In the Name of the Public: Environmental
Protest and the Changing Landscape of
Popular Contention in China
H. Christoph Steinhardt and Fengshi Wu*
A B S T R A C T
Since the mid-2000s, China has experienced a wave of large environmental protests against
major economic development projects. Based on both interviews and documentary sources,
this article examines four prominent cases and identifies four innovations in China’s popular
politics: broadened protest constituencies, mobilization for public goods, a proactive strategy
to prevent government projects, and a mutual reinforcement of street mobilization and policy
advocacy. These new traits of popular resistance have also begun to appear outside of the environmental
arena. The way was paved for these innovations by transformations in the public
sphere, a relative decrease in the risk of protest participation, and development of the environmental
NGO sector. Although the new repertoire of contention appears in only some of
China’s abundant protests, it is becoming more widespread and in some cases influences government
policy. Recent environmental protests may well stand at the forefront of broader
changes in the landscape of Chinese sociopolitical activism and contentious politics.
Concerns over pollution and the environment have become some of the most
important triggers in China’s expanding sociopolitical contention.1
Starting
with a pioneering local campaign against a multibillion yuan paraxylene (PX) petrochemical
plant in the eastern coastal city of Xiamen in 2007, the country has witnessed
a series of large-scale protests against PX plants and other large-scale in*Author
names are in alphabetic order. We wish to thank Sebastian Veg for discussions on our initial
research; for helpful comments on previous drafts we are grateful to Chen Feng, Chloe Froissart, Guan Yue, He
Zengke, Liu Chengli, Liu Rensheng, Peng Lin, Ran Ran, Tang Wenfang, Zheng Yongnian, two anonymous
reviewers, and the editors. Chen Xiran and Zhang Lei provided excellent research assistance. Steinhardt acknowledges
financial support from a Mobility Grant for Doctoral Research on Contemporary China, French
Centre for Research on Contemporary China (CEFC), and the Lion Dr. Francis K. Pan Scholarship, Faculty of
Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
1. Xin Zhou and Henry Sanderson, “Chinese Anger over Pollution Becomes Main Cause of Social Unrest,”
Bloomberg, March 7, 2013, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-03-06/pollution-passes-land
-grievances-as-main-spark-of-china-protests, accessed July 29, 2015.
Electronically published November 20, 2015
The China Journal, no. 75. 1324-9347/2016/7501-0004. Copyright 2015 by The Australian National University. All rights reserved.
• 61 •
dustrial and infrastructure projects.2
The siting of waste treatment facilities on the
outskirts of large cities has emerged as another common target of popular mo-
bilization.3
According to a recent report by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,
environmental pollution has triggered half of the “mass incidents” (quntixing
shijian) that attracted 10,000 or more participants between 2000 and 2013.4
No wonder that public ire over environmental problems has become a recurrent
subject of media headlines and has caught the attention of the Chinese leader-
ship.5
When addressing the opening session of the National People’s Congress in
March 2014, Premier Li Keqiang accordingly declared “a war on pollution.”6
Research on these recent protests has shown how they are shaped by existing
imperfect official channels for public participation7
and probed how communication
technologies and framing strategies used by activists have affected the trajectories
of individual cases.8
Scholars have also speculated that recent environmental
2. PX is an oil-based chemical product that is widely used in plastic bottles, polyester fiber, etc. Major
protests occurred at Zhangzhou in Fujian Province in 2008, at Dalian in Liaoning Province in 2011, at Ningbo
in Zhejiang Province in 2012, at Kunming in Yunnan Province in 2013, at Maoming in Guangdong Province in
2014, and at Jinshan in Shanghai municipality in 2015. The most widely reported protests involved an ethylene
plant at Chengdu in Sichuan Province in 2008, a maglev train extension in Shanghai in 2008 that aroused
concerns about health and falling property prices caused by radiation, coal power plants at Haimen in
Guangdong Province and at Yinggehai in Hainan Province, a copper plant at Shifang in Sichuan Province, an
industrial sewage pipeline at Qidong in Jiangsu Province in 2012, and a uranium-processing plant at Jiangmen
in Guangdong Province in 2013.
3. Such protests occurred in Beijing’s Liulitun in 2006, Gao’antun in 2008, and Asuwei in 2009, Shanghai’s
Caoluzhen in 2008, and Guangzhou’s Panyu and Huadu in 2009. Particularly in Guangdong Province, antiincinerator
protests and campaigns have spread beyond major cities, emerging in the outskirts of Dongguan
and Foshan in 2010, and Huiyang in 2013.
4. Li Lin and Tian He, eds., Zhonguo fazhi fazhan baogao [Annual report on China’s rule of law] (Beijing:
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Press, 2014), 13–16.
5. On increasingly pro-environmental signals from the central authorities, see Rachel E. Stern, “The Political
Logic of China’s New Environmental Courts,” The China Journal, no. 72 (July 2014): 53–74.
6. Ben Blanchard and David Stanway, “China to ‘Declare War’ on Pollution, Premier Says,” Reuters, March 5,
2014, http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/05/us-china-parliament-pollution-idUSBREA2405W20140305.
7. Thomas Johnson, “Environmentalism and NIMBYism in China: Promoting a Rules-Based Approach to
Public Participation,” Environmental Politics 19, no. 3 (2010): 430–48, and “The Politics of Waste Incineration
in Beijing: The Limits of a Top-Down Approach?” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 15, no. 1
(2013): 109–28; Wanxin Li, Jieyan Liu, and Duoduo Li, “Getting Their Voices Heard: Three Cases of Public
Participation in Environmental Protection in China,” Journal of Environmental Management 98 (2012): 65–72;
Ran Ran, “Perverse Incentive Structure and Policy Implementation Gap in China’s Local Environmental
Politics,” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 15, no. 1 (2013): 17–39.
8. Ronggui Huang and Ngai-ming Yip, “Internet and Activism in Urban China: A Case Study of Protests in
Xiamen and Panyu,” Journal of Comparative Asian Development 11, no. 2 (2012): 201–23; Chin-Fu Hung,
“Citizen Journalism and Cyberactivism in China’s Anti-PX Plant in Xiamen, 2007–2009,” China: An International
Journal 11, no. 1 (2013): 40–54; Jun Liu, “Mobile Communication, Popular Protests and Citizenship in
China,” Modern Asian Studies 47, no. 3 (2013): 995–1018; Jian Lu and Chris King-Chi Chan, “Collective
Identity, Framing, and Mobilization of Environmental Protest in Urban China: A Case Study of Qidong’s
Protest,” China: An International Journal (2016, forthcoming); Thomas Johnson, “The Health Factor in AntiWaste
Incinerator Campaigns in Beijing and Guangzhou,” China Quarterly, no. 214 (2013): 356–75.
62 • T HE C H INA J OUR N AL, No. 75
protests indicate a rising participatory demand among the middle class and signify
the emergence of a fledgling version of ecological modernization in China.9
However,
this ongoing wave of environmental contention has yet to feature prominently
in the debates among China scholars who study continuity and change in
China’s contentious politics.10
This article will review key scholarly insights into the dominant pattern of contention
in China since the 1990s and will use these as a conceptual lens to examine
four cases of recent protests in the cities of Xiamen (2007), Nanjing (2011),
Panyu (Guangzhou) (2009), and Kunming (2013). Combing through and comparing
these episodes, the study identifies substantial deviations from the earlier
protest repertoire in four dimensions—broadened protest constituencies, mobilization
for public goods, a proactive and preventive strategy, and a mutual reinforcement
of street mobilization and policy advocacy. What unites these changes
in the very nature of protests is that the scope of participants and sphere of action
have been substantially expanded. From a watershed event in Xiamen, where
social elites and large numbers of citizens joined forces on a one-off basis, the new
action repertoire has evolved to incorporate more substantial involvement and
sustained policy advocacy by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).
