Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311 -325 https://doi.Org/10.1007/sl 2033-022-00567-0
REVIEW PAPER
®
Check for updates
A Review on the Mechanism and Applications of CRISPR/Cas9/Cas121 Casl 3/Casl 4 Proteins Utilized for Genome Engineering
V. Edwin Hillary1© • S. Antony Ceasar1
Received: 16 May 2022 / Accepted: 15 September 2022 / Published online: 27 September 2022
©The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022
Abstract
The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR/Cas) system has altered life science research offering enormous options in manipulating, detecting, imaging, and annotating specific DNA or RNA sequences of diverse organisms. This system incorporates fragments of foreign DNA (spacers) into CRISPR cassettes, which are further transcribed into the CRISPR arrays and then processed to make guide RNA (gRNA). The CRISPR arrays are genes that encode Cas proteins. Cas proteins provide the enzymatic machinery required for acquiring new spacers targeting invading elements. Due to programmable sequence specificity, numerous Cas proteins such as Cas9, Casl2, Casl3, and Casl4 have been exploited to develop new tools for genome engineering. Cas variants stimulated genetic research and propelled the CRISPR/Cas tool for manipulating and editing nucleic acid sequences of living cells of diverse organisms. This review aims to provide detail on two classes (class 1 and 2) of the CRISPR/Cas system, and the mechanisms of all Cas proteins, including Casl2, Casl3, and Casl4 discovered so far. In addition, we also discuss the pros and cons and recent applications of various Cas proteins in diverse fields, including those used to detect viruses like severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This review enables the researcher to gain knowledge on various Cas proteins and their applications, which have the potential to be used in next-generation precise genome engineering.
Keywords CRISPR • Cas system • Genome engineering • DETECTR • SHERLOCK
Introduction
Genome editing or gene editing is a popular technology used in medicines, therapeutic drugs, infectious studies, and agricultural biotechnology. The genome-editing tools have been employed to study the precise function of a gene by cutting and altering at a programmed locus through insertion, deletion, or replacement of targeted bases. In the beginning, conventional gene-editing techniques like homologous recombination (HR) were utilized for gene inactivation, but the effectiveness of HR was extremely low with the labor-intensive process [1]. Later, targeted gene knock-down utilizing RNA interference (RNAi) technique has provided researchers with rapid and low-cost technology to silence the gene of interest to study its functions. However, it also could not completely knock-down the targeted sequence,
E3 S. Antony Ceasar
antony_sm2003 @yahoo.co.in
1    Department of Biosciences, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, 683 104, Cochin, Kerala, India
which faced unpredictable off-target effects and delivered only temporary or partial inhibition of gene function [2].
The genome-editing technique needs programmable sequence-specific endonucleases to produce the site-specific single-stranded breaks (SSBs) or double-stranded breaks (DSBs) at the targeted site that allow the endogenous repair mechanisms to fill the breaks [3]. These breaks are fixed by either of the two major repair mechanisms, (1) homology-directed repair (HDR) and (2) non-homologous end-joining repair (NHEJ) [4]. To facilitate specific DNA breaks, various genome-editing tools are developed previously, such as meganucleases or homing endonucleases [5], zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) [6], and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) [7]. But these tools demand laborious efforts for cloning and protein construction to make DSBs, which hinders these tools from routine applications of genome editing. In 2012, the researchers developed clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated proteins (Cas) system-based genome editing tools [8]. CRISPR/Cas system mediates diverse adaptive immune systems against phages or
Springer
312
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311-325
plasmids. Due to unique features of simplicity in design, cost-effectiveness, and labor intensity, the research community has immediately adopted the CRISPR/Cas system as a user-friendly and robust RNA-guided DNA targeting tool for genome editing in various species [8-11]. Based on the mechanism, the CRISPR system has been divided into two main classes (1 and 2) and six types (I-VI) [12]. In these, types I to III were extensively studied, whereas types IV and VI were recently discovered. Types I, II, and V cut DNA, type VI cleaves RNA, type III cleaves both DNA and RNA and the cleavage activity of type IV has not yet been identified [13].
Cas9 protein has been utilized for diverse applications such as fluorescent imaging, base-editing, and transcriptional activation, apart from targeted cleavage of dsDNA. Like Cas9, the CaslO protein is also involved in various applications such as fluorescent imaging, base-editing, and RNA tracking. As an alternative to Cas9 and CaslO, the Cas 12 protein enhanced genome-editing efficiency by targeting only T-rich motifs without utilizing tracrRNA. So Cas 12 system has expanded editing applications such as base-editing and detecting transcriptional variations. Cas 13 protein is also used for diverse applications such as imaging, base-editing, and detection of transcriptional variations. Recently, the Cas 14 protein has advanced genome-editing efficiency without needing an adjacent protospacer motif (PAM) and performs transcriptional regression and base-editing. This review describes the Cas variants of two classes of CRISPR systems used for genome editing.
History of CRISPR/Cas System
A group of researchers detected CRISPRs by analyzing the alkaline phosphatase gene, which is liable for the isozyme conversion of alkaline phosphatase (iap) in the E. coli K-12 strain [14]. They identified a genomic region that contains a series of 32 nucleotides of distinctive sequences flanked by invariable palindromic repeats on the 3' end of the iap gene [14]. Later, distinctive parallel sequences were found in the other E. coli strains and Enterobacteria {Shigella dysenteriae and Salmonella entericd) [15]. Similarly, during the study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, researchers identified 36 bp repeats interspaced with unique spacers of 35-41 bp [16].
In subsequent works, the CRISPR array was found in archaea (Haloferax mediterranei and Streptococcus thermopile'), and the same was identified in 90% bacterial and 40% archaeal genomes [17]. However, this odd genomic sequence first turned out to be the outline of the CRISPR array. Still, due to the absence of necessary genome sequence data, the biological function of CRISPR remained elusive. Jansen et al. in 2002 described the CRISPR-associated genes [18].
Following this, several CRISPR/Cas genes were identified. In 2005, spacer sequence was identified in many genomes, and unique spacer regions were found within the CRISPR array [19]. These results showed that CRISPR is an adaptive immune system to defend prokaryotic cells against phage infection through the RNA-guided process.
Classification of CRISPR/Cas System
The CRISPR system has been classified into two major classes. In the Class 1 system, the RNA-guided target cleavage needs several effector proteins, but the Class 2 system requires only one RNA-guided endonuclease to cleave the DNA sequences [12, 20]. The class 1 system of CRISPR is divided into three types I, III, and IV, and the Class 2 system is divided into types II, V, and VI [21, 22]. In the type I system, the CRISPR/Cas locus contains the Cas3 signature gene that encodes a large protein with a helicase to unwind DNA-DNA and RNA-DNA duplexes [23]. The type II locus encodes multidomain protein to target and cleave the dsDNA [8]. The type III CRISPR/Cas possesses the CaslO signature gene, encodes a multidomain protein with palm domain to target, and cleaves ssDNA [24]. Type IV system contains CRISPR-associated splicing factor 1 (Csfl), which encodes a ribonucleic protein, but the detailed function of this system is yet to be identified [21]. Type V locus possesses Cas 12 signature gene (known as CRISPR from Prevotella and Francisella 1 (Cpfl), C2cl or C2c3 protein) encodes RuvC (an E. coli protein involved in DNA repair) domain, which cleaves both dsDNA or ssDNA [25]. Type VI contains Cas 13 (C2c2) that encodes higher eukaryotes and prokaryotes' nucleotide-binding domain (HEPN), which cleaves ssRNA [26] (Table 1).
