IV everything is different … though nothing really changed (or the other way round ) the early La Tène period Ha D1 = cca 600 – 550/530 aC Ha D2-D3 = 550/530-480/450 aC LT A = 480/450 – 380 aC -the cultural focus in Central Europe shifts to a stripe of Marne/Champagne – middle Rhine area – SW Bohemia (and a considerable blob in Dürrnberg near Salzburg) -in Northern Italy, things go on as before: Felsinean culture (Bologna, Spina, Marzabotto etc.) in EmiliaRomagna and Golasecca culture in Lombardy are at their best, fully engaged in mediating trade between Greece, Etruria and the Transalpine area Fels. Glscc. -the majority of imports flow across the Alps from the Golasecca culture area -the Rhône valley partially supplies the territory of France [-distribution in central Europe is not mapped precisely – both maps are French and French colleagues do not always bother about what happens in the East] Distribution of Attic Black Figure pottery (VI – early V BC) Distribution of Greek Wine Amphorae https://www.academia.edu/27955549/F._Sacchetti_- _Transport_amphorae_in_the_West_Hallstatt_zone_r eassessing_socio-economic_dynamics_and_long- distance_Mediterranean_exchange_in_western_Cent ral_Europe_in_the_Early_Iron_Ag._Oxford_Journal_o f_Archaeology_35_3_2016 2nd half of the VI century BC 1st half of the V century BC 2nd half of the V century BC Distribution of Gollasecca culture objects in Europe - Bronze beaked flagon/“Schnabelkanne“ -the stereotypical indicator of transalpine contacts in the LT A period -made in Etruria, widespread in the Felsinean and the Golasecca area + everywhere on the other side of the Alps where things were going on in the period Halštatské spony v severní Itálii Ha D2 Ha D3 /1/ The [Po] lowlads used to be inhabited by the Etruscans, […] /3/ the Celts, who were often meeting with them as neighbours and were very invidious for the beautiful country, attacked them unexpectedly under a futile pretext with an enormous army expelling the Etruscans from the territory around the Po and seized the country themselves. Polybios II, 17 its is said that the main reason why the Celts – once separated from us by the Alps that by that time used to be an unsurmountable obstacle – invaded Italy, were dry figs, grapes, oil and wine brought to their country by a Helvetian Helico when he came back home from Rome where he excercised his craft. if it is so, we cannot but forgive them that they resorted even to war. Plin. NH II, 5 The contacts were apparently bilateral Distribution of Hallstatt type brooches in northern Italy →  Elite (wagon) graves of Ha D2/3 Elite (chariot) graves of LT A → In central Europe, the Late Hallstatt centres are abandoned and new dynamic area appear further north  Hochdorf Somme – Bione → Ha D elite burials -very small number, extremely rich -men, women, and children -4-wheel wagon = ceremony -dagger = symbolic power -southern imports and other prestige goods => semidivine and dynastic LT A elite burials -more numerous, less exuberant -adult men largely prevail -2-wheel chariot = war -sword = practical use -southern imports and other prestige goods => real-world military leaders Glauberg -hilltop settlement + princely tumulus (both dating to LT A) -a small fortified settlement -no southern imports, no signs of specialised production, no wheel-turned pottery -in a rather periferal area -stress on fortification = a refuge? -overlooking a tumulus with a moumental access corridor…. … with two warrior burials…. …and a stone statue on the mound A lot in common with the Hirschlanden statue… adapted for the new times  Glauberg is a new iteration of the concept of Late Hallstatt elite though adapted to a different social reality -what changed is the warrior stylization of the dead and the style of local metalwork, best exemplified by the beaked flagon: not an import (there are no imports in the grave) but a local product in a completely new artistic style -the fist attempt at transalpine adaptation of Mediterranean prestige goods comes from early V BC from Heuneburg -handle attachment of a bronze vessel imitating Etruscan models rather faithfully in terms of both style and subject matter.. But it‘s just the beginning Kleinaspergle Kleinaspergle A beaked flagon entirely based on Etruscan models but locally made with different proportions and figural emebellishments in a very non-Etruscan style Kleinaspergle -Attic red-figure cup mended/decorated with gold-leaf elements in the same style as the flagon attachment [a sidenote: in 1921, the classical archaeologist Paul Jacobsthal came to Stuttgart to study the painting on the cup… inspired by the piece, he ended up indulging in study of La Tène art and publishing the first monograph on it in 1944] -the rise of the LT culture signifies a large-scale social transformation including redefinition of elites but also a new approach to art -art is not a meaningless dispensable embellishment of the past reality, it directly reflects large-scale intellectual revolution and probably also end of some previously valid religious practices – taboo on depiction of