Our case studies are based on interviews with protesters, officials, NGO staff,
scholars, journalists, and local residents in Xiamen, Nanjing, Guangzhou, and
Beijing at various times between 2008 and 2013. We also draw on academic and
mass media publications, photographic evidence, Internet sites, and mobile phone–
based social media. The four case studies encompass all of the most common
triggers of recent environmental protests, from the beginning of the new form
of protests in the mid-2000s up through recent developments; they have also attained
a high degree of public recognition. Our case selection allows us to capture
innovations and the front line of an emerging and potentially significant sociopolitical
phenomenon.11
We will also explore the extent to which the common features
of recent environmental protests have proliferated, and we will highlight
9. Graeme Lang and Ying Xu, “Anti-Incinerator Campaigns and the Evolution of Protest Politics in China,”
Environmental Politics 22, no. 5 (2013): 832–48; Jeffrey N. Wasserstrom, “Middle-Class Mobilization,” Journal
of Democracy 20, no. 3 (2009): 29–32.
10. See, e.g., Chris King-Chi Chan and Pun Ngai, “The Making of a New Working Class? A Study of
Collective Actions of Migrant Workers in South China,” China Quarterly, no. 198 (June 2009): 287–303;
Manfred Elfstrom and Sarosh Kuruvilla, “The Changing Nature of Labor Unrest in China,” Industrial and
Labor Relations Review 67, no. 2 (2014): 453–80; Lianjiang Li, “Rights Consciousness and Rules Consciousness
in Contemporary China,” The China Journal, no. 64 (July 2010): 47–68; Elizabeth Perry, “A New Rights
Consciousness?” Journal of Democracy 20, no. 3 (2009): 17–20.
11. On the importance of public interpretations of major events for repertoire changes, see Doug McAdam
and William H. Sewell Jr., “It’s About Time: Temporality in the Study of Social Movements and Revolution,”
in Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, ed. Ron Aminzade, Jack A. Goldstone, Doug McAdam,
Elizabeth J. Perry, William H. Sewell Jr., Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2001), 118. On the usefulness of studying “extreme cases,” see David Collier and James Mahoney,
“Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Research,” World Politics 49, no. 1 (1996): 72–75.
Environmental Protest and Changing Popular Contention in China • 63
the important contextual conditions that have paved the way for these protests
and that often have succeeded in changing state behavior. The article’s conclusion
deliberates on the broader significance of the observed repertoire changes
for Chinese politics.
POPULAR CONTENTION SINCE THE EARLY 1990s
After the forceful repression of the Tian’anmen movement, the intellectual-led
and idealistic repertoire of contention of the 1980s came to an end.12
A form of
collective resistance that centered on everyday grievances came to the foreground
in the early 1990s and ushered in a new stage of contention in China.13
A large
body of literature has examined the main features of this still dominant repertoire,
and four defining characteristics stand out.14
First, narrow protest constituencies: until the new protest repertoire emerged,
almost all of the protests in China have been “cellular” and relatively small, staged
in the name of separate and narrow constituencies that are linked through preexisting
social ties in villages, factories, and residential compounds or ethnic iden-
tity.15
Even resisting groups with very similar grievances have very rarely joined
forces across social and geographical boundaries. The last available figures released
by the authorities for the period prior to 2004 further illustrate this point.
They showed that the mean number of participants per incident had continuously
declined from 73 in 1994 to 51 in 2003. Only 12 percent of the protests in
2003 included more than 100 participants.16
Second, exclusive mobilizing grievances: before the new repertoire arose,
the shared discontent that propelled people into collective action almost always
hinged predominantly on factors bearing on protesters’ immediate—frequently
12. We adopt Charles Tilly’s definition in this article and understand repertoires of contention as “shared
scripts” of “claim-making routines” that have a “clustered, learned, yet improvisational character.” Charles
Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006), 35.
13. Guobin Yang, The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online (New York: Columbia
University Press, 2009), 24.
14. Yongshun Cai, Collective Resistance in China: Why Popular Protests Succeed or Fail (Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press, 2010); Xi Chen, Social Protest and Contentious Authoritarianism in China (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2012); Ching Kwan Lee, Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s
Rustbelt and Sunbelt (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007); Kevin J. O’Brien, ed., Popular Protest in
China (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008); Kevin J. O’Brien and Lianjiang Li, Reightful Resistance;
Elizabeth Perry and Mark Selden, eds., Chinese Society: Change, Conflict and Resistance (New York:
Routledge, 2010).
15. Lee, Against the Law, 9; Thomas P. Bernstein and Xiaobo Lü, Taxation without Representation in Rural
China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 157; Xi Chen, Social Protest, 212; Elizabeth Perry,
“Permanent Rebellion? Continuities and Discontinuities in Chinese Protest,” in O’Brien, Popular Protest in
China, 206.
16. H. Christoph Steinhardt, “How Rebellious Is Chinese Society? An Analysis of Official Figures and
Survey Data,” EAI Background Brief, no. 853 (2013): 1–18, East Asian Institute, Singapore.
64 • T HE C H INA J OUR N AL, No. 75
monetary—interests.17
The outcomes of successful cases of this type of resistance,
such as compensation for requisitioned or polluted farmland or damaged
health, restoration of residential and property rights, or better pay or better working
conditions in a factory, have usually been restricted to the members of the
protest constituencies. It is crucial to note here that the exclusive nature of such
outcomes characterized them, in the language of rational choice analysts, as private
or club goods, but not public goods.18
As a partial result of such narrow protest
constituencies and specified and exclusive mobilizing grievances, solidarity
and support from the larger public have typically been very limited.
Third, ex post facto resistance: protests since the 1990s have typically sought
compensation, or nominal retrospective justice, for a controversial act that had
not only already occurred but often also had resulted in significant personal harm.
Such victimhood-driven resistance has typically evolved out of petitions, complaints,
lawsuits, or other forms of seeking redress for acts that ran counter to existing
laws, policies, or norms. Although resisters, when successfully mobilized,
sometimes successfully pressed for concessions, these have been confined to
“the realm of policy implementation” and remained largely excluded from the domain
of policy making.19
The ex post facto sequence has been rooted in a lack of
access to information and decision-making processes. It also implied resisters’
weak ability to advocate for broader public awareness of their specific grievance
and to prevent it from happening again.20
Fourth, the separation of protest and policy advocacy: paralleling the increase
of “mass incidents,” policy advocacy efforts to change state behavior have also
been on the rise, led by elites such as journalists, academics, NGO officials, entrepreneurs,
and even reform-minded government officials.21
The elite and NGO
activists were particularly cautious to not get involved with grassroots mobilization,
and protests were almost universally characterized by an absence of effective
17. On mobilizing grievances, see Remy Cross and David A. Snow, “Social Movements,” in The WileyBlackwell
Companion to Sociology, ed. George Ritzer (Chichester: Wiley, 2011), 524.
18. Mancur Olson, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).
19. O’Brien and Li, Rightful Resistance, 122.
20. On the sequence of resistance, see Yongshun Cai, “Collective Ownership or Cadres’ Ownership? The
Non-agricultural Use of Farmland in China,” China Quarterly, no. 175 (2003): 662–80. For the typical pattern
of environmental protests, see Jun Jing, “Environmental Protests in Rural China,” in Perry and Selden, Chinese
Society, 197–214. For a rare example of a preventive protest, see Yanhua Deng and Guobin Yang, “Pollution and
Protest in China: Environmental Mobilization in Context,” China Quarterly, no. 214 (2013): 321–36.
21. Yihong Jiang, “Altering the Rules: Chinese Homeowners’ Participation in Policymaking,” Journal of
Current Chinese Affairs 42, no. 3 (2013): 121–48; Scott Kennedy, The Business of Lobbying in China (Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press, 2005); Andrew Mertha, “‘Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0’: Political
Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process,” China Quarterly, no. 200 (2009): 995–1012; Shaoguang Wang,
“Changing Models of China’s Policy Agenda Setting,” Modern China 34, no. 1 (2008): 56–87; Fengshi Wu,
“Strategic State Engagement in Transnational Activism: AIDS Prevention in China,” Journal of Contemporary
China 20, no. 71 (2011): 621–37.