The CRISPR/Cas system uses three stages to defend against viruses or foreign genetic materials [27] (Fig. 1). In the first stage, protospacers are incorporated into the host CRISPR locus as spacers between crRNA repeats [28]; next, Cas proteins are expressed, a spacer is transcribed into pre-crRNA, and the pre-crRNA is cleaved by Cas proteins and becomes functional as a mature crRNA [28]. In the third stage, Cas protein recognizes the target with the help of crRNA and generates cleavage of the genome [28]. Many CRISPR systems act based on the presence of a sequence-specific PAM, which is adjacent to the crRNA-specific site within the target genome.
CRISPR/Cas System
Scientists have discovered a novel microbial defense system that defends itself from viral and mobile genetic elements. One of the defense mechanisms found in bacterium and
Springer
Molecular Biotechnology
(2023) 65:311-325
313
pi
o
pi p*
Pi
U
3 B S 2 to
u
.S
u
u
S s"
P* H
c/} S
H
u
■a p.
u
cd o U
U
U
U
u
<
D
U
U
U
Pi P*
t/3
2
u
u
u
u
cd (J U
U
U
U
U
D
U
-s .
8 T) c
F c S>
i- cd oo
I § *
u
-H _
tí
U
U
S <
i u
U U
u
D
U U
U
u
u
u
(N
u
u
u
u
u
u <
D
c«
Td Td
u
U
U
Incorporation
into the bacterial DNA/
Casl / Cas2   Viral DNA
CRISPR locus
Spacer  Spacer Spacer
V
Spacers and\tracrRNA tracrRNA expression
l^TTTTTTTTTT |
Pre-crRNA processing
Ribonucleoprotein complex
DNA Hybridization and cleavage
pre-crRNA
Fig. 1 CRISPR/Cas adaptive immunity system. The three stages such as CRISPR adaptation (stage 1), CRISPR RNA biogenesis (stage 2), and CRISPR interference (stage 3) are schematically illustrated. During the adaption stage, the injection of genetic material (virus) into bacterial cells triggers the Casl and Cas2 adaption module proteins, which cleaves the invading sequences (spacers) and are then incorporated into the CRISPR array. During CRISPR/RNA biogenesis stage, the CRISPR array is transcribed into a precursor to crRNA molecules (pre-crRNA), which are then cleaved into mature crRNAs. These mature crRNAs form effector complexes with Cas proteins. When foreign genetic material sequences match a CRISPR spacer, the matching crRNA binds to the invading strand and cleaves the invading strand with the help of Cas nuclease (CRISPR interference stage)
archaea is referred to as CRISPR/Cas system. By integrating DNA sequences into their genome identical to previous invaders, bacteria and archaea generate a cellular memory of them [29]. These acquired sequences permit them to spot viruses or mobile genetic invaders resulting in the degradation of the invading sequences and work as an adaptive immune system [29, 30].
CRISPR immunity is denoted by distinct phases. In the adaptation phase, bacterium and archaea gain cellular memory of the invading phages [30]. The phage genome sequences are integrated into the CRISPR locus of the bacterial or archaeal genomes, composed of 24 to 47 base pair (bp) repeats and separated by spacers. The unique loci of the CRISPR system were first discovered in 1987 [14]. Then Bolotin et al. in 2005 identified CRISPR's function (enzymes encoding Cas genes generate DNA fragmentation)
ô Sprin:
ger
314
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311-325
involved in protecting the bacteria and archaea from foreign invaders [31]. Later, scientists revealed that the CRISPR/Cas system works as an adaptive immune system [32] that was eventually adopted as a versatile system for RNA programmable genome editing [8].
Cas Proteins of the CRISPR System
Cas proteins have gained popularity among the research community for broader genome engineering applications and are currently used in diverse fields, including biotechnology, agriculture, and medical research. Recently discovered programmable Cas proteins like Cas 12, Cas 13, and Cas 14 have improved the precision of the CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing (Table 2). The mechanism of these different Cas proteins, pros and cons, and their applications are summarized in detail below.
acquisition in vivo; however, the molecular mechanism behind these proteins throughout immunity is unclear [43]. Casl and Cas2 proteins formed an integrase complex consisting of two distal Casl dimers bridged by a Cas2 dimer [44]. The Casl and Cas2 proteins bind to the pre-spacer like twin-folded DNA. The pre-spacer integrated the proximal leader region of the CRISPR array guided by the leader sequence with a pair of inverted repeats inside the CRISPR repeat [45].
Applications of Casl and Cas2 Proteins
Casl and Cas2 are the conserved proteins among all CRISPR/Cas systems. The molecular mechanism behind the Cas 1 and Cas2 proteins is still unclear. Hence, researchers have not applied these proteins for genome-editing in various fields.
Casl and Cas2 Proteins
Casl and Cas2 are generally conserved proteins in the prokaryotic adaptive immune system [28]. CRISPR/Cas system consists of a CRISPR array containing the repeats (~30 to 40 bp) separated by spacers, an adjacent module comprising Casl and Cas2, and the distinctive signature proteins [41].
Mechanism of Casl and Cas2 Proteins
Casl and Cas2 belong to the Type II CRISPR system found in E. coli [42]. E. coli Casl-Cas2 complex mediates spacer
Pros and Cons of Casl and Cas2 Proteins
So far, no genome editing studies have been demonstrated via Casl and Cas2 proteins; therefore, significant merits and demerits of Casl and Cas2 proteins should be evaluated before applying these in diverse fields.
Cas9 Protein
Cas9 is a protein associated with the CRISPR adaptive immune systems of S. pyogenes and is referred to as S/ryCas9 protein. The SpyCas9 protein had a large multifunctional
Table 2 Details on various CRISPR/Cas proteins with their host organism, sgRNA size, PAM sequence with their target molecule and cut site
Protein name   Host organism sgRNA        PAM sequence Target     Cut site References
sequence size
Cas9	S. pyogenes	20	5'-NGG-3'	dsDNA	5'of PAM	[33]
Cas9	S. pyogenes	-	5'-NAC, NTG, NTT, and NCG-3'	DNA	5'of PAM	[34]
Cas9	F. novicida	20	5'-NGG-3'	DNA	5'of PAM	-
Cas9	S. aureus	21	5-NNGRRT-3'	DNA	5'of PAM	[35]
Cas9	Neisseria meningitidis	24	5 '-NNNNGATT-3'	DNA	5'of PAM	[35]
Cas9	S. thermophilus	20	5-NNAGAAW 5'	DNA	5'of PAM	-
Cas9	S. thermophilus	20	5'-NGGNG-3	DNA	5'of PAM	[36]
Cas9	Campylobacter jejuna	22	NNNNACAC and NNNRYAC	DNA	5'of PAM	[37]
C2cl	Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris	20	T-rich PAM	DNA	5'of PAM	[38]
Cpfl	Prevotella and Francisella	20	TTTV	DNA	5'of PAM	[25]
Cpfl	Acidaminococcus sp.	24	5'-TTTN-3'	DNA	3'of PAM	[39]
Cas 12a	Acidaminococcus sp.	-	Thymine-rich PAM	DNA	5'of PAM	[37]
Cas 13	Lb	28	Non-G nucleotide at the 3' proto-spacer flanking site (PFS)	ssRNA	-	[26]
Cas 14	Uncultivated archaea	-	-	ssDNA	-	[40]
Springer
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311 -325
315
domain of 1368 amino acids and acts as a DNA endonucle-ase in natural and artificial CRISPR/Cas systems.
Mechanism of Cas9 Protein
The mechanism of Cas9 protein has been studied extensively. Cas9 protein has six domains (1) Recognition lobe (REC I), (2) REC II, (3) Arginine-rich bridge helix, (4) PAM Interacting, (5) HNH, and (6) RuvC. REC I is the major domain responsible for binding with the gRNA; the REC II function is not studied [46]. The arginine-rich bridge helix initiates cleavage activity upon binding to targeted sequences. The interaction with PAM confers PAM specificity, which is
responsible for binding with the target sequence. The HNH and RuvC are nuclease domains to chop the target sequence [46, 47] (Fig. 2).
