Socialists in outer space Soldovieri, Stefan Film History; 1998; 10, 3; ProQuest Central pg- 382 Film His'ory, Vo!jrr,e ',C |.>p. 382-398. lc98. Copyrights John Libbey & Comoany ISSN:0892-2160. prir.'ed in Malaysia East German film's Venusion adventure Stefan Soldovieri lien aggressors, flying saucers and cosmic slime are not among the images commonly associated with the films of the now defunct socialist countries. Most Western film scholars would probably be hard pressed to name more than a handful of science-fiction features made in Eastern Europe. In fact, Eastern Europe's nationalised film industries turned out only a relatively modest number of futuristic films. This was a consequence of both the high technological and financial demands such films placed on studios subject to the constraints of planned economies and the precarious status of entertainment films in politicised production schedules. Nevertheless, beginning in the 1950s and 60s, Eastern European movie-goers encountered a number of home-spun, predominantly Soviet, Polish and Czech space adventures. As was the case with their Western counterparts, the spacecraft careening across state-sponsored screens frequently drew their energy from the polarised political imagination of the Cold War. One such Eastern European science-fiction film was Kurt Maetzig's Der schweigende Stern (Silent Planet, 1960), a co-production between the German Democratic Republic (GDR) and Poland. Relating the story of a mission to the planet Venus, the film was initially slated for release in 1 959, the year of the GDR's tenth anniversary. DEFA, as the GDR's centrally managed Deutsche Film-Aktiengesell-schaft was known, pulled out all production stops for its first science-fiction effort, delivering a quality product in 70 mm 'Totalvision' format, four-track sound, and satiny Agfacolor.1 These were high technical benchmarks for DEFA, which assumed responsibility for the project. When it premiered after significant production delays on 26 February 1 960, Silent Planet had become the most expensive DEFA film ever made. Silent Planet was not just a technically and financially ambitious enterprise. With the race for manned space exploration and the Khrushchev-induced Berlin Crisis raging on in the background, the studio had to contend with a charged ideological atmosphere throughout the production process. Scripting alone lasted nearly two-and-a-half years and involved at least three different scriptwriting teams. Casting difficulties arising from plans to enlist authentically foreign actors for the spacecraft's international crew and disputes with the Polish co-producer over the script and the staffing of the production team contributed to delays. When cultural officials balked at DEFA's pursuit of a French partner and charged that sinister West German film agents were running about unchecked on the Babelsberg studio grounds, the project was nearly derailed altogether. Silent Planet provides an unusually well-documented and instructive illustration of the multi-layered influence of Cold War politics on the GDR cinema and, significant national, political and institutional differences notwithstanding, other Eastern European cinemas as well.2 Made at a time most of the financial, organisational and ^'^g^gy^^ Stefan Soldovieri teaches in the German Department at Northwestern University. He has written on film regulation and legal discourse and on censorship in the GDR film industry in the mid-1960s. Correspondence: c/o Dept. of German, NWU, 1859 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. E-mail: 100553.1156@compuserve.com Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. n nitroPDF*professional download the free trial online at nitropdf.com/pnofeBsional Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Socialists in outer space 383 when the GDR film industry had notyetabandoned the production of genre films, DEFA viewed Silent Planet as an important experiment in a new entertainment form.' Fiim officials also supported the project, which was included in a special addendum to the studio's 1958 production plan, citing the 'painfully conspicuous absence of futuristic films and adventure stories in our studio's production schedule'.4 In addition to providing a welcome replacement for Western entertainment imports of questionable ideological content, the film was perceived as an effective vehicle for promoting the image of a peace-loving and technologically superior community of socialist nations. Set in the not-very-distant future of 1 970, Silent Plant is the story of a daring voyage to peacefully ward off an anticipated attack by the inhabitants of Venus. The mission, spearheaded by socialist nations, is started when excavations in the Gobi desert turn up an enigmatic, spool-like object containing a fragmentary message, which suggests a possible invasion of Earth. Unable to establish communications with the Venusians, a scheduled mission to Mars is quickly re-staffed with an international team of specialists and re-routed to the mist-enveloped planet. On Venus, the members of the crew, composed of its Russian commander and astronauts From Africa, China, Germany, India, Japan, Poland and the USA, discover the scorched remains of an advanced civilisation and a sophisticated technical apparatus whose function is not immediately apparent. Explorations involving a close call with a mass of pulsating ooze cost three lives and reveal the machine to be a disabled atomic weapon that had been designed to destroy the Earth but had turned on the Venusian world instead, Theonly signs of the planet's exterminated inhabitants are their bizarre shadows, heat-emblazoned oncrumbling walls. Assembled in front of the spaceship back on Earth in the film's final scene, the remaining crew members offer a warning about nuclear war and call for continued interplanetary exploration. Silent Planet underwent various incarnations during the course of script development from late 1956 to early 1 959. Reaching an acceptable compromise between genre conventions, humour, and adventure on the one hand and a political message on the other, entailed extended negotiations. Italso party institutions.5 An example of a relatively harmless