Environmental Protest and Changing Popular Contention in China • 65
policy advocacy.22
Occasionally, protesters sought support from sympathetic elite
allies, just as policy advocates used the specter of grassroots unrest to make their
case for reforms.23
But in the overall landscape of social contention, until recently
there was a substantial separation between these two realms of actors and activ-
ities.
The following four cases of environmental protests since the mid-2000s illustrate
a recent divergence from the above four characteristics so substantial that
they deserve to be distinguished as representing a new repertoire.
A TRANSFORMATIVE EVENT: THE ANTI-PX PROTESTS IN XIAMEN
In July 2006, the National Development and Reform Commission formally endorsed
plans to build a multibillion yuan PX plant near a new residential area
in Haicang, a suburb of Xiamen. The decision was made in spite of an earlier demand
by the Fujian Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the State
Environmental Protection Administration (the precursor to the Ministry of Environmental
Protection) to “adjust” (tiaozheng) the development plans, which
would have implied a relocation of the PX project.24
When a Xiamen University
professor who was then a delegate to the Chinese People’s Political Consultative
Conference learned about the National Development and Reform Commission’s
decision, she decided to take action. After fruitless communication with the Xiamen
government through personal connections, she organized the drafting of a motion
at the annual Consultative Conference meeting in Beijing in March 2007 that
called for relocating the plant, on the grounds that the project was too close to
residential areas and posed a high accident risk for the wider Xiamen public. Although
the motion was ultimately not adopted, she managed to obtain support
from 105 fellow delegates, among them the deputy governor of Fujian Province.
This provided the necessary legitimacy for coverage in the national commercial
news media and spurred other local advocates to chime in. Substantial media coverage
and online agitation over health threats soon began to emerge. By late May,
22. Research has even found that NGOs and policy advocates are sometimes allied with or embedded
in local governmental agencies rather than leading or representing policy victims. Peter Ho, “Embedded Activism
and Political Change in a Semi-authoritarian Context,” China Information 21, no. 2 (2007): 187–209;
Jessica C. Teets, Civil Society under Authoritarianism: The China Model (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2014); Guobin Yang, “Environmental NGOs and Institutional Dynamics in China,” China Quarterly,
no. 181 (2005): 46–66.
23. O’Brien and Li, Rightful Resistance, 13; Fayong Shi and Yongshun Cai, “Disaggregating the State:
Networks and Collective Resistance in Shanghai,” China Quarterly, no. 186 (2006): 314–32; H. Christoph
Steinhardt, “State Behavior and the Intensification of Intellectual Criticism in China: The Social Stability Debate,”
Modern China (2015), doi:10.1177/0097700415581158.
24. Jiaoming Pang, “Xiamen PX xiangmu daikuan keneng zaocheng daizhang, shi chang bu duideng boyi”
[The Xiamen PX project might result in bad debts, the playing field is not fair], Zhongguo Jingji Shibao [China
economic times], June 6, 2007.
66 • T HE C H INA J OUR N AL, No. 75
calls for protests from anonymous sources circulated on mobile phones and
online discussion forums.25
On June 1 and 2, 2007, two largely peaceful demonstrations
with several thousand participants each, playfully titled on the Internet
as “collective strolling” ( jiti sanbu), marched through Xiamen’s city center.26
In
response, the State Environmental Protection Administration conducted another
environmental impact assessment of the PX project, followed by a public hearing.
By December 2007, the project was shelved.
In addition to the large protest turnout, the preventive nature of resistance, and
the unusual outcome, what most distinguished this from the majority of protests
at the time was its broad constituency. Protesters claimed to speak not for a narrow
subset of citizens, but for the general public of this major city. And that
claim seemed to have resonated. Individual demonstrators’ accounts and photographic
evidence reveal an outpouring of sympathy from large crowds of bystanders
and even occasional acts of sympathy from police officers on the days
of the protests.27
Interviews and conversations with dozens of Xiamen residents
from all walks of life also suggest that although some had reservations about
taking to the streets, support for the cause was virtually unanimous.28
Members
of the Xiamen diaspora elsewhere in China showed support online before and
after the protests.29
Widespread positive reporting in the news media reflected
and in turn further generated evident sympathy from all over the nation.30
The primary mobilizing grievance and dominant narrative of the Xiamen antiPX
campaign was anchored in public concerns about the potential impact of air
pollution and industrial accidents on the whole city. A second and much more
exclusive type of grievance was the fear of Haicang residents that the value of
25. The messages (on file with the authors) appealed to the common identity of “Xiamen renmin” (the
people of Xiamen), asserted that the PX plant would bring about dramatic deteriorations of health, and falsely
claimed that international organizations had determined such projects could only be built at least 100 kilometers
outside of residential areas.
26. One journalistic estimate mentioned 30,000 participants (Didi Kirsten Tatlow and Joey Liu, “Thousands
Protest against Chemical Plant in Xiamen,” South China Morning Post, February 2, 2007, http://www.scmp
.com/article/595260/thousands-protest-against-chemical-plant-xiamen, accessed June 19, 2014. The first author’s
interview with a protest participant on June 10, 2007, elicited a similar estimate. A Chinese survey study
reports a 10.8 percent participation rate of three districts in Xiamen with a combined population of over
1.4 million, pushing the number of participants even higher. Zhijia Zhou, “Huanjing baohu, qunti yali, haishi
liyi boji: xiamen jumin PX huanjing yundong canyu xingwei de dongji fenxi” [Environmental protection, group
pressure or interests? An analysis of the motivations for participating in the Xiamen PX citizen environmental
movement], Shehui [Society] 31, no. 1 (2011): 1–34.
27. The authors are in possession of 269 original photographs that were taken by a protest participant.
28. The first author’s interviews and informal conversations during several weeks research stay in Xiamen
in May, June, and September 2008.
29. Xu Liu, “Fan PX wangmin ‘Xiamen Lang’ huo niandu wangluo gongmin da jiang” [Netizen opposing
PX “Xiamen wave” receives annual internet citizen award], Nanfang Dushi Bao [Southern metropolis news],
January 14, 2008.
30. For example, Fangqing Shao, “Yige chengshi de taidu” [A city’s attitude], Diyi Caijing Ribao [No. 1 finance
daily], April 18, 2007.
Environmental Protest and Changing Popular Contention in China • 67
their residential properties would decline if the project was built, but a Chinese
survey study found that residence or property ownership in Haicang had no significant
impact on protest participation.31
A large number of anecdotal statements
by ordinary citizens and slogans used by protesters suggest that supporters
of the anti-PX campaign were discontented with the drive for “political
performance” (zhengji) by the local government that only focused on gross domestic
product (GDP) growth and not the public welfare, and linked this governmental
mentality with the decision on the PX project.32
A discursively reinforced
identity of “Xiamen people” (Xiamen ren)33
inhabiting an intangible and
collectively owned “beautiful Xiamen” (meili de Xiamen) that was under threat
and thus required citizens to “defend the beautiful home” (baowei meili jiayuan)34
became viral online and was present throughout the protests. Thus, while mobilizing
grievances were obviously mixed, it is evident that what spurred thousands
of people to the streets went substantially beyond exclusive concerns of
a narrow subset of the population. Those who took part in the protest did so
for issues that could affect not only themselves and the people they knew personally
but also millions of unknown fellow Xiamen citizens and the future of the
entire city.
