REVIEW
The peptide nucleic acids (PNAs), powerful tools
for molecular genetics and cytogenetics
Franck Pellestor*,1
and Petra Paulasova2
1
CNRS UPR 1142, Institute of Human Genetics, 141 rue de la Cardonille, F-34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France;
2
Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Institut of Biology and Medical Genetics, Motol Hospital,
V uvalu 84, 150 06 Praha 5, Czech Republic
Peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) are synthetic mimics of DNA in which the deoxyribose phosphate backbone is
replaced by a pseudo-peptide polymer to which the nucleobases are linked. PNAs hybridize with
complementary DNAs or RNAs with remarkably high affinity and specificity, essentially because of their
uncharged and flexible polyamide backbone. The unique physico-chemical properties of PNAs have led to
the development of a variety of research assays, and over the last few years, the use of PNAs has proven
their powerful usefulness in molecular biology procedures and diagnostic assays. The more recent
applications of PNA involve their use as molecular hybridization probes. Thus, several sensitive and robust
PNA-dependent methods have been designed for developing antigene and anticancer drugs, modulating
PCR reactions, detecting genomic mutation or labelling chromosomes in situ.
European Journal of Human Genetics (2004) 12, 694–700. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201226
Published online 23 June 2004
Keywords: PNA; PNA/DNA duplex; mutation detection; PNA-PCR; PNA-FISH
Introduction
Advances in genomic technologies have opened up new
avenues in the diagnostics and the management of human
diseases. In genetics, the advent of molecular techniques
has brought forth new procedures for increasingly specific,
rapid and reliable diagnostic and predictive DNA analysis.
In this way, development of nucleic acid analogs has
become an important feature because of the potential use
of these new biomarkers in genetic diagnostics and
investigations. Over the last decade, nucleic acids have
been extensively modified, by replacing the posphodiester
linker or the sugar-phosphodiester backbone by various
neutral or charged structures. Several of these modified
oligonucleotides have improved properties in terms of
affinity and binding to DNA and RNA. Two significant
representatives of this new type of oligomers are locked
nucleic acids (LNAs), also known as bridged nucleic acids
(BNAs), and peptide nucleic acids (PNAs).
LNAs consist of monomer nucleotides connected by a
20
–40
methylene bridge. The entropic constraint imposed
by the 20
–40
linker increases the binding affinity of LNAs
for complementary nucleic acids. In addition, LNAs display
an enhanced resistance to nuclease degradation. As LNAs
possess a phosphodiester backbone, they have a good
aqueous solubility and can be introduced into cells by
standard transfection techniques. Thus, these molecules
could act as antiproliferative agents, but further studies are
needed to exactly determine the pharmacokinetic properties
of LNAs.
Among all the modified oligonucleotides designed, the
PNAs constitute a remarkable class of nucleic acid mimics,
with important physico-chemical properties that have
been exploited to develop a wide range of powerful
biomolecular tools, including molecular probes, biosensors
and antigene agents. The present paper provides an
overview of PNAs properties and the techniques exploiting
PNA technology in molecular genetics and cytogenetics.Received 30 January 2004; revised 13 April 2004; accepted 23 April 2004
*Correspondence: Dr F Pellestor, CNRS UPR 1142, Institute of Human
Genetics, 141 rue de la Cardonille, F-34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Tel: þ 33 4 9961 9912; Fax: þ 33 4 99 61 99 01;
E-mail: franck.pellestor@igh.cnrs.fr
European Journal of Human Genetics (2004) 12, 694–700
& 2004 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1018-4813/04 $30.00
www.nature.com/ejhg
PNA structure and properties
The PNAs have been introduced by Nielsen et al.1
PNAs are
synthetic DNA analogs in which the phosphodiester
backbone is replaced by repetitive units of N-(2-aminoethyl)
glycine to which the purine and pyrimidine bases
are attached via a methyl carbonyl linker (Figure 1). The
procedures for PNA synthesis are similar to those employed
for peptide synthesis, using standard solid-phase manual or
automated synthesis. The PNA molecules can routinely be
labelled with biotin or fluorophores. A subsequent generation
of PNAs could involve modification of the N-(2aminoethyl)
glycine backbone (PNA analogs) or chimeric
architecture, like PNA–peptide chimeras or PNA–DNA
chimeras developed in order to improve the solubility
and the cellular uptake of PNAs or to exhibit new biological
properties.2
The synthetic backbone provides PNA with
unique hybridization characteristics. Unlike DNA and
RNA, the PNA backbone is not charged. Consequently,
there is no electrostatic repulsion when PNAs hybridize to
its target nucleic acid sequence, giving a higher stability to
the PNA–DNA or PNA–RNA duplexes than the natural
homo- or heteroduplexes. This greater stability is reflected
by a higher thermal melting temperature (Tm), as compared
to the corresponding DNA–DNA or DNA–RNA
duplexes.3
An additional consequence of the polyamide backbone is
that PNAs hybridize virtually independently of the salt
concentration. Thus, the Tm of PNA–DNA duplex is barely
affected by low ionic strength. This property can be
exploited when targeting DNA or RNA sequences involved
in secondary structures, which are destabilized by low ionic
strength. This facilitates the hybridization with the PNAs.
