FF:AJ69039 Translation-specific tendencie - Course Information

AJ69039 Translation-specific tendencies

Extent and Intensity

0/2/0. 2 credit(s) (plus 3 credits for an exam). Recommended Type of Completion: zk (examination). Other types of completion: z (credit).

Teacher(s)

Mgr. Renata Kamenická, Ph.D. (lecturer)

Guaranteed by

Jeffrey Alan Vanderziel, B.A.
Department of English and American Studies – Faculty of Arts
Contact Person: Tomáš Hanzálek
Supplier department: Department of English and American Studies – Faculty of Arts

Timetable

Thu 9:10–10:45 G21

Course Enrolment Limitations

The course is only offered to the students of the study fields the course is directly associated with.

The capacity limit for the course is 15 student(s).
Current registration and enrolment status: enrolled: 0/15, only registered: 0/15

fields of study / plans the course is directly associated with

there are 7 fields of study the course is directly associated with, display

Course objectives

The course is a variant of the course Universals in Translation (AJ 29083) aimed at students of the Master’s Degree in Translation studies programme, and therefore consistently focusing on translation universals in non-literary translation. The questions we will attempt to answer in the course will be: Are texts created as translations in any way different from original, untranslated texts (in the same language)? If so, how can these differences be described? Translation universals will be understood as phenomena with a higher distribution in translated texts than non-translated texts, disregarding the source language. Potential translation universals include on the one hand simplification, conventionalization, lexical phrases untypical of the target language, lower distribution of lexis specific to the target language (all that compared with non-translated texts in the same language) and on the other hand text lengthening, interference, standardization, explicitation, dialect normalization, narrative point of view simplification, use of more conventional collocations, reduction of repetition (compared with source texts). These phenomena will be identified and studied in non-literary texts translated from English and learn about the methods and results of research in this branch of Translation Studies. Each student is going to use both her/his own translations and the corpus of non-literary translations and texts gradually developed in the Department which the students will help to build, too. Touching upon the very essence of this process, exploring translation universals represents an exciting point of view for contemplating translation. We will explore translations of non-literary texts and learn the basics of the methodology used in this type of research, which may lead to formulation of diploma theses projects. From the practical point of view, students will expand their ability of critical reflection in the process of translating.

Syllabus

• (1) Goals and methods of the course, introduction to the field, basic concepts. Wrok with the introductory text – conceptualizing universals using a bottom-up approach. Literature: Chesterman (2004). (3) S- a T-universals. Individual work with the introductory text (by sections) – joint discussion. Universals and descriptivism in translation studies. Literature: Klaudy (1998). Comparison of terminologies. (Chesterman vs. Routledge). (3) The explicitation hypothesis and its testing. Linn Overas: „In search of the third code“ (1986). What, how and why do we explicitate in translation? Explicitation from the speaker’s point of view and explicitation from the point of view of depicted reality. (4) Universals and use of corpora in translation studies. Application of the terminology on other texts. (5) Translation universals in students’ own texts – analysis and feedback. Type/token ratio; lexical density. Preparation and organization of collection of texts for the corpus of non-literary texts – practical instructions. (6) Simplification in non-literary texts. Literature: Laviosa (1996) a (1998). Comparison of research results. Simplification in students’ own texts. (7) Normalization / conventionalization; shift towards more conventional collocations. Literature: Kenny (1999). To which extent is normalization relevant to non-literary texts? Manual analysis of text samples. (8) Employing WordSmith software for analysis in translation studies. Illustrations and tips application tips. (9) Explicitation of text cohesion. Literature: Pápai (2004), Puurtinen (2004). (10) The lower frequency of TL-specific items. Literature: Tirkkonen-Condit (2004). (11) Length of translated text. Interfence. Literature: Mauranen (2004). (12) Presentations of final projects I. Survey of supplementary literature. Methodological analysis of a sample student project. (13) Presentations of final projects II. Third code vs. translationese. Literature: Tirkkonen-Condit (2002). Conclusions from the course, course evaluation.

Literature

• BAKER, Mona and Maeve OLOHAN. Reporting that in Translated English: Evidence for Subconscious Processes of Explicitation? 2002, 141-158. Across Languages and Cultures 1(2). info
• BLUM-KULKA, Shoshana. Shifts of Cohesion and Coherence in Translation. Tübingen: Gűnter Narr, 1996, 17-35. Interlingual and Intercultural Communication. info
• KENNY, Dorothy. Lexical Hide-and-Seek: looking for creativity in a parallel corpus. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing, 2000, 93-104. Intercultural Faultliness. info
• KENNY, Dorothy. Lexis and Creativity in Translation. A Corpus-based Study. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing, 2001, 260 pp. ISBN 190065038X. info
• LAVIOSA-BRAITHWAITE, Sara. Investigating Simplification in English Comparable Corpus of Newspaper Articles. Szombathely: Daniel Berzsenyi College Printing Press, 1996, 531-540. info
• LAVIOSA, Sara. Corpus-based Translation Studies. Theory, findings, applications. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi, 2002, 138 pp. ISBN 9042014873. info
• MAURANEN, Anna and Pekka KUJAMÄKI. Translation universals: do they exist? Amsterdam, Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Publishing Company, 2004, 224 pp. info
• OVERAS, Linn. In Search of the Third Code. 1988, 571-588. Meta, XLIII, 4. info
• Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies. Edited by Kirsten Malmkjaer - Mona Baker. London: Routledge, 1998, xviii, 654. ISBN 0-415-09380-5. info

Assessment methods (in Czech)

Výuka formou seminářů. Účast na seminářích je povinná, předpokládá se pravidelná příprava - četba zadaných kapitol z literatury a analýza překladů. Kurz je ukončen zkouškou, která spočívá ve vypracování a odevzdání závěrečného projektu, jehož příprava a plánování budou obsahem závěrečných seminářů.

Language of instruction

English

Further Comments

Study Materials
The course is taught annually.

Information about innovation of course.

This course has been innovated under the project "Faculty of Arts as Centre of Excellence in Education: Complex Innovation of Study Programmes and Fields at FF MU with Regard to the Requirements of the Knowledge Economy“ – Reg. No. CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0228, which is cofinanced by the European Social Fond and the national budget of the Czech Republic.

• Enrolment Statistics (Spring 2013, recent)
  
• Permalink: https://is.muni.cz/course/phil/spring2013/AJ69039