Also notable in this case was the mutual reinforcement of policy advocacy
and street protests. Before and after the large demonstrations in June 2007, local
elites conducted extensive policy advocacy. A local blogger who was a Southern
Weekend Magazine columnist republished key media reports and pamphlets on
his widely read blog, urging locals to discuss the PX project on the Internet and
in private and fostering a shared grievance and identity.35
While it is difficult
to imagine that the massive protests would have taken place without elite advocacy,
it is similarly hard to envision that city authorities would have eventually
backed down without a show of force on the streets. However, a notable distance
between these two spheres of advocacy remained. Some local advocates participated
in the demonstrations but were careful not to call for protests directly.
The main environmental NGO in the city, the Xiamen Green Cross Association,
publicly declared its neutrality on the matter.36
The NGO got involved only after
31. Surprisingly neither did the perceived threat of pollution or dissatisfaction with the state of the local
environment. What mattered most, according to this study, was if residents gave or received pressure to
participate from peers. See Zhou, “Environmental Protection.”
32. The first author’s interviews with a Haicang resident on September 16, 2008. The authors have photographic
evidence of anti-GDP protest slogans on file.
33. Huan Weng, “Xiamen ren: Yi yongqi he lixing zhuzhao weilai” [Xiamen residents: With bravery and
rationality enlightening the future], Nanfang Zhoumo [Southern weekly], December 17, 2007; Zhou, “Environmental
Protection,” 23. The first author also interviewed two Xiamen officials and academics and heard
similar comments, September 20, 2008.
34. The authors have relevant photographic evidence of protest slogans on file.
35. The complete set of his blog posts during the campaign is on file with the authors.
36. The second author’s interview with the executive director of the NGO in Beijing on May 20, 2011.
68 • T HE C H INA J OUR N AL, No. 75
institutionalized public participation had become possible in the State Environmental
Protection Administration’s renewed environmental impact assess-
ment.37
The evidence strongly suggests that the successful mutual reinforcement
between elite advocacy and mass protests was not the result of strategic planning
but the outcome of an intersection of simultaneously evolving processes.
The anti-PX campaign in Xiamen in 2007 was a “transformative event” in which
longer-term structural changes provided the opportunity to innovate contentious
strategies and significantly change the popular imagination of what a protest
can look like and achieve.38
The very idea that an alliance of social elites and
average citizens in a proactive preventive campaign in the name of the public
against a major state-backed project is not only possible, but can be successful,
was born in Xiamen and has since taken root in China. Based upon the template
of Xiamen, the following three episodes pushed this new model further.
FROM POLLUTION TO A COMMON HERITAGE:
THE TREE-SAVING CAMPAIGN IN NANJING
In February 2011, some Nanjing citizens were disturbed by what they saw on the
streets. During the construction of a subway station, a number of phoenix trees
(wutong shu) that lined the inner city streets and hailed back to the Republican
Era were cut down. Citizens soon began to express their discontent over this
destruction, and the “Nanjing Wutong Tree Salvation” microblog group was
formed.39
Before long, a number of local prominent figures chimed in on the
Internet, and the news media began critical reporting, highlighting that over
600 trees were to be felled according to the plans for a new subway line.40
Various
symbolic means of resistance began to emerge, for example, tying green ribbons
to trees and putting stickers on cars with tree-saving logos and slogans.41
Following calls on the Internet, in March a few hundred people gathered for a
peaceful sit-in (jingzuo) in front of the city library under the watchful gaze of
numerous police officers.42
On the following day, local authorities gave in and
37. Fanxu Zeng and Zhigao Jiang, “Xiamen shimin PX de PK zhan” [Xiamen residents’ war against PX],
Nanfang Renwu Zhoukan [Southern people weekly], December 28, 2007.
38. McAdam and Sewell, “It’s About Time,” 118.
39. Op Ed, “Nanjing ‘wutong ranglu’ shijian” [The Nanjing “phoenix trees making way for (subway)” incident],
Xuanjiangjia [Orator] website, January 22, 2013, http://www.71.cn/2013/0122/702309.shtml, accessed
July 8, 2014.
40. Haiyong Li, “Nanjing 40 duo ke shu bei ‘ti guangtou’ zhi wei ditie xian rang dao” [Nanjing: More than
40 trees having their “heads shaved” to give way for subway line], Yangzi Wanbao [Yangzi evening news],
March 1, 2011.
41. One of these stickers read: “Ai wo gudu, baowei wutong” (Love my old city, defend plane trees).
Photographic evidence is on file with the authors.
42. Sharon Lafraniere, “Nanjing Fights to Save Its London Plane ‘Supertrees,’” New York Times, June 4,
2011.
Environmental Protest and Changing Popular Contention in China • 69
announced that the construction plan for the underground railway would be altered
to preserve the city’s venerable trees. Two-thirds of the trees originally to
be removed were saved because of Nanjing citizens’ various forms of peaceful
contention.
As in the case of Xiamen, people mobilized for a public good. It is not meaningful
to argue that the loss of the wutong trees would have affected the people
who participated in the sit-in, or tied a ribbon on a tree, more than others. The incident
stood out precisely because the trees had no significant material impact
on their private lives or possessions. The phoenix trees were perceived as being
a symbol of Nanjing with an intangible value that belonged to the public. One
Internet user wrote passionately:
To us the phoenix trees are not simply trees; they have nourished one generation
after another from Nanjing, and as a whole they cannot be taken from our hearts
[geshe bu liao de qingjie]. Nanjing residents take action! Let our voices be heard!43
Some Internet commentators even claimed that the trees had to be defended not
only in the name of Nanjing but in the name of the entire nation, as Nanjing was a
“jewel in the heart of every Chinese person.”44
The act of protecting the trees unleashed broader discussions of what should
be the ultimate goal of development. As one Internet user remarked, “Please respect
what history preserved for us,” followed by a rhetorical question: “Does
economic development really have to override everything else?” Another user
wondered, “Without the ancient trees, what is left of the ancient city?”45
Unsurprisingly,
given what was phrased as a noble cause, the campaign gathered
nationwide solidarity and support. During its high tide, the topic “Concern for
Nanjing Plane Trees” attracted 400,000–500,000 posts per day and was among
the hottest ones on Sina microblog.46
Similar to Xiamen, it is difficult to envision street mobilization without the
participation of social elites. Likewise, without the combination of elite advocacy
and street mobilization, the final outcome may well have been different.
43. Online post, “Guanzhu Nanjing wutong shu de kanfa” [Pay attention to the cutting phoenix tress in
Nanjing], Tianya Luntan (BBS site), January 2011, http://bbs.tianya.cn/post-free-2114996-1.shtml, accessed
July 8, 2014.
44. Online post, “Wutong shu shang de lüsedai” [Green ribbons on phoenix trees], Xici Hutong (BBS site),
http://www.xici.net/d143135723.htm, March 2011, accessed July 8, 2014.
45. “Guanzhu Nanjing wutong shu beikan shijian” [Pay attention to the Nanjing phoenix tress cutting
incident], Wangyi Weibo (microblog), Hot Event, March 2011, http://t.163.com/zt/pub/njwts?fpevent.hot,
accessed July 8, 2014.
46. Yiman Liu, “Nanjing: wutong shu xia, yi zheng fenglei” [Nanjing: Wind and thunder under the phoenix
trees], Dongfang Zhoukan [Eastern weekly], November 4, 2011; Xuanyao Zhu, “Nanjing wutong baowei zhan:
Weibo de you yici shengli” [The Nanjing phoenix tree defense campaign: Another triumph of microblogs],
Nanfang Ribao [Southern daily], March 17, 2011.
70 • T HE C H INA J OUR N AL, No. 75
Public figures such as well-known football commentator Huang Jianxiang and
television host Meng Fei, other journalists, and NGOs played a reinforcing role.