living creatures disappears and the new style is based not only on Mediterranean models but also on knowledge and skills acquired from the Mediterranean, including advanced geometrics Greek model – palmette/lotus frieze (southern Italy, late VI/early V BC) The same motif stylized into geometric shapes (Belgium, mid/late V BC) The same geometric shapes further stylized and alternately mirrored -the single geometric forms are decomposed into the single elements and these further re-arranged into new compositions These arrangements are never haphazard but always based on rigorously applied rules of geometry -the same geomteric rules apply to (relatively rare) depiction of living creatures -openwork belt-hooks of the so-called Ticino class are inspired by the Mediterranean motif of Master of the beasts translated into Early La Tène art style -common in both Italy and Transalpine Europe, their origin was for some time disputed -most likely they are Transalpine but their massive presence in Italy proofs active interaction between both areas https://www.academia.edu/7487616/Mo bility_and_Cultural_Change_of_the_Earl y_Celts_La_T%C3%A8ne_Openwork_Belt -Hooks_North_and_South_of_the_Alps Masque brooches -equally analytical approach to depiction as with Early La Tène art in general -often combination of human and animal traits Dürrnberg bei Hallein (Salzburg) Glauberg (Hessen) Basse-Yutz (Moselle) -the most masterly application of Early La Tène art is on local beaked flagons of which the pair from Basse-Yutz is the most splendid example -pair of identical flagons with coral inlays Btw coral in Iron Age Europe -present already from Ha and through LT A and B periods -inlays in bronze objects or individual twigs -the provenance (southern France or Italy) is disputed… LT A–BHa D2–3 https://cez-archaeometrie.academia.edu/SebastianF%C3%BCrst the state of art information on Iron Age corals can be found by Sebastian Fürst Another btw.: -wheel thrown pottery started appearing in central Europe in Ha D (Heuneburg) -inspired by the ‚céramique grise monochrome‘ of southern France? -or from Italy? -in LT A the technology of wheel throwing becomes widespread (though by no means generalised or exclusive) for fine wares LATE HALLSTATT AND EARLY LA TÈNE PERIOD IN BOHEMIA AND RELATIONS WITH MEDITERRANEAN LT A -more intense occupation and concentration of rich graves in Southern and South-Western Bohemia -obvious central places with evidence of contacts with Mdtrrn reappear in Ha D2/LT A -Bohemia becomes one of focal points in emergence of LT A culture The Kaliště - Bezděkov hillfort North Pontic area -Traditional explanation is that Scythian raids in the Carpathian basin made trade routes („amber route“) shift further west to Bohemia… -or Bohemia was for differennt reasons part of the processes going on in the West? -Scythian artefacts are not absent in Bohemia but it does not necessarily explain everything distribution of Early La Tène swords in graves in Bohemia Bohemia replicates the model of warrior graves developping in parallel in the Rhine-Main-Mosel region  Few rich graves (with imports and swords) and a series of richer graves with swords  Concentration in the SW - S Branov, okr Rakovník Chlum, okr. Rokycany All that a LT A elie grave should have: -sword -imports -LT A art on prestige objects Chýnov, Praha západ Manětín-Hrádek Including a depiction of full human figure which is not completely LT A but has some interesting Mediterranean connotations Manětín-HrádekJikve (o. Nymburk) The very fact that a human is depicted is quite a Mediterranean feature, this figure is moreover wearing turn-up shoes, which is a fashionable Etruscan footwear of the period, documented also as a fineware pottery vessel in Jikev, Manětín-HrádekJikve (o. Nymburk) The very fact that a human is depicted is quite a Mediterranean feature, this figure is moreover wearing turn-up shoes, which is a fashionable Etruscan footwear of the period, documented also as a fineware pottery vessel in Jikev, Manětín-Hrádek -and also something of a non-elite evidence: -not unlike in the west, LT A culture touches all strata of society, sometimes even with the same intricacy and sophistication -wheel thrown pottery produced by specialised potters becomes widespread (perhaps as a lowlevel prestige gift creating bond between elite and intermediate strata of society) https://www.academia.edu/30479397/Th%C3%A9r_R.-Mangel_T.