The Cas9 protein remains inactive due to the absence of gRNA. The engineered gRNA forms a T-shape involved in 1 tetra-loop and 3 stem-loops [8, 46]. The gRNA is programmed to own a 5' end, which is complementary to the target sequence. The programmed gRNA binds to the Cas9 and generates changes in the protein, which leads the inactive Cas9 protein into its active form. Once triggered, it searches the target sequence by binding with a sequence that matches the PAM sequence (5'-NGG-3')- Then Cas9 cuts dsDNA at 3 bp upstream of the PAM using its HNH
(A)
RECI
RECII
t
HNH I RuvC
PAM interaction
X
v> a. a c
U o o
11 III MIM III
target specifi crRNA sequence
1 c—
tracrRNA
(B)
RECI
RECII
HNH
iimiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiii ........
RuvC
PAM interaction
guide RNA/ Cas9 complex
XT
•fTTTTTTTTT
Blunt ends
Fig. 2 Schematic illustration of CRISPR/Cas9 mechanism. A The Cas9 protein complex contains six domains (Recognition lobe (REC I), REC II, Arginine-rich bridge helix, PAM Interacting, HNH, and RuvC). REC I is the major domain responsible for binding with the gRNA, the REC II function is not studied. The arginine-rich bridge helix initiates cleavage activity upon binding to targeted sequences. The interaction with PAM confers PAM specificity, which is responsible for binding with the target sequence. The HNH and RuvC are
nuclease domains to chop the target sequence. The Cas9 protein remains inactive due to the absence of gRNA. B The programmed gRNA binds to the Cas9 and generates changes in the protein, which leads the inactive Cas9 protein into its active form. Once triggered, it searches the target sequence by binding with a sequence that matches the PAM sequence (5-NGG-3'). Then Cas9 generates DSBs at 3 bp upstream of the PAM using its HNH and RuvC domains
Springer
316
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311-325
and RuvC domains. The HNH domain cleaves the DNA strand that is complementary to the 20-nucleotide sequence (gRNA) of crRNA (target strand)) and the RuvC domain cleaves the DNA strand opposite to the complementary strand (non-target DNA strand). The spyCas9 system for cleaving target DNA recognizes a short 'seed' sequence with the 5'-NGG-3' di-nucleotide containing PAM [8]. The twin tracrRNA: crRNA was fused into a single guide RNA (sgRNA), making the CRISPR/Cas9 system to cut the targeted dsDNA or ssDNA sequences [8].
Application of Cas9 Protein
Cas9 protein holds great promise for efficient and targeted genome engineering applications in research, medicine, and biotechnology. The ease of genome modification in many species by simply designing a gRNA sequence enables large-scale genome editing experiments to probe genome function more than traditional gene editing techniques like TALEN and ZFN. Further, the Cas9 protein is also converted into an RNA-guided homing device (dCas9) by inactivating the
nuclease domains to slow down the transcription. Using effector fusion (Cas9 proteins or sgRNA) to alter transcription states of specific genomic loci, or rearrange the genome, can significantly expand the genome engineering modification utilizing the CRISPR/Cas9 system. CRISPR/Cas9 system has been widely adopted by researchers and applied in diverse fields, including microbes [48], plants [49-51], animals [52], insects [53, 54], and human cell lines [55] (briefly explained in Fig. 3).
Pros and Cons of Cas9 Protein
The advantage of the CRISPR/Cas9 system is the design simplicity with more efficiency than existing ZFN and TALEN systems [8]. Multiplexed genome editing is another significant advantage of Cas9, which can be achieved by designing multiple sequence-specific gRNAs simultaneously [8].
Despite numerous advances, CRISPR/Cas9 system faced several disadvantages and also opened numerous queries about risks associated with editing. One example is the
Generation of animal models
Zebrafishes Mice Rats Drosophila
Pigs Monkeys Xenopus tropicalis Caenorhabditis elegans Axolotls
Non-model organisms
Mosquitoes
Ticks Butterflies Silkworm Mites
Somatic genome editing
Mouse liver Mouse lung
Application of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Genome wide screening
Knockout libraries Loss of function screens Gain of function screens
Functional genomic screening
CRISPRi CRISPRa
Agricultural applications
Genomic engineering Development of resistance breeds (rice, wheat, etc.,)
Corrections of genetic disorders
Mouse cataracts
IMouse muscular dystrophy Human cystic fibrosis
Treaing infectious diseases
Cancer
Human Immuno Virus infection
Fig. 3 Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 system. CRISPR/Cas9 system has revolutionized genome engineering: its accuracy, rapidity, and affordability permit its use in a nearly limitless range of applications. Since its discovery, researchers have been using the CRISPR/ Cas9 system to cure diseases, discover new treatments, and for precision medicine. It does not stop there; beyond treating human dis-
eases, CRISPR/Cas9 is also being utilized for studying the model and non-model insects' biology, somatic genome editing, manufacturing biofuels, and engineering better crops (rice, wheat, etc.), etc. These advances made possible by the invention of the CRISPR/Cas9 system will change the lives of people globally
Springer
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311 -325
317
gRNA, which guides the Cas9 to cleave dsDNA or ssDNA showed higher on- and off-target mutations in the targeted organisms [9, 55]. Even the finest accessible CRISPR/Cas system that uses HDR also induces undesirable mutations. However, these off-target effects can be reduced by utilizing the modified Cas9 version called null Cas9 (nCas9), which generates a nick in only one strand than the DSBs [55]. However, 100% off-targets cannot be reduced using nCas9, which requires upgraded Cas9 versions in the future.
Casl 2 Protein
Casl2 is a versatile protein with more dynamic applications, including epigenome editing. The Casl2 protein belongs to the type V CRISPR system [56]. The Casl2 protein had recently emerged as an effector RNA-guided DNA endo-nuclease that becomes an alternative to the Cas9 protein for genome editing [25]. The Casl2 protein was isolated from the Acidaminococcus species (A^Casl2a) and Lachno-spiraceae bacterium (LbCasl2a) that fight against invading viruses. Cas9 protein discriminates more accurately against mismatches within the initial -10 bp of the RNA-DNA helix proximal to the PAM sequence [25]. Moreover, Casl2 isn't a bit like the Cas9 protein; as a result, this protein can process the precursor crRNA by itself, which doesn't require tracr-RNA or RNase III. This process enhanced researchers to use Casl2 protein for multiplex genome editing [25].
Mechanism of Casl 2 Protein
The Casl2 protein requires only the crRNAs to create an efficient cut at ssDNA and dsDNA. Casl2 protein contains the RuvC and nuclease lobe (NUC) domains for cleavage activity [56]. Like Cas9, Casl2 encounters a potential target site beside a PAM sequence. Once Casl2 starts encountering, it initiates R-loop, which forms base-pair hybridization between the crRNA and the target DNA strand. During this step, Casl2 matches the< 17 bp of the target sequence and leads to an R-loop formation [47]. Once R-loop is formed, the Casl2 protein uses its active RuvC domain to cleave the non-target strand with the help of the PAM sequence [56] (Fig. 4). However, the function of the RuvC domain of Casl2 protein in cleaving the targeted DNA strand is not yet clearly studied.
