3 Author mills – dubious practices with monographs

Unfair publishing practices have affected even the field of monograph publication. A typical example is the so-called author mill or academic author mill. This term refers to publishers’ practices where the business model consists of producing a large number of titles in very small editions – the very opposite of well-established publishing houses which focus on a limited number of good-quality authors and publish their works in thousands of copies. The target group of these publishers are usually postdoctoral researchers whom such publishers actively try to persuade to publish their doctoral theses with them.

Recognizing bogus publishers is more difficult compared to identification of untrustworthy journals, because publishers of books do not commonly provide detailed information on their websites regarding the description of the review process, editorial board, etc. Therefore, one should pay attention to various details and, above all, consult one’s colleagues for what experiences they might have had with the publisher (e.g. whether there was a review process, what care was devoted to final language editing, etc.).

undefined

The publisher Lambert Academic Publishing (LAP) sent to Jiří Kratochvíl, one of the authors of this material, an offer to publish his PhD thesis as a book. The suspicion that LAP is a bogus publisher arises based on two factors. Firstly, the e-mail was sent in December 2010, yet Jiří Kratochvíl did not finish his PhD thesis and defend it until May 2013. Secondly, LAP state in the e-mail that they received a reference to Jiří Kratochvíl in the field of medicine, when in fact Jiří Kratochvíl was studying humanities.

undefined
If you look at the website of LAP, under the link “Why choose us?” you can find – among other things – the information about the review process shown above. Of course every author can decide for themselves whether publishing a book, especially a scholarly one, without any review represents a real contribution to science. In any case, LAP’s justification for publishing PhD theses (or other graduate theses) without any peer-review process on the basis that the thesis underwent a similar process at the PhD student’s university, is controversial. This approach completely ignores the fact that even when the defence is successful, theses are of varying quality.
undefined