A Nanjing University professor even openly called for Nanjing mayor Ji Jianye
to be “impeached.”47
A local NGO, Green Stone, got involved directly by organizing
a successful online campaign asking citizens to take their pictures in front
of wutong trees and to post them online as a way of expressing their discontent
with the tree-cutting policy.48
This microblog-based strategy of symbolic action
emulated one developed by an activist sociologist a few weeks earlier.49
Advocacy
even came from outside of the People’s Republic of China when Chiu Yi,
a member of the central standing committee of Taiwan’s Kuomintang Party,
posted microblog comments and directly communicated his concern for the phoenix
trees to the Nanjing mayor.50
In the anti-tree-cutting campaign, the repertoire of Xiamen had been adopted
and developed further. As in Xiamen, the campaign was conducted in the name
of all of the city’s residents as a public good; resistance kicked in before the city
government’s project had become irreversible; and protest and elite advocacy reinforced
each other. Substantial further innovation was obvious as well. This
time around, citizens took action for an evidently symbolic and immaterial asset,
extending their environmental concerns beyond pollution and toxins. They employed
a larger and more imaginative and playful range of contentious acts and
drew in active support from an NGO as well as netizens and prominent figures
from around the nation.
FROM PROTEST TO THE BIRTH OF A NEW NGO:
ANTI-INCINERATOR ACTIVISM IN PANYU
Panyu, a newly developed satellite district (a former rural county) 30 kilometers
south of the city of Guangzhou, is home to over 800,000 residents. In September
2009, some homeowners in a residential complex (xiaoqu) in Panyu learned
that a waste incinerator was to be built in their neighborhood. These homeowners,
who included a number of journalists, public servants, and retired bureaucrats,
soon began signing petitions and displaying slogans on buildings in
the neighborhood to express their worries about potential pollution and health
47. Renminwang, “Ji Jianye tiba daziyuan qingfu dang Yangzhou shi fagaiwei fu zhuren” [Ji Jianye promoted
his secretary mistress to deputy chairwomen of the development and reform commission of Yangzhou
City], Renminwang [People’s net], October 23, 2013, http://news.china.com/domestic/945/20131029/
18115985.html, accessed August 25, 2015.
48. The second author’s interview with Green Stone staff in Nanjing, June 12, 2012.
49. Fengshi Wu and Shen Yang, “Web 2.0 and Political Engagement in China,” VOLUNTAS (July 2015),
doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9627-6.
50. Si Meng, “The Battle for Nanjing’s Trees,” China Dialogue, March 30, 2011, http://www.chinadialogue
.net/article/show/single/en/4191-The-battle-for-Nanjing-s-trees.
Environmental Protest and Changing Popular Contention in China • 71
hazards.51
Representatives of the Panyu campaign paid a visit to Likeng village in
the northeastern outskirts of Guangzhou, where the first waste incinerating facility
in southern China had been built in 2000 and had since caused recurrent protests.
After the trip, Panyu residents became much better informed about the
potential effects of living in close proximity to a waste incinerator and more determined
to resist having one operate at their doorstep.52
In November 2009,
over a thousand residents from both Panyu and Likeng staged a demonstration
in front of the Guangzhou municipal government building and requested to meet
with leading officials. After a few more “collective petitions” (jiti xinfang) were
submitted, in December 2009 the District Party Secretary met with representatives
of Panyu residents and promised to halt the project.
The campaign and local mobilization did not stop after district authorities
showed signs of giving in. Panyu campaigners had realized by then that re-siting
or rejecting a single incinerator was not a sustainable solution to the problem of
urban solid waste. Being geographically close to large cities like Guangzhou, suburban
areas face the long-term threat of becoming the “dumping ground” of
wastes. But with the Guangzhou Asian Games approaching in late 2010, governmental
authorities in Guangdong Province tightened social control, and antiincinerator
activism in Panyu almost came to a standstill. At that time, Friends
of Nature, joined by other Beijing-based groups such as the Green Beagle Environmental
Institute and the Nature University, stepped up their support for
Panyu activists. After months of mentorship and grooming, Basuo Fengyun
(a blog name), one of the most active participants in the earlier petitions and
protests, eventually became the public face of the Panyu group. Basuo Fengyun
and his followers soon redirected their focus onto a new round of governmental
decision making for the siting of the pending incinerator that was no longer
related to Panyu district. In 2011, he won the prestigious SEE-TNC Ecological
Award, which provided necessary financial resources, moral endorsement, and
peer support to continue advocacy for alternative waste treatment methods.
Basuo Fengyun and fellow activists finally came to realize that public participation
in the siting of an incinerator and establishing sustainable waste treatment
facilities in China still had a long way to go and that it would be impossible
for them to monitor governmental decisions on a regular basis and be
part of future policy making without a formal organizational structure.53
Thus,
in the spring of 2012 they formed an NGO and named it Eco Canton (Yiju
Guangzhou).
51. Lang and Xu, “Anti-Incinerator Campaigns,” 838; Natalie W. M. Wong, “Advocacy Coalitions and
Policy Change in China: A Case Study of Anti-incinerator Protest in Guangzhou,” VOLUNTAS (May 2015),
doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9603-1.
52. The second author’s interview with Basuo Fengyun, the leader of the Panyu campaign, in Guangzhou
on September 21, 2012.
53. The second author’s interview with Basuo Fengyun in Shenzhen on September 23, 2013.
72 • T HE C H INA J OUR N AL, No. 75
Since its establishment, Eco Canton has been embedded in a network of environmental
NGOs, activist-minded lawyers, university professors, and relatively
progressive media outlets in Guangzhou.54
In cooperation with a center
at Zhongshan University, it completed a survey of 15 waste sorting and recycling
programs in Guangzhou, which formed the basis for a convincing report
with policy recommendations for the municipal government. The Guangzhou
governmental agency responsible for urban planning accepted the recommendations
and formulated a guideline for residential community-based waste sorting
and recycling.
Eco Canton has close organizational links to leading environmental NGOs
in Beijing and is part of the Zero Waste Alliance funded by the Global Alliance
for Incinerator Alternatives—an NGO alliance that aims at policy advocacy for
sustainable waste treatment at the national level. Other NGOs and governmental
agencies from different cities often invite Basuo Fengyun to present the case
of Panyu and Guangzhou and to share the experience of solving controversies
related to waste treatment siting.55
At the same time, Eco Canton continues to
play a role as an information disseminator for ordinary citizens in their resistance
to industrial pollution and for waste management policies beyond Guangzhou.
It has become an influential cross-regional player in policy advocacy for
urban waste management and antipollution protests elsewhere.
The Panyu anti-incinerator campaign and the establishment of Eco Canton
highlight a further closing of the gap between street protests and policy advocacy.
Starting with a narrow constituency and mobilizing around an exclusive grievance,
substantial involvement of activists from Beijing led the initial campaign
to evolve and eventually turn into an NGO and a long-term policy advocacy
initiative that treats urban waste as a public good and pushes for broad public
participation in policy reforms. The resulting activism involved public education,
policy recommendations, and social mobilization for urban waste management
with attention from and outreach to partners in different parts of the country
and even overseas. Thus, the intersection of protest and advocacy in Panyu has
had more substantial policy implications than the two previous cases.
NGO ADVOCACY ON THE FRONTLINE:
THE ANTI-PX CAMPAIGN IN KUNMING
In March 2013, the Kunming municipal government announced that a PX project
in Anning Industrial Park, 32 kilometers southwest of the city center, had
54. Fengshi Wu, “Environmental Activism in Provincial China,” Journal of Environmental Policy and
Planning 15, no. 1 (2013): 89–108.
55. Eco-Canton’s official microblog site, http://weibo.com/u/2738146140, accessed July 11, 2014; Wong,
“Advocacy Coalition,” 7–10.
Environmental Protest and Changing Popular Contention in China • 73
received approval from the National Development and Reform Commission.
