecule) and a quraternary structure (grouping of monomers); many proteins are glycosylated ●but both above conditions need not be necessarily fulfilled for classification of a drug as a biologic © Oldřich Farsa 2012 Some possible problems in terminology ●pharmaceutics = technology of manufacturing of application forms of drugs (“pharmaceutical technology” is the literal translation from Czech) ⇓ ● biopharmaceutics ≈ biopharmacy = „a discipline concerning drug absorption” on a frontier of pharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics (pharmacology) ● biologicals: analogy to chemicals ⇒ they include „biological drugs“ but also diagnostic monoclonal antibodies, enzymes used in technology etc. ●biologics: the term mostly used for „biological drugs“ ⇓ „Biopharmaceutics“ is not a suitable name for a subject devoted to “biological drugs”, but is also used. Differences in production of “small molecules” and biologics ●small molecules – classical organic synthesis: chemicals with exactly defined chemical structure and purity react under exactly defined conditions with a predictable and preciously verifiable results ●biologics- preparation by „harvesting“ of compounds produced ancreted by artificially constructed cells (genetic engineering) An illustration of the difference between a biologic and a “small molecule” erythropoietin and acetylsalicylic acid History of biologics ●the Antiquity and the Middle Ages: usage of leeches for treatment of circulation and blood disorders (hirudin) ●classical vaccines: preparation of dead or attenuated bacterial cultures or attenuated or inactivated viruses (e.g. pox: transfer of the infection „from a skin to a skin“ has been known long since around 1000 A.D. in China; 1796 – Edward Jenner demonstrated that putting of the purulence from a furuncle of the cowpox in under the skin protected against the infection with pox; 1805 – 1st vaccine against pox was prepared on the calf skin in Italy; 1864 – mass usage of this vaccine; after 1940 – lyofilized vaccines (Collier)) Edward Jenner. Lithograph based on the painting by J.R. Smith (1801). Courtesy of the Institute of the History of Medicine, The John Hopkins University, where the original painting is on display. The cowpox lesion on the hand of the milkmaid, Sarah Nelmes, from which Jenner took pustular material to inoculate the boy James Phipps, May 1796. Case XVI of Edward Jenner’s 1798 report on vaccination (2). History of biologics - continued ●(poly-clonal) antibodies („sera“) - immunisation of a suitable production macro-organism (eg. horse, rabbit) with a noxious agent (a toxin, e.g. a snake poison), a serum acquired from the blood used as an antidote; monoclonal antibodies for analytic and diagnostic purposes, then a suitable transformation (RIA, ELISA) ●peptides – isolation from biological material (insulin: Banting and Best 1921) Production of polyclonal antibodies from horse antisera. More recent history of biologics – genetic engineering ●1977 - somatostatin first time prepared by a recombinant technology in E. coli (Genetech, USA) ●1978 – human insulin cloned ●1982 – recombinant human insulin prepared in E. coli marketed ●1984 – Factor VIII of the blood clotting first time prepared in a laboratory ●1985 – FDA approved somatrem, a somatotropin analogue ● since 1980th – development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mabs) ● in 1980th 80 % of mabs of mouse origin, in 2000th only 7 % ●OKT3 - murine anti-CD3 antibody was the first mab approved by FDA for treatment of organ transplant rejection History of biologics from the point of view of a corporation (Genetech) Development and authorisation of biologics EMA (EU): normal approval procedure like for any other drug FDA (USA): possibility of taking part into so called Fast Track Drug Development Program (since 1998, revised 2004) – the prerequisite is the usefulness for serious or life endangering condition and legitimated hope for better clinical efficacy than up to the present time used drugs Generics and „biosimilars“ Generics: small molecules – contain the same active compound as the original and reach 80 – 105 % of the bioavailability of the original „Biosimilars“ or „Follow-up Proteins“: contain a biologic prepared by the similar procedure and with the similar effects as the original Different approaches of FDA (USA) and EMA (EU) ●EMA: consistent testing of effects in the relationship to the