sort: Long before the Silent Planet screenplay had been completed, an over-zealous Foreign Office had contacted the Ministry of Culture toconfirm press reports that the film was to contain scenes set in the Sahara. Alarmed that DEFA was planning to film in Africa, which was in the throes of decolonisation, the office inquired about the location of the shoot and other specifics.0 Although an undoubtedly bemused film official succeeded in reassuring government officials that the studio had no intentions whatsoever of actually filming on location, during the course of script development the setting was diplomatically moved to the politically acceptable Gobi.7 Comprising only a single shot in the film, the requisite footage was shot as originally scheduled at the sandy Spreetal less than 40 km from Babelsberg.8 By the time the final version of the screenplay had been completed, the story shared only the most general plot features with its nominal literary source. Based on Stanislaw Lem's Astronauci [ 1951), which was published in the GDR in 1954 as Planet des Todes (Planet of Death), the script began as an ideologically ambivalent, somewhat dry treatment laden with pseudo-scientific detail.9 Early endeavours to increase the story's entertainment value soon encountered objections both within the studio and among film officials and, as scripting progressed, the basic story became increasingly politicised. In the end Lem's universal, largely allegorical warning about the dangers of atomic war had given way to unambiguous references to Hiroshima and Western militarism. The plan for a film adaptation of Lem's popular novel as a GDR-Polish co-production was conceived soon after the book appeared in East Germany. A first treatment based on the novel was produced by the Polish production unit 'lluzjon' in late 1956.'° The main characters comprising the spacecraft's international crew in the treatment, which had been authorised by Lem, corresponded essentially to those of this novel. These were the Russian captain and physicist Arsenjew, the Anglo-American pilot Smith, the French doctor Tarland, the Polish engineer Soltyk, theGerman communications expert Rainer, and Chandrasekar, a mathematical genius from India. This early version brought into play a dizzying number of state arl¥^at*ita#pted in a dramatic scene fatefully trapping ft* nitroPDF*professional Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 384 Smith and Arsenjew in a tunnel below the Venusian surface. Thanks to the Soviet captain's brilliant plan, they succeed in blasting a passage in the surrounding walls. The scene closes with one of the men, whose identity is obscured by the explosion's billowing smoke, carrying the other out of the rubble. Characteristic of the story's even-handed politics at this early stage, the issue of who rescues whom remains open. The scenario ends in a scene back on Earth as Smith recalls the details of the voyage: 'Venus was very beautiful once. It was inhabited by beings similar to us Taking recourse to the Polish treatment, Joachim Barckhausen and Alexander Stenbock-Fer-mor, who had collaborated on numerous scripts for DEFA, drafted a new scenario and submitted it to the responsible studio 'dramaturg' In the context of DEFA's system of self-regulation, dramaturgs were the readers and editors charged with parleying artistic and ideological issues during production, in addition to overseeing scripting and work-in-progress studio screenings, their responsibilities included helping to navigate films through the Ministry of Culture's censorship procedures. At DEFA, the appointment of chief dramaturg, a kind of film policy director, ranked second only to the studio head. 2 The lower-tier dramaturg responsible for the 'Planet of Death' project made a number of suggestions for developing the treatment into a script capable of overcoming the regulatory hurdles standing in the way of a production start. Not surprisingly, a primary concern was the way in which the scriptwriters had broached the depiction of the political situation on Earth and the decision to send a spacecraft to Venus in lieu of initiating a preventive nuclear strike. The author-sanctioned lluzjon treatment had worked around this latter issue with oblique references to a vote by the world's population in favour of peaceful contact DEFA's scriptwriters had dedicated considerably more attention to this problem, envisioning a strategic debate between aging military conservatives and the young representative of a 'World Federation'. In an additional scene, a scientificcommission including members of the later Venus crew would also opt for talks with the Venusians. While the dramaturg was generally satisfied adapt Lem s basic plo', he was concerned with their rendering of the political situation in the story's future time. Aware that too much detail would be likely to cause troublesome discussions with the chief dramaturg and film officials, the dramaturg cautioned the scriptwriters not to overdo the description of Earthly politics Instead, he suggested simplifying the matter by concentrating on the World Federation, which he pictured as an alliance of peaceful socialist nations and a few reluctant capitalist states favouring a pre-emptive military strike against Venus, in his opinion of the new treatment, the studio reader also encouraged the scriptwriters to fortify the Film's pacifist message through a drastic rendering of the remains of the Venusian civilisation. 4 The first script, bearing the sensationalist title of the GDR release of the novel, 'Planet of Death', was completed in mid-April 1957. As outlined in their scenario, Stenbock-Fermor and Barckhausen had installed a group of silver-haired generals representing the hawkish Cold War attitudes of the West. Debating the course to be taken given the possibility of an attack from Venus, the generals criticise the policies of previous decades that have left the Earth defenceless against the emergence of an alien threat. In keeping with the dramaturg's recommendations, the scriptors had avoided an extended ideological discussion of the pros and cons of a preemptive bombing and had even given the scene a mildly humourous touch, with one general ironically e