RURAL LAND USE PLANNING: INTRODUCTION Content • Significance • Priorities and challenges • Interventions • Institutional framework • Effectiveness • Clarify aims Œ SIGNIFICANCE Rural planning has been the poor relation to urban planning • Problems dispersed and ‘disguised’ • Post-war reconstruction • Agriculture and forestry excluded from planning permission • Image is tranquil and unchanging  PRIORITIES OF RURAL PLANNING • Urban development • Food production • Resources (timber, minerals, water) • Conservation • Recreation • Place of peace and solitude Challenges faced by rural planning • Managing change Ž INTERVENTIONS IN RURAL PLANNING “Gilg-Selman spectrum” • Public ownership • Regulatory controls • Monetary disincentives • Financial incentives • Voluntary approaches • Agency or body • Designations • Market methods  INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK Lord Haskins Review of Rural Service Delivery (Autumn, 2003) • Better accountability • Readiness for policy change • Devolution • Customer focus • Simplicity • Co-ordination • Value for money EFFECTIVENESS OF RURAL PLANNING Planning constraints coffin (Gilg, 1996) • Imperfect knowledge • Influence of personalities, ideologies and political shifts • Socio-economic & political realities • Pressure of day-to-day events • Restrictions of existing environment • Unforseen events and unexpected results of past policies Problems of policy evaluation • Whose goals? • Policies change over time • ‘Counter-factual’ problem • Unintended consequences ‘ AIMS • Examine the nature of changes taking place in the countryside and the processes involved • Evaluate the impact of policies, plans and management schemes which seek to guide the processes of change Four main components of rural land use change • Growth and changing composition of urban areas • Changes in agricultural sector • Extension of forest and woodland • Growing competition for rural land from ‘quasi-urban’ uses