The unnatural backbone of PNAs also means that PNAs are
not degraded by nucleases or proteases. For instance,
incubation of PNAs with S1 nuclease or DNAse I has no
effect on PNA.4
Owing to this resistance to the enzyme
degradation, the lifetime of PNAs is extended both in vivo
and in vitro. Also, PNAs are not recognized by polymerases
and therefore cannot be directly used as primers or be
copied.
PNAs hybridize to complementary DNA or RNA in a
sequence-dependent manner, according to the Watson–
Crick hydrogen bonding scheme. In contrast to DNA, PNA
can bind in either parallel or antiparallel manner. However,
the antiparallel binding is favoured over the parallel one.
Structural information on the PNA binding modes have
been obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance and by X-ray
crystallography.5
PNA are able to adopt both A- and B-type
structures when associating with RNA and DNA, respectively,
whereas PNA–PNA duplexes form an unusual helix
conformation, called P-type and are characterized by a
large pitch of 18 base pairs.6
PNA probes can bind to either single-stranded DNA or
RNA, or to double-stranded DNA (Figure 2). Homopyrimidine
PNAs with a minimum of 10-mers, as well as PNAs
containing a high proportion of pyrimidine residues, bind
to complementary DNA sequences to form highly stable
(PNA)2 –DNA triplex helices displaying Tm over 701C. In
these triplexes, one PNA strand hybridizes to DNA through
standard Watson–Crick base pairing rules, while the other
PNA strand binds to DNA through Hoogsteen hydrogen
bonds. The resulting structure is called P-loops. The
stability of these triple helixes is so high that homopyrimidine
PNA targeted to purine tracts of dsDNA invades
the duplex by displacing one of the DNA strands.6
The
efficiency of this strand invasion can be further enhanced
by using two homopyrimidine PNA oligomers connected
via a flexible linker or by the presence of nonstandard
nucleobases in the PNA molecule.
Finally, PNA–DNA hybridization is significantly more
affected by base mismatches than DNA–DNA hybridization.
Using a 15-mer PNA, all possible single mismatch
combinations were tested in both PNA/DNA duplexes and
corresponding DNA/DNA duplexes. In the PNA/DNA
duplexes, the average Tm was 151C, whereas it was 111C
in the corresponding DNA/DNA duplexes.6,7
Similar results
were obtained for PNA/RNA duplexes.3
This high level of
discrimination at single base level indicates that short PNA
Figure 1 Chemical structures of PNA as compared to
DNA and protein. The backbone of PNA displays 2aminoethyl
glycine linkages in place of the regular
phosphodiester backbone of DNA, and the nucleotides
bases are attached to this backbone at the amino-nitrogens
through methylene carbonyl linkages. The amide bond
characteristic for both PNA and protein is boxed in. By
convention, PNAs are depicted like peptides, with the
N-terminus at the left (or at the top) position and the
c-terminus at the right (or at the bottom) position. PNAs
hybridise to complementary DNA or RNA sequences in a
sequence-dependent manner, following the Watson–Crick
hydrogen bonding scheme. PNAs can bind to complementary
nucleic acids in both parallel and antiparallel
orientation. However, the antiparallel orientation illustrated
in this figure is preferred. The Watson–Crick hydrogen
bonds are indicated by ‘.....’.
The PNA probes in human genetics
F Pellestor and P Paulasova
695
European Journal of Human Genetics
probes could offer high specificity, and thus allow the
further development of several PNA-based strategies for
molecular investigations and diagnosis.