Application of Casl 2 Protein
A more concise system, CRISPR/Cas 12 cleaves, dsDNA or ssDNA via the RuvC domain and does not require tracrRNA. Recently, Doudna's group introduced a novel CRISPR/ Cas diagnostic tool termed DNA endonuclease-targeted CRISPR trans-reporter (DETECTR) based on Cas 12 protein (Fig. 5b) [57]. This DETECTR technique uses type V enzyme to cleave ssDNA sequence in a three-stage process: (1) Casl2a protein and target crRNA are complemented to the DNA reporter probes; once crRNA recognizes its
Fig. 4 Schematic illustration
of CRISPR/Cas 12 mechanism. The Cas 12 protein requires only the crRNAs to generate DSBs. Cas 12 protein cleaves the target region beside a PAM sequence (CTA, TTN, TTTN) with the help of the RuvC and nuclease lobe (NUC) domains. Once Cas 12 starts encountering, it initiates R-loop, which forms base-pair hybridization between the crRNA and the target DNA strand. During this step, Cas 12 matches the< 17 bp of the target sequence and leads to an R-loop formation. Once R-loop is formed, the Cas 12 protein uses its active RuvC domain and generates a staggering cut in the non-target strand with the help of the PAM sequence
Springer
318
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311-325
(A) SHERLOCK system
dsDNA RNA
JRPA IrT-RPA
IIIIIIIII Mllllllll HI......I
I_T7 transcription
I
(B)DETECTR system
'I-
DNA
RNA
^RPA
HIIIIIIII IIIIIIIM 1111111 ITT
Cas13 system
Cas12 system (^) Detection \y
Fig. 5 a and b Mechanism of SHERLOCK and DETECTR systems. (A) Targeted double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) or RNA is amplified with recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) or reverse transcription (RT)-RPA. The RPA is coupled with T7 transcription to covert targeted RNA for detection by Casl3 system. This amplification step with the combination of reporter probe, enable specific high-sensitivity enzymatic reporter unlocking (SHERLOCK) to detect the
targeted sequence, (B) In DNA endonuclease-targeted CRISPR trans reporter (DETECTR), DNA is amplified with RPA. The Casl2 system pairs with the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) of interest, and the DNase activity of Casl2 system is initiated. This amplification step, combined with the reporter probe, enables DETECR to detect the targeted sequence
target sequence through Casl2a protein, the Casl2a protein turns on collateral action and cleaves the target ssDNA or dsDNA. (2) Target DNA probes bind with fluorophores and a quencher molecule. (3) Degradation of the DNA probes releases fluorophore and quencher, producing a robust fluorescent signal for detecting targeted ssDNA or dsDNA cleavage [58]. In addition, this system detected even a single molecule of viral particles (Fig. 5b). For instance, Chen et al. (2018) used the DETECTR technique and detected Human Papilloma Viruses (HPV) [57]. In brief, they combined the non-specific ssDNA of Casl2 with DETECTR and differentiated several HPV 16 and HPV 18 strains from crude DNA extracts of clinical samples within 1 h. Furthermore, researchers detected African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) by employing the CRISPR/Casl2 system [59]. They combined a fluorescent-based point of care (POC) system with CRISPR/Casl2 and detected ASFV within 2 h. From this result, they reported that the CRISPR/Casl2 is very specific and can detect even up to a single nucleotide of a targeted virus [59]. Recently, DETECTR is also utilized for
detecting novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavi-rus-2 (SARS-Cov-2). Mammoth Biosciences, Inc. targeted two Nucleocapsid (N) and Envelope (E) genes of SARS-Cov-2 and observed faster virus detection within 1 h [60]. In brief, they generated Casl2-gRNAs to specifically target the SARS-CoV-2 and optimized the DETECTR assay for E and N genes. They utilized this upgraded DETECTR assay and detected the SARS-CoV-2 on a lateral flow strip within 1 h. Similar to this, Argentina and CASPR Biotech used a quick and portable SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic method based on CRISPR/Casl2 system [61]. They gathered saliva samples from COVID-19 patients and reported that the naturally occurring proteins in saliva had no inhibitory effects on the CRISPR/Casl2-based paper strip experiment [61]. Additionally, a Chinese institution used the CRISPR/Casl2-based DETECTR system to confirm a clear detection of SARS-CoV-2 [62]. They engineered gRNA that targeted the orfla, orflb, N, and E genes of the SARS (Wuhan-Hu-1 strain) and related viruses, in which they detected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). From these results, researchers stated
Springer
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311 -325
319
that CRISPR/Casl2-based detection could be employed for the efficient and rapid diagnosis of COVID-19. Jiang et al. (2021) recently developed a magnetic-pull-down-assisted colorimetric (M-CDC) technique coupled to the CRISPR/ Casl2 system to detect SARS-CoV-2. They used gold nano-particle (AuNP) probes for this technique to detect SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, they screened 41 viral samples and reported that M-CDC is a useful technique for screening SARS-CoV-2 variants without requiring advanced instruments [63]. These applications of Casl2 nuclease enhanced scientists to increase the scope of genome-editing in various fields, including in diagnosing novel viruses [64-66].
Pros and Cons of Cas12 Protein
Like Cas9, Casl2 protein was also considered as a sole member of the CRISPR family for genome editing. But in most circumstances, Casl2 was deemed superior to Cas9 protein because Casl2 protein generates staggered DSBs and promotes HDR repair mechanism instead of both NHEJ & HDR [67]. Casl2 system also overcomes disadvantages associated with diagnostic strategies. For example, diagnosing SARS-COV-2 utilizing quantitative qRT-PCR demands a longer time to get the results [66]. But the CRISPR/Casl2-based DETECTR detects the SARS-CoV-2 within 1 h [66]. These results proved the advantage of the CRISPR/Casl2 system, which can also be utilized in detecting newly emerging viruses in the future.
The rapid advancement of the CRISPR-Casl2 system for genome editing has proved revolutionary for the life sciences. Despite this technology's wide application areas, the CRISPR/Casl2 system faces several significant flaws. For example, the CRISPR/Casl2 system is dependent on host cell DNA repair machinery with or without the presence
of a template [68]. Although this system has been successfully used to acquire accurate DNA insertion into the desired genomic loci, its effectiveness varies depending on the cell type. DNA repair through HDR is also associated with active cell division, making these tools ineffective in cell division (for example, neurons) [69]. However, significant continuing research aims to tailor the Casl2 system further to ensure accurate DNA insertion into the targeted genome. Apart from this drawback, this system has a wide range of applicability, and ongoing endeavors are striving to generate enhanced CRISPR/Casl2 for robust genome engineering.
Casl3 Protein
The most recently discovered Cas protein is Casl3. CRISPR/ Casl3 system functions as an 'adaptive' immune system in archaea and bacteria to defend against the invading RNA elements [70]. The Cas 13 protein family contains two subtypes: (1) Cas 13a protein from Leptotrichia shahii bacterium (L.y/zCasl3a), which is formally known as C2c2 and belongs to type VI, and (2) Cas 13b from Prevotella sp. (P^pCasl3b) belongs to the type III CRISPR/Cas system. This system targets and cleaves only the ssRNA, not the ssDNA or dsDNA [71].
Mechanism of Casl 3a Protein
Cas 13a protein is activated through a single crRNA, like Casl2 protein from pre-crRNA processing. Casl3a protein comprises crRNA, NUC lobes, and two nucleotide-binding (HEPN) RNase domains for targeting RNA (Fig. 6). The L.y/zCasl3a cleaves ssRNA, upon recognizing the target sequence (22-28 nt) complementary to the crRNA spacer
Fig. 6 Schematic illustration of CRISPR/Casl3a mechanism. Cas 13a protein is activated through a single crRNA. Cas 13a protein comprises crRNA, NUC lobes, and two nucleotide-binding (HEPN) RNase domains for targeting RNA. The Cas 13a cleaves ssRNA, upon recognizing the target sequence (22-28 nt) complementary to the crRNA spacer. The target sequence is flanked by a protospacer-flanking site (PFS) at the 3 '-end and crRNA binds together and cleaves the target region of ssRNA without the tracrRNA
single stranded
RNA 5'iilL
Casl3a
22-28nt spacer 11 II 11llllllllll1111 llllllll 11 III
2?
crRNA
ILL
1113'
\
Protospacer flanking site
y 1 11111111    v ILLLLLLLL5' Degraded RNA
Springer
320
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311-325
[72, 73]. The target sequence is flanked by a protospacer-flanking site (PFS) at the 3'-end, which has a bias to adenosine (A), uracil (U), and cytosine(C). LshCasl3a and crRNA bind together and cleave the target region of ssRNA without the tracrRNA.
