|
|
|
|
|
|
R3 = Marguerite was planning Z2, that is, to go to the ball as said in the letter received by Raoul (thus the Z2 planned by Marguerite is the same as the Q1 stated by the letter); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R4 = Raoul knows the possible course of events expressed by proposition Q2; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R5 = Marguerite knows the possible course of events expressed by proposition Q1; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R6 = there are two individuals, Raoul and his mistress, linked by the S-necessary relation of encountering at the ball; Raoul is the Templar and believes Z3, that is, that the Pirogue is Marguerite, while this proposition is untrue; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R7 = there are two individuals, Marguerite and her lover, linked by the S-necessary relation of encountering at the ball; the Pirogue is Marguerite and she believes Z4, that is, that the Templar is Raoul, while this proposition is untrue; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R8 = there are two individuals, Raoul and Marguerite, linked by the S-necessary relation of encountering at the ball; they are the same as the Templar and the Pirogue; Raoul believes Z5, that is, that Marguerite is the Pirogue and that she believes Z6, that is, that the Templar is her lover; Marguerite believes Z7, that is, that the Templar is Raoul and that he believes Z8, that is, that the Pirogue is his mistress; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R9 = if the Templar knows that the Pirogue is not Marguerite and cries out in surprise, then in a previous state he believed that the Pirogue was Marguerite; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R10 = if the Pirogue knows that the Templar is not Raoul and cries out in surprise, then in a previous state she believed that the Templar was Raoul; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R11 = R9 is impossible because the identity of Marguerite with the Pirogue was a piece of the furniture of the WRc of the reader, while their irreducible difference is a piece of the furniture of the WN. Since these two worlds are not mutually accessible, R9 cannot hold; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R12 = R10 is impossible because the identity of the Templar with Raoul was a piece of the furniture of the WRc of the reader, while their irreducible difference is a piece of the furniture of the WN. Since the two worlds are not mutually accessible, R10 cannot hold; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R13 = the ghost chapters can be rewritten by assuming that there were only two individuals, different from Raoul and Marguerite, linked by the S-necessary relation of encountering at the ball, respectively disguised as Templar and Pirogue, and the Templar believed Z3, that is, that the Pirogue was Marguerite, while the Pirogue believed Z4, that is, that the Templar was Raoul. |
|
|
|
|
|