Applications of PNA technology
PNAs are used as powerful tools not only in research
laboratories but also in prognostics, diagnostics and disease
monitoring in molecular medicine. Since its introduction,
an increasing number of applications of PNA technology
have been described, confirming the high potential of
PNAs in molecular genetic investigations.
Antisense and antigene applications
Originally conceived as agents for double-stranded DNA
binding, the unique properties of PNAs as DNA mimics
were first exploited for gene therapy drug design. PNAs can
inhibit transcription and translation of genes by tight
binding to DNA or mRNA.
PNA-mediated inhibition of gene transcription is mainly
due to the formation of strand invaded complexes or
strand displacement in a DNA target. Several in vitro studies
have shown that the binding of PNA or bis-PNA to
complementary DNA can efficiently block transcriptional
elongation and inhibit the binding of transcriptional
factors. Thus, Boffa et al8
reported that PNA invasion of
the tandem CAG repeat of the human androgen receptor
and the TATA binding protein inhibits the transcription of
these genes. PNA-mediated inhibition of transcription was
also demonstrated for the alpha-chain of the interleukin-2
receptor.9
PNA targeted against the promoter region of a
gene can form stable PNA–DNA complexes that restrict the
DNA access of the polymerase, whereas PNA complexes
located far from the promoter can block the polymerase
progression and lead to the production of truncated RNA
transcripts. Nielsen et al10
have demonstrated that even an
8-mer PNA can efficiently block transcriptional elongation
by (PNA)2 –DNA triplex formation. Another way to alter
gene transcription is based on the use of PNAs as
competitors with endogenous cis-element(s) present in
the target gene for trans-acting factors. This results in an
attenuation of the authentic interactions of trans-factors
with their cis-elements.11
PNAs are able to interact with mRNA independently of
the RNA secondary structure. Studies on the mechanisms
of antisense activity have demonstrated that PNA inhibits
expression differently than antisense oligonucleotides
acting through RNase-H mediated degradation of the
mRNA–oligonucleotide hybrid. Since PNAs are not substrates
for RNAse, their antisense effect acts through steric
interference of either RNA processing, transport into
cytoplasm or translation, caused by binding to the
mRNA.12
Application of PNAs as antisense reagents was first
demonstrated in 1992. The nuclear microinjection of a
15-mer PNA targeting the translation start region of SV40
large T antigen mRNA inhibited transcription in cell
extracts.13
This inhibition was both sequence-specific and
dose-dependent. More recently, Mologni et al14
reported
the effect of three different types of antisense PNAs on the
in vitro expression of the PML/RARalpha gene. The PNAs
used targeted various sites involving translocation start
sites, coding sequences and the 50
-untranslated region
(UTR). It was also reported that intron–exon splice
junctions were very sensitive targets for PNA antisense
probes because correct mRNA splicing can be altered by
PNA binding.15
The good stability of PNA oligomers, their strong
binding efficiency and their lack of toxicity at even
relatively high concentrations suggests that PNAs could
constitute highly efficient compounds for effective antisense/antigene
application. However, despite the initial
Figure 2 Schema of PNA binding modes for targeting double-stranded DNA. PNA oligomers are drawn in bold. (1) Standard
duplex invasion complex formed with some homopurine PNAs. (2) Double-duplex invasion complex, very stable but only
possible with PNAs containing modified nucleobases. (3) Conventional triple helical structure (triplex) formed with cytosinerich
homopyrimidine PNAs binding to complementary homopurine DNA targets. (4) Stable triplex invasion complex, leading
to the displacement of the second DNA strand into a ‘D-loop’.
The PNA probes in human genetics
F Pellestor and P Paulasova
696
European Journal of Human Genetics
rapid success of PNA-based approaches in vitro, progress in
the use of PNAs as tools for regulating gene expression was
hampered by the slow cellular uptake of ‘naked’ PNAs by
living cells. Subsequent modifications of PNAs have led to
significant improvements in the uptake of PNA in
eukaryotic cells. Delivery into the cell can be speeded up
by coupling PNA to DNA oligomers, to receptor ligands or
more efficiently to peptides such as cell penetrating
peptides which are rapidly internalized by mammalian
cells.16
Several reports have demonstrated that PNAs
conjugated to such peptides are efficiently taken up by
eukaryotic cells. Pooga et al17
reported the use of a PNApeptide
conjugate in the downregulation of the galanin
receptor in neuronal cells in culture. The intrathecal
injection of the PNA conjugate into the brain of living
rats induced attenuated receptor activity in the rat brain.18
Another strategy adapted to improve the in vivo delivery of
PNA can be their incorporation into liposomes.19
Thus, the in vitro cellular delivery of PNA is the major
challenge that must be overcome before it can be
efficiently used as a therapeutic agent. Results of the
various proposed methods to facilitate the cell delivery of
PNAs are promising and indicate that PNAS guided by
suitable vectors can work as chemotherapeutic agents.