Mechanism of Cas13b Protein
The Casl3b protein is more precise than the Casl3a protein since a PFS flanks RNA targeting with A, U, or G at the 5' end and PAM (NAN/NNA) at the 3' end [74]. Casl3b protein is associated with the mature crRNA. CRISPR/Casl3b complex searches for the target ssRNA and induces conformational changes at the ssRNA target, resulting in nonspecific RNA cleavage [75]. However, the mechanism behind the Casl3b protein is not fully revealed, but scientists tested the ability of the casl3b protein for RNA editing (Fig. ).
Application of Cas13 Protein
Casl3 proteins had wider application in various genome-editing and diagnostic fields. Beyond other applications like base editing, the Casl3a is also utilized for single-nucleotide detection at any site on the target sequence [25]. Like the DETECTR system, which depends on the activity of Casl2 protein, the specific high-sensitivity enzymatic reporter unlocking (SHERLOCK) technique depends on Casl3 protein (Fig. 5a) [76, 77]. The SHERLOCK system works by integrating the targeted RNA fragments with Casl3 crRNA and fluorescent RNA probes. If the corresponding target sequence exists in the sample, Casl3 recognizes it via crRNA and cleaves fluorescent DNA probes, influencing fluorophore and quencher. This results in detecting the target
via a fluorescent signal [73]. In addition, while SHERLOCK combined with reverse transcription-recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA) or isothermal-RPA, the crRNA -Casl3a complex binds and cleaves a specific target sequence with high specificity [72]. SHERLOCK is used for various functions, including RNA detection, sensitive detection of nucleic acid contamination, and general RNA/DNA quantitation of specific qPCR assays [77].
Additionally, Casl3 nuclease could potentially track the allele-specific expression of transcripts or disease-associated mutations in cells. These attractive features opened new avenues to discriminate single nucleotide changes with high sensitivity in many organisms, including viruses (Fig. 5a). For instance, Gootenberg et al. (2018) diagnosed E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with the DNA isolated from these strains using the SHERLOCK system. They have also distinguished the isolates of Klebsiella pneumonia with two types of resistance genes, such as K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and New Delhi metallo-p-lactamase 1 [70]. Furthermore, SHERLOCK differentiated African and American strains of the zika virus, the dengue virus (DENV) serotype, and cancer-related DNA targets. In addition, SHERLOCK detected Zika virus and DENV with higher sensitivity within 30 min. Researchers also developed a unique technique for detecting viral infection by combining SHERLOCK with heating unextracted diagnostic samples to obliterate nucleases (HUDSON) [75]. Within 2 hours, updated SHERLOCK identified DENV in a patient's saliva, blood, and serum. From these existing results, SHERLOCK Biosciences, Inc. and Mammoth Biosciences, Inc. used the SHERLOCK technique for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. They targeted S and Orflab genes and detected the SARS-Cov-2 RNA sequence within an hour. Metsky et al. (2020)
Fig. 7 Schematic illustration of CRISPR/Casl3b mechanism. Casl3b protein is associated with the mature crRNA. This gRISPR/Casl3b complex searches for the target ssRNA and induces precise conformational changes at the ssRNA target with the help of the Protospacer flanking site (PFS), which flanks RNA targeting at the 5' end and PAM sequence (NAN/NNA) at the 3'end, resulting in nonspecific RNA cleavage
single stranded
RNA 5' I.....
Cas13b 30ntspacer
crRNA
111111111111111111111111111111111 .........■.............'J^lllii
Clevage site
1111
13'
D
Protospacer flanking site
\
NAN/NNA
Protospacer flanking
site
3' I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I 5'
Degraded RNA is depended on a double side protospacer flanking site (D at 5' and NAN/NNA at 3)
<£} Sprin
ger
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311 -325
321
also detected the SARS-CoV-2 RNA using the Casl3a proteins. They combined synthetic RNA targets with fluorescent visualizers and detected SARS-CoV-2-RNA [76]. To test the effectiveness of detecting SARS-CoV-2, Rauch et al. (2020) recently utilized the Casl3 based-Ragged-Equitable-Scalable Testing (CREST) method [77]. This technology uses portable and lightweight LED visualizers built with plastic filters. Researchers also used lateral flow immu-nochromatography strips to detect target RNAs, but these strips are expensive. Therefore, they created a P51 cardboard fluorescent visualizer, which was less expensive and could detect 10 copies of target RNA per millilitre. Additionally, they utilised the smartphone camera to capture data, which they then uploaded to the cloud to enable POC testing [77]. It improves nucleic acid detection based on CRISPR and demonstrates its power to change diagnostic and surveillance efforts by direct screening even on a vast population. Later, the CRISPR/Casl3a test based on single-molecule RNA diagnosis was developed by the Tian et al. (2020) group, which eliminated reverse transcriptase and nucleic acid extension procedures [78]. They stated that the SARS-CoV-2 would be easily detectable using the CRISPR/Casl3a test [78, 79]. These advantages of Casl3 protein enabled researchers to target any non-targetable sequences in diverse organisms [80-82].
Pros and Cons of Cas13 Protein
Like Cas9 and Casl2, CRISPR/Casl3 is also a robust, precise, and versatile RNA-targeting system, which opens novel research horizons in diverse fields. Compared with earlier RNA manipulation systems, CRISPR/Casl3 offers numerous advantages. For example, its modular construction, which consists of a single protein effector module and an RNA guide module, allows for significant scalability by enabling the production of whole libraries of various guide RNAs in addition to easy and quick design [83]. The recently discovered Casl3 mutant versions (dCasl3, Casl3x), which function as programmable RNA-binding proteins, efficiently target different effectors to specific RNAs to induce specific mutations [83]. Due to the inherent crRNA biogenesis, multiple RNAs can be targeted using Casl3 precisely. Compared with RNAi, CRISPR/Casl3 mediated genome modifications are not limited to targeting cytoplasmic transcripts. In addition, Casl3 enables faster downregulation of gene expression by directly knocking out the cytoplasmic mRNA transcripts [83]. Recently, CRISPR/ Casl3-based SHERLOCK and SHERLOCKv2 also played a vital role in developing novel molecular diagnostic tools to detect viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. Apart from these major advantages, CRISPR/Casl3 faced off-target mutations [55], which is the major drawback of this system. However, future research would help overcome this obstacle and aid
in developing novel RNA knockdown approaches with more specificity and efficiency.
Casl 4 Protein
Doudna's group investigated other and similar types (Cas9, Casl2, and Casl3) of Cas systems that were available in nature [84]. They explored by creating a metagenomic database of the bacterial genome to search for uncharacterized Cas genes [84]. Surprisingly, they found Cas 14 protein, which codes for smaller Cas protein with MW 40-70 kd. This Cas 14 protein is extremely smaller (400-700 amino acids) than the other characterized Cas proteins [84]. Due to their small size, Doudna's lab reported that Casl4 protein can target ssDNA without a PAM [84].