In April, two local NGOs, Green Watershed and Green Kunming, conducted
a field investigation of the proposed project site.56
Through the Internet and social
media portals, these two NGOs then expressed serious concerns about the
siting of the project and its potential impact on air quality in Kunming. Word
spread quickly, and soon calls for “a civilized collective outing” (wenming jiti
chuxing) against the PX project appeared in various websites, social networking
portals, and microblogs.57
Headed by a few well-known environmentalists and
NGO leaders, a petition (with real names and identity card numbers) against
the project also spread widely via WeChat, a cell phone–based social media ap-
plication.58
Some residents filed formal applications for holding a demonstration
and posted these online with their real names.59
Despite various attempts
to keep students and state employees from participating, two large demonstrations,
each with a few thousand participants from diverse backgrounds, took
place on May 4 and May 16. On June 2, Kunming’s mayor finally announced
that the project would not commence without a comprehensive public consultation
process. The Ministry of Environmental Protection released the PX project’s
environmental impact assessment report on June 28, which temporarily
put the project on hold.
In many aspects, this and other anti-PX protests since 2007 resemble the Xiamen
case discussed earlier. Citizens mobilized in the name of all Kunming residents,
taking to the streets with concerns that are public in nature: clean air
in the “spring city” (chuncheng) and discontent over a GDP-driven local government,
a lack of transparency in public policy making, and a perceived irresolvable
contradiction between investment in petrochemical industry and
Kunming’s role as a tourism destination.60
However, what sets Kunming apart
from Xiamen and other anti-PX protests is the role played by local NGOs before,
during, and after the protests. This is largely due to the fact that Kunming
and Yunnan Province have a better-developed NGO community compared with
other parts of China, particularly in the field of environmental protection.61
56. Newsletters appear on Green Kunming’s official website, http://www.greenkm.org/detail/914.htm,
accessed January 31, 2014.
57. “No PX! Fangzhi wumai, baowei Kunming! Baowei meili chuncheng!” [No PX! Prevent haze, defend
Kunming! Defend the beatiful spring city!] Tianya Luntan [Tianya discussion forum], April 2013, http://
bbs.tianya.cn/post-62-578140-2.shtml, accessed June 12, 2014.
58. The authors have evidence of the petition and its content on file.
59. “Kunming shimin tiyi faqi kangyi PX xiangmu luohu youxing weishi” [Kunming residents suggest
launching a demonstration to protest the PX project], Weiquanwang, March 26, 2013, http://www.weiquan
wang.org/?pp33959, accessed June 12, 2014.
60. The authors have a collection of relevant online discourses on file.
61.Yunnan has the largest number of environmental NGOs at the provincial level nationwide (Wu,
“Environmental Activism,” 91). NGOs and social activism in Yunnan Province have been studied widely
by social scientists (Berthold Kuhn, “Government-NGO Cooperation in the People’s Republic of China:
Experiences from Yunnan Province,” International Journal of Civil Society Law 4, no. 3 [2006]: 62–72; Ralph
74 • T HE C H INA J OUR N AL, No. 75
Founded in 1998, Green Watershed is one of the most active and influential
green NGOs in Yunnan Province and the nation. It has played a crucial part
since 2004 in a public campaign against the construction of a large dam in the
Nu River,62
and more generally it conducts research, advocacy campaigns, and
community-based pilot projects in the fields of nature conservation and sustainable
energy. Green Kunming has a less high profile and only began its work
in environmental education in 2006. By 2012, a new board had been established,
and several prominent activists and social leaders joined Green Kunming. This
enhanced its visibility and operational capacity and prepared the organization
to move toward campaigning and policy advocacy. These two NGOs were familiar
with each other and had collaborated before the anti-PX campaign.63
Green Watershed was the first to investigate the PX project proposal in Kunming
after the Ministry of Environmental Protection had given it the green light
in July 2012, and Green Kunming joined the mission in early 2013. Their joint
field investigation in April 2013 and subsequent mobilization ignited widespread
public discussions of the project and eventually the protests in May.
The two NGOs did not stop when the city government announced concessions
due to the pressure generated by the two peaceful protests. Having learned
from previous anti-PX cases and understanding that the lack of national-level
policy advocacy had allowed officials to relocate proposals for PX and other
polluting industries further into rural areas, Green Watershed, Green Kunming,
and other local activists, supported by Friends of Nature, Nature University, and
a few other veteran Beijing-based environmental organizations, launched a coalition
to push for reassessing the siting of all petrochemical projects in Anning
and for a more transparent decision-making process, which would allow for
public monitoring and consultation in deciding any future PX projects.64
After
the Ministry of Environmental Protection had suspended the Kunming PX project,
this NGO coalition organized a press conference in Beijing and urged authorities
to release more information about all ongoing projects of the China
National Petroleum Cooperation (the PX project’s primary investor) and encouraged
a comprehensive round of environmental assessments of the planning at
the Anning Industrial Park. These NGOs also initiated an “ICARE Kunming”
62. The 2006 Goldman Environmental Prize was awarded to the founder of Green Watershed, Dr. Yu
Xiaogang, for this effort. He was the second Chinese recipient of this award.
63. The second author conducted telephone interviews with Green Watershed and Green Kunming in
April 2012.
64. The second author’s interview in Beijing during January 2013 with Friends of Nature staff members,
who were in collaboration with GW throughout the Kunming anti-PX campaign.
Litzinger, “The Mobilization of ‘Nature’: Perspectives from North-west Yunnan,” China Quarterly, no. 178
[2004]: 488–504; Katherine Morton, “The Emergence of NGOs in China and Their Transnational Linkages:
Implications for Domestic Reform,” Australian Journal of International Affairs 59, no. 4 [2005]: 519–32; Anthony
J. Spires, Lin Tao, and Kin-man Chan, “Societal Support for China’s Grass-Roots NGOs: Evidence from
Yunnan, Guangdong and Beijing,” The China Journal, no. 71 [January 2014]: 65–90).
Environmental Protest and Changing Popular Contention in China • 75
program calling on all concerned citizens across the country to pay attention to
PX projects and the broader issue of environmental protection in China.65
Since the 2013 public protests, Green Watershed and Green Kunming have
identified monitoring of petrochemical projects in Anning and mobilizing of the
public to participate in environmental assessment processes as their organizational
priority. The two NGOs have since taken on the role of environmental watchdogs
for Kunming and Yunnan by publishing regular field study reports, making official
documentation and data publicly available, and discussing policy alternatives.
They are part of a growing activism network across the country that focuses on
public access to environmental information and public participation in industrial
pollution reduction.66
The network makes full use of the legal status of the
national government’s Measures for Open Environmental Information (for Trial
Implementation), enacted in 2008, and NGO members of this network monitor
industrial pollution in their regions by encouraging broad public participation
in environmental information sharing and publicizing.67
The Kunming anti-PX protest has pushed the repertoire earlier developed in
Xiamen further in terms of protest-policy advocacy linkages. The case demonstrates
the pronounced effect NGO advocacy can have when it intersects with
broader citizen mobilization. Although the two leading NGOs did not directly
organize street protests, the information they disseminated was critical for setting
public debate in motion and providing vital argumentative ammunition that
allowed the resistance ultimately to be successful. Due to the two local groups
and an experienced cross-regional coalition of environmental NGOs, the Kunming
anti-PX campaign went beyond large-scale but one-off protest and evolved
into ongoing policy advocacy for transparency and public participation in environmental
governance beyond Kunming.
THE NEW REPERTOIRE, ITS SPREAD AND
CONTEXTUAL CONDITIONS
Table 1 summarizes the innovations and outlines the points of departure from
the preexisting pattern of popular protest. Instead of closely knit groups of victims
and their personal supporters, the new type of resistance mobilizes large
numbers of people unknown to each other. In contrast to the pursuit of exclusive
benefits, the new repertoire revolves around public goods, policy concerns,
65. This press conference document was supplied by the Friends of Nature to the authors.
66. In addition to the two Kunming NGOs, this coalition includes grassroots NGOs, such as the Institute
for Public and Environmental Affairs in Beijing, Green Stone in Nanjing, the Wuhu Ecology Center in
Anhui Province, and Green Hunan in Changsha.
