FSS:EUP435 Academic skills review - Course Information
EUP435 Academic skills review
Faculty of Social StudiesSpring 2020
- Extent and Intensity
- 1/1/0. 4 credit(s). Type of Completion: zk (examination).
- Teacher(s)
- doc. Vratislav Havlík, Ph.D. (lecturer)
Mgr. Martin Jirušek, Ph.D. (lecturer)
Mgr. Lukáš Lehotský, Ph.D. (lecturer) - Guaranteed by
- doc. Vratislav Havlík, Ph.D.
Department of International Relations and European Studies – Faculty of Social Studies
Contact Person: Olga Cídlová, DiS.
Supplier department: Department of International Relations and European Studies – Faculty of Social Studies - Timetable
- Mon 16:00–17:40 exP21
- Course Enrolment Limitations
- The course is only offered to the students of the study fields the course is directly associated with.
The capacity limit for the course is 20 student(s).
Current registration and enrolment status: enrolled: 0/20, only registered: 0/20 - fields of study / plans the course is directly associated with
- European Politics (Eng.) (programme FSS, N-PL)
- European Governance (programme FSS, N-MS)
- Course objectives
- The course is focused on explaining the basics of academic writing and research design. The course brings the students the elementary information about such topics as structure of an academic thesis, working with sources, ethics in research etc.
- Learning outcomes
- At the end of the course the students should be able to formulate research questions for his/her research and to propose a basic research design. The student should be also able to work with academic sources in an appropriate way and should be aware of issues on the field of academic ethics.
- Syllabus
- Session 1 (September 21, 90 minutes)
- Aims of the course, Requirements, Essentials of academic writing
- Session 2 (October 5, 180 minutes)
- Part A: The sense of academic work/academic writing. Why do political scientists write papers? Ethics in academic writing. What is plagiarism and how can we avoid it? Part B: Work with sources. When should we use direct quotations? When should we paraphrase and how can we do it?
- Session 3 (October 12, 180 minutes)
- Part A: Structure of academic papers. How should an introduction look like? How to formulate a research question? What is the literature review? Part B: Critical thinking in academic work. Descriptive vs. analytical skills. What is the value added of an academic work?
- Session 4 (October 19, 180 minutes)
- Part A: Theory and Methodology. Why do political scientists use a theory? Why is the use of research methods so much important? Part B: How to write a good literature review?
- Literature
- required literature
- CRESWELL, John W. Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. International student editio. Los Angeles: Sage, 2014, xxix, 273. ISBN 9781452274614. info
- Teaching methods
- lectures, class discussions, short homeworks
- Assessment methods
- The total evaluation includes 1/ Formulating research questions (max. 20 points) 2/ Critical reading analysis (max. 30 points) and 3/Final short essay (max. 50 points)
- Language of instruction
- English
- Further Comments
- Study Materials
The course is taught each semester. - Listed among pre-requisites of other courses
- IREn5500 Academic skills review
!EUP435 && !NOW(EUP435) && !IRE103 && !NOW(IRE103)
- IREn5500 Academic skills review
- Enrolment Statistics (recent)
- Permalink: https://is.muni.cz/course/fss/spring2020/EUP435