PNA–peptide duplexes, which can penetrate into cells,
have been used in anticancer applications. In this manner,
telomerase activity in human melanoma cells and tumour
specimens was inhibited by PNA conjugated with Antennapedia
derived peptide (Antp) at nanomolar concentra-
tions.20
Since telomerase is almost ubiquitously expressed
in human tumours, these data point out the potential use
of PNAs as anticancer drugs.
PNA as delivery agent
A major limitation of nonviral gene therapy is the low
efficiency of gene transfer into target cells. PNAs can be use
as adapters to link peptides, drugs or molecular tracers to
plasmid vectors. According to the binding site, the
coupling of PNAs to plasmids has no effect either on the
transcription of genes included in the plasmid or on the
plasmid’s physiological activities. Thus, this approach
allows circumvention of such barriers to gene transfer
and fixation of drugs to plasmids in order to enhance the
gene delivery or tissue-specific targeting.21
Using a triplex
forming PNA as linker, Braden et al22
observed an eight
times higher nuclear localization of a coupled nuclear
localization signal (NLS) than did the free oligonucleotide.
PCR and Q-PNA PCR
PNA probes have no direct interaction with DNA polymerase
but PNAs can terminate the elongation of oligonucleotide
primers by binding to the template or competing
with the primers.23
Moreover, PNA–DNA chimeras can be
recognized by the DNA polymerase and can thus be used as
primers for PCR reactions.24
The high affinity binding of
PNAs has also been used for detecting single base pair
mutations by PCR. This strategy, named PNA directed PCR
clamping, uses PNAs to inhibit the amplification of a
specific target by direct competition of the PNA targeted
against one of the PCR primer sites and the conventional
PCR primer.25
This PNA–DNA complex formed at one of
the primer sites effectively blocks the formation of the PCR
product. The procedure is so powerful that it can be used to
detect single base-pair gene variants for mutation screening
and gene isolation.26
More recently, novel automated realtime PCR has been
developed using PNAs. In this method, named Q-PNA PCR,
a generic quencher labelled PNA (Q-PNA) is hybridized to
the 50
tag sequence of a fluorescent dye-labelled DNA
primer in order to quench the fluorescence of the primer.
During PCR, the Q-PNA is displaced by incorporation of
the primer into amplicons and the fluorescence of the dye
label is liberated.27
Furthermore, LightUp probe and LightSpeed probe
technologies have taken advantage of PNA properties.
LightUp probes consist of a thiazole orange conjugated
with a PNA oligomer, whereas LightSpeed probes are duallabelled
PNAs with a fluorescent dye and a quencher dye
bound to the opposing termini of the molecule.28,29
Both
LightUp and LightSpeed probes are unique reagents for
real-time PCR, which combine fluorescent enhancement
with the high sensitivity and specificity of PNAs. A singlebase
mismatch in the target sequence is sufficient to
prevent probe binding.30
Nuclear acid capture
PNAs can be used for sequence-specific capture of singlestranded
nucleic acids taking advantages of the tight
complex formation at low ionic strength, which destabilizes
nucleic acid secondary structure. Several studies have
reported such applications of PNAs. Short PNA probes can
then be used as generic capture probes for purification of
nucleic acids. A system for capture of double-stranded DNA
was also experimented using (PNA)2 –DNA openers creating
a large single-strand DNA loop to which a biotinylated
oligonucleotide can hybridize. This complex allows the
capture of the DNA via streptavidin beads.31
Analogous to
the padlock hybrydization system,32
such a procedure may
be used for detecting specific DNA sequence, for example
on chromosomes, by enzymatic primer extension of the
bound oligonucleotide. Also, the ability of pyrimidine
PNAs to serve as opener for specific DNA sites by strand
invasion and formation of a P-loop has been used in
combination with oligodeoxyribonucleotides or fluorescent
probes for the capture of double-strand DNA or the
detection of target sequences by rolling circle DNA
amplification.33,34
The PNA probes in human genetics
F Pellestor and P Paulasova
697
European Journal of Human Genetics
Solid-phase hybridization techniques
PNAs can be used in many of the same hybridization
applications as natural or synthetic DNA probes but with
the added advantages of tighter binding and higher
specificity. Their neutral backbone significantly increases
the rate of hybridization in assays where either the target or
the probe is immobilized. This could lead to faster and
easier procedures in most standard hybridization techniques,
such as Southern and Northern blotting.6
An
alternative to Southern analysis is also the PNA pregel
hybridization process, which significantly simplifies the
procedure of Southern hybridization.35
Labelled PNAs are
then used as probes, allowing hybridization to a denatured
dsDNA sample at low ionic strength prior to loading on the
gel. This is different from conventional Southern blotting
where hybridization occurs after gel electrophoresis and
membrane transfer. Here, the mixture is directly subjected
to electrophoresis for separation of bound and unbound
PNA probes. Owing to their neutral charge, excess unbound
PNA probes do not migrate in an electrical field. The
PNA–DNA hybrids are then blotted onto a nylon membrane
and detected using standard chemiluminescent
techniques. The method is sensitive enough to detect a
single mismatch in a DNA sample.
