II Theories on the origin cj' Courtly Love HISPANO-ARABIC Lon: was either imported into the south of France from Muslim Spain, or \\'<15 strongly influcnccd Il) the culture, podry and philosophy of the Arabs. (a) Scholarship and ctJltU[C of the Islamic world. It was from the Arabs, from the tenth onwards, that Christian Europe became better acquainted with Hellenic culture. Europe, which was still emerging from barbarism, assimilated the literary, scientific and technological achievements of a civilisation which had already reached its maturity. Lampillas (177 ii-SI ); Andres (1782-1822); Boutenvek (18ol-~O); Sismondi (1813); Dawson (1935). (b) Chilalry of the Arabs. The institution and the ideal of chivalry was unconnected with the feudal syst,'m; it was introduced into Europe from Moorish Spain or from the Middle East, together with Arabian prose romances, through cultural, commercial and •cont,lCts, and as a consequ~nce of the Crusades. Huet ( 167 I ); Sismondi (1813) ; Hammer-Piirgstall (1849) ; Ghali (1919); Nelli (1963); Graves (1967); Burckhardt (19]2). Music. The music to which the European troubadours set their was Arabic in inspiration, and the instruments which they del'ived from the Arabs. Ribera y Tarrag6 (1922); Farmer (1<)30); Briffault (1945">. (d) RI!'ymc und poeticJorms. The Arabs were the/irst to compose rhymed verse, and Pro\, Love 63 share a Humber of themes and motifs, some of which may be enumerate,l: the use of the pseudonym or senhal to conceal the identity of the lady addressed; the masculine form of address, instead of madomna; the same dramatis personae, such as the the slanderer and the confidant; the same pathological symptoms of love, namely insomnia, pallor, emaciation and melancholy; a belief in the fatal consequences of this malady, known a<~ 'isllq or Qmor hcrcos; and the use of the Eckl'r (1934); Nykl (1939); Mefll~ndez Pidal (1941); Peres (1947); U:vi-I'roven<;:al (1948); Nelli (1963); Dutton (I 9bS); Hussein (197 I ). in pactI)'. Some, ifnot all, the essential features of l.ove can he discerned in Hispano-Arabic (and even Middle Eastern) poetry: the insatiability of desire; the description of love as exguisite anguish; the elevation of the lady into an of worship; the poet's submission to her capricious tyranny; and the emphasis on the need for secrecy. Sismondi (1813); Schack (I ; Burda(;h (191ii); Gibb (1931); Nykl (1939); Menendez Pidal (1941); Peres (1947); Daniel (197 (h) Thcorcrical works on the naWre cif love. There are a number of analogies hetween Courtly Love and the Arabic theory of profane which constitutes a distinct Arabic literary genre. The works most frequently cited are Ibn DawGd's Kitiib al-Zahra, Ibn !::fazm's ,(awq al-l.Iallliima and Avicenna's Risiila fl'1-'Jshq. These works formulated a Platonic ethic which might explain the origin of jill'amon. Nykl (1931); Gibb (1931); Denomy (19H); LeviPr()vel1~:al (1948); Garcia Gomez (I ; Hussein (1971). There are, on the whole, strong grounds for supporting this even if sOl1le or the arguments used are false. The cultural supremacy of tbe Islamic world in the period immediately preceding the rise of the troubadour lyric is indisputable, and the importance of Arabic scholarship as a medium for the transmission of Greek classical texts is widely acknowledged. 1 More important still, poetry was an art in which the Arabs, according to their own estimate, excelled. 2 In order to prove that Arabic poetry exercist~d a decisive in!luence on the development of the Romance lyriC, parallels must be established between court poetry composed in Muslim Spain (or in the Middle East) and that which was composed in Provence 01' elsewhere in Europe. It must then be demol1straterl that channels or communication existed between the Islamic world and Christian Europe, and that poets from southern The and Meaning oj Court!J LOI'e74 between Arab and Christian poets (Schlegel, p. 67; Jeanroy, La Poesie !Jrique, I, pp. 70-1). This argument carries little weight. Prior to the intervention of the fanatical Almohads in the middle of the twelfth century there was constant social intercourse between Muslims, Jews and Christians; within the sphere of religion there was confrontation rather than interchange, but cultural elements which did not threaten religious identity were easily transferable; even in the fifteenth century Henry IV of Castile was able to employ numerous Moors at court and to adopt a Moorish style of life, much to the astonishment of some Bohemi,m travellers who visited him in 1467.'15 Women in Muslim Spain were comparatively free: they could meet in public and often wore no veil; their social position was no worse than that of Provenyal women, who were kept under the surveillance of a gardador s;, !,...-J.f'5<... counterpart to the Arabic raqib) (Menendez Pidal, Poesfa arabe, pp. 48-9). Intermarriage and a trade in Christian ~l'!