-Gregor_M._2015- Life_of_a_potter_begins_in_LT_A.pdf https://www.academia.edu/6612526/Th%C3%A9r_R._- _Mangel_T._2014_Inovace_a_specializace_v_hrn%C4%8D%C3%AD%C5%99sk%C3%A9m_%C5%99e mesle_v_dob%C4%9B_lat%C3%A9nsk%C3%A9_model_v%C3%BDvoje_organiza%C4%8Dn%C3%ADc h_forem_v%C3%BDroby._Archeologick%C3%A9_rozhledy_66_3-39 - stamped pottery -stamping as decoration follows the same principles as the high LT A art – patterns composed of geometrical shapes (exceptionally figures) https://www.academia.edu/2348703/Kunst_f%C3%BCr _alle_Einige_Bemerkungen_zur_stempelverzierten_ Keramik.. -the same geometrical principles and the same intelectual package as in elite art decoration structure (Neředín, okr. Olomouc) Tuchoměřice, okr. Praha západ => LT A is a cultural and intellectual revolution whose Mediterranean roots were thorgoughly reelaborated and touched the entire population Dobrovíz, okr. Praha západ Libkovice (okr. Most) Kanín , okr. Nymburk Some scholars considered LT A stamping to be directly inspired by Italian stamped wares of VII – VI BC … -but these are too early and the approach to stamúing is completely different (boring friezes of repeting motifs) -much more likely they translate in LT style the painted (or stamped?) decoration of Attic pottery Závist http://www.archeologickyatlas.cz/en/lokace/lhota_pz_oppidum_zavist 1963 – 1898 excavations of the Archeological Institute, Prague -discoveries of unexpected complexity and scale whose interpretation went too far in some aspects including those of Mdtrrn contacts More details here p. 129–130 https://www.academia.edu/39772510/the_Celts_2018_2019_- _Religion_and_Sanctuaries The acropolis – extremely complex straigraphy and unexpected structures 1st horizon – series of large houses and an enclosure 2nd horizon – a huge enclosure with a single large building 3rd horizon – the entire summit is terraced into a huge plateau delimited by a ditch on which a series of structures are built -the structures on the plateau were extremely boldly interpreted as cult buildings inspired by Etruscan temples ?!?! All this inspite of: No evidence of cultic function No evidence of the actual superstructures Extremely naive use of Mdtrrn analogies and vocabulary There is no doubt that the site was extremely significant with huge labour investment in the earthworks and presumably enormous social and very likely religious significance…but the proposed interpretation has nothing to do with reality and only obscures the actual understanding of the site and btw… There are no (real) Mdtrrn imports in Závist! The only exception is one brooch from Spain which is curious but doesn‘t fit into the picture of interaction with Italy All the other „Mediterranean“ finds are only conjectures https://www.academia.edu/36254964/Non- invasIve_materIal_and_traceologIcal_research_of_the_stone_head _from_celtIc_settlement_Z%C3%A1vIst_near_Prague A stray find of stone head possibly of the Early LT phase Once again, the Mdtttn influence is only filtered ALL WE (DON‘T) KNOW ABOUT (REAL) MDTRRN IMPORTS IN LT A BOHEMIA https://www.academia.edu/36710370/Imports_as_indicato rs_of_interregional_routes_in_Early_Iron_Age_Bohemia https://www.academia.edu/35129269/Bemerkungen_zur_ keltischen_Kunst_und_zur_mediterranen_Importen_in_Fr %C3%BChlat%C3%A8nezeit_in_B%C3%B6hmen https://www.academia.edu/39772548/the_Celts_2018_201 9_-_Bohemia_and_Mediterranean (p. 282–286) Useful overviews here (you are not obliged to believe everything that is written there) Bronze vessels Always in elite graves Beaked flagons or parts thereof stamnos Basins with beaded rim Basins All these types are common in Northern Italy and the Rhinelands Hradiště u Písku Chlum u Rokycan Hořín [9] Písek [7] Glass vessel fragment (perfume bottle from Strakonice Bologna Though their production is often associated with Phoenicians or the island of Rhodes, these vessels are extremely common in Northern Italy. Whether produced in the Middle East, in Greece or Southern Italy, Phoenicians had no share on the contacts with the Central Europe… just to make things clear… Wine amphora Only one fragment is known so far (many could have been overlooked because mistaken for modern pottery or roof-tiles) https://www.academia.edu/19576034/The_first_find_of_a_Greek_transport_a mphora_in_the_Late_Hallstatt_Early_La_T%C3%A8ne_Bohemia_and_its_signifi cance_for_the_archaeology_of_interregional_contacts Greek painted pottery Attic Black-figure (VI – early V BC), Red-figure (V BC) and Black-glaze pottery Kadaň – Jezerka A single sherd of late VI century black-figure cup in Kadaň Droužkovice -a few sherds of V BC black-gloss cups from a elite enclosure in Droužkovice Praha-Ruzyně Jiviny .. and a whole lot of mid V BC attic redfigure pottery in simple settlements around Prague, always among waste in simple settlement pits Praha-Pitkovice .. and a whole lot of mid V BC attic redfigure pottery in simple settlements around Prague .. and a whole lot of mid V BC attic redfigure pottery in simple settlements around Prague, always among waste in simple settlement pits Tuchoměřice .. and a whole lot of mid V BC attic redfigure pottery in simple settlements around Prague, always among waste in simple settlement pits Dobrovíz .. and a whole lot of mid V BC attic redfigure pottery in simple settlements around Prague, always among waste in simple settlement pits Local imitations of Attic pottery - Attic pottery imitations Chržín (o. Mělník) Plzeň – Roudná Radovesice, okr. Teplice Tuněchody, okr. Chrudim And even a ceramic imitation of a beaked flagon from a simple settlement in Tuněchody in Eastern Bohemia  metal vessels in elite burials  Attic pottery in mundane settlements  Hillforts without imports…. … if someone understands it, let me know, please…