Mechanism of Casl 4 Protein
This Cas 14 cleaves ssDNA and confers immunity against viruses with ssDNA genomes or mobile genetic elements (MGEs) [84]. Cas 14 protein recognizes the ssDNA, mediates seed sequence interaction with the target ssDNA, and cleaves the ssDNA, not dsDNA or ssRNA. Like Cas9, the Cas 14 protein requires both tracrRNA and crRNA to target the ssDNA (Fig. 8). The cleavage efficiency of the Cas 14 protein is more specific than Cas9, Casl2, and Cas 13 proteins without the presence of the PAM region [40]. Thus, this system meets all the criteria for high-fidelity genome editing.
Application of Casl 4 Protein
CRISPR/Casl4 system is now harnessed as superior to the Cas 13 system. Researchers combined the CRISPR/Casl4 system with the DETECTR as a diagnostic approach for high-fidelity detection of ssDNA. Harrington et al. (2018) first used CRISPR/Casl4 system with the DETECTR technique. They designed gRNA targeting the HECT and RLD Domain Containing E3 Ubiquitin Protein Ligase 2 (HERC2) gene of human saliva samples from blue-eyed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) individuals. They exhibited strong activation of recognition of the blue-eyed SNP by Cas 14, while the Cas 12 system failed to detect the blue-eyed SNP [40]. This result represents a cost-effective method for screening pathogenic mutations and provides a great opportunity for mapping the candidate genes associated with different pathogens. Another group proposes the Casl4 for viral diagnostic in combination with the simplified nucleic acid extraction, which does not involve complicated sample extraction like heating unextracted diagnostic samples to obliterate nucleases (HUDSON). The results reported that Cas 14 could provide an advanced platform in the future for viral screening [72, 79]. This novel CRISPR/Casl4 system
Springer
322
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311-325
Fig. 8 Schematic illustration of CRISPR/Casl4 mechanism. The Casl4 protein comprises both tracrRNA and crRNA to target ssDNA. Casl4 protein recognizes the ssDNA with the help of tracrRNA and crRNA, mediates seed sequence interaction with the target ssDNA, and cleaves the ssDNA, not dsDNA or ssRNA. The cleavage efficiency of the Cas 14 protein is more specific than Cas9, Cas 12, and Cas 13 proteins without the presence of the PAM region
single stranded DNA
5'J
Cas14
..........■...........
Si
.....■■■.............
Clevage site
Nil 11
LLLi
■ n 1111 r
crosses criteria with user-friendly, sensitive, and more specific applications for future genome engineering. It can be harnessed for other purposes, including diagnostic applications like phylogenetic association (new viruses), epidemiology association with other pathogens, and taxonomic analysis [85].
Pros and Cons of Cas 14 Protein
The Cas 14 protein, which edits dsDNA, ssDNA, and RNA, holds various advantages over traditional Cas9 protein. For example, the Cas 14 protein that has around 500 amino acid is very small, so this protein could be easily delivered to target any tissue than Cas9 protein [86]. Additionally, the Cas 14 protein's selectivity improves the fidelity of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) [83]. Finally, the Cas 14 protein has less limiting PAM requirements (uses only T-rich sequences) [83], allowing it to edit more targeted genomic sequences than the Cas9 protein. However, only a few studies have been demonstrated, which requires extensive studies to assist Cas 14 in several fields of research in the future.
Conclusion and Future Perspectives
The exploitation of CRISPR/Cas tools made a breakthrough in genome engineering in the last few years. The discovery of Cas proteins has revolutionized natural science research and enabled advances in basic research, therapeutics, and diagnostics. The ease to use, the requirement of very little
3-111111111  '; niniuis'
SSDNA
equipment, and the low cost have made many laboratories utilize these CRISPR/Cas-based systems to study the function of genes in various organisms. The initial discovery of the Cas9 protein, which shows its spotlight in the CRISPR system, has enhanced researchers to find different Cas variants like Casl2, Casl3, and Casl4 proteins. This research improvement in Cas proteins has provided exciting platforms in genome engineering, including detecting RNA viruses from plants, animals, and humans and treating infections. Several studies are currently underway to find novel Cas variants from nature. However, numerous aspects of the mechanism of Cas proteins still lack sufficient understanding. Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanism behind the Cas proteins, identification of PAM-less Cas proteins, and accurate targeting specificity to minimize off-target effects will increase the potential of utilizing Cas proteins for precise applications of genome engineering. In addition, identifying the uncharacterized advance Cas proteins that may still exist in many bacteria or archaea will revolutionize multiple fields, including diagnosing novel viruses, therapeutics, agriculture, breeding, etc. If these proteins are fully addressed with improved genome-editing abilities, it might kick-start new CRISPR "fever" offering influential and groundbreaking CRISPR technologies into mainstream use in the near future.
Author Contributions All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. EHV and SAC wrote the article. EHV and SAC drew the images.
Springer
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311 -325
323
Funding No funding was received for this article.
Declarations
Competing interest The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Ethical Approval No ethics approval is needed for this article.
References
1. Capecchi, M. R. (2005). Gene targeting in mice: Functional analysis of the mammalian genome for the twenty-first century. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(6), 507-512.
2. McManus, M. T., & Sharp, P. A. (2002). Gene silencing in mammals by small interfering RNAs. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3(10), 737-747.
3. Rudin, N, Sugarman, E., & Haber, J. E. (1989). Genetic and physical analysis of double-strand break repair and recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 122(3), 519-534.
4. Kass, E. M., & Jasin, M. (2010). Collaboration and competition between DNA double-strand break repair pathways. FEBS Letters, 584(11), 3703-3708.
5. Stoddard, B. L. (2005). Homing endonuclease structure and function. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 38(1), 49.
6. Sander, J. D., Dahlborg, E. J., Goodwin, M. J., Cade, L., Zhang, F., Cifuentes, D., & Qi, Y. (2011). Selection-free zinc-finger-nuclease engineering by context-dependent assembly (CoDA). Nature Methods, 8(1), 67-69.
7. Reyon, D., Tsai, S. Q., Khayter, C, Foden, J. A., Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2012). FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing. Nature Biotechnology, 30(5), 460.
8. Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012). A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 337(6096), 816-821.
9. Ceasar, S. A., Rajan, V., Prykhozhij, S. V., Berman, J. N, & Ignacimuthu, S. (2016). Insert, remove or replace: A highly advanced genome editing system using CRISPR/Cas9. Bio-chimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Cell Research, 1863(9), 2333-2344.
10. Hille, F., Richter, H, Wong, S. P., Bratovic, M., Ressel, S., & Charpentier, E. (2018). The biology of CRISPR-Cas: Backward and forward. Cell, 172(6), 1239-1259.
11. Xu, Y, &Li, Z. (2020). CRISPR-Cas systems: Overview, innovations and applications in human disease research and gene therapy. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 18, 2401-2415.
12. Makarova, K. S., Haft, D. H, Barrangou, R., Brouns, S. J. J., Charpentier, E., Horvath, P., & Yakunin, A. F. (2011). Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 9(6), 461-411.
13. Wang, F., Wang, L., Zou, X., Duan, S., Li, Z., Deng, Z., & Chen, S. (2019). Advances in CRISPR-Cas systems for RNA targeting, tracking and editing. Biotechnology Advances, 37(5), 708-729.
14. Ishino, Y, Shinagawa, H, Makino, K., Amemura, M., & Nakata, A. (1987). Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. Journal of Bacteriology, 169(12), 5429-5433.
15. Nakata, A., Amemura, M., & Makino, K. (1989). Unusual nucleotide arrangement with repeated sequences in the Escherichia coli K-12 chromosome. Journal of Bacteriology, 171(6), 3553-3556.