Another gel-based strategy, known as affinity electrophoresis,
can be exploited with PNA probes. In this case,
the slowdown of DNA during electrophoretic passage is
related to its hybridization with a complementary PNA
probe entrapped in the gel matrix. Likewise, hybridization
PNA-based biosensor procedures have been developed in
which a single-stranded PNA probe is immobilized onto
optical or mass-sensitive transducers to detect the complementary
strand or corresponding mismatch in a DNA
sample solution. The hybridization events are converted in
electric signals by the transducers. Jensen et al3
reported
the real-time analysis of the kinetics of PNA–DNA and
PNA–RNA hybridizations using the BIAcore (biomolecular
interaction analysis) technique. Also, MALDI-TOF mass
spectrometry was successfully used with mass-labelled PNA
probes for the detection of single-nucleotide polymorph-
isms.36
Owing to their remarkable sequence discrimination,
PNAs also have great potential in the growing area of
whole genome analysis. Weiler et al37
demonstrated that
PNA oligomers may be efficiently incorporated into
microarrays, and recently automatic production of PNA
library arrays has been reported.38
In situ hybridization (PNA-FISH)
The efficiency of PNAs as hybridization probes has also
been demonstrated in fluorescence in situ hybridization
(FISH) applications. Thank to its high binding specificity, a
single 15-mer PNA probe can substitute to a set of longer
DNA probe. Also, the neutral backbone of PNAs allows
them to bind to DNA or RNA under low ionic strength
conditions, which discourage reannealing of complementary
genomic strands. This is particularly advantageous for
in situ targetting of repeat sequences for which both the
length and the repetitive nature can favour renaturation
over hybridization with probes. Additional benefits of
using PNAs in situ are lower background signals, mild
washing procedure and unlimited stability of the probe
mixture.39
Using the recommended procedure for in situ
labelling and washing, no significant residual signals were
seen, and the background signals remain low probably
because of the high binding specificity of the PNA probes,
which limits the unlegitimate binding of probes, and the
short time of in situ hybridization. PNA probes are
compatible with a wide range of reporter molecules and
fluorochromes including fluoresceine, rhodamine as well
as cyanine and Alex dyes available in a large variety of
colours.
The PNA-FISH technique was first developed for quantitative
telomere analysis. Using a unique fluoresceinlabelled
PNA probe, Lansdorp et al40
performed the in situ
labelling of human telomeric repeat sequences and the
data obtained allowed accurate estimates of telomere
lengths. Subsequently, telomeric PNA probes were used in
several in situ studies of cancer and ageing.41,42
Further
developments were focused on the in situ specific identification
of human chromosomes on both metaphases and
interphase nuclei, using PNA probes specific for satellite
repeat sequences of various chromosomes (chromosomes
1, 2, 7, 9, 11, 17, 18, X and Y). Multicolour PNA
experiments were thus reported on lymphocytes, amniocytes
and fibroblasts from normal subjects and patients
with numerical abnormalities.43,44
Chen et al45
reported
that PNA probes could discriminate in situ between two
centromeric DNA repeats that differ by only a single base
pair. Similar results were obtained with PRINS primers,
oligonucleotide probes or padlock probes,32,46,47
but never
with standard FISH probes. The identification of chromosomal
variations and the analysis of polymorphisms could
greatly benefit from the discrimination power of PNAs. The
flexible procedure of PNA synthesis allows to consider the
further creation of allele-specific PNA probes.
