PrF:DPVP06 Work on Thesis - Review - Course Information
DPVP06 Work on Doctoral Thesis - Review in a Journal
Faculty of LawAutumn 2024
- Extent and Intensity
- 0/0. 2 credit(s). Type of Completion: k (colloquium).
In-person direct teaching - Guaranteed by
- doc. JUDr. Ing. Josef Šilhán, Ph.D.
Faculty of Law
Supplier department: Faculty of Law - Course Enrolment Limitations
- The course is only offered to the students of the study fields the course is directly associated with.
- fields of study / plans the course is directly associated with
- there are 26 fields of study the course is directly associated with, display
- Course objectives
- The course is a part of the topical complex Initiation of Preparation of Dissertation Thesis. The purpose of this course is to develop a student`s critical thinking, development of skills of defining fundamental features of scientific work and comprehension its substance. At the end of the course a student submits a review to the publication in scientific press.
- Learning outcomes
- - the ability to better identify the essential features of a quality professional work - gaining inspiration for one's own publishing activities - recognising the ills that occur in professional publications and being better able to avoid them on the basis of their identification
- Syllabus
- Syllabus is elaborated individually according to the agreement with the supervisor within the framework of the individual study plan. A student agrees with his supervisor on selected publication a review of which he will elaborate.
- Literature
- Publikace k recenzi bude stanovena v dohodě se školitelem.
- https://is.muni.cz/auth/el/law/jaro2021/DPVP06/index.qwarp
- Teaching methods
- consultation
- Assessment methods
- The course ends with a colloquium, in which the student and the supervisor discuss the prepared review. The review must meet the appropriate professional parameters - it must not be a mere annotation, a description of the content of the publication, nor should it be an advertising message recommending the purchase of the publication. It is recommended to avoid common mistakes, such as structuring the text mechanically according to the chapters of the reviewed monograph and only descriptively summarizing the content that is presented in the individual chapters. Such a (pseudo)review is unlikely to be published in any quality journal. A review should be a professional text in its own right, in which its author can provide a critical view of the various parameters of the reviewed publication, including its systematics, its focus and breadth of coverage, methodology, level of expertise, depth of argumentation, usefulness of conclusions, breadth and representativeness of sources used, clarity, readability and readability, etc. Often, it also provides a confrontation with other published works in the field (it is therefore quite common to work with other expert sources in a review) and puts the topics discussed in a broader context. Examples of some published reviews for inspiration: p. 58-60: https://www.cak.cz/assets/komora/bulettin-advokacie/ba_9_2016_web.pdf) http://actaff.zcu.cz/export/sites/ffacta/files/archiv/2020/Acta-FF-c-1/7-Acta-2020-1-recenze_2.pdf https://advokatnidenik.cz/2020/09/29/jiri-svestka-jan-dvorak-josef-fiala-a-kol-obcansky-zakonik-komentar-svazek-i-%C2%A7-1-az-654-2/ https://journals.muni.cz/cpvp/article/view/13321/11452 https://journals.muni.cz/cpvp/article/view/13978/11739 https://journals.muni.cz/cpvp/article/view/14444/11966
- Language of instruction
- Czech
- Further Comments
- The course is taught each semester.
- Enrolment Statistics (recent)
- Permalink: https://is.muni.cz/course/law/autumn2024/DPVP06