• 6.1. Raw material Vertebrates: • Liver studies – rat • Skeletal muscle studies – rabbit • Organs (heart, brain, kidney, thymus) – cow or pig • Blood or placenta – human Invertebrates: • Are very small • Difficult to dissect organ of interest from each individual Plants: • Spinach (Spinacia oleracea) chloroplast • Beta vulgaris Microorganisms: • Yeast • Bacteria 6.1.1. Species used for protein purification 6.1. Raw material 6.1.2. Freshness and storage Yeast cakes remain viable: - weeks (0°C) - month (frozen) - years (sealed under vacuum or in nitrogen) Bacterial host cells: higher concentration of recombinant protein production - protein insolubility - biologically inactive proteins - protein processing Figure 1. Growth of organisms in nutrient-rich medium. The ideal time for harvesting is toward the end of the log phase before growth rate slows, giving a high yield of cells. But specific enzymes may be maximum at an earlier or later stage, so some trials at different times are desirable. 6.1. Raw material 6.1.2. Freshness and storage 6.1. Raw material 6.1.2. Freshness and storage “Usually, the sooner the raw material is used, the better and more physiologically relevant the preparation will be.” •Natural degradative processes will have started. Frozen storage: • Free water freezes and ice crystals grow – very destructive for membrane layers and organelles, not for protein. • Decreasing temperature causes the remaining liquid to become increasingly concentrated – solubility problem. • pH changes drastically before complete solidification. • Proteases liberated from lysosomes are activated. • Freezing of extracts is sometimes preferable (proteolytic enzyme inhibitors). • Thawing speed can be important – the faster, the better. 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction Extraction of protein from tissues and cells is perhaps the most critical step in any protein purification or proteomics strategy. The principal aim: • Achieve reproducibility. • The highest degree of cell breakage. • Minimal disruptive forces. • Maintaining protein integrity (avoiding altering the native structure – biological activity). Perturbation of native protein structure can be caused by exposure to: • Extreme pHs, • Extremes temperatures, • Mechanical stress (shearing forces), • Pressure, or • Proteolytic degradation (association with host proteins). 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction Hand-operated or motor driven Waring blender Ultrasound Vibrating bead mill Manton-Gaulin homogenizer 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.1. Mammalian tissues • Frozen tissue stored below -50°C • Dice tissues and cut away connective tissue and fat • Extraction buffer: 2-3 vol/gram of tissue. • Waring blender (30 s) • Stir the homogenate (10-15 min) • Check the pH • Centrifuge (5,000-10,000 g/max 60 min) • Decant extract through Miracloth • Gentler conditions (Nonidet P-40), keep the sample cold, add protease inhibitors 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.1. Mammalian tissues 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.1. Mammalian tissues 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.1. Mammalian tissues 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.1. Mammalian tissues 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.1. Mammalian tissues 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.1. Mammalian tissues 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.1. Mammalian tissues 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.2. Erythrocytes • Collect red blood cells by centrifugation. • Rinse with isotonic NaCl (0.9%, 0.15 M). • Osmotic lysis with water (2 vol/1 vol packed cells). • Selectively remove hemoglobin (90%) – ethanol/chloroform. Scanning electron micrograph of blood cells. From left to right: human erythrocyte, thrombocyte (platelet), leukocyte. 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.3. Soft plant tissues • 0.5-1 vol of cold extraction buffer • 20-30 mM of β-mercaptoethanol • Homogenize in blender (30 s) • Centrifuge as soon as possible (2-3 x 105 g min) (minimize oxidative browning). • Addition of powdered polyvinylpyrrolidone (for adsorbing phenols). 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.4. Yeasts • Mechanical disruption (Manton-Gaulin homogenizer) 2-5 vol/gram wet weight. • Toluene autolysate (35-40°C) after 20-30 min. • Ammonia cytolysis (0.5 M NH4OH) 2 vol/gram wet weight (16 -20 h). Bring pH down (1-2 vol of water plus acetic acid). • Bead mill (1 g/3 ml of buffer) “Merckenschlager”. • Manual beading (glass beads of diameter 0.5, suitable bottle, shaken manually for 5-10 min). • Enzymatic lysis (mixture containing mannanases, glucanases and chitinases). 