Recently, PNA-FISH has been adapted to in situ chromosomal
analysis of the human sperm.48
This adaptation
constituted an interesting challenge because of the particularities
of human spermatozoa nuclei in terms of
genomic compaction and accessibility of DNA sequences.
Comparative estimates of disomies X, Y and 1 were
performed in sperm from healthy subjects using FISH,
PRINS and PNA procedures in parallel. An equivalent
quality of in situ nuclear labelling and similar results were
obtained with the three methods. However, the hybridization
timing of PNA probes (ie 45 min) appeared to be
significantly shortened in comparison with FISH reaction
on sperm, which requires an overnight hybridization in
order to be efficiently completed. The fast hybridization
The PNA probes in human genetics
F Pellestor and P Paulasova
698
European Journal of Human Genetics
kinetics of PNA was similar to the kinetics of PRINS
reaction. The similarity between PNA and PRINS might
be essentially due to the small size of both PNA probes and
PRINS primers, which do not exceed 30 bases in length.
These data point out the importance of the probe size for in
situ assays and consequently the great potentiality of the
PNA approach, since high specific binding can be obtained
with a short, unique PNA oligomer. This study also
demonstrates the efficiency of the multicolour PNA
procedure and shows that PNA could be a powerful
alternative to FISH and PRINS for in situ chromosomal
investigations. The application of PNA in cytogenetics
opens up the possibility of multiplex assays using various
fluorophores or combinations of PNA probes with DNA
probes or PRINS primers.
Conclusion
Since the first description of PNAs, various types of
applications have been reported, demonstrating the great
interest of the PNAs for biotechnology and molecular
genetics. Powerful applications of PNA have also emerged
in microbiology, virology and parasitology. PNA-based
applications benefit from the unique physico-chemical
properties of PNA molecules, enabling development of
simple and robust assays in molecular genetics and
cytogenetics. PNAs are finding increasing uses as probes
and other tools in genetics, because these molecules
exhibit enhanced binding afinity, increased stability and
resistance in biological fluids and reduced nonspecific
effects. As pointed out by Nielsen and Egholm6
‘the
greatest contribution of PNAs may come from the development
of new applications that cannot be performed
using oligonucleotides’. New chemical modifications of
the original PNA backbone may contribute to increasing
the potentialities of PNAs and lead to the development of
novel applications and PNA-dependent projects in many
areas of biology and therapy.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by an European grant COPERNICUS 2
(Contract ICA-CT-2000-10012, proposal ICA2-1999-20007).
References
1 Nielsen PE, Egholm M, Berg RH, Buchardt O: Sequence-selective
recognition of DNA by strand displacement with a thyminesubstituted
polyamide. Science 1991; 254: 1497–1500.
2 Koch T, Naesby M, Wittung P et al: PNA-peptide chimera.
Tetrahedron Lett 1995; 36: 6933–6936.
3 Jensen KK, Orum H, Nielsen PE, Norden B: Hybridization kinetics
of peptide nucleic acids (PNA) with DNA and RNA studied with
BIAcore technique. Biochemistry 1997; 36: 5072–5077.
4 Demidov V, Frank-Kamenetskii MD, Egholm M, Buchard O,
Nielsen PE: Sequence selective double strand DNA cleavage by
peptide nucleic acid (PNA) targeting using nuclease S1. Nucl Acids
Res 1993; 21: 2103–2107.
5 Rasmussen H, Kastrup JS, Nielsen JN, Nielsen JM, Nielsen PE:
Crystal structure of a peptide nucleic acid (PNA) duplex at 1.7A
resolution. Nat Struct Biol 1997; 4: 98–101.
6 Nielsen PE, Egholm M: An introduction to peptide nucleic acid.
Curr Issues Mol Biol 1999; 1: 89–104.
7 Giesen U, Kleider W, Berding C, Geiger A, Orum H, Nielsen PE: A
formula for thermal stability (Tm) prediction of PNA/DNA
duplexes. Nucl Acids Res 1998; 26: 5004–5006.
8 Boffa LC, Morris PL, Carpeneto EM, Louissaint M, Allfrey VG:
Invasion of the CAG triplet repeats by a complementary peptide
nucleic acid inhibits transcription of the androgen receptor and
TATA binding protein genes and correlates with refolding of an
active nucleosome containing a unique AR gene sequence. J Biol
Chem 1996; 271: 13228–13233.