16. Hermans, P. W., Van Soolingen, D., Bik, E. M., De Haas, P. E., Dale, J. W., & Van Embden, J. D. (1991). Insertion element IS987 from Mycobacterium bovis BCG is located in a hot-spot integration region for insertion elements in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains. Infection andlmmunity, 59(8), 2695-2705.
17. Mojica, F. J. M., Diez-Villaseiior, C, Soria, E., & Juez, G. (2000). Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of archaea, bacteria and mitochondria. Molecular Microbiology, 36(1), 244-246.
18. Jansen, R., van Embden, J. D. A., Gaastra, W., & Schouls, L. M. (2002). Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Molecular Microbiology, 43(6), 1565-1575.
19. Haft, D. H, Selengut, J., Mongodin, E. E, & Nelson, K. E. (2005). A guild of 45 CRISPR-associated (Cas) protein families and multiple CRISPR/Cas subtypes exist in prokaryotic genomes. PLoS Computational Biology, 1(6), e60.
20. Koonin, E. V, Makarova, K. S., & Zhang, F. (2017). Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 37, 67-78.
21. Koonin, E. V, & Makarova, K. S. (2017). Mobile genetic elements and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems: All the way there and back. Genome Biology and Evolution, 9(10), 2812-2825.
22. Shabalina, S. A., & Koonin, E. V. (2008). Origins and evolution of eukaryotic RNA interference. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(10), 578-587.
23. Brouns, S. J. J., Jore, M. M., Lundgren, M., Westra, E. R., Sli-jkhuis, R. J. H, Snijders, A. P. L., & Van Der Oost, J. (2008). Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science, 322(5891), 960-964.
24. Marraffini, L. A., & Sontheimer, E. J. (2008). CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA. Science, 322(5909), 1843-1845.
25. Zetsche, B., Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Slaymaker, I. M., Makarova, K. S., Essletzbichler, P., & Regev, A. (2015). Cpfl is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell, 163(3), 759-771.
26. Abudayyeh, O. O., Gootenberg, J. S., Essletzbichler, P., Han, S., Joung, J., Belanto, J. J., & Regev, A. (2017). RNA targeting with CRISPR-Casl3. Nature, 550(7675), 280-284.
27. Deltcheva, E., Chylinski, K., Sharma, C. M., Gonzales, K., Chao, Y, Pirzada, Z. A., & Charpentier, E. (2011). CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature, 471(7340), 602-607.
28. Barrangou, R., Fremaux, C, Deveau, H, Richards, M., Boyaval, P., Moineau, S., & Horvath, P. (2007). CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science, 325(5819), 1709-1712.
29. Horvath, P., & Barrangou, R. (2010). CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science, 327(5962), 167-170.
30. Semenova, E., Jore, M. M., Datsenko, K. A., Semenova, A., Westra, E. R., Wanner, B., & Severinov, K. (2011). Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(25), 10098-10103.
31. Bolotin, A., Quinquis, B., Sorokin, A., & Ehrlich, S. D. (2005). Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRIS-PRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology, 252(8), 2551-2561.
32. Koonin, E. V, & Wolf, Y. I. (2009). Is evolution Darwinian or/ and Lamarckian? Biology Direct, 4(1), 1-14.
33. Mojica, F. J. M., Diez-Villaseiior, C, Garcia-Martinez, J., & Soria, E. (2005). Intervening sequences of regularly spaced
Springer
324
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311-325
prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 60(2). 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00239-004-0046-3
34. Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., & Zhang, F. (2013). Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science, 339(6121). 819-823. https://doi.org/10.1126/scien ce. 1231143
35. Esvelt, K. M., Mali, P., Braff, J. L., Moosburner, M., Yaung, S. J., & Church, G. M. (2013). Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing. Nature Methods, 20(11), 1116-1121. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2681
36. Horvath, P., Romero, D. A., Coiite-Monvoisin, A. C, Richards, M., Deveau, H, Moineau, S., Boyaval, P., Fremaux, C, & Bar-rangou, R. (2008). Diversity, activity, and evolution of CRISPR loci in Streptococcus thermophilus. Journal of Bacteriology, 190(A), 1401-1412. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01415-07
37. Kim, E., Koo, T., Park, S. W., Kim, D., Kim, K, Cho, H.-Y, Song,
D. W., Lee, K. J., Jung, M. H, Kim, S., Kim, J. H, Kim, J. H, & Kim, J.-S. (2017). In vivo genome editing with a small Cas9 orthologue derived from Campylobacter jejuni. Nature Communications, 8(1), 14500. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncommsl4500
38. Yang, H, Gao, P., Rajashankar, K. R., & Patel, D. J. (2016). PAM-dependent target DNA recognition and cleavage by C2c 1 CRISPR-Cas endonuclease. Cell, 167(1), 1814-1828.el2. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.053
39. Yamano, T., Nishimasu, H, Zetsche, B., Hirano, H, Slaymaker, I. M., Li, Y, Fedorova, I., Nakane, T., Makarova, K. S., Koonin,
E. V., Ishitani, R., Zhang, F., & Nureki, O. (2016). Crystal structure of Cpf 1 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell, 165(4), 949-962. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.003
40. Harrington, L. B., Burstein, D., Chen, J. S., Paez-Espino, D., Ma, E., Witte, I. P., & Doudna, J. A. (2018). Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPR-Cas 14 enzymes. Science, 362(6416), 839-842.
41. Wiedenheft, B., Zhou, K, Jinek, M., Coyle, S. M., Ma, W., & Doudna, J. A. (2009). Structural basis for DNase activity of a conserved protein implicated in CRISPR-mediated genome defense. Structure, 17(6), 904-912.
42. Datsenko, K. A., Pougach, K, Tikhonov, A., Wanner, B. L., Sev-erinov, K, & Semenova, E. (2012). Molecular memory of prior infections activates the CRISPR/Cas adaptive bacterial immunity system. Nature Communications, 3(1), 1-7.
43. Babu, M., Beloglazova, N, Flick, R., Graham, C, Skarina, T., Nocek, B., & Binkowski, A. (2011). A dual function of the CRISPR-Cas system in bacterial antivirus immunity and DNA repair. Molecular Microbiology, 79(2), 484-502.
44. Yosef, I., Goren, M. G, & Qimron, U. (2012). Proteins and DNA elements essential for the CRISPR adaptation process in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Research, 40(12), 5569-5576.
45. Wright, A. V., & Doudna, J. A. (2016). Protecting genome integrity during CRISPR immune adaptation. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 23(10), 876.
46. Nishimasu, H, Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Konermann, S., Shehata, S. I., Dohmae, N, & Nureki, O. (2014). Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell, 156(5), 935-949.
47. Anders, C, Niewoehner, O., Duerst, A., & Jinek, M. (2014). Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature, 523(7519), 569-573.
48. Liu, R., Chen, L., Jiang, Y, Zhou, Z., & Zou, G. (2015). Efficient genome editing in filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Discovery, 2(1), 1-11.
49. Zhang, Y, Massel, K, Godwin, I. D., & Gao, C. (2018). Applications and potential of genome editing in crop improvement. Genome Biology, 29(1), 1-11.
50. Hillary, V. E., & Ceasar, S. A. (2019). Application of CRISPR/ Cas9 genome editing system in cereal crops. The Open Biotechnology Journal, 23(1), 173-179.
51. Ceasar, S. A., Maharajan, T., Hillary, E., & Krishna, T. P. A. (2022). Insights to improve the plant nutrient transport by CRISPR/Cas system. Biotechnology Advances, 59, 107963.
52. Lee, H, Yoon, D. E., & Kim, K. (2020). Genome editing methods in animal models. Animal Cells and Systems, 24(1), 8-16.
53. Hillary, V. E., Ceasar, S. A., & Ignacimuthu, S. (2020). Genome engineering in insects: focus on the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Genome engineering via CRISPR-Cas9 system (pp. 219-249). Elsevier.