67. For a complete English translation, http://www.epa.gov/ogc/china/open_environmental.pdf; available
at http://www.cecc.gov/resources/legal-provisions/measures-on-open-environmental-information-trial-cecc
-full-translation.
76 • T HE C H INA J OUR N AL, No. 75
or symbolic values relevant to a broad “imagined community” of a city or even
the whole country.68
And, rather than taking action ex post facto, protest campaigns
seek to prevent governmental acts perceived as harmful from being implemented
in the first place (or carried out in full, as in the case of Nanjing).
Finally, the gap between those who protest and those who engage in policy advocacy
has narrowed substantially. The most obvious innovation since Xiamen
in 2007 was that NGOs began to play a larger role. In the latter two cases,
protest evolved into NGO-driven longer-term policy monitoring and public
education.
How widespread are the innovations of popular resistance summarized in table
1? Although the concurrence of all four elements has been most pronounced
in the cases analyzed above, they have emerged to different extents in protests
across geographic locations and issue domains. In the environmental domain,
all of the major anti-PX or anti-industrial development protests in urban areas
(e.g., Chengdu in 2008, Dalian in 2011, Ningbo and Shifang in 2012, Jiangmen
in 2013, Maoming in 2014, and Heyuan and Jinshan in 2015) mobilized large
numbers of residents to prevent pollution threats that would have affected all
of the citizens in these localities. Wider solidarity from outside the specific places
has been frequent.69
At the intersection of protest and policy advocacy, protesters
against a power plant in Heyuan (2015) were reportedly spurred into action by
a TV presenter’s attention-generating advocacy documentary on air pollution,
Under the Dome, released a few weeks earlier.70
The linkage between NGOs and
protests has grown most visibly in the environmental field. The anti–waste inTable
1. A Comparison of the Earlier Repertoire of Contention and New Innovations
Main Repertoire since
the 1990s
The New Repertoire
since the Mid-2000s
Protest constituencies Narrow, closely knit
communities of “victims”
Broad “imagined communities”
of cities or regions
Mobilizing grievances Exclusive (private) Nonexclusive (public)
Sequence of resistance Ex post facto Preventive
Protest and policy
advocacy
Hardly any linkages Mutual reinforcement; sometimes
sustained advocacy with NGO
participation
68. Benedict R. Anderson, Imagined Communities (London: Verso, 1983).
69. The 2014 protests in Maoming even led to solidarity protests in Guangzhou and Shenzhen. Shannon
Tiezzi, “Maoming Protests Continue in Southern China,” Diplomat, April 5, 2014, http://thediplomat.com
/2014/04/maoming-protests-continue-in-southern-china, accessed December 5, 2014.
70. Andrea Chen and Mimi Lau, “Chinese Activists Collect Signatures against Proposed Power Plant in
Heyuan in Guangdong,” South China Morning Post, March 8, 2015.
Environmental Protest and Changing Popular Contention in China • 77
cinerator campaigns in Beijing’s Liulitun and Asuwei (2006–12) displayedclose parallels
with the one in Panyu in terms of local activists becoming policy advocates
and cooperating with environmental NGOs.71
An environmental NGO steered
farmers to successfully resist against a polluting factory in Anhui’s Quigang village
(2006–8).72
Environmental NGOs and veteran activists based in Beijing,
Kunming, and other big cities accumulated knowledge and learned how to contact
and collaborate with community leaders or potential pollution victims, especially
through the prolonged campaigns against large dam building in southwest
China since 2003.73
Some of the environmental NGOs involved in the
Nujiang dam campaign, such as Green Watershed, also became the core players
in the Kunming PX campaign.
Beyond the environmental domain but similar to the tree-saving campaign in
Nanjing, pro-Cantonese-language protests in Guangzhou in 2010 were prompted
by a proposal to extend Mandarin programming on local television. The protests
were rooted in concerns over the value of the Cantonese language and lingnan
(southern China) culture. People are now ready to take to the streets on public issues
that touch upon their collective identity and symbolic heritage.74
Drawing on
“the art of collective behavior” (jiti xingwei yishu) to combine policy advocacy with
collective street action, citizens carried banners, set up replica scenes, and played
mini-drama in public space to condemn sexual violence and to support a pedicure
worker who was on trial for killing a man who had sexually assaulted her in 2009,
which was widely reported in news media. Women’s rights groups have since innovatively
combined high-level policy advocacy and flash-mob-style collective action
on the street in multiple cities across the country.75
Demonstrating that even
an overtly political public good (media freedom) could spur street protests under
specific circumstances, a large number of local residents laid farewell flowers in
front of Google’s Beijing headquarters when the company decided to stop obeying
state censorship in 2011. Hundreds took to the streets in Guangzhou and many
more voiced their support online in early 2013 to support journalists who were
striking against censorship at Southern Weekly.76
Moreover, a vibrant anti-GM
food movement brings together a diverse coalition of actors, such as international
71. Johnson, “The Health Factor.”
72. Skye Gilbert, “Victory: A Grassroots NGO Empowers a ‘Cancer Village’ to Take Action,” China
Environment Forum, 2009, http://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/victory-grassroots-ngo-empowers
-cancer-village-to-take-action, accessed August 5, 2015.
73. Andrew Mertha, China’s Water Warriors (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008), 110–49; Teets,
Civil Society, 113–15.
74. Austin Ramzy, “Protesters Stand Firm on Cantonese Rights,” Time Magazine, August 2, 2010,
http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2008060,00.html, accessed July 9, 2014.
75. Stephanie Bräuer, “Becoming Public: Tactical Innovation in the Beijing Anti-Domestic Violence
Movement,” VOLUNTAS (June 2015), doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9610-2.
76. China Media Bulletin Special Feature, “The ‘Southern Weekly’ Controversy,” Freedom House, January
18, 2013, http://www.freedomhouse.org/cmb/2013_southern_weekly#.U7zaVrH54T0, accessed July 9, 2014.
78 • T HE C H INA J OUR N AL, No. 75
NGO Greenpeace, social celebrities (e.g., famous TV anchor Cui Yongyuan), and
nationalist Maoists, and merges sustained advocacy with small but regular dem-
onstrations.77
To varying degrees, innovations in terms of broader protest constituencies,
sequence, and linkages between protests and advocacy have also been borrowed
during conflicts over clear-cut economic interest. For example, in 2013 a coalition
of township and village Party secretaries and commercial associations engaged
in advocacy but at the same time orchestrated a demonstration with an estimated
thousand participants. They succeeded in thwarting plans to integrate
Zhejiang Province’s prosperous Changxing county into neighboring Huzhou city
as an urban district.78
In 2015, residents in Linshui, Sichuan, acted fast upon learning
that a new high-speed railway would bypass their county. They staged several
days of large-scale demonstrations to demand a change in the plan, using slogans
emphasizing the broad benefits the railway could bring to the whole county, not
just the interests of the protesters.79
In short, while the large majority of the several
tens of thousands of protests in China every year still draw on the old repertoire,
innovations pioneered in the environmental domain are becoming more
common.
Three interrelated key dynamics that arguably paved the way for the emergence
of the new type of protest are at play here and have come to the fore
during the early 2000s. First, changes in the Chinese public sphere—the commercialization
of the media and the development of the Internet and social media—have
produced a stock of journalists and Internet opinion leaders who seek
opportunities to shape public debate.80
These actors possess the capacity to mold
and mobilize latent collective identities. They also have the necessary skills to
frame issues of public concern and not yet materialized threats into grievances
that mobilize large numbers of people into action. Such figures have played
an important role in all our cases and were particularly evident in Xiamen and
Nanjing. In addition, the availability of policy information, partly due to new
government regulations on information release, partly due to a faster flow and
availability of information through the Internet, smart phones, and interactive
77. Jim Harkness, “The Politics of GMO in China,” Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, October
2011, http://www.iatp.org/blog/201110/the-politics-of-gmo-in-china, accessed July 9, 2014, and “Genetically
Modified Crops: Food Fight,” Economist, December 14, 2013.