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.5. Bacteria • Sonication • Dissolution of solids • Dispersion of particulates in liquids • Sonochemistry and chemical reaction acceleration • Degassing of solutions • Bead-milling (vortexing with glass beads) • French press (8,000–20,000 psi [55-140 MPa], 10-30 ml) • Grinding with abrasive agents (alumina or sand) • Lysozyme (enzyme digestion 0.2 mg/ml + DNAase 10 ug/ml) • Nitrogen cavitation – 800 psi (5.5 MPa) 1 – 1000 ml Sonication https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykvS2gldQnw 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.5. Bacteria Small-scale disintegration of bacteria. Glass beads are added to a small test tube (e.g. 15 mm diameter) to a depth of about 10 mm. A slurry of cells in buffer (e.g. 1 g wet weight in 5 ml of buffer) is added until up to 5 mm above the glass beads. The mixture is vortexmixed for 2-5 min. The extract is sampled from the surface of the beads and centrifuged in a microcentrifuge tube. 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.5. Bacteria A different problem can occur with E. coli expression system, where the expressed recombinant protein appears in the crude extract: • Insoluble aggregates – “inclusion bodies” need to be solubilized in a strong denaturant (e.g. Guanidin hydrochloride or urea). • Lysis conditions will depend on whether the lysate is to be used for: • Immunoprecipitation studies, • Western blotting, • 2D electrophoresis, • Native target protein isolation using conventional chromatographic purification procedures, or • Recombinant protein purification procedures that rely on the target protein expressed as fusion protein including a purification “handle” or “tag”. 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.5. Bacteria 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.5. Bacteria 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.5. Bacteria 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.5. Bacteria 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.5. Bacteria Inclusion body formation can be prevented and the soluble fraction of the target protein increased by: • Lowering temperature from 37°C to 30°C, 22°C or even lower, • Varying the media composition and using different strains, • Co-expression of molecular chaperones, • Fusion of the target protein with a highly soluble protein, or • Growing cells in the presence of sorbitol and glycyl betaine. Two major advantages of inclusion bodies: • By sequestering recombinant protein, these bodies permit the cell to express the protein at high levels. • The inclusion bodies can be readily purified away from bacterial cytoplasmic proteins by centrifugation. 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.5. Bacteria 6.2. Cell disintegration and extraction 6.2.6. Fatty tissues • Homogenization difficulties • Large amounts of detergent • Acetone powder 6.3. Optimization and clarification of the extract • Adjust the acidification (cause the aggregation). • The best method is to make small-scale extract using a large volume (10ml/g) of extractant, and measure the amount of activity after different times of treatment. • Isoosmotic buffer – for isolating organelles (sucrose, mannitol or sorbitol). • EDTA (1–5 mM) destabilize complexes and inhibit proteases. • β-mercaptoethanol (reducing condition). • Typical buffers: 20-50 mM phosphate, pH 7–7.5; 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 0.1 M KCl with a little buffer in it. • Ionic strength inside (0.15–0.2 M). 6.3. Optimization and clarification of the extract Provided that the protein wanted, acidification can be most beneficial if: 1. does not also isoelectrically precipitate at the pH used, 2. does not adsorb to the precipitate forming, and 3. remains stable at the subphysiological pH. The extract should be: • kept cold, • controlled for pH after stirring 10-20 min, • readjusted after pH measurement. • Plant tissues - are more acidic. • Microorganisms - contain large amount of nucleic acid. - The cell wall and extracellular material may either be finely dispersed (turbid extract) or partially solubilized (gum-like polysaccharide in solution). A common procedure is to treat with substances that cause precipitation of the nucleic acids and associated compounds. These include: • Streptomycin (precipitates ribonuclear proteins and clarifies the extract) • Protamine (precipitates DNA and RNA complexes) • Polyethyleneimine (precipitates nucleic acids and causes precipitation of aggregated nucleoproteins) 6.3. Optimization and clarification of the extract. 6.4. Extraction of membrane proteins Many proteins and enzymes are not naturally present in an aqueous phase: • cell membrane proteins in prokaryotes; • in gram-negative organisms, periplasmic proteins immobilized between the outer and inner membranes; • in multicellular eukaryotes, individual cell membranes and organelles (mitochondria, nuclei, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, vacuolar and lysosomal membranes). Membrane proteins are categorized as: • peripheral (loosely associated on the surface of the membrane) or • integral. 