54. Hillary, V. E., & Ceasar, S. A. (2021). Genome engineering in insects for the control of vector borne diseases. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, 179, 197-223.
55. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, D. R., Ramirez-Solíš, R., Garza-Elizondo, M. A., Garza-Rodríguez, M. D. L., & Barrera-Saldafla, H. A. (2019). Genome editing: A perspective on the application of CRISPR/Cas9 to study human diseases. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 43(A), 1559-1574.
56. Fonfara, I., Richter, H, Bratovič, M., Le Rhun, A., & Charpen-tier, E. (2016). The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf 1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA. Nature, 532(7600), 517-521.
57. Chen, J. S., Ma, E., Harrington, L. B., Da Costa, M., Tian, X., Palefsky, J. M., & Doudna, J. A. (2018). CRISPR-Casl2a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science, 360(6387), 436^139.
58. Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I., Iranzo, J., Shmakov, S. A., Alkhn-bashi, O. S., Brouns, S. J. J., & Horvath, P. (2020). Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: A burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 18(2), 67-83.
59. He, Q., Yu, D., Bao, M., Korensky, G, Chen, J., Shin, M., & Du, K. (2020). High-throughput and all-solution phase African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) detection using CRISPR-Cas 12a and fluorescence based point-of-care system. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 154, 112068.
60. Broughton, J. P., Deng, X., Yu, G, Fasching, C. L., Servellita, V., Singh, J., & Sotomayor-Gonzalez, A. (2020). CRISPR-Casl2-based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Biotechnology, 38(1), 870-874.
61. Satyanarayana, M. (2020). A COVID-19 diagnostic that uses CRISPR gets a nod from the FDA chemical & engineering news.
62. Feng, M., & Li, X. (2020). Land cover mapping toward finer scales. Science Bulletin, 65(19), 1604-1606.
63. Jiang, Y, Hu, M., Liu, A.-A., Lin, Y, Liu, L., Yu, B., & Pang, D. W. (2021). Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by CRISPR/Cas 12a-enhanced colorimetry. ACS Sensors, 6(3), 1086-1093.
64. Bandyopadhyay, A., Kancharla, N, Javalkote, V. S., Dasgupta, S., & Brutnell, T. P. (2020). CRISPR-Cas 12a (Cpfl): A versatile tool in the plant genome editing tool box for agricultural advancement. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 1589.
65. Tsukamoto, T., Sakai, E., Iizuka, S., Taracena-Gándara, M., Sakurai, F., & Mizuguchi, H. (2018). Generation of the adenovirus vector-mediated CRISPR/Cpf 1 system and the application for primary human hepatocytes prepared from humanized mice with chimeric liver. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 41(1), 1089-1095.
66. Teng, F., Li, J., Cui, T., Xu, K, Guo, L., Gao, Q., & Zhou, Q. (2019). Enhanced mammalian genome editing by new Casl2a orthologs with optimized crRNA scaffolds. Genome Biology, 20(1), 1-6.
67. Hillary, V. E., & Ceasar, S. A. (2022). Prime editing in plants and mammalian cells: Mechanism, achievements, limitations, and future prospects. BioEssays, 44, 2200032.
Springer
Molecular Biotechnology (2023) 65:311 -325
325
68. Hillary, V. E., Ignacimuthu, S., & Ceasar, S. A. (2021). Potential of CRISPR/Cas system in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 22(11), 1179-1189.
69. Al-Shayeb, B., Sachdeva, R., Chen, L. X., Ward, E, Munk, P., Devoto, A., & Amano, Y. (2020). Clades of huge phages from across Earth's ecosystems. Nature, 578(1195), 425—431.
70. East-Seletsky, A., O'Connell, M. R., Knight, S. C, Burstein, D., Cate, J. H. D., Tjian, R., & Doudna, J. A. (2016). Two distinct RNase activities of CRISPR-C2c2 enable guide-RNA processing and RNA detection. Nature, 538(1624), 270-273.
71. Liu, L., Li, X., Wang, J., Wang, M., Chen, P., Yin, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Two distant catalytic sites are responsible for C2c2 RNase activities. Cell, 168(1-2), 121-134.
72. Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Lee, J. W., Essletzbichler, P., Dy, A. J., Joung, J., & Freije, C. A. (2017). Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Casl3a/C2c2. Science, 356(6336), 438^142.
73. Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Kellner, M. J., Joung, J., Collins, J. J., & Zhang, F. (2018). Multiplexed and portable nucleic acid detection platform with Casl3, Casl2a, and Csm6. Science, 360(6387), 439^144.
74. Konermann, S., Lotfy, P., Brideau, N. J., Oki, J., Shokhirev, M. N, & Hsu, P. D. (2018). Transcriptome engineering with RNA-targeting type VI-D CRISPR effectors. Cell, 173(3), 665-676.
75. Smargon, A. A., Cox, D. B. T., Pyzocha, N. K., Zheng, K., Slaymaker, I. M., Gootenberg, J. S., & Makarova, K. S. (2017). Casl3b is a type VI-B CRISPR-associated RNA-guided RNase differentially regulated by accessory proteins Csx27 and Csx28. Molecular Cell, 65(4), 618-630.
76. Kellner, M. J., Koob, J. G, Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., & Zhang, F. (2020). SHERLOCK: Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR nucleases. Nature Protocols, 15(3), 1311.
77. Kellner, M. J., Koob, J. G, Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., & Zhang, F. (2019). SHERLOCK: Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR nucleases. Nature Protocols, 14(10), 2986-3012.
78. Tian, T., Shu, B., Jiang, Y, Ye, M., Liu, L., Guo, Z., & Zhou, X. (2020). An ultralocalized Casl3a assay enables universal and nucleic acid amplification-free single-molecule RNA diagnostics. ACSNano., 15, 1167.
79. Myhrvold, C, Freije, C. A., Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Metsky, H. C, Durbin, A. F., & Parham, L. A. (2018).
Field-deployable viral diagnostics using CRISPR-Casl3. Science, 360(6387), 444^148.
80. Metsky, H. C, Freije, C. A., Kosoko-Thoroddsen, T. S. F., Sabeti, P. C, & Myhrvold, C. (2020). CRISPR-based surveillance for COVID-19 using genomically-comprehensive machine learning design. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.26.967026
81. Rauch, S., Roth, N, Schwendt, K, Fotin-Mleczek, M., Mueller, S. O., & Petsch, B. (2020). mRNA based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate CVnCoV induces high levels of virus neutralizing antibodies and mediates protection in rodents. bioRxiv., 11, 12.
82. Palaz, F., Kalkan, A. K, Can, O., Demir, A. N, Tozluyurt, A., Ózcan, A., & Ozsoz, M. (2021). CRISPR-Casl3 system as a promising and versatile tool for cancer diagnosis, therapy, and research. ACS Synthetic Biology, 10(6), 1245-1267.
83. Lotfi, M., & Rezaei, N. (2020). CRISPR/Casl3: A potential therapeutic option of COVID-19. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 131, 110738.
84. Burstein, D., Harrington, L. B., Strutt, S. C, Probst, A. J., Anan-tharaman, K, Thomas, B. C, & Banfield, J. F. (2017). New CRISPR-Cas systems from uncultivated microbes. Nature, 542(1640), 237-241.
85. Nayak, S., Blumenfeld, N. R., Laksanasopin, T, & Sia, S. K. (2017). Point-of-care diagnostics: Recent developments in a connected age. Analytical Chemistry, 89(1), 102-123.
86. Mahas, A., Stewart, C. N, Jr., & Mahfouz, M. M. (2018). Harnessing CRISPR/Cas systems for programmable transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. Biotechnology Advances, 36(1), 295-310.
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Springer