~~s resulted in alr-...3'1.5-\y-J degree of freedom for wo 'n Muslim S ain han in other parts of the Islamic wor : the customs of the Spanish Arabs may well have been as much influenced by Christian infiltration, often involunas the other way round' (Daniel, 1975, p. 101). It has been argued that parallel themes and poetic forms might arise ;e.2!Jtaneously in diflerent places, especially in view of the fact that Westt'rn Europe and the Islafiu~or1ds'r1ai~tb~~sji~HeflenT:c-hl~rnage-­ and a Semitic monotheistic reli~j(Be';ola, II, p. 191r).it-.has,_~ ;cCi'; maintained that' Courtly Love is itself polygenetic, that is to say its essential features are timeless and eo ra hieal bound . > Dronkc, iIJ.:dicl'al Latin, I, p. ix hilst it is true that few urthe motifs in the concor . and Nykl are exclusive to Arabic and I'rovt'Il<;al poetry, the accumulation or analo ks is persuasive Most scholars would, of course, agree t lat r lyme is po ygenetic, and occurs, Theories on the origin clon:d is not personal union, and the beloved is a sllperior being who imposes oi,lig.ltions on Ihe lovcr, then Ihe fulfilmcnt of these oblig /lo\} 0.....to undermine the feudal basi;Drt lC aristocracy. The establishment of a more stable currency made it gradually possible to replace or ment payments and services in kind by an exchange of money, thereby loosening personal ties of dependence and permitting the individual more freedom of movement. Furthermore the inhabitant of a burgh 9392 The and Meanina Court!! Love township enjoyed rights, as a member of a community, which were denied to the feudal vassal, who was bound to render onerous services in return for protection. A 'feudalisation of love' thus occurred when feudalism was beginning to decline. The principle of primogeniture, which was adopted by the aristocracy of the twelfth century as a means of avoiding the constant subdivision of fiefs, was another socio-economic factor which indirectly influenced the cultural ideals of the since it increased the number of unattached landless knights, wl10 were debarred by prescriptiv(~ custom from stooping to productive labour. In an age when the feudal contract ceased to exercise the same sense of moral compulsion over lords and vassals, and when rapid changes in the structure of society resulted in friction and insecurity, Courtly _ Love, itself a patron-dient relationship, may have acted to some extent S'b u ~1..~Ya cohesive force between the ruling elite and those who were affiliated tn them. The courtly lov,er was, to adapt Veblen's phrase, 'con~u'<%sly subservient', whV~ women of noble birth, having been endowed with that 'prero{at~e ~Ieisure which is the mark of gentility', reqUired entertainment.66 It was in the interests of the princes and magnates to promote the new ideology because it guaranteed fidelity from their noble subjects and prevented them from stirring up trouble on their rural estates. Moreover it may, as Kohler suggested, have served to neutralise the conflict at court between the old hereditary nobility and the petty nobility of recent origin. These are all factors which might be studied more carefully. Huizinga noted that however delusory, are no less important to the cultural historian than the real but hidden socio-economic force.s which are known in retrospect to have shaped the course of history. However, like most theorists of Courtly Love, he underestimated the influence of the latter upon the former. The materialistic and utilitarian character of medieval marriage is one of the few socio-economic factors which has been considered relevant. 'Any idealization of sexual love, in a society where marriage is purely utilitarian, must,' according to C. S. Lewis, :_~~eing an idealizati<:n of adultery' (Lewis, 1936, p. 13). This argume0 __ obvio_ll~lall~ If love was not normally connecte(fWith marriage, '-~;~--inust conclude that love was extra-conjugal, which is not to say that it was necessarily adulterous. There is, in any case, a more fundamental reason for this situation: in the words of Andreas, 'the easy attainment oflove makes it little prized' (Andreas, trans. Parry, p. 184-). It may also be observed that conjugal love was not immune from amatory ideals. There were no doubt some husbands in the Middle Ages Theories on the rtf Court!! Love who sought to follow the example of the Franklin in The Frankeh!J'nS Talc, and shared his opinion that 'Love wol nat been constreyned maistry' .67 Since, however, the fin amant did not, at least ostensibly, woo his lady with a view to marriage, it is doubtful whether any significance can be attached to the practice of hypergamy_ The chief objection to a purely sociological approach is that society is not the only context within which poetry should be judged; it is also the product of all intellectual environment, shaped by philosophical and religious ideas and by literary traditions and influences. The sociologist tends to be concerned with poetry only in as much as it reflects certain aspects of society. This theory would nevertheless appear to be one of the most important theories of origin. NOTES For a ~umlll