proposed therapeutic usage; the security of the patient is fundamental; neither generic prescription nor substitution among biosimilars ●FDA: more liberal approach; full support for „biosimilars“ approvals Committee for Medicinal Products for HumanCommittee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Guideline on Similar BiologicalUse (CHMP) Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal ProductsMedicinal Products (CHMP/437/04) “It should be recognised that, by definition, similarby definition, similar biological medicinal products are not genericbiological medicinal products are not generic medicinal products, since it could be expected that there may be subtle differencessubtle differences between similar biological medicinal products from different manufacturers or compared with reference products, which may not bemay not be fully apparent until greater experience in their usefully apparent until greater experience in their use has been establishedhas been established. Therefore, in order to support pharmacovigilance monitoring, the specific medicinal product given to the patient should be clearly identified.” Pharmacological classification of biological and biotechnological substances in accordance with WHO ● Drugs for alimentary tract and metabolism: insulins. ●Anti-infectives: antimicrobial, bactericidal permeability increasing polypeptides, human papilomavirus. ●Antineoplastics: peptide vaccines, recombinant vaccines, toxins. ●Blood and agents acting on the heamopoietic system: antithrombins, blood coagulation cascade inhibitors, blood coagulation factors, erythropoietin type blood factors, heparin derivatives including low molecular mass heparins (heparinoids), hirudin derivatives, trombomodulins. ●Immunomodulators and immunostimulants: colony stimulating factors, inteferons, interleukin receptor antagonists, interleukin type substances, monoclonal antibodies , receptor molecules, native or modified, tumor necrosis factor antagonists. ●Hormones, hormone antagonists, hormone-release stimulating peptides or hormone-release inhibiting peptides (excluding insulins): growth hormon (GH) derivatives, its antagonists, oxytocin derivatives, pituitary / placental glycoprotein hormones, pituitary hormone-release stimulating peptides, synthetic polypeptides with cortikotropin-like action, vasoconstriktors, vasopressin derivatives. ●Various: „antisense“ oligonucleotides, enzymes, gene therapy products, growth factors, peptides a glycopeptides not classified above. Basics of biologics nomenclature in accordance with WHO recommendations [INTERNATIONAL NONPROPRIETARY NAMES (INN) FOR BIOLOGICAL AND BIOTECHNOLOGICAL SUBSTANCES (A REVIEW) INN Working Document 05.179 Update December 2010] Basics of biologics nomenclature in accordance with WHO recommendations (continued) Basics of biologics nomenclature in accordance with WHO recommendations (continued) Chimeric vs. humanized monoclonal antibodies Nomenclature of monoclonal antibodies – continued ●a sub-stem A for disease or target class is situated before a sub-stem for source of the product: Nomenclature of monoclonal antibodies – continued Special sub-stems for tumours were in the older version of INN rules from 2007 and are not recommended in the newer one An example of the INN name of a monoclonal antibody humanized ↓ prefix→bevacizumab ↑ cardiovascular Nomenclature of monoclonal antibodies – continued Disadvantages of biologics (except adverse effects, which are in general the same as in small molecules) ●imunogenicity – induction of formation of antibodies against the drug ●HAMA – human anti-mouse antibodies – formed against mouse peptide sequences in chimeric biologics (similarly HARA – human anti-rat antibodies) ●greater than 20% of murine antibodies induce only tolerable/negligible immunogenicity ●HAHA – human anti-human antibodies – formed against fully human antibodies or other biologics; bound to a unique binding site, where they are not tolerated by the immunity system ●humanization of some murine antibodies may reduce their clinical effectiveness ● neutralizing × non-neutralizing; if they are neutralizing, they attenuate the efficacy of treatment ●formation of antibodies against drugs (e.g. compounds acting against TNF) depends also on presence of infection ●high price ●activity and security frequently insufficiently guaranteed ●poor biological availability requiring special methods of application