78. We thank Liu Mingxing for bringing this case to our attention. “Zhejiang huzhou changxing xian
qian ren juji kangyi che xian she qu guanfang xuanbu zanhuan” [Thousands gather in protest against the
planned integration of Changxing County into Zhejiang’s Huzhou City and the authorities announced a
suspension of plans], Guanchazhe Wang [Observer net], May 10, 2013, http://m.guancha.cn/local/2013_05
_09_143483, accessed July 9, 2014.
79. Siqi Cao, “Sichuan County Protests ‘Unfair’ Rail Links,” Global Times, May 18, 2015.
80. Jonathan Hassid, “Four Models of the Fourth Estate: A Typology of Contemporary Chinese Journalists,”
China Quarterly, no. 208 (2011): 813–32; Yanqi Tong and Shaohua Lei, “War of Position and Microblogging
in China,” Journal of Contemporary China 22, no. 80 (2013): 292–311.
Environmental Protest and Changing Popular Contention in China • 79
communicative technologies, has proven critical for preventive resistance and
provided sufficient time for policy advocates to enter the game.81
Second, while getting arrested in protests continues to be a real possibility,
in practice the risk for average participants has substantially declined over the
2000s. Through new regulations, the central government has restrained local
authorities’ discretion in using repression, and the growing importance of the
private sector means that the local state’s capacity to coerce urban residents
as government employees has been weakened.82
The central government also
has augmented sympathy for protesters in its public communications, has allowed
more protests to be reported in the news media, and has tolerated increasingly
candid debates among intellectuals about major cases of unrest.83
These changes have led to a decrease in public perceptions of risk related to
protest. In our case studies, Xiamen people took to the streets only days before
the hyper-sensitive Fourth of June, Nanjing residents mobilized although the
state was in the midst of a repression campaign following the Arab Spring,
and Kunming residents openly shared online their applications for demonstration
permits. As the perceived cost of protest participation has decreased, more
people are willing to mobilize in behalf of causes that do not exclusively benefit
themselves, their families, and their close associates.
Third, over the past 20 years Chinese civil society has developed by leaps
and bounds. The number of NGOs across issue areas has been rising, and the increase
has been particularly pronounced in the field of environmental protec-
tion.84
Environmental NGOs have emerged in all provinces, and they have cultivated
nested networks for mutual support. These groups have accumulated
the necessary knowledge and organizational resources to support grassroots campaigns
and to translate protesters’ demands into policy advocacy, as has been
81. Wu and Yang, “Web 2.0 and Political Engagement in China.”
82. Xi Chen, Social Protest, 59-86; Yanhua Deng and Kevin O’Brien, “Relational Repression in China:
Using Social Ties to Demobilize Protesters,” China Quarterly, no. 215 (2013): 533–52; Kevin O’Brien and
Yanhua Deng, “The Reach of the State: Work Units, Family Ties and “Harmonious Demolition;” The China
Journal, no. 74 (July 2015): 1–17; Peter L. Lorentzen, “Regularizing Rioting: Permitting Public Protest in an
Authoritarian Regime,” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8 (2013): 127–58; Yang Su and Xin He, “Street as
Courtroom: State Accommodation of Labor Protest in South China,” Law and Society Review 44, no. 1 (2010):
162–63.
83. H. Christoph Steinhardt, “From Blind Spot to Media Spotlight: Propaganda Policy, Media Activism, and
the Emergence of Protest Events in the Chinese Public Sphere,” Asian Studies Review 39, no. 1 (2015): 119–37,
and “State Behavior and the Intensification of Intellectual Criticism in China”; Su and He, “Street as Court-
room.”
84. Timothy Hildebrandt, Social Organizations and the Authoritarian State in China (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2013); Mertha, China’s Water Warriors; Teets, Civil Society; Spires et al., “Societal
Support”; Wu, “Environmental Activism”; Yang, “Environmental NGOs.”
80 • T HE C H INA J OUR N AL, No. 75
evident in the cases of Panyu and Kunming. Given the great expansion of environmental
NGOs, it is not coincidental that street protests over environmental issues
have been the first to intersect successfully with NGO-led policy advocacy.85
CONCLUSION
From rejecting plans for polluting factories and bargaining over the siting of
waste treatment facilities to advocating for better conservation of green heritage,
Chinese citizens now proactively mobilize for a broad range of environmental
concerns. This article has examined how a watershed event in the mid-2000s
has ushered in a wave of large-scale environmental protests that have significantly
diverted from the repertoire of popular contention that became dominant
in the 1990s. This emerging repertoire has begun to appear in protests beyond
the environmental arena. As William Gamson astutely observed, an enlargement
of protest action to incorporate new actors and wider domains of conflict usually
benefits the weaker side. Thus, the repertoire innovations imply a strengthening
of social forces vis-à-vis the state.86
As important as these changes are, three points of caution are necessary when
thinking about their broader significance for Chinese politics. First, although
Chinese protesters have shown that they can be substantially more public spirited
than before, the public good of a city (e.g., clean air) becomes a private
good of that locality when the polluting industry simply shifts elsewhere. This
problem is a well-known feature of the NIMBYism (Not In My Backyard) phenomenon.
Environmentalists in China are working to circumvent such a scenario
by promoting pollution control as a general concern for the whole country
that demands top-level change in policy making. Yet environmental protests
in China have not entirely avoided this pitfall. An example is the relocation
of the Xiamen PX project to the neighboring poorer city of Zhangzhou, where
the worst fears of activists became true when the factory exploded in early 2015.
Second, this article has shown that the strategy of resisting government policies
and large state-backed projects in the name of the public has taken root,
but we do not claim that the new repertoire will soon replace other types of popular
resistance or necessarily evolve into a unified mass movement. The authorities
so far have managed to avert the emergence of a coherent macronarrative
that weaves incidents and identities together on a national scale.
85. Certainly, direct cooperation between NGOs and protesters remains very sensitive. For instance, antiPX
protesters in Ningbo were reluctant to talk to leading environmental NGOs even weeks after the protests
had passed and the local government had withdrawn the proposal.
86. William A. Gamson, “Bystanders, Public Opinion, and the Media,” in The Blackwell Companion to
Social Movements, ed. David Snow, Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), 242.
Environmental Protest and Changing Popular Contention in China • 81
Finally, in the three years since the new national leadership took office in
late 2012, state pressure on the media, universities, and civil society has intensified.
Prominent human rights activists, lawyers, journalists, and Internet commentators
have been arrested, and women’s rights activists, college students,
and NGO staff now sometimes face harassment or detention. The Internet is
increasingly censored, and a documentary on air pollution that went viral overnight
was cleansed from the public sphere as soon as its mobilization potential
became apparent. Nonetheless a pushback by the state does not imply that
the new action strategies will be forsaken. Even if some repertoire innovations
may become less prominent for the time being, they are likely to rebound once
an opportunity presents itself.
With these caveats in mind, we conclude that the new repertoire of popular
contention that has emerged in the environmental field and reaches beyond
it poses a challenge to the Chinese state, because it links citizens from diverse
backgrounds on behalf of broader causes and generates a high amount of publicity
and social learning. As the environmental crisis in China shows no signs
of abating, major public environmental grievances with pronounced potential
for mobilization will remain on the table. The new protests in the name of the
public may well stand at the forefront of broader changes in the landscape of
Chinese sociopolitical activism and contentious politics.
82 • T HE C H INA J OUR N AL, No. 75