6.4. Extraction of membrane proteins How to release membrane proteins as soluble: 1. Sonication 2. EDTA, EGTA at 1-10 mM 3. Mild alkaline conditions (pH 8-11) at low ionic strength 4. Dilute non-ionic detergent 5. Low concentrations of partially miscible organic solvents such as n- butanol 6. High ionic strength, e.g., 1 M NaCl 7. Phospholipase treatment Some proteins have hydrophobic patches on the surface which will mutually attract, resulting in aggregation. Some detergents commonly used for extraction of membrane proteins. In general, the ionic detergents are more solubilizing, but also are more likely to denaturate the solubilized proteins. Nonionic: • Tween 20 • Tween 80 • Triton X-100 • Triton X-114 • Emulgens • Lubrol • Digitonin • Octyl glukoside Zwitterionic: • Lysoletcithin • CHAPS • CHAPSO • Zwitergents Ionic: • Cholate • Deoxycholate • CTAB • SDS – dodecyl sulfate 6.4. Extraction of membrane proteins 6.4. Extraction of membrane proteins • 5 mg/ml protein suspension requires at least 1% of detergent. • All detergents form micelles. • Micelle clusters range from 30,000 to 100,000. • Triton X-114 extracts membrane proteins at close to 0°C using 1-3% detergent. • Chloral hydrate in 100% aqueous w/v. Chloral hydrate is produced from chlorine and ethanol in acidic solution. In basic conditions, the haloform reaction takes place and chloroform is produced. 4 Cl2 + C2H5OH + H2O Cl3CCH(OH)2 + 5 HCl 6.5. Differential detergent fractionation Differential detergent extraction is an established method for cell fractionation, which partitions subcellular constituents into functionally and structurally distinct compartments. Differential detergent fractionation (DDF) applicable for fractionation: • cell grown in suspension • monolayer culture • whole tissues • further subfractionation DDF preserves the structural and functional integrity of cellular proteins and is useful in a variety of proteome research applications: • Determine the subcellular localization of biological proteins. • Semi-purify compartment-specific macromolecules. • Enrich for low-abundance proteins. • Investigate dynamic interactions between cytosolic and structural entities (membranes bind the cytoskeleton). • Monitor treatment-induced compartmental redistributions of macromolecules. 6.5. Differential detergent fractionation 6.5. Differential detergent fractionation 6.6. Preparation of subcellular extracts The aim of subcellular fractionation is to separate cellular compartments with minimal damage. • Homogenization of tissues and cells followed by separation of cellular organelles: • achieves maximum cell breakage in a reproducible manner, • uses disruptive forces that minimize damage to the organelles of interest, and • retains the original structure and functional integrity of the organelles of interest. The principal methods for disrupting cells (osmotic shock, ultrasonic vibration, mechanical grinding or shearing, and nitrogen cavitation): • Centrifugal methods that separate organelles by size • Immunoisolation methods that use antibodies • Electrophoresis methods that separate proteins on the basis of surface charge distribution 6.7.1. Lysis of cultured cells for immunoprecipitation 6.7. Sample protocols 6.7.1. Lysis of cultured cells for immunoprecipitation 6.7. Sample protocols 6.7.1. Lysis of cultured cells for immunoprecipitation 6.7. Sample protocols 6.7.2. Lysis of cultured cells for immunoblotting 6.7. Sample protocols 6.7.2. Lysis of cultured cells for immunoblotting6.7. Sample protocols 6.7.3. Disruption of cultured cells by nitrogen cavitation 6.7. Sample protocols 6.7.3. Disruption of cultured cells by nitrogen cavitation 6.7. Sample protocols 6.7.3. Disruption of cultured cells by nitrogen cavitation 6.7. Sample protocols 6.7.3. Disruption of cultured cells by EmulsiFlex-C3 6.7. Sample protocols The EmulsiFlex-C3 homogenizer is powered by an electric motor. There are no "O"-rings or gaskets in the entire path of the product. No compressor is needed to run the pump. 6.7.3. Disruption of cultured cells by Pressure Cell Homogenizer 6.7. Sample protocols https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9-G-n4crpk • Continuously adjustable proces pressure from 1,500 psi (10 MPa) to 60,000 psi (410 MPa) allows processing of ingredients that are difficult or uneconomical to process in any other way, offering the widest scope of formulations • The homogenising valve features ceramic needle and seat with profiled geometry for optimised performance. Pneumatically controlled, it provides constant pressure and allows fine adjustment • Choice of (easily interchangeable) processing cells: 1 ml, 10 ml, 18 ml and 35 ml • The inverted design and full-stroking piston with bore seal practically eliminates dead volume • Can be run in single-shot mode - including very viscous formulations - and continuous mode (except the 1 ml cell). The flow rate in both modes is adjustable from drop-by drop to 200 ml/min (depending on the processing cell and formulation) • All wetted parts are simply removable without tools in less than one minute for cleaning, sterilization (including autoclave), pre-cooling, or pre-warming, all as required by the sample/process • Three options for temperature control