FF:ISKM09 Librarian English - Course Information
ISKM09 Librarian English
Faculty of ArtsSpring 2022
- Extent and Intensity
- 1/1/0. 2 credit(s). Type of Completion: z (credit).
- Teacher(s)
- PhDr. Michal Lorenz, Ph.D. (lecturer)
Agnieszka Suchomelová-Polomska, M.A. (lecturer)
Mgr. Martina Šindelářová Skupeňová (lecturer)
Mgr. Lenka Zouhar Ludvíková, Ph.D. (lecturer) - Guaranteed by
- doc. PhDr. Jiří Kudrnáč, CSc.
Department of Information and Library Studies – Faculty of Arts
Contact Person: Mgr. Alice Lukavská
Supplier department: Department of Information and Library Studies – Faculty of Arts - Timetable
- Fri 8:00–9:40 B2.23
- Timetable of Seminar Groups:
ISKM09/02: No timetable has been entered into IS. A. Suchomelová-Polomska - Prerequisites
- Intermediate/upper-intermediate knowledge of English (B2 level according to CEFR) is expected.
- Course Enrolment Limitations
- The course is also offered to the students of the fields other than those the course is directly associated with.
- fields of study / plans the course is directly associated with
- there are 7 fields of study the course is directly associated with, display
- Course objectives
- The aim of the course is achieving B2+ according to CEFR - Common European Framework of Reference.
The course is designed for KISK students and it focuses on developing linguistic and academic skills concentrating on their field of study - librarianship and information studies. The course emphasizes receptive, interactive and productive skills in English for specific purposes:
- developing critical thinking and other strategies for reading academic texts
- developing interactive skills and using appropriate devices of cohesion and coherence
- developing presentation skills
- developing writing for academic purposes - Learning outcomes
- After finishing the course, the students will be able:
- to use a variety of reading strategies appropriate for the intended outcome
- to process and to reconstruct the notes based on an academic text into a fluent written or spoken utterance
- to interact skillfully with other participants in a discussion
- to apply a variety of cohesive devices for connecting ideas into coherent complex sentences
- to write an abstract of a presentation
- to prepare and present an academic poster according to the conventions in the field
- to write a report / summary - Syllabus
- 1. study skills
- 2. formal / informal language
- 3. notetaking
- 4. presenting
- 5. critical reading
- 6. paraphrasing
- 7. comparing / contrasting
- 8. argumentation
- 9. abstract / summary
- 10. referencing and referring
- 11. visuals
- 12. academic discussions
- Literature
- Guy A. Marco, (1996) "Two false dogmas of information science", New Library World, Vol. 97 Issue: 7, pp.11-14, https://doi.org/10.1108/03074809610148766
- NOLIN, Jan – ĂSTRÖM, Frederick. Turning weakness into strenght: strategies for future LIS. Journal of Documentation. 2010, 66 (1), 7 – 27. ISSN 0022-0418.
- Van HOUSE, Nancy A. – SUTTON, Stuart A. The Panda Syndrome: An Ecology of LIS Education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 1999, 37(2): 131-147.
- ROTHSTEIN, Samuel. Why People Really Hate Library Schools. Library Journal. 1986, 110(6), 41 – 48. ISSN 0363-0277.
- RAYWARD, W. Boyd. Visions of Xandu: Paul Otlet (1868-1944) and Hypertext. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1994, 45(4): 235 – 250. ISSN 1532-2890.
- BUCKLAND, Michael. Emanuel Goldberg, Electronic Document Retrieval, and Vannevar Bush’s Memex. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1992, 43(4): 284 – 294. ISSN 1532-2890.
- FURNER, Jonathan. Information Studies Without Information. Library Trends. 2004, 52(3), 427 – 446. ISSN 0024-2594.
- CRONIN, Blaise. Cutting the Gordian Knot. Information Processing & Management. 1995, 31(6): 897-902.
- Teaching methods
- The seminars focus on developing language and academic skills with the use of the following methods:
- pair discussions, group discussions, round tables
- working on posters and presenting them (individual or groupwork)
- home preparation
- peer review
- formative feedback on spoken and written language
- reflection
- analysing the canonic texts - Assessment methods
- The course is of pass / fail nature. In order to pass the course, the students have to write an abstract, present a poster and write a report from a poster session. In the exam period, the students will present their portfolio of course assignments at an individual final interview with their teacher. The aim is to prove 50hour workload and progress.
- Language of instruction
- Czech
- Further Comments
- Study Materials
- Enrolment Statistics (Spring 2022, recent)
- Permalink: https://is.muni.cz/course/phil/spring2022/ISKM09