9 Vickers TA, Griffity MC, Ramasamy K, Risen LM, Freier SM:
Inhibition of NF-kappaB spe´cifique transcriptional activation by
PNA stand invasion. Nucleic Acids Res 1995; 23: 3003–3008.
10 Nielsen PE, Egholm M, Buchardt O: Sequence specific
transcription arrest by PNA bound to the template strand. Gene
1994; 149: 139–145.
11 Mischiati C, Borgatti M, Bianchi N et al: Interaction of the human
NF-kappaB p52 transcription facture with DNA–PNA hybrides
mimicking the NF-kappaB binding sites of the human
immunodeficience virus type 1 promoter. J Biol Chem 1999;
274: 33114–33122.
12 Knudsen H, Nielsen PE: Antisense properties of duplex- and
triplex-forming PNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24: 494–500.
13 Hanvey JC, Peffer NJ, Bisi JE et al: Antisense and antigene
properties of peptide nucleic acids. Science 1992; 258: 1481–1485.
14 Mologni L, Lecoutre P, Nielsen PE, Gambacorti-Passerini C:
Additive antisense effects of different PNAs on the in vitro
translation of the PML/RARalpha gene. Nucleic Acids Res 1998;
26: 1934–1938.
15 Doyle DF, Braasch DA, Simmons CG, Jaowski BA, Corey DR:
Inhibition of gene expression inside cells bypeptide nucleic acids:
effect of mRNA target sequence, mismatched bases, and PNA
length. Biochemistry 2001; 40: 53–64.
16 Cutrona G, Carpaneto EM, Ulivi M et al: Effects in live cells of a cmyc
anti-gene PNA linked to a nuclear localization signal. Nat
Biotechnol 2000; 18: 300–303.
17 Pooga H, Soomets U, Ha¨llbrink M et al: Cell penetrating PNA
constructs regulate galanin receptor levels and modify pain
transmission in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 1998; 16: 857–861.
18 Fraser GL, Holmgren J, Clarke PB, Wahlestedt C: Antisense
inhibition of delta-opioid receptor gene function in vivo by
peptide nucleic acids. Mol Pharmacol 2000; 57: 725–731.
19 Nastruzzi C, Cortesi R, Esposito E et al: Liposomes as carriers for
DNA–PNA hybrids. J Control Release 2000; 68: 237–249.
20 Norton JC, Piatyszek MA, Wright WE, Shay JW, Corey DR:
Inhibition of human telomerase activity by peptide nucleic acids.
Nat Biotechnol 1996; 14: 615–618.
21 Wilson GL, Dean BS, Wang G, Dean DA: Nuclear import of
plasmid DNA in digitonin-permiabilized cells requires both
cytoplasmic factors and specific DNA sequences. J Biol Chem
1999; 274: 22025–22032.
22 Braden LJ, Mohamed AI, Smith CIE: A peptide nucleic acid–
nuclear localization signal fusion that mediates nuclear transport
of DNA. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17: 784–787.
23 Nielsen PE, Egholm M, Berg RH, Buchardt O: Peptide nucleic
acids (PNAs): potential antisense and antigene agents. AntiCancer
Drug Des 1993; 8: 53–63.
24 Misra HS, Pandey PK, Modak MJ, Vinayak R, Pandey VN:
Polyamide nucleic acid–DNA chimera lacking the phosphate
backbone are novel primers for polymerase reaction catalyzed by
DNA polymerases. Biochemistry 1998; 37: 1917–1925.
25 Orum H, Nielsen PE, Egholm M, Berg RH, Buchardt O, Stanley C:
Single base pair mutation analysis by PNA directed PCR
clamping. Nucleic Acids Res 1993; 21: 5332–5336.
26 Cochet O, Martin E, Fridman WH, Teillaud JL: Selective PCR
amplification of functional immunoglobulin light chain from
The PNA probes in human genetics
F Pellestor and P Paulasova
699
European Journal of Human Genetics
hybridoma containing the aberrant MOPC 21-derived Vk by
PNA-mediated PCR clamping. Biotechniques 1999; 26: 818–822.
27 Fiandaca MJ, Hyldig-Nielsen JJ, Gildae BD, Coull JM: Selfreporting
PNA/DNA primers for PCR analysis. Genome Res 2001;
11: 609–613.
28 Svanvik N, Westman G, Wang D, Kubista M: Light-up probes:
thiazole orange-conjugated peptide nucleic acid for detection of
target nucleic acid in homogeneous solution. Anal Biochem 2000;
281: 26–35.
29 Seitz O: Solid-phase synthesis of doubly labeled peptide nucleic
acids as probes for the real-time detection of hybridization. Angew
Chem Int Edn 2000; 39: 3249–3252.
30 Isacsson J, Cao H, Ohlsson L et al: Rapid and specific detection of
PCR products using light-up probes. Mol Cell Probes 2000; 14:
321–328.
31 Bukanov NO, Demidov VV, Nielsen PE, Frank-Kamenetskii MD:
PD-loop: a complex of duplex DNA with an oligonucleotide. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 5516–5520.
32 Nilson M, Krejci K, Koch J, Kwiatkowski M, Gustavsson P,
Landegren U: Padlock probes reveal single-nucleotide
differences, parent of origin and in situ distribution of
centromeric sequences in human chromosomes 13 and 21. Nat
Genet 1997; 16: 252–255.
33 Demidov VV, Bukanov NO, Frank-Kamenetskii D: Duplex DNA
capture. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2000; 2: 31–35.
34 Kuhn H, Hu Y, Frank-Kamenetskii MD, Demidov VV: Artificial sitespecific
DNA-nicking system based on common restriction enzyme
assisted by PNA openers. Biochemistry 2003; 42: 4985–4992.
35 Perry-O’Keefe H, Yao XW, Coull JM, Fuchs M, Egholm M: Peptide
nucleic acid pre-gel hybridization: an alternative to Southern
hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 14670–14675.
36 Ross PL, Lee K, Belgrader P: Discrimination of single-nucleotide
polymorphisms in human DNA using peptide nucleic acid probes
detected by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 1997; 69:
4197–4202.
37 Weiler J, Gausepohl H, Hauser N, Jensen ON, Hoheisel JD:
Hybridisation based DNA screening on peptide nucleic acid
(PNA) oligomer arrays. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25: 2792–2799.
38 Matysiak S, Reuthner F, Hoheisel JD: automating parallel peptide
synthesis for the production of PNA library arrays. Biotechniques
2001; 31: 896–898.
39 Williams B, Stender H, Coull JM: PNA fluorescent in situ
hybridization for rapid microbiology and cytogenetic analysis;
in Nielsen PE (ed): Peptide nucleic acids; methods and protocols.
Totowa, New York: Humana Press Inc.; 2002, pp 181–193.
40 Lansdorp PM, Verwoerd NP, van de Rijke FM et al: Heterogeneity
in telomere length of human chromosomes. Hum Mol Genet 1996;
5: 685–691.
41 Boei JJWA, Vermeulen S, Natarajan AT: Analysis of radiationinduced
chromosomal aberrations using telomeric and
centromeric PNA probes. Int J Radiat Biol 2000; 76: 163–167.
42 Mathioudakis G, Storb R, McSweeney PA et al: Polyclonal
hematopoiesis with variable telomere shortening in human
long-term allogeneic marrow graft recipients. Blood 2000; 96:
3991–3994.
43 Chen C, Wu B, Wei T, Egholm M, Strauss WM: Unique
chromosome identification and sequence-specific structural
analysis with short PNA oligomers. Mamn Genome 2000; 11:
384–391.
44 Taneja KL, Chavez EA, Coull J, Lansdorp PM: Multicolor
fluorescence in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid
probes for enumeration of specific chromosomes in human
cells. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2001; 30: 57–63.
45 Chen C, Hong YK, Ontiveros SD, Egholm M, Strauss WM: Single
base discrimination of CENP-B repeats on mouse and human
chromosomes with PNA-FISH. Mamm Genome 1999; 10:
13–18.
46 Pellestor F, Girardet A, Lefort G, Andre´o B, Charlieu JP: Rapid in
situ detection of chromosome 21 by PRINS technique. Am J Med
Genet 1995; 56: 393–397.
47 O’Keefe CL, Warburton PE, Matera AG: Oligonucleotide probes
for alpha satellite DNA variants can distinguish homologous
chromosomes by FISH. Hum Mol Genet 1996; 5: 1793–1799.
48 Pellestor F, Andre´o B, Taneja K, Williams B: PNA on human
sperm: a new approach for in situ aneuploidy estimation. Eu J
Hum Genet 2003; 11: 337–341.
The PNA probes in human genetics
F Pellestor and P Paulasova
700
European Journal of Human Genetics